/lit/ - Literature

File: 17 KB, 220x317, 220px-Immanuel_Kant_(painted_portrait).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Oct 14 22:09:06 2018 No.11934523 [Reply] [Original]

>hurr DURR reason bad because reason

Why is this kind of relativist SJW bullshit popular in philosophy?

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 14 22:15:57 2018 No.11934576 sage the absolute state of this board

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 07:23:16 2018 No.11936276 >>11934523 Read Schopenhauer's critique of Kant

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 07:35:33 2018 No.11936294 >>11934523 its not SJW irts ALL Over because its UNDENIABLE btw it was also the driving force of NAZISM!!! so you are SJW

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 07:45:58 2018 No.11936314 Are not metaphysical notions of e.g. beauty or esthetics inherently absolute? I know this is a bait thread but still.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 09:09:33 2018 No.11936549 If you want to read somebody who actually criticizes reason, don't read Kant. Read Böhme.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 09:10:09 2018 No.11936550 >>11936314 Honestly bait threads are just as cancerous to the board as non-ironic posts.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 09:13:00 2018 No.11936560 >>11936276 i don't read losers

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:11:00 2018 No.11938344 File: 132 KB, 844x974, read.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11934523 >hur durr he critiqued pure reason therefore he must thing all reason is bad Pick up the fucking book, you mong.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:44:30 2018 No.11938513 >>11938344 Also critique means examination here

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:47:13 2018 No.11938524 Why do I sense a naturalist posted this?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:52:49 2018 No.11938546 I am now an anti-natalist

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:53:57 2018 No.11938552 File: 246 KB, 1180x842, notolerance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11934523 i cant believe OP made a thread discussing kant after literally just reading the title

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 16:54:17 2018 No.11938557 >>11936560 Is that why you don't read yourself?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 17:02:48 2018 No.11938603 >>11938552 He didn't even read the title because if he had he would have noticed the PURE which precedes the Reason thereby denoting the type of reason being critiqued. Or maybe he just really is that stupid

Anonymous Mon Oct 15 17:47:37 2018 No.11938839

>>11934523

Kek. I love posts by people who pretend to know philosopher's theories while actually, they don't. Especially when another joins in and they both start fighting.

Dude, Kanf was pro-reason. Read his paralogisms of pure reason. He actually detests any sort of metaphysical assertion of reality, because we can't prove the existence of immaterial objecrs

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 15 18:14:29 2018 No.11938974 >>11938552 You could do the same and at least the first few pages

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]