[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 250 KB, 1200x1800, slipperryslope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11748396 No.11748396 [Reply] [Original]

when the entire book is a logical fallacy

>> No.11748425
File: 25 KB, 331x499, 418Y5bVp9CL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11748425

when the entire book is obscure meaningless word salad

>> No.11748437

How? It feels like Hayek actually understands how things are to a certain extent, MY fault with it is that he conflates socialism with communism and all other forms solely from the economic perspective.

But the correlation between fascism and communism is a valid connection, and one I don’t see made enough on here

>> No.11748471

>>11748396
>I don't like what is written in perhaps the best book of early XXth century political philosophy so I just call it fallacious instead.

>> No.11748476

>>11748437
https://youtu.be/ITBJ0K-9aas

his conflation of the origins of fascism and communism are the weakest parts of the book.

>> No.11748489
File: 15 KB, 251x242, 6dBt2Oj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11748489

>>11748476
>Nationwide common ownership of the means of production is possible without a strong state

>> No.11748676

>>11748471
>what is the is-ought fallacy
>what is the reasonable middle fallacy
>what is the all-or-nothing fallacy
>what is the fallacy of extrapolating from a small dataset

>>11748489
I own my farm. You own your farm. We're two farmers on an otherwise uninhabited island. Badda bing badda boom, nationwide common ownership of the means of production without a strong state.

>> No.11748703

>>11748676
>I own my farm. You own your farm. We're two farmers on an otherwise uninhabited island. Badda bing badda boom, nationwide common ownership of the means of production without a strong state.

>He doesn't understand socialism.

Farms are private property and thus are to be collectivized (nationalized)

>> No.11749236

>>11748703
>both farms are completely identical in every way
>any slight difference would be disproportionate ownership
if they owned each others farms then that would be socialism

>> No.11749272
File: 63 KB, 924x560, 1527237033767.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11749272

>>11748676
>What is the fallacy fallacy
Checkmate, don't forget the plus 5 for my logic sword

>> No.11750494

>>11748676

You don't own your farm, you use it as a worker. If someone lands on your side of the island and start doing their own farming there, you have to accept it if you're a socialist.

>> No.11750517

>>11748396
Great rebuttal.