[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 60 KB, 1000x563, Schopenhauer and Nietzche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11657352 No.11657352[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Are these the final bosses of philosophy?

>> No.11657398

was Nietzsche a philosopher or a critic of philosophers?

>> No.11657401

Nietzsche is the knockoff uninspired sidequest in the twentieth installment that doesn't even attempt to be good. Like a "go here and will a rat and then come back" quest. He's a fraud

>> No.11657435

>>11657401
It's sad when the best characters are wasted on the worst games

>> No.11657538

>>11657352
They're more like that duo boss towards the beginning that are kind of hard but functions mostly as a warmup for the ass kicking to come.

>> No.11657607

Probably Wittgenstein and Heidegger are the final bosses.

>> No.11657812

Beyond Good and Evil is a book about an old man trying to find love..

>> No.11657816

>>11657607
This

>> No.11657849

They’re the Bell Gargoyles of philosophy

>> No.11657887

>>11657607
No I'm the final boss, wait till i publish my book.

>> No.11657897

>>11657352
It was Plato all along

>> No.11657907

>>11657897
/thread

Plato is the alpha and omega of philosophy.

>> No.11657909

>>11657352
Ok, hear me out, so the two of them but they wind up in a band together.

>> No.11658031

schopenhauer is the slow moving miniboss real tanky that wastes all your health pots just so fleetfooted friedrich can come and finish your sorry ass off (though once you get the hang of it friederich isn't that bad either he's really a punch out nothing like those french bullet hell games)

>> No.11658161
File: 70 KB, 2000x1200, DeleuzeGuattari-2000x1200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11658161

>>11657352
no, these are

>> No.11658251
File: 53 KB, 855x606, d6d2752aa80da8a70937aed16abbdb6e055843d66ede48950bba60e27cfa3ec4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11658251

No, he is

>> No.11658255

>>11657352
>not knowing it's Hegel and Heidegger

learn to read cunt

>> No.11658276

>>11657812
Kek

>> No.11658294

>>11657607
I actually believe this.

Half-joke answer is Thales

>> No.11658307
File: 38 KB, 512x485, zizekloss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11658307

the first dlc for this one was a little weird

>> No.11658349

>>11657538
Whomst else thought of the Bell Gargoyles?

>> No.11658358

>>11658349
I thought of drake and josh honestly

>> No.11658366

>>11657398
Isnt critic of philosophy philosophy?

>> No.11658638
File: 168 KB, 443x768, Destroy Capital, Control Capital or Synthesise Capital.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11658638

Unabomber; Nick Land and various post Lacanian commentators. These are the 3 stage final bosses before the secret final boss who shall remain unnamed.

>> No.11659011
File: 44 KB, 499x666, JayC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11659011

No, He is.

>> No.11659069

>>11659011
>God mode
Doesn't count.

>> No.11659083

>>11658638
>the secret final boss who shall remain unnamed.

Richard Spencer?

>> No.11659105

>>11657352
Read The Foundation for Exploration

>> No.11659129

>>11657398
The greeks again

>> No.11659276
File: 113 KB, 960x699, IMG_20180819_150618.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11659276

>> No.11659288

>>11657607
this

>>11658638
>the secret final boss who shall remain unnamed

plz name the secret final boss who shall remain unnamed

>> No.11660347

>>11657352
It's Aquinas

>> No.11660692

>>11658251
Is that the guy posting all those Hegelian inspired longwinded posts?

>> No.11660705

>>11658255
I can go with Hegel but what profundity is contained in Heidegger? Isn't what he said condensible to "the way to circumvent the absurdity of existence is to be engaged with what you are doing in the world"?

>> No.11660712

>>11657607
lmao no

>> No.11660719

>>11658638
>>11659083
>>11659288
It's probably kant

>> No.11660730

>>11657352
That simply Kant be the case. Schopenhauer is GOOD, but limited, Neitezcheie is alright, but more of a curiosity than the serious father of a school of philosophy.

Plato is curiously lightyears away from your simplification, as are some of the real pioneers of philosophy throughout the centuries. Leibniz alone could easily dethrone both of them in one stroke.

>> No.11660750

>>11658251
land isn't the endboss. he's more like a cheat code that lets you defeat the endboss but in the process permanently fucks up your machine

>> No.11660755

Is Being and Time worth reading or is it just obscurity trying to be profound?

>> No.11660942

It's worth reading.
Better to read it in German though. Fucking Heidegger and his focus on the etymology of words.

>> No.11660956

>>11659276
This desu, what a load of shit.

>> No.11660961
File: 76 KB, 1100x617, kierkegaard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11660961

>>11657352
Let's get real

>> No.11661039
File: 47 KB, 501x525, downloadfile-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11661039

> Not going for true ending

>> No.11661102

>>11661039
Will he ruin my life if I read him?

>> No.11661117

>>11661102
It would be extremely painful

>> No.11661122
File: 21 KB, 479x508, 1529343765031.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11661122

What's the difference between Hegel and Sartre on being for others?

>> No.11661217

nah.

theyre more like cheat mode. you so called beat the game but you didnt really play it. if you want to actually learn something from it you have to restart and play it raw.