[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 99 KB, 632x650, 1539208926226.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11966511 No.11966511 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any compelling argument theological arguments that incorporate a fully naturalistic view of consciousness? Also is this board or /sci/ better for the philosophical discussion surrounding consciousness?

>> No.11967848

/lit/ or /his/ is probably gonna be better than /sci/. There are always always consciousness discussions on /sci/, but most of them is filled with people who haven't spent more than 5 minutes thinking about it, simply throwing their initial intuitions at each other.

I'm not sure about your question. Naturalism and theology seems incompatible in general, but I guess that comes down to what you really mean by naturalism. If by naturalism we mean something like physicalism, then I think the answer is going to be no, because you can't have things like souls in a purely physical universe.