[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 111 KB, 520x503, 1_xuw_ptlFYrQkqtu7DlaY0g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12234942 No.12234942 [Reply] [Original]

Is reading Aristotle's Organon necessary to understand Critique of Pure Reason or just helpful?

>> No.12234985

>>12234942
Probably crucial

>> No.12235249

>>12234942
>wanting to read Kant
just fuck up my metaphysics famm

>> No.12236234

if you reached Kant without reading organon that means you read a lot of shit without necessary background and very likely skipped important philosophers. Kill yourself and next time start with the greeks

>> No.12236276

>>12234942

By virtue of the extreme autism required to read Kant, one will have most likely read Aristotle as well. They're bound by a force greater than mere necessity.

>> No.12236279

>>12236234
Fuck the Greeks. The vast majority of what they wrote is self-evident today. What they considered profound we learnt from cartoons.

>> No.12236289

>>12236279
geez I wonder why. Maybe because they laid the foundation for everything we know today

>> No.12236297

>>12236289
Yes. Is that a retort? I think not. We don't need to re-learn what we now understand from childhood.

>> No.12236325

>>12236297
sure you've learned plato's republic and laws and aristotle's metaphysics in childhood buddy.
By that reason, no philosopher should be read at all, not judt the greeks