[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 129 KB, 1024x768, bible1-1024x768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837003 No.11837003 [Reply] [Original]

Why is /lit/ so Christian compared to other boards?

>> No.11837006

>>11837003
reading makes u smart and if ur smart u realize christianity is the right religion

>> No.11837007

>>11837003
because god is good

>> No.11837018

It's just a meme. Just like most of /g/ posts gentoo and hates on apple constantly yet still uses a MBP with a cheap side thinkpad or battlestation to post.

>> No.11837048

*reads dostoevsky once*

>> No.11837063

because if you read enough about the struggles of the soul of men far greater than you, you'll see the only path to meaning is through God

>> No.11837080

>>11837003
It's faux philosophy. You get to pretend to be clever without having to go beyond a priori's.

>> No.11837094

/pol/ reactionaries flooded the board looking for books to confirm their worldviews. There’s that copy pasta about becoming a Catholic after reading some entry level affirmation-of-faith books but rejecting the sitting Pope because he’s progressive. They’re just “DEUS VULT xD” retards

>> No.11837099

>>11837003
Honestly. I feel like christianity has a significantly stronger presence on all the boards than what you'd expect. I'm sure a lot of them are just larpers though.

>> No.11837109

Christianity is popular metaphysics.

>> No.11837112

>>11837003
it isn't. fuck off with this larping.
it fucking amazes that people still cling to this stuff in this day and age as if they don't even understand the discoveries of the last few centuries
christianity is the ideological equivalent of a renaissance fair

>> No.11837152

>>11837099
>Honestly. I feel like christianity has a significantly stronger presence on all the boards than what you'd expect
r/atheism converted 4chan to Christianity

>> No.11837166

This is a Catholic board. Why do you think the pic in the sticky is the Empyrean?

>> No.11837172

>>11837018
>>11837080
>>11837094
>>11837112
Absolute faggots.

>>11837003
Its because when people are left in an unregulated environment, they tend to lean right and become more religious. It's a natural part of growing up.

>> No.11837193

>>11837003
Its mostly teenie-bopper LARPing

>> No.11837195
File: 37 KB, 650x390, saint augustine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837195

>>11837063
well said.

>> No.11837211

>>11837193
>>11837172
Congrats, you get added to the faggot list.

>> No.11837225

>>11837003
Muh Deus Vult /pol/tards or Anons seeking any form of spiritual meaning and community past 4chan and their dead end lives that are not sated with anime waifus, porn, video games, or Internet browsing.

>> No.11837231

>>11837003
Other boards are full of brainlets, /lit/ is full of high-IQlets
>be brainlet
>want to understand religions
>come to your conclusions through peer pressure and whatever you see in hollywood, reject Christianity cause your only exposure to it is retarded evangelicals

>be high-IQlet
>want to understand religions
>read the scriptures of various faiths as well as the writings of the followers of these faiths. Combine your readings with healthy dosages of history and philosophy. Come to realize that the only man who can bring people to God is Christ the King, and the only true God is the undivided trinity. Worship him in spirit and in truth

>> No.11837246

>>11837225
You say that like it’s a bad thing.

>> No.11837276

>>11837094
>/pol/ is christian
>>11837112
>muh progress makes christianity less plausible. yes, the bible is a science textbook!
>>11837109
this, hence /his/ is quite christian too

>> No.11837297

>>11837276
lmao try going to an actual smart board like /sci/ sometime

they have daily threads that BTFO of any christians or 'muh idealism' tards who happen to wander over there

tis quite amusing

>> No.11837315

>>11837003
Because Christianity is the backbone of the western literary tradition, especially since they destroyed so many works that didn't fit in their tradition.

>> No.11837316

>>11837297
>actual smart board
>BTFO
>tis quite amusing
YHTGB

>> No.11837327
File: 7 KB, 250x241, 1432724756686s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837327

>>11837297
>reddit spacing
Why does he do it

>> No.11837332

>>11837003
Lurker here, I cant speak for the rest of the board, but as a Catholic who grew up playing video games nonstop, there isn't exactly a whole lot of people that are like minded. So of course I end up on /v/, and after being on /v/ for a bit, I eventually came to the conclusion that video games were making it hard for me to function as well as making me generally lazy and nihilistic. But you can't just quit video games, you have to replace it with something better, so I chose reading to get, hopefully, closer to God in the process of acquiring the taste for reading. So naturally the switch to /lit/ just makes sense. Knowing that I'm not special and I'm fairly average, I wouldn't be surprised if many of the lurker anons on this board have similar stories.

>> No.11837422
File: 128 KB, 308x308, 1516254856464.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837422

>>11837112
>current year posting in 2018

>> No.11837428

>>11837422
>When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. 8 If she does not please her master, who has designated her[b] for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed.
>thou shalt not cover their neighbor's ox
yeah, real applicable to modern times

>> No.11837433

>>11837003
this is a literature board. do you realise the significance of the bible as a piece of literature? dumb post, op.

>> No.11837436

>>11837003
religion taken in as a whole is pretty much the highest form of art that has ever existed by far. the fact that people actually think the point of the bible, millenia later, was to let people know about some dude in the sky is testament to its power and beauty

>> No.11837486
File: 1.59 MB, 325x235, 1495664166319.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837486

>>11837428
>applicable

>> No.11837494

>>11837297
>an actual smart board like /sci/
>Anybody on /sci/ btfo'ing anybody about anything
Come now

>> No.11837505

>>11837112
Give five common arguments for evolution, list the three most common objections to each one, and then the most common retorts to each one of these objections.

>> No.11837574

>>11837428
Incredible how ignorant you are. The ceremonial and judicial laws of ancient Israel have never applied to Gentiles such as you and I. The moral laws do.
Even if "thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's ox" was a standalone command, it would still obviously implicate a more general command--do not covet. But it's not a standalone command and you've botched what the verse actually says. Exodus 20:17

>> No.11837617

>>11837112
>Fedora tips down to Earth's molten core

>> No.11837622
File: 55 KB, 300x406, Transfig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837622

>>11837006
Smart people are prideful and are easily tricked by Satan.
>>11837018
There is no doubt that at least some people are "Christposting" as a meme, but not all.
>>11837094
Christianity does not confirm the worldview of /pol/, which is a racialist worldview directly contradicted by Christianity.
>>11837112
This argument is weak and tired. The discoveries of the last few centuries do not contradict Christianity (the theory of common descent is false).
>>11837152
Probably partially true (for those who are actual converts.
>>11837193
Undoubtedly partially true
>>11837231
This.
>>11837297
/sci/ doesn't know anything and is one of the worst boards on the entire site.
>>11837428
Extending the logic of this argument would mean that any specific instance that occurred in the past could be considered irrelevant because of the specificity of the event, which is obviously not true. Jesus' commands to specific people are very obviously supposed to be extrapolated into general lessons. There are also typological meanings to verses that are "irrelevant", including all of the laws, sacrificial provisions, conquests, and genealogies.

>> No.11837626

>>11837003
God is not real

>> No.11837631
File: 42 KB, 300x435, christ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837631

>>11837626
God is three persons in one.

>> No.11837635

>>11837428
>implying I don't live in a primitive shithole where slavery is still a thing and oxen are a source of wealth and pride
Typical self-centered Western wh*te scum.

>> No.11837642

>>11837436
>religion taken in as a whole is pretty much the highest form of art that has ever existed by far

>implying religion can be compared with something so childish as art

I hope you like eternal fire, anon.

>> No.11837647

>>11837631
God is not real, you are lying to yourself.

>> No.11837699

>>11837422
Based ironypost

>> No.11837703

>>11837003
It’s weak bait, along with credulous children that aren’t in on the joke.

>> No.11837765

>>11837003
Because this is the only place where christian philosophy and theology can be discussed without rancid shitposting or twisting of the meaning behind the writings.

>> No.11837784

>>11837094
>/pol/
>reactionary
pick one
I doubt even a single one of them has read de Maistre or Carlyle.

>> No.11837795

>>11837703
This is weak bait. /lit/ has the best theological threads of any board (although that's not saying much).

>> No.11838127

>>11837622
Thanks for typing all this out so I wouldnt have to. You would think a board like this would be smarter when it comes to religion instead of just parroting emotional reddit atheism. Peace be with you.

>> No.11838145

>>11837231
Its even more complicated than that. One of the smartest people I know is a creationist lmao its all ove the fuck shop

>> No.11838152

Christianity has a long literary tradition? I mean there are many LARPERS but stop playing coy

>> No.11838167

>>11837428
>clearly an imbicile dudebro
>is dishonest enough to claim that he wouldn't be proud of owning an ox

>> No.11838201

Many Brothers actually take to battle on /lit/ and I applaud them.
This is the only board that has individuals that are not of the faith yet that might take the values Christianity has as serious.

>>11837063
For this statement here, if you take part in the community on /lit/ long enough, you'll see how this is true.

>> No.11838214

>2006/7 - Atheists at the height of their power, with Hitchens and Dawkins running in their veins. They post gay comments on VenomFangX videos and watch TheAmazingAtheist daily.
>2010/11 - The fedora meme emerges, atheists, absolutely seething after being btfo by the entire world go into hiding out of shame. Christians preach openly once more despite a tough post-9/11 terrorism culture where people focus on religious wars.
>2016 - The atheists come up with a plan to out-meme christians by calling them christLARPers, in a hope that people will forget the fedora meme and take them seriously.
I feel like the christLARPer meme is dying slowly, and that the materialist STEMfaggot meme has won. I think this is because /lit/ generally has a problem with STEMfaggots and materialists who don't "get" books or reading anything that isn't a science textbook.

>> No.11838219

>>11838152
>he has never observed a single biblical allusion in any literature
I know most of /lit/ stopped reading after high school, but this...

>> No.11838228
File: 939 KB, 250x267, unnamed (6).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838228

I have a question for the legitimate Christians here.

What made you come to the conclusion that Christianity was correct, instead of say, Islam? Why do you believe Christ is the Son of God and that God is a trinity? If you had been born in an Islamic country, wouldn't you likely have come to the conclusion that Muhammad is God's last prophet and that God is a unity?

>> No.11838247

>>11838228
>I can predict your religion based on your geographical location
Consider reading something other than Dawkins. What is true for the masses is not true for the critical-thinking individual. It's not worth engaging with the masses (aka p-zombies, aka NPCs, aka bugmen).

>> No.11838250

>>11838228
Islam's violence makes it self-defeating. Christianity on the other hand can alternate between violence and pacifism quite effectively when need be.

>> No.11838259

>>11837003
what if the bible was written by satan to make people act exactly as he wanted to and not follow the real god that would have made us actually happy?

>> No.11838271

>>11838250
Is Islam really more violent than Christianity though? Yes the Muslim world is struggling with sectarian violence now, but that wasn't always the case. And it's not like Christianity hasn't had its share of violence too, and violence committed by true believers no less.

>> No.11838279
File: 269 KB, 800x869, 1509568555617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838279

>>11838228
I became convinced that the Resurrection had to be true. Islam denies that the Resurrection is real, but for me it's too compelling and too powerful a thing to deny. Islam NEEDS the Resurrection to be false, but it simply isn't. And if the Resurrection is true, then all of Christianity is true.

>> No.11838285

>>11838247
But you can't seriously think the fact you came from a Christian country had no bearing on your decision? Your history, culture, morals, identity, aesthetics, etc. have all been strongly influenced by Christianity, that would clearly have an effect on your attitude towards it?

>> No.11838289
File: 509 KB, 1438x650, Screwtape on :lit:.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838289

>> No.11838292

>>11838279
Fair enough. Might I ask what convinced you the resurrection was real?

>> No.11838295

Religion, especially xtans/Jews/mudpoops I'd a murderous ideaology that is a plauge on human existence, literally killed billions and set us back thousands of years of progress

>> No.11838296
File: 511 KB, 1437x652, screwtape on :lit: 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838296

>>11838289

>> No.11838306

>>11838292
Some of it is my own strange experiences with the Christian religion, things I can't fully explain without recourse to the divine.

Beyond that, the Wikipedia article is unironically good place to begin:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection_of_Jesus

When you remove the objection that it's impossible for someone who has died to come back to life, the facts really start to align to support the Resurrection as an event in history.

>> No.11838307

>>11838228
Christianity conforms with my experiences. Take, for instance, the existence of evil. I constantly do bad things that I don't really want to do, and, no matter how hard I try, I can't consistently do things that are morally good and that I know would be good for me. The Christian concept of original sin explains this, while the Islamic lack of original sin doesn't. It seems obvious to me that our world, and our lives, are in a profound state of brokenness, one that we are completely unable to fix on our own. No amount of discipline or knowledge can solve that problem, only the loving intervention of God.

>> No.11838318

>>11838228
>What made you come to the conclusion that Christianity was correct, instead of say, Islam?
Genetic fallacy.
>Why do you believe Christ is the Son of God
As >>11838279 says, it all rests on the resurrection. If you want this line of thinking explained in detail, William Lane Craig does a pretty good job. But as a crash course:
Even non-Christians were writing about Jesus the Nazarine less than 80 years after his lifetime. If the apostles were lying, the authorities could've put a stop to the whole thing by just opening the tomb and exposing them. Clearly they did this and it was empty, if the tomb was indeed empty, then it's unlikely the apostles took it out and hid it because, firstly, it's rather odd that so many men would choose to die and suffer horrible deaths for persecution of this prank on the Jewish and Roman authorities, and secondly, it doesn't explain the nearly 500 people that saw Jesus after his death. Mind you, the scripture gives names of some of those people, and we're not talking about today where there's 7 billion people. Back then, if you read "James from x saw him", you can just go to that region and find out the old man who claims he saw Jesus back in his youth.
As for trinity, that's much harder and needs more than a few books to explain.
>>11838271
>Is Islam really more violent than Christianity though?
Yes, way more violent.
>Yes the Muslim world is struggling with sectarian violence now
Do you understand what the sects have been fighting over? Who was the rightful leader of Muhammed's army after his death. This isn't a fresh dispute over some oil. This is a dispute that stems back right to the beginning. Furthermore, we just breezed over one tiny little fact. Muhammed had an army of some 3,000 men. Jesus was a carpenter that got NAIL'd by the Romans. We're comparing apples and oranges here. One taught love, the other taught conquering.

>> No.11838319

>>11838228
I feel the main factor for my belief that Jesus is the son of God is the historical events around Jesus' death and resurrection. Jesus was a doer, and not only a talker. There are a lot of people who say crazy shit in the world, but none who have worked miracles like Jesus did. Mohammed "rewites" the history to make it work for him, and I think he lied as part of a grab for power. He tells people that he is a prophet, but does nothing to show it. There are a lot of empty words which seem just a little too convenient for Mohammed himself.
Those who are born in middle eastern countries into muslim families do not know the truth, and it isn't their fault because nobody is there to tell them. They might still be saved, but I don't know. I can only hope.

>> No.11838323

>>11838285
My father's religion was scientism. My culture's religion is atheism.
Yes, the beliefs of those directly around you shape an incredibly strong bias, a bias that the masses never even consider challenging. The beauty of reading is that through it I realized the utmost importance of engaging in the great conversation critically and without bias. It's one of the most difficult things for a person to do, and yet it is folly to claim that one can genuinely seek the truth.

>> No.11838335

>>11838323
cannot genuinely seek the truth*

It's not comfortable to find out that your father's religion and your culture's religion are lies. Most never seek the truth because living comfortably is what matters to people today.

>> No.11838343

>>11838295
other anons already beat you to the progress meme. better get on it faster next time

>> No.11838356

>>11838228
It's hard to answer what-ifs like that, especially as someone raised Christian. The arguments I find convincing, though, are the Neoplatonist and Aristotelian points on the nature of relationships within Being. And the moral as being part and parcel of existence and of God's nature makes more sense than the idea of morality as arbitrary and the divine as unknowable that seems more prevalent in Islam, whereas a God "bound" in matters of truth and moral judgment by His own nature is something nearly universal in Christianity.

The historical evidence for Christianity over Islam seems pretty strong, especially given Islam's view of Jesus as an actual prophet. The tenets of Islam regarding that aren't compatible with sources as early as we have for Christian teachings.

Plus, as other poster mentioned, original sin is something that describes human nature better than alternative moral views.

>> No.11838357

You have to be low IQ to be a Christian.

>> No.11838359

>>11838228
Is there a God? -> What is the nature of God? (theistic, pantheistic, etc.) -> [if theistic] Who is God?

Ultimately what I realized after living for years as a nihilist is that everyone has faith in something--how foolish I was to once think that I was incapable of faith.
Reading is an excellent way to quickly distinguish between truths and lies--lies cannot hide so well on paper as they do in the messages from society.

>> No.11838365

>>11837003
Religion demands study and devotion

>> No.11838371

>>11838356

>The historical evidence for Christianity

>original sin describes human nature

You have to be retarded to believe this.

>> No.11838376

>>11838371
>reddit spacing
like clockwork

>> No.11838388

>>11838376

>muh reddit

This is what christards do nowadays since they have no evidence to back up their beliefs?

>> No.11838391

>>11838318
Knowledgeable anon. WLC, though no authored saint, seems to do a good job with layman Christianity. /lit/ correctly recommends Aquinas, Augustine, Kierkegaard, etc.
>>11838359
This. Used to think that rationality was in conflict with faith.

>> No.11838393

>>11838388
>both reddit and a dawkins-tier materialist
it just keeps getting better

>> No.11838395

>>11838228
>What made you come to the conclusion that Christianity was correct, instead of say, Islam?
Personal revelation.
>Why do you believe Christ is the Son of God and that God is a trinity?
Because I understand the divinity of the power of 3.

>> No.11838400

>>11838250
but the faith isn't the same thing as how people interpret it or practice it or attribute actions to it

>> No.11838401

>>11838388
If you actually read you'd realize that among authors, the consensus on human nature is near-unanimous. Please elaborate how it is retarded to believe that christianity accurately represents human nature. Or do you name call because you have nothing to back up your bias?

>> No.11838403

>>11837003
Because the bible is literature? And not bad literature at that.

>> No.11838405

>>11838393

>muh materialist meme

Wow, no wonder religious people are so afraid of literacy and evidence. Their whole ideology is contingent on faith.

>> No.11838409

>>11838405
>he doesn't realize that his whole ideology is contingent on faith
Consider not arguing against 1:1 creationists when I have never seen one on /lit/.

>> No.11838410

>>11838401

Christianity makes tons of faith-based claims. It's not my fault that Christians can't evidently demonstrate these claims critically.

>> No.11838415

>>11838410
Do you even understand what Faith is anon

>> No.11838418

>>11838405
if you want this knowledge regarding god then you must approach the research with faith.
don't worry about how crazy other religious people are, as you claim- gaining knowledge is an individual pursuit, especially when pertaining to one's own relationship with god.

>> No.11838419

>>11838391
>WLC, though no authored saint, seems to do a good job with layman Christianity
In a certain way, he reminds me of C.S Lewis. He does a great job at explaining what and why Christians believe to those outside the faith. Once you start with them, then your world can open up with Aquinas imho

>> No.11838422

>>11838415

In the same way that there are space reptilians takes faith to believe, yeah.

>> No.11838434
File: 73 KB, 1000x563, 15462457246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838434

>>11838228
>Conversion
>subjective experience of a knowing and righteous God
>conviction in the Spirit through recognition of His perfect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOx-fTD49BQ

>> No.11838437

>>11838388
>>11838405
>>11838410
>>11838422
read Augustine's Confessions

>> No.11838436

>>11838422
So your answer is 'No'.

>> No.11838439

>>11838401

Sweetie what 'consensus'? What church taught you that?

>> No.11838440

>>11838419
I'm new to Christian philosophy, what Aquinas do you recommend?

>> No.11838447

>>11838437

Why should I believe anybody's religious experiences?

>> No.11838450
File: 1.32 MB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20180410-121943_Reddit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838450

I implore /lit/ to listen to these videos.
Remove your personal bias and be open to what he says.

Jesus was an iconoclast, and made into a icon.
Buddha was an iconoclast, and made into a icon.

https://youtu.be/Sr1oIATudD4
https://youtu.be/jwocywANpfQ

>> No.11838452

>>11838356
can you rec some readings about all this?

>> No.11838456

>>11838440
Summa of the Summa, because if you try to tackle Summa Theologica as a newbie it'll really bog you down.

>> No.11838463

>>11837622
Become a priest and ascend to the papacy. I'm being serious.

>> No.11838465

I mean, I'm not even an atheist redditfag and you guys wouldn't last a day on a sub like r/trueatheism for instance.

>> No.11838467

>>11838450
>/lit/ giving eastshit the time of day
unlikely

>> No.11838468

>>11838456
thanks friend

>> No.11838470

>>11838447
As their own testimony to provide themselves their Faith, yes.

>> No.11838473

>believing in Jewish scribbles
Please go back to /pol/ if you indulge in these Semitic fabrications

>> No.11838474
File: 29 KB, 325x499, 41E6TKQH9RL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838474

>>11838228
https://youtu.be/t-ZeDPBDyZE?t=4m27s
if the link doesn't work correctly the timestamp is 4:27

>> No.11838478

>>11838450
>Jesus a iconoclast
Bro, he bore the Law Heavily upon the people. He provided reckoning that was promised by the Prophets.

>> No.11838482

>>11838470

Why is it that different cultures and societies have different religious and mystical experiences? That and a lot of these experiences can be explained.

>> No.11838486

>>11838467
Was that supposed to be an attack on my suggestion? Or, that /lit/ in general is always dismissive of ideas that stem from the East.

Either way, closed-mindedness is ignorance.

>most of /lit/ is ignorant.

>> No.11838489

>>11838465
ooo scary

>> No.11838492

>>11838478
Just watch the video, or at the very least the shorter video. Please, then you can shit on me.

>> No.11838496

>>11837018
>>11837080
>>11837193
>>11837225
>>11837297
>>11837436
>>11837703
>>11838473
With arguments like these...

>> No.11838502
File: 271 KB, 1508x1000, christ chan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838502

>>11838473
>>11838465

>> No.11838504

>>11838489

I agree, literacy is scary for religious people.

>> No.11838512

>>11838502
Christ-chan should wash her mouth

>> No.11838513

>>11837332
Pretty much this, but I still play some games

>> No.11838516

>>11838371
In this case the historical evidence in question is that Christian teaching within a decade of events in question are completely incompatible with the Islamic versions. No more, no less. Please set aside any atheistic bias and see the point in context.
Original sin as a description of human nature? Not sure how that's flawed. We're obviously rational beings that have a tendency to do bad and ill-advised things, but if you accept the "evil as privation", original sin is about the only thing that makes sense of human behavior. (that is an entire argument of its own, but it's pretty hard to have a moral system and a positively existing evil)
>>11838388
>This is what christards do nowadays since they have no evidence to back up their beliefs
>You have to be retarded to believe this.
Something something casting the first stone... Ad hominem dribble gets ad hominem drabble in response.
>>11838410
>>11838422
You're misunderstanding the nature of faith and reasons for belief as understood by Christians. If you enter a debate, at least understand the terms involved.

>>11838452
Original sin and Christian vs Islamic ideas of the divine as absolute truth vs authoritarian, try Chesterton (iirc Orthodoxy had a good section,) and Belloc's Great Heresies (specifically the part on Islam). Look through the earliest Christian writings (new testament, church fathers) and compare them to Islamic beliefs for what Jesus as a prophet in Islam's understanding would require.

>> No.11838520

>>11838492
No

>> No.11838524

>>11838482
Because mystical parts of religion are an objective part of human life, as is God.

>> No.11838526
File: 1.48 MB, 2528x1364, redcapeforbrainlessbull.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838526

>>11838504
Yes; clearly.

>> No.11838529

>>11838504
>le most geniuses were atheists
they weren't.

>> No.11838532
File: 62 KB, 1361x697, atheism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838532

>>11838465
>you guys wouldn't last a day

>> No.11838536

>>11838520
Okay, pseud.

>> No.11838538

>>11837647
How do you Know?

>> No.11838545

>>11838516

Nope, faith is belief in a claim. There's no 'misunderstanding', it's simple as that.

>> No.11838547
File: 1.50 MB, 2338x1445, morebooksthanyouwilleverread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838547

>>11838504
Very much so.

>> No.11838548

>>11838516
thanks for the books lad

>> No.11838550

>>11838529

I never said that but ok. Most 'geniuses' were overrated anyway.

>> No.11838555

>>11838532
>forcefeeding me with pride and arrogance
STOP

>> No.11838558

>>11838526
>>11838547
fuck

>>11838532
lol

>> No.11838562

>>11838526
>>11838547

What is this supposed to show? Literacy involves understanding what you read. Most religious people filter their understanding through biased stuff.

>> No.11838565
File: 321 KB, 782x788, 1530660186801.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838565

>>11838532
>literally advocating for living life with the mentality of a dog

>> No.11838566

>>11838228
Raised christian, had doubts in middle/high school, realized some pitfalls with materialism and other viewpoints, stuck to my faith, studied some philosophy, saw some great arguments in favor, intuition (nature's beauty, etc.) told me I was correct, faith strong as ever.

>> No.11838568

>>11838562
>Most people filter their understanding through biased stuff.
FTFY. Don't bother engaging with the masses anon.

>> No.11838569

>>11838562
Almost everyone filters their information through their existing worldview you goalpost shifting cuck. The point is that there is a 2000 year tradition of scholarship, debate, and theological reflection on Christianity, which anyone can read and examine to determine the truth of its claims.

>> No.11838570

Is it even possible to become Christian these days if you weren't raised that way?

>> No.11838572

>>11838562
>Most religious people filter their understanding through biased stuff.
All people do. Or do you believe in heliocentrism?

Whilst scientific data may be correct every now and then, all models made after it are biased and flawed. No exceptions.

>> No.11838575

>>11838570
I've seen it happen but the internet fucks everything up

>> No.11838579

>>11838575
I want so bad to believe in an eternal being that loves me but it just seems like LARPing

>> No.11838582

>>11838450
>>11838492
The shorter video makes no convincing argument. His first argument relies on the entire group of Jesus' disciples making the same mistakes with absolutely no record of dispute on the matter, and literally no one remembering the correct version of the original teachings of Christ for generations after.
"Christianity is an impossible religion"- and he misses the point again. "Guilt as a virtue"- demanding perfection of people is not insanity, it is the aim. I'm not sure what lesser goal someone should pursue in the moral sphere. What is religion for, if not to make us holy? "I'll do penance, and go and sin again"- has he even read a catechism? Listened to a priest? I've never heard a priest indicate what he says is universally preached from the pulpit. Waste of 10 minutes. Why the heck were people applauding that?

>> No.11838585
File: 162 KB, 900x617, matador-and-bull-clarence-alford.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838585

>>11838562
Subpar cope seen coming from miles away. And you now you can read the filenames, toro.

>> No.11838586

>>11838569

>almost everyone filters their information through their existing worldview

Great, so you admit that your ideology binds you.

>> No.11838590

>>11838570
Yes, if you're already a reader, it's almost no challenge at all. Join a body of believers if you want to get involved (you should). Nicest people I've ever met have been from church groups.

>> No.11838592

>>11838570
the current culture is very much against you, but you can. I was raised by two atheist parents and am converting now, it's not always easy, but it's getting easier every day with God's help.

>> No.11838597

>>11838570
Why wouldn't it be? The process is the same as always, you just start believing it's true and convert

>> No.11838598

>>11838405
What's wrong with faith?

>> No.11838602

>>11838597
>you just start believing it's true
That's the hard part. Going from "this seems like it actually accurately describes the human condition" to "jesus was literally God"

>> No.11838603

>>11838409
I'm orthodox, so creationist. Now you've seen one

>> No.11838607

>>11838586
Imagine being this guy
>>11838579
I used to feel that way, that I had no faith. Read into philosophy, theology, engage in the arguments, etc.--you have to arrive at the truth on your own. What convinced me was realizing that every ideology requires faith. Faith is not necessarily in conflict with human reasoning.

>> No.11838608

>>11838598

Faith is an obstruction.

>> No.11838609

>>11838579
I think you should read some of the stuff recommended in this thread and think about it.

>> No.11838614

>>11838592
God bless you anon.

>> No.11838618

>>11838579
>>11838609
and yeah, if you're really interested I think the best thing to do is get involved in a church or something of the sort regardless of your doubts and try not to give up on it all quickly

>> No.11838619

>>11838607

You don't have to be entangled in philosophy and theology. Those are just thought traps.

>> No.11838620

>>11838608
You have faith placed in some core beliefs right now, anon.

>> No.11838621

>>11838602
Start going to church, or at least reading the Bible regularly and praying. You might feel silly praying to a God who you don’t yet believe it, but it’s important. Faith is a gift from God, not something you can develop on your own. Over time the Spirit will move within you and you’ll begin to feel the presence of God

>> No.11838622

>>11838579

Why do you want to? Love is overrated.

>> No.11838623

>>11838608
To what? Depends on your goals. In fact, one of my main reasons for going cold on the faith front is its opposition to my vengeful nature.

>> No.11838625

>>11838619
>using terms such as "thought traps" or "masturbatory," ever
>using such terms towards philosophy in general
I feel genuine pity anon.

>> No.11838627

>>11838621

aka willfully delude myself into thinking a magic entity is inside me

>> No.11838631

>>11838608
Faith doesn't obstruct anything, it goes beyond reason. when you are dealing with a all powerful God how do you expect to know Him in any other way. You can reason your way pretty far in a physical universe. But eventually it is your own reason which becomes the obstruction. To reach beyond you need faith. You can verify that Jesus existed, did X Y or Z, as far as you can using reason, but how do you believe that he was the son of God? You need to trust in Him and have faith in Him.

>> No.11838635
File: 302 KB, 1191x1569, IMG_7400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838635

>>11838621
>You might feel silly praying to a God who you don’t yet believe

>> No.11838636

>>11838608
Do you not have faith in the Primary logical laws?

>> No.11838638

>>11838627
No, allow yourself the possibility of experiencing the transcendent God. A good metaphor is a romantic relationship. You can’t ignore your gf completely and expect her to fawn over you, you have to put yourself out on a limb and commit yourself to the act of loving, risking something in order to achieve a great reward. In religious terms, this is what Kierkegaard calls the leap to faith.

>> No.11838640

>>11838631

I can have faith in yeti trans-psychic healing and delude myself into verifying its reality. Doesn't actually show anything.

>> No.11838641
File: 13 KB, 250x346, Ne(ckbea)ro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838641

>>11838627
All experience you have is molding your physical form and appearance. The effect is real, so the source is real. Just by feeding emotions you can change your appearance.

"Nothing" has no effect. Even atheism rears its ugly head as a "magical entity", growing a neckbeard and wearing a fedora/trilby.

>> No.11838642

>>11838640
Can you though?

>> No.11838644

>>11838636

No, I question everything.

>> No.11838645

>>11838627
Hey anon that consistently uses reddit spacing, I hope that you've learned something from this thread that you've been frequenting for over an hour now.
The Holy Spirit isn't literally inside you silly :^)

>> No.11838647

>>11837003
They're too proud to admit that Capital has taken over.

>> No.11838649

>>11838638

Hmm, interesting that different societies have different religious and mystical experiences. By the way, experiences don't prove anything.

>> No.11838651

>>11838649
>By the way, experiences don't prove anything
NPC detected.

>> No.11838652

>>11838640
>all faith is blind, there is no "reasonable" faith
yikes
>>11838641
based filename

>> No.11838654

>>11838450
I watched the short video. He comes so, so close, but completely misses the point.
>does the "selectively quote John 10:34" sophistry
And then he revealed himself a complete and utter pseud. Just a forerunner of youtube intellectuals, desu.

>> No.11838655
File: 109 KB, 2000x756, 2000px-Christianity_Branches.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838655

WHAT BRANCH

>> No.11838657

>>11838644
Then you're more incoherent and illogical than thiests

>> No.11838658

>>11838651

I'm not the one that is shilling my experience as if it's something significant, that's on the nutbaker religious and mystics.

>> No.11838659

>>11838649
Ireneaus BTFO’d your brand of nonsense 1800 years ago. The Logos is responsible for all truth, in whatever manifestations it is found.

>> No.11838660

>>11838655
All of the living branches honor God. Cut out the rest.

>> No.11838663

>>11838654
What's the correct interpretation of John 10:34?

>> No.11838664

>>11838655
Where's russian orthodox?

>> No.11838665
File: 392 KB, 1000x1285, aidan-hart-ap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838665

>>11838649
>experiences don't prove anything
pic related both in example and in mfw

>> No.11838667

>>11838657

How so?

If you aren't questioning everything you're setting yourself up to be trapped.

>> No.11838668

>>11838658
>I'm not the one that is shilling my experience as if it's something significant
t. significant experience telling you and I so

Try arguing without perception and memory against the significance of experience. In fact, significance itself IS a perceived phenomenon not found with the magical "laboratory equipment of truth".

>> No.11838671

>>11838655
I grew up in an Evangelical church called the Vineyard

>> No.11838673

>>11838667
If you don't take the primary logical laws to be true, then nothing you come up with makes sense without them

>> No.11838675
File: 1.67 MB, 404x280, holy....gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838675

>>11838532
>my dog is technically an atheist

>> No.11838678

>>11838659

Nah, he BTFO'd himself because he was shilling faith-based claims that a lot of folks will be suspicious of.

>> No.11838679

>>11838532
lol

>> No.11838681

>>11838664
In Eastern Orthodoxy

>> No.11838683

>>11838655
Some divisions will claim their traditions make them the the "truest" christianity. Just keep in mind that traditions can become dangerous.
>>11838658
Your experience and knowledge is all you have to work with, anon.

>> No.11838685

>>11837003
Half of it is just a meme. The other half is Americans LARPing. Even the 'Buddhists' here are more legitimate.

>> No.11838687

>>11838681
Oh, I guess I only think of Greek when I read eastern

>> No.11838689

>>11838678
And with that it’s time for me to go to sleep. I suggest you read Irenaeus’s Against Heresies.

>> No.11838692

>>11838663
You can start by reading the whole section to begin with.

>> No.11838693

>>11838685
>just a meme
Using a reductionist curse word won't make 'meme' into a lesser being than what the reality of the scenario is.

>> No.11838695

>>11838665

Lol, it amazes me that religious folks want so desperately to act like experiences must be the cause to prove something. What poor freaks.

>> No.11838700

>>11837152
This is the correct answer. Because 4chan is filled with contrarians.

And because r/atheism is fucking insufferable.

>> No.11838703

>>11838640
you say that like it's easy; as if you could snap your fingers and believe in yeti trans-psychic healing. if it were that easy you probably would have already done it. we wouldn't be having this discussion either.

>> No.11838704

>>11838695
So experiences of empirical testing doesn't count either?

>> No.11838706

>>11838695
>Lol, it amazes me that religious folks want so desperately to act like experiences must be the cause to prove something
They are. I bet you don't eat ideally because of things like taste-sensation.

>> No.11838708

>>11838704

It doesn't count either.

>> No.11838712

>>11838640
Than go have faith in it anon. You seem interested in having some kind of faith in something but you keep stopping yourself.

>> No.11838713

>>11837003
I like to read religious books for fun, I'm not a Christian but I like the lore and find it as good as any a metaphysical justification to be a good person

>> No.11838717

>>11838706

Folks have claimed to be abducted by aliens, claimed to see ghosts, claimed to be possessed, claimed to see UFOs, etc.

>> No.11838724

>>11838717
Ok. Claims don't prove anything, experience does. Say, someone was truly abducted by aliens, doesn't matter if they make the claim or not. What matters is that it happened, and it is proven by the lived experience.

>> No.11838727

>>11838724
Not him but it seems like a decent portion of abductees are sincere. They legitimately believe they experienced what they say they did.

>> No.11838729

>>11838727
It's possible, I don't know any better. I've experienced a few bizarre /x/ moments in my life as well. Not sure what to make of them.

>> No.11838731

>>11838685
http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/
>.7% vs 70.6%
>"the supposed christians are insincere there's no way they actually believe that lol"
Thanks for your original (>>11838496) contribution to this thread!

>> No.11838733

>>11838582
I think you are missing the point. You are obviously indoctrinated in the ideals of Christianity, and religion in general.

Do you even know what he is arguing? he is saying that Jesus was put on a pedestal - he was deemed a perfect person because he was God, or the son of God, and that Man could never achieve perfection because Man is not God. But we should feel guilty for not being perfect? that makes rational and logical sense. Its like telling a kid that was born without legs, that he should feel bad for not being able to walk.

>demanding perfection of people is not insanity, it is the aim
First, what kind of perfection are you aiming for? Perfection in regards to what the Bible teaches?

>What is religion for, if not to make us holy?
What does "make us holy" even mean? You may argue with me, but religion is essentially for controlling the masses, it is the desire to control people's actions through incentives (heaven and hell) and guilt.
e.g. stealing is bad because it hurts the person you stole from. But that statement hinges on the fact that the idea of private property actually exists, and not from the fact that human's have an innate desire to identify/attach oneself to things outside of oneself. So to keep an individual from stealing something I DESIRE TO KEEP FOR MYSELF, I enter into a society where taking what you want, when you want is decentivized trhough guilt/punishment/damnation

>has he even read a catechism? Listened to a priest? I've never heard a priest indicate what he says is universally preached from the pulpit
What does this even have to do what he is talking about?

Alot of what you said is really ambiguous and doesnt make any direct reference to much of what was said in the video. It kind of seems like you just reacted, instead of examining.

>> No.11838734

>>11838724

They said to have experienced them. And no, experience doesn't prove anything. When you say experience proves something, you are making an assumption about your senses.

>> No.11838738

>>11838734
>They said to have experienced them.
So what? There are crimes that occur without us knowing about it.
>And no, experience doesn't prove anything.
It does. We are discussing something, are we not? Beyond my experience I can't prove it to myself.

>> No.11838745

>>11838738

>what is naive realism

>> No.11838753

>>11838745
>objectively
Ahahahahaha. Did you just assume that I think of you as a fellow person / soul? No, you are an ad.

>> No.11838754

>>11838733
>/lit/ doesn't agree with my simplistic eastshit? It's obviously the indoctrinated Christians who are wrong.
But please, keep posting AronRa-esque speculative videos.

>> No.11838757

>>11838753

Well hey, at least you admit you contradicted yourself.

>> No.11838764

>>11838621
>>11838638
Humans are extremely suggestible. "You have to believe in it (or act like you do) before you can perceive it" is a sign that something is pure wishful thinking.

>> No.11838766

>>11837006
>being this ignorant of actual demographical data
yep, par for the course

>> No.11838771

>>11838754
I dont see an argument.

>/lit/ doesnt entertain any ideas presented in eastern philosophy, because it goes against/is different from their Christian/Western paradigm

the amount of pseuds on this board is depressing.

>> No.11838777

>>11838757
I didn't? My experience of real events is real. Not necessarily objective. Truth doesn't need to be objective.

>> No.11838779

>>11838764
Not either of those anons but you should keep in mind that by no means will the truth reveal itself.

>> No.11838781

>>11838771
>the amount of pseuds on this board is depressing.
Resorting to experience to qualify reality and affect others? Hmm.

>> No.11838784

>>11838777
Truth is objective tho anon.

>> No.11838787

>>11838764
Placebo effect is real, though.

>>11838784
Truth has an objective form as well. Objective nature has no monopoly on truth. Truth is all there is, including experiences.

>> No.11838793

>>11838764
This would be a good point if God were a being in the universe, which we could observe in some way. God is not a being in the universe, but is Being Itself. There is no other way to know Him. Even through revelation, you cannot know everything. If you saw Jesus appear in front of your eyes right now, would you believe that he is the son of God? Not necessarily; you may believe that he exists and appeared in front of you, but the burning question still stands: Jesus appeared in front of me, is he the Son of God? Higher truths require something higher than reason. Something suprarational; in this case, faith.

>> No.11838794

>>11838771
Not the anon you responded to but it's obvious you didn't give him any counterargument, you just asked him to elaborate on every phrase he wrote.
You're depressed because of the psueds on /lit/? Pitifully ironic.

>> No.11838800

>>11838787
>Objective nature has no monopoly on truth.
And non-sense is the anti-thesis to any subjective claims.

>> No.11838804

>>11838685
>I have a comprehensive knowledge of all the people on my anonymous literature board
you're a fucking brainlet

>> No.11838809

>>11838800
Temporary one, though. We didn't know ice man Ötzi was murdered before. Now we do.
Science is temporary.

>> No.11838833

>>11837003
Whether you love it or hate it, the Bible influenced a shitton of literature

>> No.11838839

>>11837048
(you) are pseud
>>11837063
Ironically, the struggles of man stems from the Christian indoctrination and its attempt to control man. It's like a black person voluntarily becoming a slave in pre-civil war America.

>>11837112
this. But /lit/ will cope by calling you a fedora-tipper and all that jazz. It's just pure romanticization and dogmatism.

>>11837172
fuck, you are so bluepilled. People who stop being ignorant move away from the right.

>>11837231
lol the irony of your post.

>>11838145
>smartest person I know is a creationist!
t. someone living in the deep south

>>11838247
>>11838250
>>11838279
>>11838323
>>11838356
D O G M A

>>11838307
The ideas of evil, right, wrong, bad etc. have been institutionalized in you. You believe in spooks and make them out to be real fact. Your justification almost seems like circular reasoning.

>> No.11838852

>>11838794
How am I supposed to give a counter-argument, when what he said was ambiguous?
He says the video makes no convincing argument, and then proceeds to talk about the first argument without even making mention of what the argument was. How am I supposed have a discussion with someone about something, when I'm not sure the anon understood what was being said? Or are you too stupid to understand?

>> No.11838856
File: 14 KB, 364x322, my literal face when a dog of christ dares to reply to me.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838856

Something something desire for meaning

>> No.11838859

>>11838833
yeah a lot of stupid fucking literature that made people fucking retarded.

>>11838781
What do christfaggots resort to again? Hmm.

>> No.11838862

>>11838839
>Ironically, the struggles of man stems from the Christian indoctrination and its attempt to control man
Possible. You can make Christianity into a burden, or you can let it free you. You see, Christianity makes you see the entity-ridden forest of your life. To garden it may seem like a chore, but to be the breeding grounds of entities is not freedom. If you live a life of vice you should know how much they limit you. If you believe the advertisements of those entities, you'll likely only react to Christianity the way those vices do.

In other words, if you are chained by laziness, you'll find Christianity horrifying as it pushes you onward. Likewise, pride, feminism, egalitarianism and so forth act the same way. The competition of memes is not just a struggle, it's a war. However, if you manage to win as a Christian, you can be free.

>> No.11838864

>>11838859
>What do christfaggots resort to again? Hmm.
How can you affect things without reality? What's the alternative? How does anything unreal have an effect?

We have seen an extent of truth you've yet to understand. I bet you're still in high school.

>> No.11838872
File: 785 KB, 859x1500, casimir-lee-05-tarot-hierophant-s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838872

>>11838856
You clearly do have an intent behind that post. To organize reality and other people in a hierarchy of your choosing. You don't treat it all as arbitrary, but you do posit yourself as if you were doing such.
The question is; why? I presume it is because you intend to ignore things, so you use your great ape heritage and the inherent reactions to mold yourself to fit that goal. In this instance, presumed laughter.

>> No.11838882

>>11838872
Dog of christ, do you think you are deserving of a proper reply?

If so: Why? You're a dog.

>> No.11838885
File: 163 KB, 1680x1260, Sminem Redemption.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838885

>>11838839
>reddit spacing
>"It's like a black person voluntarily becoming a slave in pre-civil war America."
>"fuck, you are so bluepilled. People who stop being ignorant move away from the right."
>"lol the irony of your post."
>misusing t.
>Bold and doublespace, but without vertical letters
>ends with inane, edgy stirner drivel
Masterful, exhaustive bait.

>> No.11838888
File: 293 KB, 611x451, szondi 8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838888

>>11838882
Feeding my pride won't help you.
>You're a dog
Wrong on all accounts. Not even true on the Chinese zodiac.

>> No.11838891
File: 19 KB, 240x250, 240px-Varg_Vikernes-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838891

>>11837003
If your of European heritage, remember that your recent ancestors weren't christycucks. Christians destroyed your ancestral heritage just as it most recently destroyed the native american's heritage.

>> No.11838892

>>11838859
>yeah a lot of stupid fucking literature that made people fucking retarded
nothing new ever comes from newfags who refuse to read the threads. see >>11838219

>> No.11838893

>>11838862
>You see, Christianity makes you see the entity-ridden forest of your life. To garden it may seem like a chore, but to be the breeding grounds of entities is not freedom. If you live a life of vice you should know how much they limit you. If you believe the advertisements of those entities, you'll likely only react to Christianity the way those vices do.
>In other words, if you are chained by laziness, you'll find Christianity horrifying as it pushes you onward. Likewise, pride, feminism, egalitarianism and so forth act the same way. The competition of memes is not just a struggle, it's a war. However, if you manage to win as a Christian, you can be free.
To believe this, I would first have to buy into your notions virtue and vice. I would have to believe in spooks.

>>11838864
>your entire post
What the fuck are you even saying?
Is this some non-sequitur?

>How can you affect things without reality?
First, I'm not saying there isnt a reality, you tard. And you affect things by enacting your will on that thing.

Are you stupid? I made a descriptive, statement, saying that there are a lot of pseuds on this board and it depresses me.
You make the statement, "Resorting to experience to qualify reality and affect others? Hmm"
Which means fuck all. I made an observation on this board that is dependent upon my definitions of pseud and depressing.
>We have seen an extent of truth you've yet to understand. I bet you're still in high school.
holy shit stop fucking like a pseud/sophist, talking in ambiguities. I bet youre a fucking freshman in college.

>>11838885
>using the "reddit spacing" meme


>merely quoting what I said, with exception to "misusing t."
Proceeds to conclude that my post is bait.
Nice

>> No.11838895

This thread is one of the reasons why Christians deserve a Holocaust on them.

>> No.11838896

>>11838892
You're right, my b.

>> No.11838897

>>11838885
Jesus, that child's an amerimutt.

>> No.11838899

>>11838891
>vargposting
>didn't proofread
>spewing nonsense
you'll find likeminded individuals on >>>/pol/ and >>>/r9k/

>> No.11838904

>>11838891
Remember ur roots guys and eat bugs and live in huts LOL NEANDERTHAL PRIDE WOOP WOOP

>> No.11838905
File: 173 KB, 321x450, Kullervon kirous.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838905

>>11838891
>Christians destroyed your ancestral heritage
Did the pagans also destroy the previous heritage of your previous ancestors? The Swedes did try to destroy our national heritage and identity for cultural and racial hegemony. They failed. We still have sauna, Kalevala and our language and of course, blood. Every living thing has its heritage.

Christianity does not equate iconoclasm or swedishness. In fact, among the Norse it seems that conformism and vulnerability to trends is a part of their heritage.

>> No.11838906

>>11838904
>implying that capitalistic society today is so wonderful!

Also
>using logical fallacies

>> No.11838908

>>11838893
>with [sole] exception to "misusing t."
might want to work on your reading comprehension skills summerfriend. If you can't comprehend, you can analyze, and when you can't analyze you can't synthesize. Ex-readers are tolerable but never-readers such as yourself need to find a different board. Why are you here?

>> No.11838910

>>11838906
>fails to refute me

>> No.11838911

>>11838897
>sminem is american
painfully new
>>11838895
cute...

>> No.11838914

>>11838908
How does it feel to be a pseud?

>> No.11838915

>>11838910
>has no distinguishable argument
>expects refutation

>> No.11838920

>>11838915
>pointedly removes your arguement
>lol bro u got no arguement

Hurr durr dumb ass

>> No.11838921

>>11838914
>he doesn't know I was referring to Bloom's Taxonomy
How does it feel to be in high school?

>> No.11838926

>>11838920
What kind of person types out "hurr durr?"

>> No.11838933

>>11838915
/lit/ is filled with college freshman who consider themselves as intellectuals, but are in fact pseuds.

So, what can you expect?

>>11838921
>because i make no reference to blooms taxonomy, he assumes that I dont know what it is
Again, how does it feel to be a pseud?

>> No.11838935
File: 152 KB, 645x729, 1523170591033.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11838935

>>11838926
Wouldn't you like to know

>> No.11838937

>>11838893
>To believe this, I would first have to buy into your notions virtue and vice. I would have to believe in spooks.
Of course. Spooks have an effect, and so does "not believing" (a spook) in them.

>What the fuck are you even saying?
If someone believes in "falsehood", spook or whatever, and it has an effect on them and others, how does that effect come into being? If one of the integral mechanical parts of a machine isn't real, how can it operate?
>First, I'm not saying there isnt a reality, you tard
That wasn't even the implication. How did you end up with that conclusion? You're saying that the experienced world is somehow detached from truth, whereas I am stating that truth is the whole collective of all things that can have an effect, and quite possibly more.
>Are you stupid?
If I want to be. Right now I don't even need to.
> I made a descriptive, statement, saying that there are a lot of pseuds on this board and it depresses me.
How can it depress you if experience isn't real?
>Which means fuck all.
I'd talk in shapes if I could. Shame about being of the apelike ancestry, and not the cephalopod sort.
>holy shit stop fucking like a pseud/sophist, talking in ambiguities.
You've been talking about this mythical / spooky pseud for a while now. I'm sure you have an objective syntax for them and it isn't merely a subjective expression taken from an idealized organization of a human collective.

>> No.11838945

>>11838933
>because i make no reference to blooms taxonomy, he assumes that I dont know what it is
Yikes. My secondhand embarrassment is palpable.
A tip--you don't have to keep responding.

>> No.11838987

>>11838937
>If someone believes in "falsehood", spook or whatever, and it has an effect on them and others, how does that effect come into being? If one of the integral mechanical parts of a machine isn't real, how can it operate?
sigh, people can believe in spooks and it can still affect (their) reality. People today, enter into a society, or a machine, that has rules(spooks) and by entering into this society they create a reality for themselves to operate by - this does not mean that the society is ACTUALLY real. The society is only real in the sense that the people believe it is real. (Just because I believe in unicorns doesnt actually mean unicorns are real)
The effect comes into being when the person allows the spook to affect them. You believe in private property, a spook I take your rock that you consider yours. The reality(or truth) is that the rock is not in fact yours, it is just a rock. But you have constructed a reality for yourself that dictates, in your mind, that the rock is your property. Thus, when I take your rock I am affecting you (but in truth, you are affecting yourself) by my taking the rock.

>You're saying that the experienced world is somehow detached from truth, whereas I am stating that truth is the whole collective of all things that can have an effect, and quite possibly more.
This all started with
>>the amount of pseuds on this board is depressing.
>Resorting to experience to qualify reality and affect others? Hmm.
Are you making the assumption that by my saying, "the amount of pseuds on this board is depressing," I was making an implicit statement about the nature of experience and its relation to the "truth" - that I believe that our experience of the world is detached from the truth?

>You've been talking about this mythical / spooky pseud for a while now. I'm sure you have an objective syntax for them and it isn't merely a subjective expression taken from an idealized organization of a human collective.
sophistry, give me your definitions of "objective syntax", "subjective expression", and "idealized organization of a human collective"
and dont resort to ad homs.

>> No.11838996

Not memeing, I'm looking to convert but can't bring myself to believe in god, what do I do /lit/?

>> No.11838998

>>11838945
are you the embodiment of the analytic fedora tipper? Searching for irrelevant mistakes and then pointing them out, believing that they are somehow indicative of an argument?
It's ironic how you use logical fallacies to justify your claims.

You know intellectual dishonesty isnt something to be proud of.

>> No.11839002

>>11838987
>sigh, people can believe in spooks and it can still affect (their) reality.
It definitely has a physical effect. In fact, the physical effect follows the belief-intention. Let's say I experience hunger and remember a methodology to end it; I recollect a map (experience) I've made for myself to find all necessary (experience) ingredients (experience) and combine them in order (experience). It will result in me opening a door (a physical change), changing my location and position (a physical change), the location and position of all the ingredients, a whole list of chemical changes. Each and every physical change also affects me, as do the chemical ones. I might encounter social events (physical, economic?) and my plans may even fail. I can even choose to ignore hunger for a multitude of reasons, resulting in those physical conditions changing later or not changing at all.

>> No.11839006

>>11838996
This is the problem with this board.

why do you want to convert? Why do you want to believe in a ideology, whose main concept, is something you intuitively don't believe in?

It's like saying, I want to believe that humans and squirrels should have sex, but I dont actually believe that we should.

>> No.11839009

>>11839006
Someone I love is a christian and I can't bring myself to split with them just because of religion. I said I'd convert.

>> No.11839011

>>11839006
>something you intuitively don't believe in
I don't think that is the case. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/3512686/Children-are-born-believers-in-God-academic-claims.html
Whilst this particular fashion of belief is probably abandoned, the intuition is unlikely to change. In fact, stress and cultural motivations may push one back, as happened in Yugoslavia. It's interesting to see that 4chan has the same effect on a psyche as a brutal civil war.

>> No.11839013

>>11838996
Believing in God is the easy part, read Aquinas, Augustine etc.
Having faith in Jesus is a bit harder

>> No.11839021

>>11839009
You should probably reevaluate your values.
You're wanting to convert to an ideology that you cannot intuitively believe in for the sake of keeping a relationship is selfish.

Why not let her find someone who genuinely shares the same faith, or talk to her about accepting you as you are. Dishonesty will only serve to create a relationship filled with resentment.

>>11839011
When I speak of intuitions, I'm not saying that it is a belief that someone is born with.
I'm also not saying that our own intuitions are right, because we can and most often are wrong about our intuitions.
However, I am VERY reluctant to believe an article that makes large leaps such as:

>Dr Barrett said there is evidence that even by the age of four, children understand that although some objects are made by humans, the natural world is different. He added that this means children are more likely to believe in creationism rather than evolution, despite what they may be told by parents or teachers.

Kids don't understand how the physics of the world, and thus cannot ascribe an accurate explanation for phenomenon that they arent familiar with. Which is why examination of the world and our beliefs is important for the development of man.

>> No.11839027

>>11839021
>Kids don't understand how the physics of the world
Nobody does. QM is weird, but very real.
>and thus cannot ascribe an accurate explanation for phenomenon that they arent familiar with
This is impossible. There's even the uncertainty principle (Heisenberg), which ties physical attributes to what we know of them.

>> No.11839028

Knuckle-dragging christfucks can go fuck them selves.

>> No.11839029

>>11839028
Anger is a memetic entity. Feeding it isn't good for you, despite what it claims.

>> No.11839041

>>11839027
We actually do have a definite good understanding of how the physical world works: law of inertia, thermodynamics, etc.

Though im not sure what you mean by your second point.

>> No.11839052

Daily reminder that Christianity is a Jewish psy-op and you all fell for it. Who knew 'dude just believe lmao' was enough to trick billions of people. Those schlomo's really pulled one over on humanity.

>> No.11839090

>>11839013
I actually went the other way. I was raised atheist, but became disillusioned with the world around me and decided to check out what Jesus had to say. I figured that if over 3/4 of my nation think that his teachings are worthwhile, then maybe there must be something to it. As an experiment, I made some changes to the way I carry myself and go about my day so that I could try to be more like Jesus's example, and my life improved very much. I ended up going down the rabbit hole and becoming a weird bastard child of Christianity and Mahayana Buddhism (these actually go quite well together).

>> No.11839132

>>11837003
Daily reminder that anyone identifying as another denomination other than Orthodox is some fat la creature degenerate from the US LARPing as a christian

>> No.11839146

>>11839090

But you can only truly choose one.

>> No.11839156

>>11839146
Not true. Ideological purity is a silly thing. You can pick and mix as long as the beliefs don't conflict.

>> No.11839177

>>11839156

>if there is a God of the Andromeda Galaxy it is OK to believe in him and God is OK with that

>> No.11839182

Larpers

>> No.11839357

>>11839090
>Christianity and Mahayana Buddhism
All sects of Buddhism explicitly deny a monotheistic creator God and if you had done so much as even read the Wikipedia article on Buddhism you would know this. Stop LARPing.

>> No.11839389

>>11838839
Cringe

>> No.11839465
File: 143 KB, 1125x930, 59093a9ec7937b7e4b43bf692e012821487f0f500851e4cf2d1581c00ce2b3ab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11839465

>>11837003
>why is the most literate board the most religious and christian
The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.

>> No.11839514

>>11839156
Hinduism, Christianity and Taoism are the only three non degenerate belief systems.

>> No.11839548

>>11837626
Neither are letters and numbers. Yet they allow us to harness the universe.

Just because God is not measurable doesnt make him not exist.

t. prefers zero cosmic accountablility for his own conscious evil and petty spirit

>> No.11839558

>>11838733
The video isn't even just saying he was put on a pedestal. It was claiming that his teachings were fundamentally misunderstood by everyone who ever made a record of them, and that no fuss was ever made about the differences, and that no one saw what he actually meant for centuries. His points about guilt are also rather misrepresentative of Christianity- the argument that we can't possibly be perfect in that way fails, because each sin requires a choice to do wrong. Penance for such is only rational. And your entire atheistic spiel about control fails to agree with the motivations of a huge portion of Christian religious leaders. Yes, it was largely a reaction, but when part of his video completely misrepresents what is taught and claims that this is somehow at odds with the philosophers, he loses a lot of credit. Was there something I missed about his argument other than the straw man attack on the Christian doctrine of sin, guilt, and penance?
>>11838852
You can generally either have good faith (ironic, isn't it?) in someone you're arguing with, or rephrase his argument yourself.

>> No.11839563

>>11837647
You seem very sure. Care to share why?

>> No.11839622

>>11839548
>t. prefers zero cosmic accountablility for his own conscious evil and petty spirit
Don't we all?

>> No.11839796

>>11837003
A dedicated but small group of frequent shitposters who graduated from their edgy athiest phase into an even cringier post-unironic Christian aesthetist phase.

>> No.11839928

>>11837094
>becoming a Catholic after reading some entry level affirmation-of-faith books but rejecting the sitting Pope because he’s progressive.


lmfao i should hang out here more

t big time pol catholic

>> No.11839960

>>11839465
Why is everyone here so quick to stereotype atheists as Redditors and people obsessed with pop-sci? I've been around plenty of atheists and most of them reject rigid empiricism and essentialism. It seems like everyone on here can only refute retard atheist strawmen circa 2011.

>> No.11839965

>>11837003
Because religions are often based on books

>> No.11840024

>>11839177
to be fair Buddhism doesn't have god

>> No.11840084

>>11839558
Are you saying that there is a strawman because a lady in the video accuses him of saying its a strawman?
Are you saying it is inconceivable for there to be a fundamental misinterpretation of the teachings of Jesus? That a man who made no writings himself, and whose teachings are based upon the interpretations of other men and NOT jesus himself could not be wrong?

Are you saying my "atheistic" spiel (and its not even atheistic) falls a part because it disagrees with the apparent motivations of church leaders? Can you tell me the motivations of church leaders? I am quite ignorant of them.

And how exactly is his point of guilt misrepresentative? I know you mention that to sin you make the choice to do wrong, but what exactly does it mean to sin?

>> No.11840191

>>11839960
Look at the posters in this thread and tell me their arguments are any more sophisticated than that. I'm happy to respond to any criticism, but when atheists continually offer up the same nonsense, I'm not going to put in any more work than I need to

>> No.11840222

Christians are misguided. I went to Catholic schools for the first 18 years of my life and not a single person there actually truly believed anything they were saying. You could hear it in their voices they knew their doctrines and theology were flawed.

Christ's teachings were corrupted by (((Paul))) from whom all mainstream Christian churches today descend. Islam is the full realization of faith, and is what any serious man of God should devote himself to today in the West. Christianity is done for, it made a deal with the secular state that ensures this.

>> No.11840297

>>11840084
>>11840084
I'm saying it's a strawman because the version of the theology of sin and penance expressed and criticized in the video are radically misinterpreted from what any Christians believing in a sacrament of penance would agree with.
I'm not saying the teachings as we have them can't have been misinterpreted, but I am saying that supposing that all the disciples are each completely mistaken in the same respects without argument between each other is ludicrous. The idea that Jesus was teaching that "all people are as gods" and his disciples misinterpreted that should get him laughed at, not applauded.
Didn't mean to imply you were an atheist, just that the standard "catholic guilt" thing gets repeated enough to call a spiel. I'm saying that the view of moral nature of humanity it accompanies misunderstands the calling of Christianity.
A Christian view would be more that we consciously choose to do evil (this is sin). A conscious evil must be atoned for. We are called to perfection, but in our failings, when we seek forgiveness, it is given freely. The penance itself is a way of realigning our selves to the good. But focusing on the guilt of it is odd, and something I've not seen outside criticisms of Christianity, as guilt would just be the realization that one has brought harm to themself, another, or the good.

>>11840222
>I could tell from their voices
Yeah, I'm not going to trust the teenager to interpret from tone of voice that no one is sincere. Is taking people at their word so hard?
The pauline epistles do not present a radically different Christianity from the rest of the New Testament. Nor is it feasible that Jesus was just another prophet of Islam. The theological differences, you might disagree on, but at least accept the teachings of Christianity are Christ's.

>> No.11840414

>>11837003
It wasn't 4-5 years ago. The website's population in general has become more Christian. Rural America is getting more urbanized it seems like.

>> No.11840611

>>11837003
true e/lit/ism is daoist tho

>> No.11841578

>>11838998
Dang it, you're being one intellectually dishonest little doggy

>> No.11841590

>>11840611
>east-anything
lurk more summerfriend

>> No.11841622

>>11840222
>the masses don't have any reasons of substance for anything they believe
Wow, profound.
>christians are misguided
>paul corrupted christianity
>Islam is the "full realization of faith"
Amazing how many unsubstantiated claims you profess and presumably believe in. I don't have a fraction of the faith you do.

>> No.11842894

-More likely to be experienced with religious literature (and the fact that as a young ideology/philosophy atheism has yet to produce much of this)
-A heavy contrarian sentiment
-The fact that /lit/ has a slightly older userbase compared to other boards as well as Christianity being the culturally comfortable religious belief (ie were 4chan predominantly middle eastern you would be asking why is /lit/ so shia ect)
-This is a bit of a guess but since creating a humanities board the split has taken away some of the people more versed in comparative religion and religious history.

>> No.11843014

>>11838307
Yea, the Bible (Christian doctrine) hits the nail on the head concerning its account of the human heart (Jeremiah 17:9, Romans 7:17-25) and the woeful condition of the world (being that there are evil forces at work beyond the mere machinations of men - Ephesians 6:12).

>> No.11843033

>>11837003
The Christians are just very loud.

>> No.11843045

/lit/ is interested in philosophy and Christianity offers an internally consistent philosophy

>> No.11843100

>>11838608
He says, with faith that his ability to reason about such things -- declaring faith to be an obstruction -- is sound, fair and sensible.

>> No.11843137

>>11838569

>> No.11843214

>>11838996
>I'm looking to convert
You are already barking up the wrong tree. Christianity is not about doctrine - it is about Christ. To speak of a desire to convert suggests to me that you think of Christianity as any other man-made religion: a basket of beliefs and philosophies that may or may not ease your living or provide some metaphysical comfort.
Rather, what you should seek is a desire to know Christ. Or put more plainly, you should seek him, for everything else flows from this. It may help to know a little about the one you should seek... Most importantly, read the gospels to learn (for yourself) about what Jesus did for you and why, in the hope that you will be brought closer to believing. Failing that, you have 2 millenia of debate and exposition on the matter - that's putting it mildly. If truly desire to believe in God and to know Christ, you should commune with Christians. Visit a church, a Christian-union or anything else to see God manifest in his people.

Remember, once your ready, that repentance is not some little silly, 'I'm sorry.' Repentance is not simply a fear of God. Repentance is not a monk fasting and afflicting his body in a monastery. Repentance is not remorse because of sin's consequences. Repentance is not penance performed before the pope as you kiss his toe... Repentance is not being sorry for what I've done wrong. It is not confessing one's sins to a priest. It is not just conviction of sin. It is not the signing of a pledge of abstinence. Repentance is that thing when you come before God and see yourself as you are, and see Him as he is, and say with Isaiah 'Woe is me, for I am unclean!'.

>> No.11843366

>>11839156
>Ideological purity is a silly thing
It's silly, you say, so you you pick and mix beliefs which you believe to be true from a range of ideologies. The marrying of these beliefs into one forms a new ideology. The fact that you chose some beliefs and excluded others to form your ideology says something about its exclusivity, or purity, which you maintain is a silly thing.

>as long as the beliefs don't conflict.
Regarding pick-and-mixing from/into Christianity: Jesus himself claimed that if he was right, then all other beliefs must be wrong (John 14:6). So right there, you have Christianity separated from the rest by virtue of its own existence. It demands that it be either accepted wholly or rejected in totality. And all of it is wrapped up in the identity of Jesus Christ: was he God, or was he not?

>> No.11843455

>>11838228
It just feels right. Seriously, I can't really explain it.

>> No.11843802
File: 42 KB, 260x285, 1515956784279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11843802

>>11842894
>the fact that as a young ideology/philosophy atheism has yet to produce much of this

>> No.11843813

>>11842894
Atheist literature pretty much peaked at the Marquis de Sade and has become more limp with every passing year as people try to be "nice" while simultaneously believing in nothing.

>> No.11843988

>>11841590
>/a/ anime

>> No.11843999

>>11843813
literature pretty much peaked last millenium tho

>> No.11844003

>>11843455
You just sound dumb. Seriously, I can't really explain it.