Conservative Books

[Anonymous No.12264019]

Post conservative books

Some time after Schmitt returned to the Catholic Church (he ended up converting Ernst Jünger), he wrote his magnum opus, The Nomos of the Earth.
Thanks
>The last great, heroic act of the European peoples--the land-appropriation of a new world and of an unknown continent--was not accomplished by the heroes of the conquistador as a mission of the jus commercii, but in the name of their Christian redeemer and his holy mother Mary.

Schmitt cites the Bible extensively in this great work.

The quote in the OP pic is from The Concept of the Political

Here is a link to the conservative /lit/ discord, if you're interested

https://discord.gg/c5Vga4E

[Anonymous No.12264040]

Da lepard by Da lampidus

[Anonymous No.12264252]

Mein Kampf

[Anonymous No.12264287]

>>12264019
>Schmitt
>Conservative
fascism isn't conservative

[Anonymous No.12264294]

>>12264019
>le epic counterculture conservative anti-semite
please stop. just get laid and all this interest in reactionary literature will disappear. you'll see.

[Anonymous No.12264300]

>>12264294
>just get laid and all this interest in reactionary literature will disappear.

your not wrong. The question is off course, how does one 'get laid'?

[Anonymous No.12264301]

>>12264294
>Everything is about getting laid
Subhuman scum

[Anonymous No.12264309]

>>12264287
>>12264294
based lgbtposters

[Anonymous No.12264312]

>Conservative
>descends into ruski/kraut bootlicking
Every single time.

[Anonymous No.12264315]

>>12264300
by being attractive. you should try it sometime

[Anonymous No.12264334]

>>12264315
Having sex is gay

[Anonymous No.12264348]

>>12264294
Unfortunately pretty much all the evidence points to the opposite.

[Anonymous No.12264374]

>>12264312
It isn't their fault the Anglosphere doesn't produce any interesting conservatives and it doesn't help the best Portuguese or French conservatives haven't been translated.

[Anonymous No.12264387]

>>12264374
The Anglosphere created the only civilization actually worth conserving.

[Anonymous No.12264394]

>>12264287
If Schmitt is not conservative, then neither are Bonald, Donoso Cortés, or Pobedonostsev

>>12264294
I did used to fornicate, but no more, I'm baptized Orthodox

[Anonymous No.12264399]

>>12264387
That doesn't change the fact they're awfully boring in comparison to continental philosophers.

[Anonymous No.12264431]

Can anyone recommend me some good reactionary or pro-monarchy literature with really good prose? Such as on the level of Proust, Gracq, Borges etc if it exists

[Anonymous No.12264438]

>>12264387
>The Anglosphere created the only civilization actually worth conserving.

LMAO no. Anglos are ruled by money, materialism, and degeneracy. They are perpetually optimistic Whiggish cucks. There is no anglo conservatism anymore.

German conservatism has everything else going for it: aesthetics, metaphysics, philosophy, volkish nationalism, blood and soil, etc.

The last meaningful reactionary in the Anglo tradition was fucking Thomas Carlyle, who was himself infatuated with the German Romantics and wanted to usher in heroic aristocracy.

[Anonymous No.12264442]

>>12264394
>I did used to fornicate, but no more, I'm baptized Orthodox
>I ate my cake but now I get to have it too :)
>no no, you silly degenerates, don't "fornicate", stay celibate for the Lord
you are the worst sort of larper there is

[Anonymous No.12264472]

>>12264431
Appeal to the Old Whigs is both pro monarchy and much more reactionary than Burke's earlier work. In it, Burke argues that duty to the sovereign is compulsory and that coercion is the basis of society, not "consent of the governed".

Maistre's Petersburg Dialogues are delicious prose

[Anonymous No.12264481]

>>12264442
Ever read St. Augustine's "Confessions"?

[Anonymous No.12264495]

Great book written by a moderate republican MAGA!

[Anonymous No.12264505]

>>12264481
The person you're responding to is either a shitposter or someone too lost in their own indulgence to admit that change is possible. Either way, save your breath,.

[Anonymous No.12264532]

>>12264481
Yes and he is just as much of a larper as you.
>hurr let me spend the first half of my life banging sluts and having fun
>okay, now I want to get into heaven. better straighten up and be """""pious"""""
>now all of you need to forgo extra-marital sex. nevermind that I didn't and I have no clue what that sort of life would be like. sex outside of marriage is wrong :^)
Then some poor bastard reads this shit and ends up as a neurotic 27 year old virgin still waiting on "God's Plan".

I have more respect for Origen than I ever will for Augushit. At least Origen actually practiced what he preached from the beginning.

You are nothing but a larper who will only end up fucking over anyone credulous enough to take you seriously. There is not a more psychologically damaging thing than celibacy. Especially in today's world.

And you have no right to advocate for you, you delusional hypocrite.

[Anonymous No.12264622]

>>12264532
>if you learn from your mistakes you are an idiot

[Anonymous No.12264637]

>>12264622
It's making mistakes in the first place which makes you an idiot.

[Anonymous No.12264638]

>>12264532
Remember when Jesus told the whore to "go and sin no more"? Well guess what, that doesn't count for you!
If someone is genuinely remorseful and no longer walks the path of sin, then they are to be forgiven for that. That's not to say that their sins will take a toll on them that cannot be healed, especially in the case of sex or drugs, but you cannot hold it against those people to walk a righteous path.

[Anonymous No.12264645]

>>12264431
I can't stand this question, how are you supposed to answer it without provoking ridicule? Shakespeare fervently supported monarchy, yet plenty of people will claim its all satire.

[Anonymous No.12264653]

>>12264622
Is that actually what you think is being said here? Are you actually illiterate?

>baptized orthodox
oh, maybe it's just pure retardation. have fun playing dress-up with all the other cucks. you are no different than the nuatheists of the 2000s.

[Anonymous No.12264655]

>>12264294
this is what autism and insecurity looks like

[Anonymous No.12264700]

>>12264645
It's the term more than the idea. The term is antiquated. But Assad, for example, is effectively the same thing. And Caesars knew not to call themselves rex

[Anonymous No.12264755]

>>12264653
I think hes responding to the implication that because Augustine spent a great deal of his life having premarital sex, his writings and opinions on religion dont matter even after he converted. The other poster implied that his past life made his life after conversion null and void. Hence the brainlet meme and green text about learning from mistakes

[Anonymous No.12264770]

>>12264637
It makes you ignorant, not an idiot. In fact I'd say that not learning from your mistakes makes you an idiot. Making mistakes is tolerable if you are ignorant as to why you made the mistake or even ignorant to the fact that you made a mistake to begin with.

[Anonymous No.12264775]

>>12264653
I'm the one who was baptized Orthodox, I didn't post that image

I am Orthodox because I believe it 100%. That is the only reason

[Anonymous No.12264911]

>>12264287
This.

>>12264394
>If Schmitt is not conservative, then neither are Bonald, Donoso Cortés, or Pobedonostsev
Why namedrop these ones ?
How are they comparable ?
Having read an author doesn't automatically make you a follower of his. intellectual filiation is a continuation and sometimes even a surpassmen. It is not the same as simply copying and repeating over and over again.

[Anonymous No.12264918]

>>12264911
This.

Carl Schmitt is a literal Nazi. His views are the worst there is. Please stop, 4chan.

[Anonymous No.12264924]

>>12264918
Wow grow up, little weak faggot

[Anonymous No.12264927]

>>12264918
As if nazism was bad.

[Anonymous No.12264930]

>>12264918
>literal nazi
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa

[Anonymous No.12264940]

>>12264911
>How are they comparable

Erm? Donoso Cortés is referenced extensively by Schmitt.

Bonald is a kindred spirit of Maistre's, extremely close in thought, and Maistre was the first extensive theorist of the state of exception.

Pobedonostsev's jurisprudence is hardcore decisionist

[Anonymous No.12264953]

>>12264940
So what ? Schmitt is hegelian, does that make him a liberal since Hegel was one ?

[Anonymous No.12265050]

>>12264953
>Hegel
>liberal

Wut

[Anonymous No.12265058]

>>12265050
Honestly trying to define Hegel as anything but an asshole is an impossible task, even his own students disagreed on his actual views

[Anonymous No.12265068]

>>12264953
>Hegel
>liberal

You've clearly never read Philosophy of Right or anything by Schmitt, just stop.

[Anonymous No.12265078]

>>12265050
He was politically a liberal (not in the modern sense).
Mainly due to his lutherian background.

But that's not the point of my post.
I was just telling the guy that thinks you can label intellectuals by association that he's wrong.

[Anonymous No.12265238]

>>12264918
imagine being this dude

[Anonymous No.12265244]

>>12264953
you've almost certainly never read any hegel

[Anonymous No.12265258]

Ersnt Junger is a personal favorite of mine, then there are the writing's of CS Lewis and Tolkien. In terms of conservative German authors my experience is only with Schmitt , Junger, Nolte, and Spengler if that is what you're keen on.

As an American, I can recommend Pat Buchanan and Robert Nozick as being fairly quality.

[Anonymous No.12265363]

KIRK RUSSELL'S THE CONSERVATIVE MIND

[Anonymous No.12265376]

RUSSELL KIRK'S THE CONSERVATIVE MIND

[Anonymous No.12265431]

>>12264953
Schmitt is absolutely NOT a Hegelian. He refers to Hegel sometimes, but is definitely not Hegelian

All the thinkers I listed were more or less of the same school of thought Schmitt talks about in Political Theology

>>12265050
Hegel was liberal.

>>12265068
Philosophy of Right is an unusual work by Hegel, not reflecting of his normal view on politics, but yes, it is conservative (and a fantastic work)

>>12265258
Love Buchanan. Also Paul Gottfried and Mel Bradford

>>12265376
A little too focused on rhetoric for me, but a nice work

[Anonymous No.12265462]

Sunic's Postmortem Report was pretty good.

[Anonymous No.12265610]

>>12264315
Concerning yourself with the appraisal of plebs. No thanks.

[Anonymous No.12265655]

>>12264918
>literal Nazi
People will take this bait.

[Anonymous No.12266095]

[Anonymous No.12266147]

>>12264532
>there is nothing more psychologically damaging than remaining celibate
Holy fucking shit, I can smell the incel from a mile away. Can you imagine allowing yourself to be so completely controlled by your most basic urges? Can you imagine giving this much of a shit about what other people think about you?

[Anonymous No.12266195]

>>12264019
>was not accomplished by the heroes of the conquistador as a mission of the jus commercii, but in the name of their Christian redeemer and his holy mother Mary.

What does that even mean? I'm Christian, but that seems like some sort of none sense.

[Anonymous No.12266700]

>>12266195
he's saying they conquered not for shekelsbut for God

[Anonymous No.12266709]

>>12264019
>conservative literature thread
>is bombarded by wierdo stormfag larpers

every time

NO I DONT WANT TO READ SIEGE STOP POSTING IT

[Anonymous No.12266969]

>>12265431
Dude you avoid my point like crazy.
Does referring to conservative thinkers make one conservative ? Since referring to Hegel does not make Schmitt liberal, why would it be different there ?
Schmitt was a revolutionary counter-revolutionary.

[Anonymous No.12266990]

>>12264918
"Facist" and "Nazi" are labels that people use when they do not want to descend into the realm of true ideas

[Anonymous No.12267777]

>>12266969
Uhhh, "conservative" as a term originated in Republican France to refer to revolutionary counter-revolutionaries. The "conservatif" faction were the extreme end of the right wing.

All of the thinkers I named pretty much saw eye to eye, very much in Francisco Franco's vein. When Schmitt references Donoso Cortés, he calls him a thinker of his own school, whereas when he references Hegel it's as a perceptive thinker with a "double face".

[Anonymous No.12267783]

>>12264019
Growth of the Soil

[Anonymous No.12267839]

>>12264775
Has the Orthodox church noticed that twenty something reactionaries and traditionalists are flocking in and converting? How about other church members? Genuinely curious.

[Anonymous No.12267958]

>>12267839
Yeah, there is a church near me that is 9/10 converts, including the priest (who is extremely reactionary). Orthodox twitter is where you can observe this all first hand, women in their 20's (often married to other converts) who look normal and tweet mostly about Christianity and every day stuff but hold very reactionary positions

[Anonymous No.12268213]

>>12267958
What country, if you don't mind, been thinking of going to an orthodox service, I'm in central USA

[Anonymous No.12268249]

>>12268213
U.S.

[Anonymous No.12268270]

http://www.liberalismisasin.com/

[Anonymous No.12268300]

>>12264019
Carl Schmitt, like many other German writers, just punches you in the face leaving you defenseless.His Concept of the Political, I still have difficulties wrestling with it. His Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations is sheer genius.

Anyone who knows a great rebuttal against his concept of the political? If it's even possible

[Anonymous No.12268312]

>>12264294
Getting laid had the opposite effect on me.

>>12264300
you go to a club and get drunk

[Anonymous No.12269181]

>>12267777
Does he ever define himself as a conservative ? I doubt so.

[Anonymous No.12269224]

>>12264399
That's because non-subhumans realize true philosophy is occulted.

[Anonymous No.12269532]

Schmitt was reactionary.

Conservatism is a losing proposition, because in the West it is defined as legitimizing the liberal and progressive positions over time (a ratchet of Democracy that only works in 1-dimension).

Here:
http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/moeller/index.html
https://mises.org/library/liberty-or-equality-challenge-our-time
https://mises.org/library/leftism-de-sade-and-marx-hitler-and-marcuse

If you want some true heroin into your dick:
https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/
https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/
www.thedarkenlightenment.com/the-dark-enlightenment-by-nick-land/
https://jim.com/

https://www.libertyfund.org/books/on-power
https://archive.org/details/BurnhamJamesTheMachiavellians
https://archive.org/details/reflectionsofrus00pobeuoft/page/n7
https://mises.org/library/human-action-0

[Anonymous No.12269537]

>>12269532
and
https://mises.org/library/democracy-god-failed-1

[Anonymous No.12269559]

>>12264438
>German conservatism has everything else going for it: aesthetics, metaphysics, philosophy, volkish nationalism, blood and soil, etc.
He said, in English, his speech protected by the first amendment and English respect for individual rights.

We've let you continental faggots be hangers-on for long enough. If you try it again we will annihilate you.

[Anonymous No.12269562]

>>12264442
You're a virgin larping as a Christian but obviously know nothing about Christianity.

[Anonymous No.12269579]

>>12269532
>>12269537
>libertarianism
even worse than conservatism and reaction
please don't compare the fascistic Schmitt to liberals and conservative, he's far ahead from them

[Anonymous No.12269607]

>>12264438
>*starves to death*
>At least it's aesthetic!

[Anonymous No.12269632]

>>12269579
> Moldbug
> libertarian.
> van der Bruck
> libertarian
> James Burnham
> libertarian
> Pobedonostsev
> libertarian
> Carlyle
> libertarian

[Anonymous No.12269638]

>>12264294
I have a loving partner and I get laid everyday, and this stuff along with the jewish school of psychoanalysis are the cutting edge friendo.

[Anonymous No.12269684]

>>12269532
>Schmitt was reactionary
>The most famous fascist political philosopher was a reactionary
yeah no shit

[Anonymous No.12269689]

>>12269684
>famous fascist political philosopher was a reactionary
b-b-u- what about me?

[Anonymous No.12269690]

>>12269632
Conservatism is shit since change is seen as inherently bad.
Due to that, conservatism leads to anarchism since it will lead to fear of the political as sovereign and as capable of making a decision that will lead to a change.
That will lead conservatism to stick to inalterable customs and laws, and to a reduction of the political sphere in order to have the Sovereign not able to change things that need some change.
Which is parallel to liberalism, except liberalism puts its hopes in the rules of the Market. They share the same hate of the Political.
That's what led some to say that "The only real conservatism is anarchism. The only real anarchism is conservatism.". Which is true. Which is also what led Kuehnelt-Leddihn to say he's both liberal and conservative. And that's also why people like Hoppe are both conservative and anarchist, and why he supports abortion, which is purely evil.

Conservatism has an erronated base. It is the cult of decaying structure and the refusal to go further.

As Chesterton said : “The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.”

Instead of being a conservative or a reactionary, be something more revolutionary. Fascism and national-socialism are far more Christian than these idolatries you like.

[Anonymous No.12269697]

>>12264387
The Anglosphere isn't even an autonomous civilization, just a big shard of the Western civilization.

[Anonymous No.12269702]

>>12269689
Heidegger isn't really a political philosopher, unlike Schmitt

[Anonymous No.12269706]

>>12269689
Heiddy was a subjectivist. Bad.

[Anonymous No.12269707]

>>12269702
Donald Trump's (now former) speech writer can't get enough of him in Twitter.

[Anonymous No.12269720]

>>12269707
Of course Heidegger was a fascist, but I said "the most famous fascist political philosopher", and Heidegger isn't a political philosopher. He was a fascist, though.

[Anonymous No.12269727]

>>12269690
>Which is parallel to liberalism, except liberalism puts its hopes in the rules of the Market. They share the same hate of the Political.

If only the liberals would let the market sort it out, but no, that was denied long ago. Their head figures like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau deny that more or less explicitly. Laissez-Fairez capitalist got quickly replaced.

Dialectics is essentially leftist ratchet, which is the nature of politics. Only alternative is to replace it with space. As in, no dialectics, different people live in (hopefully) different place. Patchwork so to speak. But I'd prefer entirely different planet, hell even a station in moon.

[Anonymous No.12269730]

>>12266195
>>12266700
It's kinda half-true. Christopher Colombo genuinely thought he was opening new areas of the world to Christianity and that was one of his purposes in traveling the globe. Cortes and his men were mostly in it for the adventure and the shekels. Christian writers like to pretend than the lofty ideal of a captain can supersede the thousand practical atrocities committed by his men or associates, it's a consequence of their taste for intellectualization. Not that they're all bad, or that it's not common among nonchristians.

[Anonymous No.12269731]

Has anyone read Augusto Del Noce? Gottfried cited him in one of his books and his thought seems interesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Del_Noce

>In some of his best known works [11] he advanced the thesis that Marxism suffers what he called an "heterogenesis of ends," meaning that it is destined to triumph and self-destruct at the same time, due to its internal contradictions. To triumph, because Marx’s radical atheism and materialism are the most consistent outcomes of European rationalism. To self-destruct because, as soon as the revolutionary dream fades away, Marxian historical materialism must degenerate into absolute relativism and open the way to a “perfectly bourgeois” society, a de-humanized world that does not recognize any permanent order of values and in which alienation becomes complete.

>Del Noce wrote extensively[15] about Freudo-Marxism and on the relationship between political progressivism and the sexual revolution. He argued that both of them are rooted in the denial a priori that human reason is capable of reaching meta-empirical truths, and so they are tightly linked with scientism, the dogmatic belief that the empirical sciences are the only form of rationality. The reduction of reason to science goes hand in hand with the reduction of freedom to the satisfaction of instincts, which in turn is expressed politically as fight against “repression” and leads to a radical rejection of all traditional values. He further argued that the scientistic postulate is intrinsically totalitarian, inasmuch it de-legitimates all other forms of knowledge.

>Del Noce also studied in depth the relationship between freedom and authority. In a long essay[16] from 1975 he pointed out that, whereas in the classic and humanistic tradition authority was associated with liberation (e.g. from the power of sub-human instincts and from social manipulation), contemporary culture associates authority with repression. As a result, the modern world confuses authority and power with disastrous effects. In particular, the progressive culture since World War II has associated the defense of freedom with the rejection of metaphysical knowledge and the embrace of relativism. However, any form of liberalism that does not acknowledge the nature of authority must conclude to an even greater oppression, by making the individual completely dependent on society.

[Anonymous No.12269746]

>>12269532
>>12269684
Except Schmitt wasn't a "reactionary" because he understood, like Tocqueville, that democracy has won out in the hearts of the masses and there's no going back. For Schmitt, the challenge is in reforming democracy, either by trying to fix the constitution, getting rid of parliaments or going full NDSAP.

His entire project is wholly anti-liberal though. He was just smart enough to not have any illusions.

[Anonymous No.12269753]

>>12269746
Damn this dude sounds based unironically gotta pick up his stuff soon

[Anonymous No.12269764]

Man, Christfags are the most desperate people. I'm all for Jesus and his teaching but how feverish his "followers" are is grating

[Anonymous No.12269772]

>>12269697
lmao cope, Eurofag.

[Anonymous No.12269777]

>>12269764
> being this upset that the Catholic Church is approx. 2000 years old and will persist when his garbage protestantism burns down in marxist secular hellfire

[Anonymous No.12269781]

>>12265258
If you like conservative German authors I recommend you read Reinhart Koselleck. He is probably the last great conservative historian of that country, as he studied before the "Denazification" of German universities made them submissive to Anglo-American liberal thought. "Critique and Crisis" is considered his main work and even leftist historians consider him important, I remember reading him in college, unlike any other conservative historian, though they downplay his politics and focus on his contributions to conceptual history.

[Anonymous No.12269904]

>>12269706
No he was not, he in fact preferred the dichotomy truth-falsehood, and rejected objective-subjective and Descartes

Heidegger
>there is truth anterior to science and rationalism
Pomos
>so truth is relative and science and reason are oppression??

[Anonymous No.12269913]

>>12269181
Lol he was literally in the Konservative party and was a major figure in the Konservative Revolution

[Anonymous No.12270289]

>>12269913
It was in the 20s lol

[Anonymous No.12270491]

>>12270289
Uh yeah, what's your point? The Concept of the Political was written in 1927. Dictatorship was written in 1921. Political Theology was written in 1922. Political Romanticism was written in 1919

[Anonymous No.12270654]

>>12269904
Heidegger admired Derrida and wished to meet him.

[Anonymous No.12270929]

>>12270654
Utterly beside the point, Maistre admired Napoleon and wanted to meet with him, Nietzsche admired Schopenhauer. The fact is that Heidegger overtly believed that language is supposed to discover being, whereas Derrida believed that language is only self-referential.

[Anonymous No.12270948]

>>12269777
Marxism is 10x more in line with Jesus' teachings than any (((conservative))) is

[Anonymous No.12271002]

>>12270948
Mm, no, not unless you read Jesus according to your left wing homosexual teacher instead of according to Paul. I do agree that Christianity is not friendly toward capitalism tho, especially speculation and usury (which used to be mostly banned, as were wholesale, trading outside market hours, business on holy days, hoarding, working outside your area, etc.)

[Anonymous No.12271211]

>>12270948
you mean Proudhon

[Anonymous No.12271317]

>>12271211
Proudhon is probably the most anti theist socialist theorist there is

[Anonymous No.12272603]

>>12264532
>There is not a more psychologically damaging thing than celibacy.
>Especially in today's world.
Maybe you should go about changing that.

[Anonymous No.12273092]

>>12264387
Perhaps the dumbest post I've seen all year, I really hope you're joking. If not you need to leave Hicksville

[Anonymous No.12273093]

>>12264374
Does Chesterton count?

[Anonymous No.12273195]

>>12269559
America is not in the top 10 of having free speech, your "muh first ammendment" is sad

[Anonymous No.12273221]

August 28, 2018
BRITANNIA INTERIOUSO
"The Eternal Anglo has no sense of nation, thus there can be neither nationalism nor anti-Angloism. Here, within, this tide of the German Ideology insulates Him as a moat swirling into a landbridge of the dead. The carrion of foreign forces hold up the broken stride of Pals battalions, but continue to shudder as if their march strode on in time.
As His forces die - off somewhere in European wars - He sees Himself ever more as the Wound Man. He cuts his biology out of himself as the plagued organ of the smaller continent which can never be encircled. Victory comes as the pestilence of His soul is flung over the walls of continents—at once reconciling the paradox of the state of nature and the social contract with its triumph.
Now the Eternal Anglo chucks his own body over the castle walls; but only because he prefers to be on the receiving end of the pestilence of the soul.
Pyrrhic Victory is the imperial cult of The Eternal Anglo. His siege of the soul has sacked biology to the extent that His physiognomy of speech - that strangely anti-biological speech of the Queen living on through the jaundiced breath of the peasantry - arises from outside of the body, from outside life itself even; just as His state had risen outside of itself. He is a spectral soldier, apart from the crumpets and crumple of his teeth.
And here the dead voices of German folk singers are kept alive within the tone-deaf monarchism of The Eternal Anglo. Only death may sing alone.
Like the crumpets and their aristocratic strumpets, His teeth wander the fields of oceans without need. His spectral being is the occlusion of that which may never close in a bite. But beyond all theologies of power he has managed to capture something within the crude asymmetry of His jaw. The hole which does not resent. The hole which does not grow. The hole which lives beyond any spirit of attack. The hole which marches forward with neither heroism nor sacrifice nor the cheers of victory, only the endless passivity of forwardness. Against the Earth-March of the Germans He dry-heaves a quaint little garden into a desert.
Only rubble may grow Victory Gardens."
chttp://mandalietmandaliet.blogspot.com/2018/08/britannia-interiouso.html


Anglo civilization will usher the destruction of the human species

[Anonymous No.12273314]

>>12264019
What is the passage trying to point out?

[Anonymous No.12273337]

>>12264294
Actually, having a GF only intensified my views. Thanks, Marta <3

[Anonymous No.12273853]

>>12273314
It's from a supplementary essay. Schmitt's work was attacked for trying to paint imperialism as Christian with the assertion that imperialism was caused by putting material interests over Christianity, and that Christians should apologize for colonialism.

[Anonymous No.12275323]

Discord is a fucking honeypot, stop using it. Literally SPLC and ADL monitor it for 'hate speech'.