[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 10 KB, 480x360, angryblackkid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12188596 No.12188596 [Reply] [Original]

>should of

>> No.12188602

>>12188596
There is nothing wrong with using fewer letters to get across the same point. It saves ink.

>> No.12188603

Sounds close enough to should've.

>> No.12188610

>>12188602
it's a single apostrophe man

>> No.12188616

>>12188610
What? I'm talking about replacing 'have' with 'of' in the congiant 'should have'.

>> No.12188622

>I
Hate when people write that, like we know it's you fuck.

>> No.12188625

>>12188622
blame english teachers for making the usage of I ambiguous. There's either an extreme contempt present for anyone who uses it "excessively" or worse a feigned puzzlement if you don't use it to signify who the subject is. Trust me its their fault and no one else's. I am certain of this.

>> No.12188627

>>12188616
should've

>> No.12188629

>>12188625
There's no reason to ever use it. People are smart enough to know you are present.

>> No.12188630

>>12188627
But adding the apostrophe is now three characters instead of just two if it were 'should of'.

>> No.12188634

Officially the dumbest thread on /lit/ right now.

>> No.12188635

>>12188629
Then why did they forget my birthday?

>> No.12188636 [DELETED] 

>>12188630
Fucking Jew. Admit that you just revealed your complete retardation.

>> No.12188647

>>12188636
Explain to me how I'm wrong. Is two a smaller number than three?

>> No.12188648

>>12188630
not if you count the space but i get you is why i originally said >>12188610 it's a very miniscule character
you do save ink i guess

>> No.12188659

>>12188647
"should of" is not a valid contraction of "should have" regardless of how many characters are involved.

>> No.12188664

I just write: "shoulda".
Yes, I do have a very big IQ.

>> No.12188666

>>12188659
Yes it is. It makes the exact same sound when read outloud.

>> No.12188672

>>12188666
they're, there and their all make the same sound when said out loud but they're not interchangeable. "Should of" is blatantly incorrect, it's a misspelling.

>> No.12188681

>>12188672
>when said out loud but they're not interchangeable

Well maybe they should be. We could just spell it 'ther' and use the context of the rest of the sentence to dictate the reader's interpretation of whether it was supposed to be 'there, their, or they're'. I think people could figure it out.

>> No.12188686

>>12188664
it's a stupid question i know but there won't be a better chance to ask
shouldn't it be shouldda? like gotta
shoulda is accepted already i just wonder how it works
i don't know the etiquette on that

>> No.12188689

>>12188659
*irregardless

>> No.12188690

>>12188686
gotta = got+to
shoulda = should+have

>> No.12188700

>>12188689
When I was at Oxford there were chinks that unironically said this. Noticed it during my first lecture. The first sign that most people there were remarkably average.

>> No.12188706

>>12188681
What do you hope to gain by putting on like this?

>> No.12188726

>>12188635
>you are present

noooow you get it

>> No.12188729

>>12188706
Nothing really but I thought maybe I could make somebody laugh with these dumb ideas.

>> No.12188754

>>12188596
>I could care less

>> No.12188869

>>12188636
>you're*
Fix'd. :')

>> No.12188894

>white people saying ' ain't'
Should such people be shot on sight?

>> No.12188931
File: 11 KB, 259x194, blicky.status.quantified.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12188931

>>12188690
>shoulda = should+uh
Pic related.

>> No.12188944
File: 12 KB, 474x474, digits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12188944

>>12188700
>irregardless
It is becoming cemented as being acceptable. It will always be nigger tier to me. Next up.
>flammable
>inflammable

>> No.12188958
File: 19 KB, 1050x346, (dis)agree.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12188958

>>12188729
First rule of the shitposter:
>never admit you are a shitposter
You can:
>insist that you are right no matter what
>baffle them with brilliance while you redirect to further idiocy
>go full retard
but
>never admit you are a shitposter

>> No.12188971

>>12188754
>I could care less
I ask these people:
>Please, quantify the amount that you care at this point
I get baffled stares. I love being me.

>> No.12188972

>>12188894
do you have something against southerners?

>> No.12188982

>>12188894
>white people saying ' ain't'
Well, there is this factor:
>https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ain-t
so I surrender to it.

>> No.12189020

>>12188958
>never admit you are a shitposter

Or what?

>> No.12189026
File: 90 KB, 424x750, abilene.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12189026

>>12188972
I had a friend at my last job that used to substitute the term:
>nigger rigged
with
>southern style
In order to avoid disciplinary action. We were working in a technical environment so it was handy to have a shorthand for describing the condition of equipment without an exhaustive explanation.

>> No.12189031
File: 2.77 MB, 382x554, wizard.casts.pink.mist.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12189031

>>12189020
>Or what?
Or else you destroy the magical illusion.

>> No.12189071

>>12188894
>white people
No such thing, but they are all racist.

>> No.12189081

>Where are you at?

>> No.12189183

>have got

>> No.12189190

>>12189183
You got a problem with that?

>> No.12189274

>muh prescriptivism

>> No.12190397
File: 88 KB, 720x278, prescriptivism.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12190397

>>12189274

>> No.12190403
File: 287 KB, 620x480, 1532459847073.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12190403

>>12188596
>apostrophe s for plurals

>> No.12190891

>>12189031
Admitting your shitposting is still shitposting but worse since its already apparent to everyone isnt funny and is a complete waste.

>> No.12191124
File: 117 KB, 500x566, shitposting.be.like.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12191124

>>12190891
>watch this
>I'll bore them to death by talking about what a boring loser I am
Touché - you got me.

>> No.12191152

>half to
Even better:
>haft to

>> No.12191174

>>12188681
Some people tried to push that in French. Fuck them.

>> No.12191199

>>12191174
Similar things were done in German - which stimulated the development of Ordnung.

>> No.12191212

>"They" can be singular.
>He/she/it goes to the store.
>*They goes to the store.

>> No.12191411
File: 73 KB, 640x426, digititis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12191411

>>12191212
>There is a bunch of faggots over there.
>There is faggots over there.

>> No.12191490

>Can I have a cookie?

>> No.12193002

>>12188894
"ain't" is not and never was ebonics, you dimwit.

>> No.12193131

>>12193002
They adopted it into their parlance and it has ever since been tainted by their touch.