[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 252 KB, 361x446, 201092274.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12405264 No.12405264[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

women were a mistake
http://archive.is/Vy6mT

>> No.12406042
File: 714 KB, 1065x2240, Screenshot_20190114-081638_Firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12406042

I wasn't too concerned with what dumb ass women on lolcow were up to. In fact I was impressed by the level of on-topic discussion. Then I really started noticing a few themes and patterns in their choices.
Damn dawg. Women are so fucking worthless and stupid.

>> No.12406480

mmmm nice girl good girl nice sermon demon i would consume her oh the host oh the guest to her hospitality i would oh yes her moist pale skin one nude band of low hanging fruit so fructified yes so acute feisty but ill bite oh so globular yes ill lather slather slobber allover oh not quite but ill do my best all holes arseholes bless our souls

>> No.12406564

>>12405264
wtf is lolcow

>> No.12406665

>>12406564
roastie r9k

>> No.12407555

>>12406042
>implying there aren't anons here just as pathetic and worse.
your example is valid but have some self awareness

>> No.12407594

>>12406480
chad joyceposter

>> No.12407646

>>12405264
>>12406042
You all believe such ideas because you're exposing yourself to all the wrong kinds of women and never care to look for ones with a soul..

>> No.12407666

>>12406665
I thought that was Crystal Cafe

>> No.12407676

>>12406480
people here take joyce seriously and yet women are the stupid ones
lmao

>> No.12407677

>>12407646
I agree. Where do you meet women with souls though?

>> No.12407681

>>12405264
This is quite funny because the form of their discussion, long posts, complete sentences, well-articulated thoughts, etc., is miles above the form of /lit/’s discussion. The content, however, is absolute drivel, whereas here when you find some signal in the noise it’s actually meaningful.

>> No.12407759

>>12407677
Worthy men meet worthy women at unexpectedly expected places :)

>> No.12407789

>>12405264
Agreed.

>> No.12407808
File: 1.40 MB, 1640x1222, 1547490371451.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12407808

You only hate what you can't have.

>> No.12407840

>>12407808
>implying western women ever actively pursue men

>> No.12407842

>>12407840
>implying non-western women are any different

>> No.12407851

>>12407808
and you post this shit in /lit rather then in /pol why?

>> No.12407921

>shitting on King and shilling Aickman
Nice

>> No.12407925

>>12407808
women don’t approach men and women don’t want to fix men.

>> No.12407952

>>12407808
>thinks women approach men
is this a joke?

>> No.12407971

>>12407925
the second part isnt true. women love trying to tame a bad boy.

>> No.12407973

>>12407808
Objective critique of a person's moral character and cognitive horizon does not necessitate hatred of that person. I do not deny that there are bitter misogynists here with a plethora of mental tangles but it is important to recognize the difference between impassioned disgust and genuine criticism born from acute, impartial perception. It is telling that women seem to always assume the former--or perhaps they do not have a clear conception of morality or intelligence to begin with. The latter case would explain why we rarely see them soberly engaging in intense discussion with each other regarding virtue or the conditions of thought or other topics which require one to speak in general terms rather than personal ones. On the contrary, every retort made by a woman is either an appeal to emotion which entirely misses the point of the argument, or a sudden, ruthless, ad hominem jab at the expense of polite, courteous discourse.

>> No.12408187

>>12407842
The 80-20 rule isn't as prevalent.

>> No.12408210

>>12407840
>>12407925
>>12407952
It's to make the comic simple. It doesn't matter how you met.

>> No.12408234

>>12407646
>No true scotsman
Please reveal these soulful women to us. I'd really like to know. Otherwise, you're full of shit

>> No.12408375

lol @ all the incels in this topic
Judging by the overall quality of /lit/ you are actually worse than the average teenagers you so crude critique. You retards can barely talk about the book you've read, full of insecurities and trying to pose as "patricians"

truly pathetic

>> No.12408499

>>12408375
These posts are by far the most pathetic.