[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 306 KB, 1125x2436, 1547678384803.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12424774 No.12424774 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any books that have been written about a modern romance/love story?

>> No.12424778

Cat Person and A Good Guy by Roupenian are both short modern love stories. You might like Hollebeque or however the fuck his name is spelled too

>> No.12424787

>>12424774
He should've ghosted that thot

>> No.12424790

>>12424774
You know what know I understand why I hate emojis so much.
It's kind of like interacting with women in real life, but made into annoying little images.

>> No.12424792

>>12424774
nuke the fucking planet

>> No.12424850

>>12424774
women deserve death

>> No.12424864

>man enables her behavior
>women deserve death

>> No.12424866

>>12424774
Yikes imagine being that cucked

>> No.12424881

>>12424774
Houellebecq

>>12424787
>>12424792
As far as thot stories go, this is not that bad. If you want to lose hope in humanity, try to find some pregnancies forums and look for "paternity" threads.
I have also seen girls send some super sweet messages to their boyfriends on facebook and a minute later messaging my best friend asking to hang out with him and how she found her boyfriend lame. At that point, my best friend said "I'm never marrying".

>> No.12424898

What men refuse to realize/accept is that were you more satisfying, there would be no worry of cheating. Sorry your parents didn’t teach you an instrument, sorry you have no interests besides video games and book collecting, sorry you are woeful at sex due to years of porn addiction. Were you an actual MAN, your WOMAN would be a perfect fit.

>> No.12424908 [DELETED] 

>>12424898
Because men exist for the sake of entertaining the kind of women who would cheat on you if you got bored?

>> No.12424914

>>12424774
The cucked men who enable this kind of shit are just as bad as the thots themselves, if not worse. This image is so infuriating, jesus

>> No.12424917

>>12424914
they are worse, women have no agency, weak men enable this

>> No.12424925

>>12424908
>everything is from my own perspective no one else’s exists
Lad I know that if you find a girl who just sits there and has no value besides letting you fuck her you would be happy as a clam but that doesn’t mean that women are wired the same way. If you aren’t a match for her what obligation does she have to stay with you? Don’t be a loser.

>> No.12424927

>>12424898
Because men exist for the sake of entertaining the kind of woman who would cheat on them if they got bored?
What would they gain by doing so?

>> No.12424946
File: 130 KB, 750x259, 80A70B25-FB5E-4652-9443-48A65A620F8F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12424946

>>12424927
I have nothing to say besides you are a retard. Grow up. Don’t reply because I won’t be reading it.

>> No.12424961
File: 78 KB, 991x613, DLwyGSYW4AAEoBC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12424961

>>12424774
I refuse to believe this was a real conversation.
>>12424792

>> No.12424971

>>12424925
This is not a proper answer, is it?
Why would I want to be with someone who would leave me if she got bored? It is better to not marry than to marry someone who feels like this.
And your opinion that a man's worth is defined by how much he can entertain the kind of woman who would do that is shit.

>>12424946
>Don’t reply
Ah, don't worry. I won't reply to your post.

>> No.12424984

Not reading that but I can safely assume you are trying to imply that all women are not the same.

>> No.12425030
File: 30 KB, 620x413, GettyImages-514695000-ed8ba06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425030

When is the crisis coming?

>> No.12425053

>>12425030
I want those boots.

>> No.12425059

>>12424898
This, my ex couldn't get enough of me. We were together 24/7, now she avoids her new boyfriend all the time and comes to hang with me

>> No.12425061
File: 73 KB, 860x484, friedkorps-113633999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425061

>>12425030
soon

>> No.12425062

>>12425059
Immoral flex but ok

>> No.12425093
File: 80 KB, 480x392, 1492517287267.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425093

>>12424864
Honestly i got to agree with you, the anons here blaming the woman fail to realise that the guy in the messages is running on the same mentality as her, if not worse.

>>12424898
This as got the be the worst post in the entire thread desu. One would think that some turbo incel would say some dumb shit, but this is so retarded in so many diferent levels that i cant even bother to pick phrase by phrase in greentext to prove just how wrong and how much bullshit you are saying.

>> No.12425110

Why are peoe upset at this conversation? Do you want women to be sex less outside marriage or something? I bet everyone getting butthurt about this faps to ghastly porn and doesn't even consider what a hypocrite they are.

>> No.12425117

>>12425110
Society would probably be healthier if people didn't have sex outside marriage.

>> No.12425122

>>12425117
No society in the history of humanity has prevented sex outside marriage

>> No.12425124

i cannot believe anyone could condone this behaviour

i would have sent her extremely abusive messages with sexually suggestive images of young girls

>> No.12425127

>>12425122
No society has ever prevented some people to murder others. Doesn't mean murder is not bad.

>> No.12425147

If the people who are angry at this sort of thing weren’t such scrawny geeks with no drive we would have way more cool shit going on like the Unabomber or that dude who stole that plane, etc. Unfortunately the only people “”””“smart””””” enough to see the problem with these things are fucking losers. I genuinely believe we wouldn’t have such degeneracy (from BOTH genders) were there a constant fear of firebomb blaze-death looming. We need a KKK but instant of retarded hicks, we just break the knee caps of fags.

>> No.12425161
File: 375 KB, 537x645, 1513583569423.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425161

>>12424774
>ehh, fuck it why not

>> No.12425180

>>12424774
>>12424898
>>12424881

the problem here is the belief that men must be the ones to be high in ambition and drive only, which is a clear contrast to what these women want to think of themselves.

it's obvious that women want men who strive for greatness, but the paradigm in regards to relationships in developed worlds is that women can be equal, which while not false, is very rare. thus, average women (who are just as boring as average men), want the best possible man while not being the best possible women. this works both ways, average men thinking they can get their "10/10" (which is another ridiculous abstraction, thinking of people as ratings) while being nasty asswipes.

peasantry has existed throughout history - lower classes with less education, less opportunity, and less ambition. one could surmise that some of this is genetic, and some men and women are just never meant for greatness, they can never surpass their peasantry because they don't want to. the belief that a peasant can marry into nobility is a prevalent story in any culture because that's what some people want - a fantasy. tinder has become one of many conduits for that fantasy, that if you swipe enough times, the nobility can save you out of your peasantry.

>> No.12425195

>>12425030
We're about to be living in the Weimar republic and most people don't even know.

>> No.12425284

>>12425195
*are

>> No.12425298

>>12425284
where does the are go

>> No.12425321

>>12424898
>were you more satisfying, there would be no worry of cheating.
lel no

>> No.12425329

>>12425321
epic

>> No.12425354

>>12425329
you have to ask women themselves about this, and to do so you have to bamboozle their natural defenses, for example by pretending to be gay

you may be satisfying, but that guy she sees at the bar when tipsy may be 6'5 and a lot better looking than you(or maybe he's a musician, whatever, the point is you can't be everything she finds attractive). one night of indiscretion doesn't register as unethical to her

also consider this unpleasant fact: men will generally have a one night stand with a woman they will not date. Meaning the most attractive man a woman can get a one night stand with is necessarily more attractive than her boyfriend or husband. Meaning she is constantly tempted by people more attractive than him

>> No.12425370

>>12425354
which implies both that all women are the same and also that women have no agency. youve confused /lit/ with an incel forum

>> No.12425376

>>12425127
>a quick shag is as bad as killing someone
Are you prepared to live in a world where all women are pure and virtuous? No sex, or even kissing, until you have sorted out your life and career so that her father will grant you her hand. No prostitution and no pornography, not even lewd pop videos.

>> No.12425379

>>12425376
not him but yes absolutely

>> No.12425387

>>12425370
I said nothing of the sort. If i stated that most men would cheat granted the opportunity with a woman hotter than their gf would you get similarly flustered

>> No.12425390

>>12425379
I sincerely doubt it. How long have you done nofap? Are you prepared to abstain from all sexual stimulation until you earn 50k and own your own house?

>> No.12425399

>>12425390
im a gymcel to the point where its nearly autistic and i plan on joining the army to be a ranger soon so yes. not everyone is a degenerate.

>> No.12425417

>>12425399
Dude it's not healthy to completely abstain.
And ffs, joining the army and killing people is okay, but not a cheeky wank? What's wrong with you?

>> No.12425422

>>12425417
Well for one semen contains the energy needed for me to reproduce so I am not comfortable releasing it on a toilet or on a female (whats the difference really). whereas i have no qualms killing 80IQ middleeasterners because they arent me. simple as

>> No.12425423

>>12424774
long story short, they ended up having sex anyways.

>> No.12425440

>>12425422
not him, but damn, very virtuous. women are toilets, other ethnicities are deserving of death. premarital sex is degenerate, but murdering others and treating women as trash is highly noble

>> No.12425451

>>12425440
everything you just said is unironically a spook. what is morality given i dont follow it personally? all that “exists” is what i personally believe AND act upon. anything you say is garbage and i cannot be convinced otherwise, villain

>> No.12425471

>>12425451
damn, based. a true philosopher. you should publish that in a book and replace Plato and the rest of the canon. the world needs your wisdom, anon

>> No.12425481

>>12425471
despite your epic sarcasm he's basically right

>> No.12425485

>>12425376
Anon, the murder example was an answer to your belief that "sex outside wedlock can't be bad because some people have done it in every society". Which is not true.

>Are you prepared to live in a world where all women are pure and virtuous? No sex, or even kissing, until you have sorted out your life and career so that her father will grant you her hand. No prostitution and no pornography, not even lewd pop videos.

Yes. Why not?
That would likely be a better world.

>> No.12425487

>>12424774
ohpee this is what you get for posting an image more interesting than your topic. First post was the only one that even tried, now people are too busy jacking off hating women to suggest books

>> No.12425498

>>12425387
NTA, and not flustered but personally offended

>> No.12425503

>>12425471
What do you think Plato and most Ancient Philosophers thought about having sex for the sake of pleasure?

>> No.12425505

>>12425481
that guy is just larping as BAP

>> No.12425511

>>12425481
damn. another philosopher-kang has stepped out from the shrubbery. based. subjectivism ftw!!!!! we're gonna kill all those degenerate postmodernists who spread relativism in our societies, and reinstituting GOD and CRUSTIANITY to save the WEST, the objectively best civilization of the entire world!!

>> No.12425512

>>12425451
Scum like you deserves death.

>> No.12425513

>>12425512
implying i care what you think

>> No.12425516

>>12425511
In your delirious butthurt youve conflated several mutually contradictory positions into an incoherent strawman

>> No.12425518

>>12425511
you have got to be no older than 17. post body so we can laugh

>> No.12425520

>>12424774
byronic romances kinda work, just a different setting

>> No.12425521

>>12425513
Implying I care what you think

>> No.12425524

>>12425503
I'm not in favor of casual sex either, but the guy suddenly went beyond edgelord, comparing women to toilets and murder to be normal, but casual sex bad. so i had to respond naturally to that

>> No.12425526

>>12425511
Cringe

>> No.12425531

>>12425521
the point is, my body and mind are harder and sharper than yours will ever be

>> No.12425532

>>12425498
if from that post you feel some sort of slight on your character as an upstanding and ethical man, you're just a mark

>> No.12425533

>>12425524
/pol/ has ruined many petty brains

>> No.12425539

>>12425524
>cant discern a clear joke about women
>>12425533
ive never been to /pol/
>murder

>> No.12425545

>>12424774

Pics? I need profiling material to avoid such blemishes

>> No.12425551

>>12425539
Murder of scum like you is justifiable.

>> No.12425561

>>12425551
it's funny how the self-proclaimed ethical are always just itching to find a group they're allowed to murder in good conscience

>> No.12425564

>>12425551
seriously post your body. your posts are like when i was 12 saying i would “fuck the shit out of” hot girls

>> No.12425586

Why the outrage over this?

>> No.12425587

>>12425539
>joking about female inferiority
Yeah, we get a lot of such "jokes" here on /lit/...should have know you were "joking"

>> No.12425592

>>12425587
sorry youre retarded

>> No.12425606

>>12425195
Unless a huge economic crisis rock us and 45% find itself on the verge of economic crisis, no.

>> No.12425620

>>12425370
People like to believe things that play on their worst fears, regardless of their likelihood

>> No.12425622

I really wish I knew what made you guys so hateful. You're from the first world, you're free of diseases, you have luxuries like a phone, laptop and internet - why are you so hateful? What went wrong in your lives, that made you what you are today?

>> No.12425626

>>12425561
I'm not ethical in any way, I just find you a tumour on the face of Earth.
>>12425564
lmao, not even gonna bother with insecure pseudo-masculine dirtbags like you

>> No.12425632

>>12425626
bait

>> No.12425636

>>12425622
New sincerity ftw :) Everyone's just living they're lives. Why do you care? He seems happy, are you against happiness? Lol? Are you so bitter that you get upset when people are happy? Why do you care dude? It doesn't affect your life. People are individuals and can do whatever they want. I am just happy that people are happy. Everyones doing their best. We're all basically the same person. No one is smarter or better than anyone else lol who are you to judge? Wow you're soooo smart for judging and criticizing someone. Why judge someone lol? Why not just let him live his life? Why do you care so much? Im happy for others when their happy. I dont judge

Ummm why are you so upset? You literally have a great life? Why don't you just relax? You can do whatever you want in modern society. Aren't you tired of being upset about things you can't change? Why don't you just relax and enjoy life? Why waste your time criticizing others, lol? Why not just relax and stop being upset? Who hurt you? Who hurt you so that you feel the need to judge others instead of just enjoying life and relaxing? Why are you so upset? I'm happy, other people are happy, why can't you be happy? Life is good and everyone's just trying their best to be happy and buy the things that make them happy... Maybe the problem is really with you?? Idk maybe you need to learn to relax and stop being so obsessed with what other people are doing? :S Why don't you just relax and enjoy life?

>> No.12425639

>>12425622
Humans are evolved to not be grateful for what they have, friend. It ain't easy.

>> No.12425651

>>12425636
You have a neurosis, dude. Seriously, I dont think this site is good for you. Take a break from it, rekindle your sense of humanity, and move on from there. Don't let the darkness take you, anon. You're better than this.

>> No.12425655

can we please get rid of /pol/ larpers?

>> No.12425667

>>12425639
>ebolution
Maybe question the validity of the doctrines you believe in. I assure you, ebopsych is quite a mocked doctrine in this day and age, from many sides.

>> No.12425673

>>12425667
Mockery is not an actual argument

>> No.12425684

>>12425651
Ikr.. That anon needs to relax and learn to stop being so depressed... I recommend seeing a therapist. Wellbutrin helped me and Lexapro helped my sister. I used to feel sad but now I don't anymore so they work. Medication works. Therapy works. Now I'm normal again and happy. I can go to work and post. Sometimes I see a post that says "I hate that the road is bumpy, why can't politicians fix this? We pay taxes" and I say dude lol just be grateful you HAVE roads? I don't mind the road, it's just a little bumpy, why do you care so much? Like just relax, wow, who hurt you. I recommend getting some therapy, maybe go outside a little, maybe get a hobby and some normal friends with normal hobbies who you can learn to be normal around. I was not normal like you until I learned to be normal and now I'm happy and I don't get upset anymore. I'm not saying the game is bad, it's an amazing game and guys I am having so much fun playing it, like so much fun, but I think they shouldn't be charging $15 for palette swap DLC... but I don't mean to be negative lol I love the game I really do, I am having soo much fun with it. I don't even notice that the road has potholes lol why do you care so much. Just ignore it turn on the radio haha. My life was messed up until I got on Lexapro. It takes a while to work bro but trust me now I'm fine

>> No.12425690

>>12425673
Maybe look up the billion takedowns of ebopsych before spouting the views here, then. I'm not going to turn this thread into such a conversation.

>> No.12425703

>>12425651
This. So much this. I'm getting help from my psychiatrist - I take 5mg of Xanax daily and am starting up Lexapro next week.

You don't have to do this alone.

>> No.12425706

>>12425690
I've read a lot of 'criticism' of evopsych, most of it takes the form 'you can't really know for sure'. Well no you can't but that applies to almost everything about evolution, all you can do is infer.
Psychology evolved, behavior evolved, to state otherwise is creationism.

It's also very obvious why people don't like evopsych, it's because of its implications for morality, for social organization, for individual and group differences.

>> No.12425708

>>12425684
Yeah, mock me more dude. It's your own life that you're throwing to the gutter, your own youth that you'll regret having wasted. I'm leaving now, since I don't need to play parent to people your age.

>> No.12425722

>>12425651
Not him but it’s fresh pasta

>> No.12425733

>>12425708
>>12425651
based mature adult NPC

>> No.12425741

>>12425706

People don't like it because it's full of shit. Give it 2-3 decades and we'll see.

>> No.12425745

>>12425741
That's again not an argument, but Im sure youll just reply something like 'it's not worth my time to debate this', Im very used to people like you

>> No.12425747

>>12425706
No, it's because it's extremely laughable in a million aspects. Trying to explain the whole of human life in terms of reductive, biological speculations. Again, you've read into criticism, but your own biases towards the doctrine prevent you from seeing how flawed it is. Explain to me mathematics, in terms of evolution. Explain music, art, history, storytelling, morality (why don't we behave like your doctrine predicts us to, and are actually repulsed by the very notion? evolutionary creatures, repulsed by evolutionary notions? makes sense), poetry, literally every other non-survival-centred endeavour of humanity - oh, and existence itself, if you can. Thank you.

>> No.12425767

>>12425747
This is a strawman of what evopsych offers, which is more about basic emotional dispositions, motives, and impulses.

You are the one who has to offer an alternative causal mechanism to explain behavior if you want to get rid of evolution- the established reason for all animal behavior.

>> No.12425775

>>12425706
So it's entirely speculation, then. Based, sounds very trustworthy and likely to vecome an irreplacable doctrine of humanity's.

>> No.12425787

>>12425775
It's as much speculation as it's speculation to say that whales evolved flippers to swim

>> No.12425792

fuck women and fuck their beta enablers

>> No.12425794

>>12424774
America is pure decadence even in something as simple, intuitive and unassuming as human interactions.
Suddently I despise less the spontaneous and unsophisticated dating culture carried out in my country.
The veil of chivalry covering the untold aim of men.
It's all bs.
We know what we want, they know it too, neither will speak.

Fuck Jannies

>> No.12425807

>>12424787
why? they were both straight up about what they wanted and he still fancied having a meal with a chill seeming person without her leading him on
it is possible to enjoy the company of someone without fucking them

>> No.12425818

>>12425767
Nah, not a strawman at all. Explain observed human morality in terms of evopsych's expectations for such. Surely, one of the largest of all human realms should be neatly explained by your profound doctrine, right? And also, why do you divide up human reality? How could evolution program us in some ways and not others? Shouldn't all our behaviours be entirely designed by evolution? Where did the other ones come from, then, if not evolution? So again, no strawmen here. Explain to me mathematics, dance, visual art, music, poetry, storytelling, design, morality, entertainment and every other realm that isn't sex or food in terms of your wondrous discipline.

An alternative causal mechanism? I have none, I see humans as spiritual creatures and most of our behaviors stemming from such a nature. The universe experiencing itself, humans a class of being along a spectrum of spiritual evolution.

>> No.12425822

>>12425787
And what did water evolve for?

>> No.12425829

>>12425818
Human morality comes from a few things, one is empathy for those related to you, which confers obvious benefits. Another is reciprocal altruism, which doesn't require genetic similarity.
There is an entire literature about this stuff

'spiritual creatures', ok, this isn't really an explanation, especially from someone who is so quick to mock an explanation with an actual logic behind it

>> No.12425836

>>12425818
A lot of the activities like art can be explained as displays of fitness for sexual selection

>> No.12425864

>>12425829
So both morality and brutality are from the same source, then? Evolution is a magical construct which hosts many opposing realities in itself. Makes sense.
Recilrocal altruism, and yet if selfishness is observed, that's claimed to have evolutionary advantage as well. Very coherent doctrine. Everything is a brutal competition for resources, and all behaviors are based around such, but so people, like, benefit from sharing so they do that too.

Why does spirituality matter so much to reductively biological creatures? Why is God the most inescapably pervasive and penetratintg of all concepts in human society?

You also understand that a scientific body claiming something, positing a reason for it, doesn't mean it's true right? Or that one has to accept it? Again, I hold morality and most human behaviors to be spiritual in nature, having that as its source. I couldn't give a damn about what some pseudobiologists of the past century or so have to say about the cause for the entirety of human action.v

>> No.12425873
File: 85 KB, 728x392, Doubt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12425873

>>12425485
>Yes. Why not?

>> No.12425882

>>12425864
>Everything is a brutal competition for resources, and all behaviors are based around such, but so people, like, benefit from sharing so they do that too.
m8 you say this sarcastically like it isn't entirely reasonable. It's a cost-benefit analysis, do the genes gain more by selfish behaviour or cooperation(behavior on the level of the organism not the genes)

Why does spirituality matter to us, it could be a number of things. It's possible that God is real of course, it's also possible it's a delusion that evolved for some reason, or just happened by accident as our mental models became more complex for other reasons.

again just saying things are spiritual in nature is not an argument, you're not explaining anything, and the Reddit-esque passive aggressive sarcasm is become irritating

>> No.12425904

>>12424774
That Japanese demon thing always reminds me of this
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5PSHtH8zo7w

>> No.12425919

>>12425836
Yeah, and I laugh at such explanations. It doesn't explain why or how art ever "evolved", or even "what" art is, just laughably reduces it to "hur dur mayting strutegues!" Anyone who has lived a week on Earth can see how pathetic these explanations are. So Shakespeare was basically just the best sex pig in the pen, and his talent existed solely so he could attract his wife Anne Hathaway to him and fill her with dem babies. His artistic output is secondary to his children - his son Hamnet, who passed at 10, more important than the creation named Hamlet which was sparked by him, and has lived on for 400 years strong. Beethoven's greatest symphony? Just for getting LAID, man. Life is about FUCKING, bro! Put that dick in that clit, that's all we are, dude!

Why don't you explain to me why people find excessive sex to be degenerate, and romantic love to be pure, if evolution sees it the other way? Why do people even and ever abstain from sex, like mystics or artists or inventors do, instead of being wired to see it as the greatest thing ever? Why do we find greater transcendence in things like music or storytelling, with all great philosophers from every culture speaking of the virtue in abstaining from bodily pleasures, if sex is the highest endeavour of human life? Why do we not see it as the beginning and end of existence, as the evopsych doctrine posits it to be?

Why are we so spiritual, and see celibacy as a universal virtue among every religious culture in the world?

>> No.12425933

>>12425882
You're the one who literally parrots the exact constructs of these doctrines with zero original argumentation of your own behind them, and declares my positions shallow. Try maybe reading into other disciplines, again, instead of clinging to a single modern one that is rife with flaws. And I'm sorry for the passive-aggressiveness, seriously.

>> No.12425937

>>12425919
Shakespeare and monks can be seen as aberrations of a sort, these behaviors have to work on average to promote fitness.

I find most of your second paragraph simply untrue, the vast majority of humanity attaches immensely more importance to sex than to art

Please try to be more concise and less annoying, reading your posts is painful

>> No.12425944

>>12425933
I am repeating these arguments because I find them convincing, I don't see how whether I came up with them influences their strength.

I have read into many other disciplines, I've read a shitload of philosophy and religious stuff. I literally had a mystic experience once.

As far as human behavior goes I find many arguments in evopysch reasonable. Not absolute doctrine, just more reasonable than alternatives I've heard

>> No.12425953

>>12424774
Women don't want people to treat them like sex objects even though they treat themselves as sex objects. If you're going to act like one then expect me to treat you like one.

>> No.12425997

>>12425937
I don't consider you guys to have much depth of soul, is all, if you genuinely think these pathetic explanations are perfectly coherent, even profound. Go have some sex then, if that's all that life is, don't waste your time arguing with an idiot like me who doesn't buy into modern fad-disciplines that few already take seriously today, and even less will support tomorrow. You didn't address most of my points, like why /pol/ screeches about the prevalence of sex to be degenerate for our modern society, when they should be wired to see it as the exact opposite.

>>12425944
Well, believe what you want. I've been on the evolutionary gravy train before, until I actually reflected on the totality of life more and realized how atrocious its argumens were, how incoherent its explanations are, and haven't looked back since. Reductivism has been in fashion, but now that panpsychism is gaining steam, those ignoramuses will finally be quietened.

>> No.12426016

>>12425422
I understand your justification but please stop talking like an edgy 12 year old

>> No.12426026

>>12425417
>And ffs, joining the army and killing people is okay, but not a cheeky wank? What's wrong with you?
Taking someone else's life is more natural than wasting your seeds for nothing.

>> No.12426040

>>12425997
Panpsychism doesn't contradict evolutionary psychology in any way at all. You're deliberately refusing to even try to understand the perspective you're attacking, it's clear you haven't even read the most basic texts in the field despite apparently having been 'on the train' as you put it.

Consider that monogamy, considered by pol Christianity to be non-degenerate, is commonly found in nature as an evolved sexual strategy. Also consider that a large portion of what people say is about signalling various things and can't be taken at face value.

There is nothing incoherent about the explanations evopsych has, the proper criticism is that they are speculative, as literally all evolution-based arguments are(which we've already gone over), and should therefore be taken with a large grain of salt. The basic logic behind them is sound

>> No.12426050

>>12426026
Barring the obvious countermeasure, I have a feeling your 'seeds' will go unsewn.

>> No.12426052

>>12425937
>the vast majority attaches immensely more importance to sex
I think it's just you, anon. Most people are far more fulfilled by their careers, romance, friendships, travelling, spirituality, children, art, and other areas unrelated to fucking. Maybe it's just you, anon, who sees sex as the highest of human endeavours.

>> No.12426064

WOW! I never knew there existed woman who like hook ups and sex.

There are woman out there who are not sensation seekers, you know.

>> No.12426067

>>12426064
Not really. Women are fundamentally whores.

>> No.12426078

>>12426064
women are primarily sexual, as evidenced by the fact that their response to this very allegation is based on sex and sexual hierarchy ("you think that because you're a virgin")

>> No.12426083

>>12426064
Old women at church don't really count, although they're nice people.

>> No.12426086

>>12426052
>romance, children
>unrelated to fucking
wew
Also how often do people kill each other or themsleves over travelling or art vs. sexual relations?

>> No.12426101
File: 283 KB, 1080x1080, 1547617527319.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12426101

>tfw unattractive undesirable uninteresting male
I'm going to be alone for the rest of my life aren't I

>> No.12426102
File: 363 KB, 1080x1440, 234063_v9_ba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12426102

>>12426078
[citation needed]
>>12426067
What twitter thots say = truth.

>> No.12426103

The girl is a whore and the guy is a fag
But at least she made intentions clear, nothing worse than some dumb bitch leading you on
Also the dude 100% still thinks he has a chance to get his dicked suck, his entire goal is going to be to impress her and that'll make her wanna suck him off

>> No.12426104

>>12426101
"Why worry? You can't control being an ugly loser, so just chill and relax and be happy" - Marcus Aurelius

>> No.12426106

>>12425667
what a complete load of shit

>> No.12426107
File: 56 KB, 491x585, 1501886807293.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12426107

>clapping; sneezyface; raspberryface
unironically what did she meme by this?

>> No.12426133

>>12426104
He was an attractive desirable interesting male so what the fuck does he know

>> No.12426202
File: 113 KB, 578x319, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12426202

>>12426050

>> No.12426206

brave new world

>> No.12426221

>>12426107
the memory makes her feel sick yet excited / horny

>> No.12426259

>>12425376
Duh

All of that shit is spiritually corrosive and most guys dislike themselves for indulging in it. They just don't have any motivation not to

>> No.12426487

>>12426102
Don't post soundbite catchphrases from your phone if you want to have an actual discussion.

>> No.12426928

>>12425636
I appreciate posts like this

I hate the "teehee dont judge" types who always end up being the most judgemental yet cant even comprehend themselves as such.

>> No.12426990

>>12425376
There is absolutely nothing wrong with what you said.

>> No.12426999

>>12425684
Soma is real huh

>> No.12427008

WOAH WOAH WOAH

I originally posted this thread legitimately curious as to whether or not there was some literature that was a parody of the lack of traditional romance in modern day courting written with the same formula and cliches as an old romance novel. E.g.
>he texted her an emoji if a rose and asked if she was dtf

It's funny to see people come out of the woodwork though to complain about /pol/ and misogyny very quickly though... almost as if seeing the characters in these texts being mocked strikes a nerve...

Also funny to see how this board is plagued by the evolution-denying, spirituality-obsessed retards that plague literature.

>> No.12427016

>>12425370
>all women are the same and also that women have no agency
finally someone gets it

>> No.12427034

>>12426928
>I hate the "teehee dont judge" types who always end up being the most judgemental yet cant even comprehend themselves as such.
I noticed this, as well.

>> No.12427041

>>12427008
Thanks for the update, keep us posted

>> No.12427049

>>12424774
The justified rage of incels will be the fire that consumes the Western world.

>> No.12427138

>>12425622
no gf, all of that shit is meaningless in comparison to not having a mate

>> No.12427139

>>12425370
>all women are the same and also that women have no agency
that is true though

>> No.12427145

>>12425703
>pharma shill
>on my /lit/
shove your pills up your ass

>> No.12427175

>>12425882
>do the genes gain more by selfish behaviour or cooperation
>evolution is chaotic and random but w8 it also has a telos somehow
you bio reductionist retards are pathetic

>> No.12427201

>>12427175
yes the 'telos' is the chance it has of reproducing itself, all phenotypes are due to this
this is the basic principle of natural selection

>> No.12427213

>>12427145
think its satirical

>> No.12427229

>>12425822
this is obviously disingenuous b8 but: water isn’t an organism, retard

>> No.12427231

>>12427201
and how would it know what's more beneficial to reproduction? how would blind genes know whether competing or sharing is going to lead to a higher chance of reproduction in a given scenario? why is reproduction even beneficial in the first place?

>> No.12427245

>>12427231
do you really not understand how evolution works? 'beneficial' is used imprecisely here

the way it works is that genes that create phenotypes that cause the organism to reproduce will by definition spread in the gene pool. So the characteristics that the organism has evolved because they caused it to reproduce, or it wouldnt exist

>> No.12427249

>>12427008
>plagued by the evolution-denying, spirituality-obsessed retards
What the fuck do you mean with this?
People with certain unattractive traits cant reproduce?

>> No.12427267

>>12427231
so this board really is /pol/ for “smart” people now

>> No.12427280

>>12427245
>the way it works is that genes that create phenotypes that cause the organism to reproduce will by definition spread in the gene pool
why are these phenotypes created in the first place? why the need for reproduction? why do organisms become more complex over time?

>> No.12427308

>>12427280
the phenotypes are created at random, the ones that still exist are the ones that reproduced themseles, it's a tautology.

there is no need for reproduction, it's just something that happened. The complexity of organisms came about through incremental evolution like anything else.

>> No.12427315

>>12427249
>What the fuck do you mean with this?
You're a faggot and an idiot.

>> No.12427353

>>12427280
Not previous anon, but will try to explain the shit to you.
>why are these phenotypes created in the first place?
genetic mutations and alterations happen all the time. Can be by radiation or by scrable when they get passed on.
>why the need for reproduction?
Its not a need, but rather an instinct that tells that you need to spread your genes, you can easily overcome this instinct but keep in mind that you cant escape it altogether.
>why do organisms become more complex over time?
They dont, they can even become more simple over time if the conditions are met.
More complex organisms are a product of better suited and "challenging" enviroment that changes not drastically, but frequent enough that causes species to "improve" their ways.

>> No.12427367

>>12427308
But this just leads back to assuming everything is chaotic because it's chaos all the way down for whatever reason. Reductionists are just the extreme opposite of Christians obsessed with order.

>there is no need for reproduction, it's just something that happened. The complexity of organisms came about through incremental evolution like anything else.

You're not really answering anything here. You don't have an answer for why something exists so you just wave your hand and say it's random chance or whatever else. It's as dishonest as Christians trying to claim everything revolves around Jesus. Ironically, evolutiontards and Christfags are a match made in heaven.

>> No.12427369

>>12427315
Why the need to call me names anon?
Im not even the previous anon you replied to.
Im just curious to see what you have to say about that.

>> No.12427385

>>12427367
>Christfags
you have unironically parotted creationist talking points multiple times and you have the gall to say this

>> No.12427434

>>12427229
And why is it there at all? And the sky? And mountains? Clouds? Rain? Trees? Wind? The sun?

>> No.12427442

>>12427353
>>12427385
Again, no answers whatsoever. Quit thinking you can avoid the questions with technical jargon. I'm well aware of how the process functions. You haven't answered a single thing by providing more irrelevant details. I'm not a creationist, so trying to explain evolution over and over again in different ways really isn't helping your case. I simply asked a few questions and your "creationist identified" programming kicked in. Every time you get pressed on a topic, you backpedal and change things. That is EXACTLY what Christians do as well. This is how naive and ideological you are. Read some Indian philosophy and realize you and the creationists you get so moist over do not have all of the answers. You will NEVER have the answers, NEVER. Go jerk off to Bertrand or Christ, whichever of the two you prefer.

>> No.12427459

>>12425882
Nature performs cost-benefit analyses, now, does she? Sure you're not just picking and choosing select human systems to project onto "nature", anon?

>> No.12427462

>>12427367
Only in literature and art can you find people so stupid they will mindlessly critique both evolution and creationism simultaneously while offering no counter-position AND think themselves more intelligent for doing so.

>> No.12427469

>>12427462
the trick is realizing we simply donno nuffin nigga and being content with it

>> No.12427475

>>12424898

"You let your women do this stuff, it's men's fault" - women
"If you were a real man, women wouldn't leave/cheat" - women

Also women

"Male dominated society stops women from achieving"

At what point do we just accept women do not value agency?

>> No.12427480

>>12427442
>I'm well aware of how the process functions
you literally aren’t lmao
>le Christianity as a derogatory term maymay
you are as dumb as any christcuck, and with an even more boring ideological motivation for your idiocy

>> No.12427489

>>12427469
There is absolutely no point to argue for or against this perspective.

>> No.12427494

>>12427434
the initial boundary conditions of the universe

>> No.12427496

>>12425836
Ah yes, explains why many great artists never even took wives or had children, and even deprived themselves of worldly resources in dedication for their art. Because art is somehow really about mate selection, in this grand game of life which ultimately reduces to resources, survival, and reproduction, hence why "bachelor artists" and "starving artists" are the very well-known archetypes found on them.

Evolution is so based, what terrific correspondence between the explanations given and the real-world we actually see in front of us!

>> No.12427501

>>12427480
>t. retarded religious evolutionist thinking he has any answers

>> No.12427512

>>12427501
um actually you can’t know that

>> No.12427542

>>12427496
How do you really know you're even typing anything? Evolution nor religion proves this.

We cant know that so its equally as likely that you never typed anything.

>> No.12427593

>>12425807
Its not fair though 'cause I bet the fuck guy doesn't do the nice meal and interesting conversation. So she's dividing it up and that sucker is doing all the bullshit work while fuck guy fucks her.

>> No.12427627

>>12427542
To even doubt that I'm typing, there must be something to doubt, proving my typing to exist in some form, even if ultimately illusory. Nor is there any relation between basic philosophical investigations like the one you brought up, and the discussion of evolutionary constructs we find here.

>>12427494
Wow, that explains everything! See guys, science DOES have all the answers! We just have a few more details to work out, is all!

>>12427442
Which Indian philosohy should I read, desu? Are you referring to the notions of Maya, Lila, Atman-Brahman?

>> No.12427645

>>12427627
Relations dont exist idiot.

Homey shit I destroyed you.

>> No.12427647

>>12427627
>Wow, that explains everything
yup, glad I could help

>> No.12427694

>>12427593
>No, thank you. I get enough dick elsewhere.
A polite rejection and clarification that you have no chance. It couldn't be more fair. He's not a sucker, he's a faggot.

>> No.12427718

NON-OVERLAPPING MAGISTERIA

>> No.12427730

>>12424792
*america

>> No.12427842

>>12424774
This is so sad, unironically.
So often i see people interacting and its like a competition to see who can feign a lack of care the most convincingly, or maybe they're not feigning it, which is even worse.

>> No.12427884

>>12424787
He should have killed himself
>tfw did something exactly like this after a nice church girl I thought I was going on a date with told me she wanted to make it clear that she just wanted to be friends. Went anyways to avoid upsetting her. Still regret it.
Learn from my mistakes, frens.

>> No.12427895

>>12424881
>I have also seen girls send some super sweet messages to their boyfriends on facebook and a minute later messaging my best friend asking to hang out with him and how she found her boyfriend lame. At that point, my best friend said "I'm never marrying".
Wait, what?

>> No.12427909

>>12425376
No sex or pornography or lewd videos have ever brought me the slightest bit of happiness, or have even given me a better fap. I was perfectly fine just rubbing one out to the memory of some girl bending over at school.
The only time a sexual thing has brought happiness was when it accompanied an emotional connection, if it meant that my marriage would more stable i'd give all that shit up without batting an eye.

>> No.12427910

>>12424898
I know this is bait but there are people and women out there who actually believe it and it just depresses the fuck out of me. Radical idea for those considering an heroing because nogf - you literally don't need a woman. Bachelorhood is an historical norm and there are so many avenues of noble virtues that NPCs like this just don't understand. You matter, you have value, and a woman doesn't need to see that for it to be true.

>> No.12427913

>>12425180
Surprisingly woke take

>> No.12427914

>>12425622
>But you can buy lots of consumer electronics bro, this is utopia!

>> No.12427944

>>12425180
>tinder has become one of many conduits for that fantasy, that if you swipe enough times, the nobility can save you out of your peasantry.
It's a wealth without work story. People love them - the lottery, Youtube singers, Bitcoin, El Dorado. The male equivalent of a Cinderella story is the Manic Pixie Dream Girl (INFP male with ENFP female). It's basically the inversion of gender roles - the man is passive and the woman is active. The man is sheltered and somewhat boring and the woman loves him for what he is rather than what he does (which is the opposite of how it usually works - men love women with an obsessive passion due to the mate guarding instinct, whereas women only really love high value men - when they have avenues (like Tinder) for obtaining those men and lack repercussions for whoring around, they are perfectly content to avoid marriage and low-value men altogether.

Fortunately for low-value men, the wall exists, so you get to laugh at them when they are used up and alone, but only if you refuse to economically and socially enfranchise thot enablers.

>> No.12427950

>>12425451
Based.

>> No.12427969

>>12425620
I mean in this case it's a literally zero percent chance of it ever happening because we're talking about a world where Anon even has a partner to cheat on him.

>> No.12427973

>>12425636
>>12425684
I love everything you choose to be. You are going to inspire my shitposting immensely.

>> No.12427986

>>12425708
Yeah, he's not coming back for a long time.

>> No.12427990

>>12426928
I'm judgemental but the whole point of New Sincerity is that you forgive people for indiscretions, favoring your real relationship with them over ideological schism. It's not like liberal atomism where everyone has the right to be whatever they want so trying to change them is a macroaggression.

>> No.12428009

>>12424898
What interests would make a man more satisfying to a woman, besides playing an instrument?

>> No.12428118
File: 26 KB, 979x276, hasband_slip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12428118

>>12424774
The end.

>> No.12428127

>>12425059
>my ex couldn't get enough of me
>until she did

>> No.12428136
File: 23 KB, 400x519, FUCK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12428136

>>12428118

>> No.12428167

>>12425376
i would give my life in order to bring about such a world

>> No.12428203

>>12428167

I’d settle for being a productive member of society

>> No.12428490

>>12428118
Fake story obviously.

Nobody would mention "oh he got disabled trying to save me teehee"

>> No.12428505

>>12428118
What's wrong with this? What, is she supposed to waste her entire life on him? How is she in the wrong in any way?

>> No.12428561

>>12424898
I fucked a girl with a boyfriend who was better-looking, fitter, taller, wealthier, and more interesting than I am. People cheat just for variety's sake

>> No.12428696
File: 34 KB, 580x548, 1542677044908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12428696

>>12424881
>If you want to lose hope in humanity, try to find some pregnancies forums and look for "paternity" threads.
Why did you ask me to do this...

>> No.12428709

>>12428505
He wasted his life on her, the least she can do is "waste" her life on him.

>> No.12428718

>>12426016
Get a grip hon.

>> No.12428738

>>12428709
So you'd rather have two lives ruined instead of only one? Why?

>> No.12428808

>>12425376
I know that you tried hard to prove your point, but you ended up just describing what a lot of us actually want, which is rather hilarious.

All of the degenerate behavior displayed today doesn't bring anyone happiness. Quite the opposite, actually. Studies have shown that hookup culture in college messes with people mentally, to the point where some seniors have a negative view on relationships and sex. If you think that Stacy is ultimately happy because she has 20 different Chads on speed dial, you're completely wrong. Put her in a room with 100 average guys or girls who have a hard time finding a partner and you'd find that she's likely the least happiest person there.

>> No.12428827

>>12428738
Yes i would rather two people experience a bit of suffering rather than one person being pushed down into the gutter and curbstomped.

>> No.12428829
File: 130 KB, 424x403, kojima.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12428829

>>12425376
Yes, absolutely.

>> No.12428853

>>12428709
That would be the morally good thing to do, yes. Would it take a lot of sacrifice on her part? Yes, but the guy already paid for it in spades.

>> No.12428855

>>12428827
>living as a vegetable is just a bit of suffering
>devoting your entire life to a vegetable out of some dubious notion of morality, abandoning your hopes and aspirations is just a bit of suffering.

>> No.12428865

>>12424774
>Asking before chemistry has even had a chance to develop
>Getting denied

Surprise

>> No.12428885
File: 90 KB, 900x1042, 1522771333756.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12428885

>>12425622
Born a bastard to middle class family in 1992. Never met my father or any member of that side of the family. No roots. No past. No meaningful connection to any culture, race, ethnicity, or creed. No direction. No motivation. No strong familial ties. No inheritance. No estate. No prospect of ever owning land or a home. No money for college. No money to move out of my low-income community. No prospect of receiving job training in my low-income community. No sober friends. Been cheated on by every woman I've ever been serious with. Been cheated on by every woman I wasn't serious with. Women continue throwing themselves at me but I feel no affection toward them any longer, only the Ideal. I spend my free time studying history, economics, esoteric conspiracies, philosophy, theology, ect. From everything I've learned, it's horrifyingly obvious that the future has been canceled, and nature has reached obsolescence.

>> No.12428940

>>12428855
People are not trash that you can throw away when they become inconvenient.

>> No.12428958

>>12428709
do you really expect this kind of honour from a woman

>> No.12428980

>>12428940
Such grand and intoxicating innocence.

>> No.12428991

sally rooney

>> No.12429016

>>12427895
Not him, but I have a chad friend that is quite a whore and he has also has shown me messages and pics he gets from girls I know for are supposedly in happy "lovey dovey" relationships with other guys guys I know.
If you are an introvert like me get yourself some popular extroverted friend it will really open your eyes as to how much gross and selfish people can be when they think no one will ever know.

>> No.12429025

>>12425747
cringe

>> No.12429036

>>12428940
Women view men as disposable tools that can be discarded once they are no longer useful.

>> No.12429230

>>12429016
This this this.

>> No.12429231

>>12427842
I feel alienated from the culture i supposedly grew up in, i'm 22 and it wasn't like this when i was younger. The fuck happened all of a sudden.

>> No.12429261
File: 1.08 MB, 1280x2460, 1547708078887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12429261

>>12429231
People are connected now more than ever and all consume the same media while in the past people former their own distinct communities and ideas spread slower.

In other words, culture is becoming increasingly one global consumerist mess that is constantly changing on the whims of entertainment propagandists. The cattle all eat from the same trough.

>> No.12429297

>>12429261
Fucking jews. Now, look up the Saatchi & Saatchi advertising company, then look up the one Saatchi brother who finances Damien Hirst and Tracy Emin to spraed their derivative degenerate filth everywhere.

>> No.12429325

>>12429231
Perhaps the intertubes where socialisation can easily be gained but people don't need each other as much as a result
Also the ability to publicly mock anyone sincere about anything doesn't help
Corporate PR culture has extended to cover the entire Anglospheric world, on and off the clock
These combined make for the banal, shallow nihilists competing to care the least

>> No.12429336

>>12429231
People can't believe anything because it will end up being offensive to people who can gain a sense of power by calling their bosses or educational institutions

>> No.12429360

>>12424774
IF YOU PAID, KYS

>> No.12429369

>>12425636
Based

>> No.12429441 [DELETED] 

>>12425622
I'm from the third world you retarded american

>> No.12431048

>>12428118
These are so obviously being made by someone on 4chan to suss out spicy replies. The sad thing is that even though it's fake, if you posted it on TwoXChromosomes, you'd be guaranteed to get at least 1 supportive reply encouraging you to do what makes you happy.

>> No.12431052

>>12428561
Sure you did, Anon. Sure you did.

>> No.12431066

>>12428940
Not gonna make it

>> No.12431079

>>12424792
/thread

>> No.12431085

>>12428696
>>12424881
>If you want to lose hope in humanity, try to find some pregnancies forums and look for "paternity" threads.
I did this and could only find 2 threads even searching for "disputed paternity." Paternity just showed paternity leave threads. Based on your mention of Houellebecq, I'm assuming this is one of those gay fetish posts that people used to make on /r9k/

>> No.12431097

>>12429261
Posting about Jewish ancestry on Wikipedia has to be the greatest public service of all time.

>> No.12431140

>>12425636
legendary pasta; based post

>> No.12431160

>>12425684
>>12425636
How come incels are so funny and still unable to get laid?

>> No.12431165

>>12428203
There is no difference

>> No.12431177

>>12427730
this but unironically

>> No.12431193

>>12424774
>Lol who cares, i'm so casual, we're cool, just chill out bro. Haha, its not big deal lol.

>> No.12431204

>>12425370
>all women are the same and also that women have no agency.
the truth and nothing but the truth

>> No.12431256

>>12427895
He got "traumatized" by this.

>>12429016
My friend was not even a manwhore. He got disgusted by this.

>> No.12431313

>>12431160
their faces

>> No.12431332

>>12428940
jesus how embarassing

>> No.12431372
File: 10 KB, 300x300, images.duckduckgo.com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12431372

>>12429261
of course it's (((them))) again

>> No.12431428

>>12429261
So it's possible to reach the elite if you're willing to fuck everyone over? I'll see you guys later.

>> No.12431443

>>12431160
>he fell for the just be funny meme

>> No.12432246

>>12424774
hmm, this is disgusting and pathetic, but she is honest... there's something nice about that.

>> No.12433034

>>12424774
Yes, you fucking moron
There just aren't any good ones.

>> No.12433184

>>12425376
You do realise what you speak of it what the vast majority of men want?
All that lewd shit is trash compared to the genuine affection of a woman with whom you're her first.

>> No.12433479

>>12425626
Lol du absoluter Autist hast mir noch immer nicht auf Skype geantwortet. Schwächling.

>> No.12433603

>>12433479
Tut mir ja Leid mann ich dachte du gehst weg wenn ich dich lange genug ignoriere

>> No.12433732
File: 106 KB, 418x605, 1410150197002.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12433732

>>12425636
>>12425684
beyond based

>> No.12433771

>>12428696
Post some screencaps from there, please, I'm to lazy to look it up myself.

>> No.12433881

>>12424774
the unix timestamp tells me that this image was posted on 1/16, does anyone have a link to the thread where this was originally posted?

>> No.12434010

>>12427008
based concerned thread-daddy poster

>> No.12434025

Tao Lin

>> No.12435102

This is why morality is not possible without God. We have failed to meet Nietzsche's challenge as well.

>> No.12435134

>>12425606
We live in a world economy propped up by central bank manipulation and Apple stock buybacks. This is not a tenable situation. Although my fear is the stack of cards is so vast at this point that even a huge hit can't crumble the entire thing. This industry or that country will be ruined for a time, and right back to it in a decade.

>> No.12435140

>>12433881
it was on / tv /

>> No.12435195
File: 110 KB, 1024x839, 1526343822395.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12435195

>Falling for the women meme in 2019
I still don't understand how in this day and age, after all the shit that women do has been exposed, how men continue to be weak enough to fall for their tricks.

>> No.12435206

>>12424774
DESU the guy didn't ask very smoothly, but it could have worked. It was nice of her to be straight but he should take a hint and cut it there, because at this point his only source of interest in her WAS getting laid. The transaction's over, hang up

We're in a weird spot right now because there's no advantage to long term pair bonding for either sex (besides raising a family, which doesn't seem intrinsically motivating on its own). Mates distinguish themselves by being able to augment their partner, women have someone they can rely on for heavy lifting, defense, and most importantly in modern society income. Men have someone that do the fine tasks and bear children. When the average income of someone under 30 is not enough to support even themselves it makes very little sense for one to provide for two. Following that, with women approaching ever closer to equal pay there's less men out there who can augment their life. True many millennial couples comprise of two workers but that means it's harder to maintain intimacy.

I don't think either men or women are truly happy with this situation.

>> No.12435213

>>12435195
not everyone is gay

>> No.12435218

>>12425376
I wish

>> No.12435219

>>12435206
>no advantage to long term pair bonding
>romantic love is not an advantage
Makes me sick

>> No.12435222

>>12435206
Women are finally starting to benefit from capitalism, and still retain many special privileges. If they're not happy now they never will be.

>> No.12435224

>>12435219
It is but like raising a family clearly not intrinsic enough. These are weak drives that work in concert to drive human behavior.

>> No.12435226

>>12435219
>implying women are capable of love
>>12435222
>implying women are capable of happiness

>> No.12435572

>>12431052
Women cheat on NFL stars. Hugh Grant cheated on Elizabeth Hurley in her prime with an ugly black tranny. Women who jump from relationship to relationship tend to date up, but women will fuck down if they're bored and think that they won't get caught

>> No.12435632

>>12424774
This is no different than hookups in ancient greece. You guys just want to complain about not having a romantic partner.

>> No.12435854

>>12428709
>He wasted his life on her
Only if he feels he did.

Life doesn't have to end after becoming a quadriplegic, and saying it does is dangerous..

>> No.12435875

>>12424774
Diary of an Oxygen Thief comes to mind.

>> No.12435886

>>12424898
What women refuse to realize/accept is that no one actually cares what they think because their purpose is to provide children to men and not a goddamned thing else.

Look, I can ridiculous shit that someone might believe is a sincere opinion, too.

>> No.12435889

>>12425161
big post

>> No.12435897

>>12425422
You won't lose fertility by masturbating you retard. And masturbation actually decrease prostate cancer exposure, so you better get busy rght now.

>> No.12435913

>>12425636
Your happiness inspires me to be a better, more carefree man. Thanks anon.

>> No.12435917

>>12424971

Asked you nicely. Now things get serious

>> No.12435932

Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.

>> No.12435933

>>12424971
>It is better to not marry than to marry someone who feels like this
I've always felt like this, I'd rather be free on my own than spend the rest of my life as a pleasure slave to someone else.

>> No.12436033
File: 36 KB, 600x389, images~03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12436033

>>12435213
Wrong.>>12435219

>> No.12436319

>>12433603
Mimimi alle haben komplexe außer mir. Mir wird so einiges klar wenn ich sehe dass du fast ausschließlich den Leseempfehlungen dieses Dreckslochs folgst :^)

>> No.12436405

>>12425298
I believe he meant we are living in a Weimar republic.

>> No.12436428

>>12425422
if you don't fap you're risk for scrotum cancer rises with 30%

>> No.12436443

>>12425636
I feel like you're trying to rape me ideologically.
Good post anon.

>> No.12436455

Blacked: The anthology

>> No.12436529

>>12429036
Because "pump and dump" is not a literal catch phrase.

>> No.12437696

>>12435140
thanks, this is the original thread I think:
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/108093749/#108093878

>> No.12437984

>ehh, fuck it why not
He’s being overly agreeable and people pleasing but that’s not the bad part, the bad part is he probably thinks he’s doing the right thing.

>> No.12438892

>>12428940
How new of you

>> No.12438979

>>12435206
The Modern Man:
>Fuccbois enable men to be thought of as walking dildos
>If he doesn't take risks all day with his time, he dies poor by default
>Utterly disposable workforce under tax constraints

The Modern Woman:
>So degenerated that the promise of "a loving family and a better future" seems preposterous even to a large portion of plugged in weak-minded men.
>Used to a life of affluence to the point where money is not appreciated, only expected.
>Can very easily prop her entire life up on welfare without shame

The main issue is not long term pair bonding but actually it's predecessor, the desire to work.
More and more people aren't working because the system is so unbelievably humiliating to succeed within and the prize inside the box is visible (More taxes, more responsibility, less free time, more stress)
We're absolutely heading to a reverse version of the 60s explosion where conservatives (at least the people who hold those typical values) become more rebellious whilst the moral liberals become more like monsters of their own game, clamping down on any individual who doesn't "get involved", socially or sexually.

>> No.12438988

>>12438979
Good post

>> No.12439492

>>12427459
Had to reply to this just because of the combination of idiocy and smugness. Cost-benefit here means in terms of genetic fitness, and has nothing to do with conscious intent. It simply refers to the impact the behavior has on the likelihood the organism reproduces

>> No.12439537

Fucking degenerates

>> No.12439634

>>12424774
thanks for posting this. I was starting to get concerned that my own Tinder exchanges were pathetic, but compared to this cap they seem like something out of a Jane Austen book.

>> No.12439752

>>12439634
delete Tinder and forget sex, you'll be way happier if you withhold yourself for the times it comes naturally. It puts you in a dependance mindset (like most non-artistic internet mediums)

>> No.12439762

There is literally noting wrong with the people in OP's picture. Unemotionally attached hookups have happened since the dawn of mankind.

>> No.12439812

>>12439762
The line I draw is when people do this and then still act like they have the moral high-ground.
Imagine you've been a Christian all your life.
You remain a virgin for marriage. Then BLANK whose resume includes being the town bike now calls herself a born again Christian.
At what point do you say, no your not, your life choices have been immoral and so it would be incorrect for you to assume otherwise.
Cake and eat it with women, they can't lose.

>> No.12439823

>>12424898
>there would be no worry of cheating

Even Napolean was cucked. You could be the greatest military leader that the world had known at that point, rule near almost a continent, have armies at your beck and call and still, some bitch you love can and will cheat on you if the opportunity presents and a little sweet talking from another attractive male.

>> No.12439831

>>12439812
Having sex isn't immoral

>> No.12439838

>>12424774
The Pussy by Delicious Tacos.

>> No.12439861

>>12439831
I agree with you, having sex with someone you don't want a relationship with however, is.

>> No.12439864

>>12439831
Depends on why you have it.

>> No.12439875

>>12424774

>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46687275

What about that of the love for God?

>TV art historian and nun Sister Wendy Beckett has died at the age of 88, it has been announced.

>Joined a convent when she was 16.

>Congratulatory First Class degree in English literature from Oxford university

>Given permission from the Vatican to pursue spiritual solitude

>In her spare time became a semi-professional art historian who even presented on national TV

>> No.12439909
File: 26 KB, 624x351, 1528837491272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12439909

>>12438979
>We're absolutely heading to a reverse version of the 60s explosion where conservatives (at least the people who hold those typical values) become more rebellious whilst the moral liberals become more like monsters of their own game, clamping down on any individual who doesn't "get involved", socially or sexually.

But who is going to win out is the real question? Throw in the fundamentalists and relgious conservatives into the mix of secular conservatives and it's a real battle royale.

>> No.12439918

>>12439861
Why is that so?

>> No.12439972

>>12439918
Because it makes you promiscuous.

>> No.12439989

>>12439972
Which is objectively immoral how?

>> No.12440007

>>12439909
In my opinion, although I maybe mis-quoting him, Houellebecq had it in mind that the Islamification of Europe will be the bizarre renaissance of conservative values. The turning point no doubt being the point wherein the moral left suddenly realises that Sharia law is the death knell of their entire society. The other theory being Spengler's that their will be a new Caesar (although I believe that was Hitler)
What I do know is that the moral left is only moral by name now and that they are losing their "cool" cred each day, like a son who realises his hippie parents are morons.

>>12439918
Denigration of the family unit, increased inability to pair-bond, likelihood of secondary sociopathy corroding lifestyle, becoming co-dependant on strangers for pleasure. I could go on but people who say "Why?" have usually made up their minds before asking. Question everything. It is my opinion that morality assuages a live lived badly, even if only for your own comfort, on your own terms. If you think hunting for strange is a decent way to live, I'd call that a life lived through others and not yourself. Doing drugs feels good but it's not a way to live, it's a way to burn-out well. Once you go down this road, you're choosing to unconsciously dismantle a prosperous future you can't see yet. Imagine giving herpes to your wife.

>> No.12440008

>>12439989
Because being promiscuous makes you a worse person than if you weren't.