[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 14 KB, 220x220, 220px-Theodore_Kaczynski_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11878448 No.11878448 [Reply] [Original]

ITT authors pseuds think are deep

pic very related. Babby's first political awakening.

>> No.11878453
File: 16 KB, 220x269, salinger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11878453

>> No.11878473

>>11878448
He's not deep but neither are you for calling his fans out.

>> No.11878484

>>11878473
I am balls DEEP in your moms vagoo you edgy unabomber fanboi

>> No.11878488
File: 11 KB, 171x266, 198384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11878488

>> No.11878489

DFW

>> No.11878494

>>11878484
Necrophilia can't be fun when they've been ded for over a decade.

>> No.11878500

>>11878494
cringe

>> No.11878985

>>11878500
It's not a joke, she's actually dead.

>> No.11879005

>>11878448
>Posts every possible /lit/ philosopher
Hmm, I don't feel superior enough
>Posts every famous philosopher
I'm getting there, but still don't feel good enough about myself
>Posts every philosopher
I am almost.. there...
>Posts every person
I AM SUPERIOR TO EVERYONE HAHAHHA

A thread died for this. You guys realize you can't prove a guys ideas invalid by calling them pseuds, right? And of course none of you are confident enough to post your own contrary (precisely because you are trapped in the maze of ironic contrarianism and you don't know what you genuinely believe!)

>> No.11879626

>>11879005
/Thread

>> No.11879630

>>11879005
>Someone called my favorite philosopher a pseud so I have to prove to everyone I'm not a pseud

>> No.11879633

>>11879005
kek relax you incel

>> No.11879634

>>11879005
Ok pseud

>> No.11879639

>>11879005
this might have any merit if that one faggot didn't constantly spam ted threads
also we all know it's you

>> No.11879641

>>11879639
I've never read Unabomber and I don't plan to.

>> No.11879643

>>11878448
How 'bout instead we do authors that geniuses think are deep.

pic very related. The degree to which someone is capable of understanding and appreciating Wittgenstein's work is unironically perhaps the best intelligence around (along with one's ability to do pure math).

>> No.11879647
File: 18 KB, 220x306, 220px-35._Portrait_of_Wittgenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11879647

>>11879643
f u q

>> No.11879651

>>11878985
>having your mother actually be dead
Cringe

>> No.11879658

>>11879651
based

>> No.11879659

>>11879630
Kierkegaard and stirner were never mentioned. This isn't about me, this is about annoying pointless lazyposting which is equivalent to saying "I don't like this guy" over and over again with an image attached of a (bonus contrarian points if famous) philosopher. At least that would have some comedic value, this doesn't have any value.

>> No.11879685

>>11879659
>Kierkegaard and stirner
lol

>> No.11879723

>>11878448
>using the word pseuds
>using the word "deep"

I have bad news for you

>> No.11879776

>>11879659
>kierkegaard and stirner are my favorite philosophers
it would have been less embarrassing if you had the meme /pol/man as your favorite instead of the meme-christian-but-totally-for-intelligent-people mascot and mr youre all my property aka edgy-sixteen-year-old's-angst-against-their-stepdaddy-personified.

>> No.11879785

>>11879685
>>11879776
Announcement everyone: after 150+ years Kierkegaard has finally been BTFO!

>> No.11879788

>>11879005
>A thread died for this
and? it was probably a shitpost too.
>Kierkegaard and stirner
oh I see, you're a retard.

>> No.11879804

>>11879651
Basted and retardpilled.

>> No.11879844

>>11879788
>>11879776
It was inevitable I would be criticized for sharing my beliefs, for you already saw me in a negative light. At least I'm brave enough to post mine though then to facetiously tear others down with no reason to do so like a coward lol.

>> No.11879858

>>11879844
>I would be criticized for sharing my beliefs, for you already saw me in a negative light.
>it could have nothing to do with the fact I'm genuinely stupid.
(You)

>> No.11879914

>>11879858
>"You can't refute someone's ideas through shallow name-calling"
>Gets shallow name-called
Whatever you say.

>> No.11879929

>>11879788
>oh I see, you're a retard.
Stirner and Kierkegaard refuted in one sentence

>> No.11879932

>>11879914
who are you quoting?
>>11879929
t. reddit

>> No.11879942

>>11879932
>reddit
Refuted in one word

>> No.11879951

>>11879932
He was saying that you can't refute an idea with a buzzword, then you refuted his idea with a buzzword

>> No.11879962

>>11879942
You seem mad. Maybe you should return to leddit

>> No.11879990

>>11879951
Maybe he should suck my dick?

>> No.11879999

>>11879990
>>11879962
You have proven you are based, passionate about shitposting even when faced with relentless opposition. I admire you. You have won this battle of wits m'lady. *tips

>> No.11880008

>>11879999
but then you got them quads and I had to check em!!!!!!

>> No.11880055
File: 2.00 MB, 438x302, 1538444818467.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11880055

>>11879999
>>11880008
I feel a romance blossoming.

>> No.11880070

>>11880055
Being a sternerite and a Kierkegaardian, the essence of my life philosophy is the ultimate faith and commitment to the individuals creation, and this man has proven he is ultimately committed even when refutation knocks on his front door and demands anal sex, the asshole being the mindhole of his spirit and the dick being my penetrating thoughts that degenerate passion. Your asshole was too tight, so I had to surrender.

>> No.11880100

>>11880055
while that other dude is busy thinking about dicks and assholes and stirner I'm balls deep in his girlfriend.

Looks like she's my property now, cuck!

>> No.11880104

>>11880070
Is that the autists version of "Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?"?(Sonnet 18)
That's pretty romantic, literary romance for all of us to enjoy, sometimes this place is wholesome. You guys should exchange details, shed your anonymous veil.

>> No.11880210

>>11880100
Looks like you will forever resent me. Oh well, I thought you had a chance.

>> No.11880227

>>11879647
>shilling midwittgenstein
well you're in the right thread

>> No.11880343

>>11880210
I only cuck people I care about.

>> No.11880974
File: 224 KB, 1200x800, 1200px-Reggie_Watts_at_PopTech_2011_(a).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11880974

>>11879999
holy fuck check out those quads!!!!

>> No.11881299

>>11879844
>it's brave to share your beliefs on an anonymous image board
Bergson and Spinoza fag here.

>> No.11881661

>>11879005
/lit/ BTFO