False history

[Anonymous No.12099534]

>Much of antiquity could have been invented by sects or orders of Christians or even Jews, to make it look like their contrived and artificial, utilitarian religions had some basis in human nature or were anticipated by wise men in the past. When, in fact, the entirety of their energy was directed toward suppressing the natural spirit of man, the innate reverence of man for the magnificence inside animals and inside things. In the end, nothing can be trusted, that you can’t see and feel yourself.

>What if there is no firm ground to what we receive from history, and the continuity we think we have is actually a jumbled and confused mess—that events from antiquity have been confused with events from the Middle Ages, for example?

This made me extremely paranoid lads. Any recs for further reading?

[Anonymous No.12099542]

>>12099534
Why don't these people take the 1 week necessary to actually investigate these things before making another /pol/-infographic tier assumption?
Is actual scholarship really so repugnant to these airheaded e-celebs who think wikipedia articles make them master of a subject?
The entire op post is an insult to the whole institution of archeology.

[Anonymous No.12099544]

>>12099542
Get out, modernist

[Anonymous No.12099551]

>>12099542
lol, not even a /pol/tard, but stay mad buddy

I think it's an interesting hypothesis (just that: a hypothesis and nothing more) and thought it worth entertaining a little. Any recs or are you just in this thread to sperg out?

[Anonymous No.12100234]

>>12099534
>dude, what if nothing's real?
>what if everything we know is a lie?
Lmao imagine believing this.
Have some confidence that not everything is some twisted misinterpretation of reality.

[Anonymous No.12100254]

>>12099542
>actually thinking the field of archeology isn't basically 100% conjecture
lmao

[Anonymous No.12100282]

>>12099534
begone chthonic revivalists

[Anonymous No.12100344]

>>12100254
this
carbon dating is all fucked and the results are only used in relation to each other

[Anonymous No.12100371]

>>12100254
>>12100344
extrapolate please

[Anonymous No.12100374]

>>12099534
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)

[Anonymous No.12100380]

>>12099534
fomenko

[Blindspotting No.12100388]

>>12099542
how is this /pol/
at best it's' leftypol