[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 35 KB, 217x232, ww.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11638001 No.11638001 [Reply] [Original]

Hegel avoids the consequences of Kant's transcendental solipsism by applying it to the world: the unity of my mind is the unity of being itself. Kant denies emergentism in nature: he really does think you bring space and time with you like a spotlight, Hegel doesn't, he thinks it's everything else that's shining. But only if you bleed for it. God lives for the endorphin rush of the negative. Hegel attenuates the oneness of God with the other, or to put it differently, the One is othered to itself, it is the "conjunction of conjunction and non-conjunction". Really Deleuze's entire opposition Hegel can be reduced to an inversion of this speculative "identity of identity and non-identity". Difference in Deleuze is, in a way, redoubled. There are others, and this otherness is constitutive of our otherness together. Deleuze denies the self-closure of Hegel's Concept, but doesn't understand this closure is only ever provided by sense-certainty's persistence in and through the impossibility of total dialectical transparency: it's because thought can't account for its mediation with its substrate that the intelligibility of this mediation is guaranteed - as precisely the Notion of an eternally groundless accounting-for. Thought burns aporias like calories. Form is the presupposition of content: God is the Notion of notionality itself: it is actual because it is possible, it is possible because it is actual: the Ouroborous as Mobius strip. Mind thinks itself as it finds itself. Relapse is the condition of success: success just is that moment of triumphing over your fuck ups. God isn't something outside us but the very self-propulsion of our thought. His infinitely plastic operating power demands only your Enjoyment: YHWH as Demiurge tasted the Garden first, before Adam.

>> No.11638019
File: 770 KB, 2824x2721, ww2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11638019

The formal difference of x ≠ y ("Being, pure being") establishes an infinitely recursive Indra Net: every center is the differential effect of every other, the singularity didn't "bang", it inflated: every point of space left in its wake became a singularity together. The Logos was a stutter: 1 x 1 = 1. The Cartesian obsession with necessity and universality turns mystery into a slush pile. There is such a thing as spiritual color-blindness. Healthy individuals are healthy singularities. Nietzsche's will-to-power: individuation is self-possession, sickness is a leaking at the seams. As I relate to the outside world I am related to that which relates: if I let the individuality of these powers free I flirt with demonism: evil is non-being's thirst for being, the other intrudes on me as the excitation of malignant algorithms: there is nothing there. But being in a flow-state - in the zone - is the happy balance, I become like self-modulating flow, living volatility, capitalism exists only to fill the vacuum of this state's absence, because time commits us to continuing anyways, God is an infinity of witnessing centers living and dying, God kills you for a fresh pair of eyes (dying makes sure you forget you forgot, space is a blood-soaked sponge), and something else besides, the sun has fed and nourished every plant you've ever seen in your life, you're just meat in a radical void or: Plato was right about everything, Spinoza was poisoned by mechanism, black holes are irruptions of noumena, Kant built his log cabin on the island of a prioricity and Hegel went sailing into the blue. But even he didn't sail into the darkest storms, unlike Schelling and Holderlin. Hegel didn't compromise with the East, he and Dogen just took two different routes to the same bar. It's getting late now and they're whispering about a childhood star, about a Thought always waking up into waking up. Wake up.

>> No.11638067
File: 416 KB, 500x775, 1534436156498.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11638067

>>11638019
>>11638001
based and likely redpilled

>> No.11638079
File: 400 KB, 803x688, 1522621886880.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11638079

>>11638001
>>11638019

>> No.11638087

>>11638001
I will be impressed when you can actually string together many different kinds of eastern thought instead of dropping a few token Buddhist concepts mixed with the western people you talk about, like you have for the last several of these posts. Still basic-bitch stuff but you have potential.

>> No.11638121

that's either woke as fuck or pure word salad
i don't believe i have the background knowledge to differentiate, you've combined many topics together to create some form of unity. i understand some of the themes from psychedelic experiences and reading+ mathematics. but the narrative is still lost on me.
good word salad either way anon

>> No.11638326

>>11638121
hmm i guess the main point is everything will be okay

>> No.11638424

>>11638001
>>11638019
This is going in my pseud compilation

>> No.11638576

Can someone translate this into 80 iq speak? I am serious btw. I want to make a sense of this.

>> No.11638632

>>11638576
line by line would take too long, pick the ones you want to understand most or i can just rec u some books

>> No.11638647

>>11638087
I bet you're a Virgo, that's such a Virgo answer.

>> No.11638654

>>11638326
that's nice to know
is it basically tldr: bhudism/taoism/ generic ego death related spirituality, but worded much more intellectually?

>> No.11638690
File: 90 KB, 960x720, 0fa17073984d2ddf12be331373ad5eb3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11638690

Hegel can explain Alice in Wonderland's unbirthday parties:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdsZT7WKjW8

Deleuze's (de-LOOZ-ay) can not.

>> No.11638699

>>11638654
Well, it has nothing to do with Taoism, so there's that.

>> No.11638702

>>11638001

Alright, I'll bite.

>the Ouroborous as Mobius strip.

Besides the introduction of Notion, this is the cringiest thing so far in your passage. Really? The snake shit? God damn.

>YHWH as Demiurge tasted the Garden first, before Adam.

I have an urge to cringe.

>There is such a thing as spiritual color-blindness.

God, this shit fucking hurts. At least the first half of your first post was slightly cogent. This is way off the mark and drags down the rest of your compelling narrative. It's meant to be expository and it fails completely.

>I become like self-modulating flow, living volatility, capitalism exists only to fill the vacuum of this state's absence,

???

>As I relate to the outside world I am related to that which relates: if I let the individuality of these powers free I flirt with demonism: evil is non-being's thirst for being,

Dumb spirituality bullshit that has nothing to do with your proof offered before. Why even bring in deleuze?

You clearly gave up after awhile and started spouting nonsense, when in reality you could have kept going with a certain mystic logic to your thought, and made me actually enjoy your bullshit instead of sighing to myself that we have yet another retard on this board that thinks they can get away with impressing themselves by writing themselves into an illogical stupor and feeling clever because of it.

I'd recommend reading Plato again, too. Or at least, erase these two posts before you claim anything he said was right. Probably good for your mental health either way.

>> No.11638703

>>11638654
Go incomprehend Western philosophy somewhere else you dumb gook, nobody cares about your fortune cookie philosophy, stop projecting.

>> No.11638712

>>11638702
I was under the impression he was a Cthulhu cultist initiate.

Props for trying to decipher.

>> No.11638753

>>11638702
>cringe, cringe, cringe, nonsense, nonsense, nonsense

not really convincing me you've attained the same heights or higher

>> No.11638765

>>11638647
you're right lol

>> No.11638784

>>11638654
no, it isn't "just" [cliche] worded more intellectually, any more than hegel's system is "just" the statement that all is One worded more intellectually, level of expression is commensurate to understanding, if you reduce philosophy to clichés it's because you think in them (or maybe you don't, I mean this in general)

>> No.11638871

>“On this account, therefore, I have not hesitated nor have I been ashamed to call you my
brethren and my companions, because ye will be fellow-kings with me in my kingdom. This, therefore, I say unto you, knowing that I will give you the mystery of the Ineffable; that is: That mystery is I, and I am that mystery.

>> No.11638905

>>11638001
Ah. So this is the kind of obscure, worthless prose that one produces after taking drugs and reading superficially a mix of Western and Eastern philosophy. I hope you're not older than 20 years old or being serious, because this is embarrassing. Saged and hidden.

>> No.11639942

Love your posts, bud. Keep it up.

>> No.11640016

>>11638576
In the first post he is saying that individual mind is a part of the universal mind and contains it so knowledge of the absolute is within us. And that G-- is that which causes thought within us so we can know G-- by observing our process of thought.

>> No.11640023
File: 11 KB, 225x225, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11640023

>>11640016
>G--

beep beep beep

>> No.11640044

>>11640016
--- -- ---- - -- ---

>> No.11640977

>>11638001
this image you use is ugly and it makes me angry

>> No.11640981

>>11640977
So...you bump the thread?

>> No.11642153
File: 1.44 MB, 2560x1440, 20180817_211409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11642153

Bump

>> No.11642169

>>11638576
It's just a pretentious way of bringing up the mind body problem.

>> No.11642177

>>11642169
Haha no

>> No.11642180

based

>> No.11642227

>>11638576
One way to summarize one of the points in the OP is: it's because thought can't make complete sense of what it thinks, that it /does/ make sense.

Little more to it than that but that's the gist

>> No.11642269

>>11638576
Basic idea in the second is that proper spirituality is cultivating a centrality of self. Being centered in yourself instead of getting pulled every which way by thought and desire. Don't shut the world out, learn to expose yourself to it and not get swept away

>> No.11642331

Sophistry at its finest

>> No.11642345

>>11638001
>>11638019
Could you say that again without the schizobabble? It might be interesting

>> No.11642355

>>11642345
See: >>11642227
>>11642269

>> No.11642465

I hate how you start all your stupid pseuds posts with a :