[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 143 KB, 2286x2794, sc101-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11632879 No.11632879 [Reply] [Original]

Personally, I prefer the director's cut

>> No.11632915

Nah man, the editor knew what he was doing with this one.

>> No.11632926
File: 12 KB, 300x365, science-book1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11632926

personally, I prefer the non-fiction version

>> No.11633357
File: 26 KB, 367x500, 847169841228430465.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11633357

>>11632926
>science is my religion!

>> No.11633377
File: 72 KB, 850x400, quote-there-is-a-fundamental-difference-between-religion-which-is-based-on-authority-and-science-stephen-hawking-41-16-99.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11633377

>>11633357
it's not a religion, you mouth breather, it's literally facts, which is like the antipode of religion
also
>has never read any science books
>criticizes it nonetheless
lmao. like clockwork

>> No.11633421

This guy above me is bait, don't feed him (you)'s.

>> No.11633499

>>11633377
>that quote
Literally the opposite is true.

>> No.11633507

>>11633499
Which is why we're talking on machines designed by the church right?

>> No.11633515

>>11633507
>That brainlet response
You clearly didn't understand what he was trying to say enough to respond to it.

>> No.11633524

>>11633515
>ad hominem cause I have no argument

>> No.11633531

>>11633507
Science is currently based on authority. Religion (the true version) is based on observation and reason. There is no difference between true religion and true science, none of which need to be based on authority.
>science will win
This idiot has no idea what he's even talking about.

>> No.11633540

>>11633531
>the true version
yeah yeah no true scotsman blah blah blah

>> No.11633551

>>11633524
>Ad hominem meme
He's not saying that religion "wins" because of the fact that it contributes more to society. He's saying that religion will win because the vast majority of people seek the existential comfort that religion offers rather than the void of meaninglessness that science tends to portray. So literally the exact opposite of that quote is true, science has never won out over religion and it likely never will because, to the human psyche religion is just too valuable. And calling you a brainlet while it may be insulting is also an objective truth so take that as you will.

>> No.11633553

>>11633540
Just look without prejudice at the way science works today.

>> No.11633566

>>11633553
curing diseases, saving lives, producing the greatest technology ever conceived, explaining all aspects of existence and the cosmos?
yeah, so fucking terrible
I too wish we still believed stars had souls and the sun went around the earth, think of all we've lost!!
/sarcasmoff

>> No.11633572

>>11633566
you literally type like a teenager atheist on facebook, which compliments your logic

>> No.11633576

>>11633551
>wanting doxa/gnosis instead of phronesis

>> No.11633581

>>11633566
You're ridiculous.
>producing the greatest technology ever conceived
Here he is, the presumptious modern man who thinks he knows all of a history that would be linear according to his illegitimate belief. Otherwise, his teachers surely would have told him that there were more advanced civilizations in the past.
>explaining all aspects of existence and the cosmos?
Please tell me you're joking. The opposite would be worrying.

>> No.11633620

>>11633499
How is the opposite true?

>> No.11633636

>>11633620
>>11633531

>> No.11635475

>>11632926
>>11633377
Obviously bait but since it hasn't been said: the bibble™ isn't a science textbook and your mind has been Dawkin'd if you actually think there is one thing in the book that gets "BTFO by science."
/lit/ is where scientism comes to die.

>> No.11635516

>>11633531
>>11633581
>>11635475
religion and christianity in particular has been one long process of saying
>we have the answers to everything
then scientific facts come along and they go
>well, actually what we meant was this and that, and you still haven't shown how THIS works, but we have the answers for it
then scientific facts come along and does show how it works and so on ad infinitum
just look at basic stuff like Evolution, Neuroscience, post-Einsteinian Physics, etc
christianity has been on its heels ever since they decided to stop burning the """"heretics"""" who could prove their dogmas to be the horseshit that they are

>> No.11635539
File: 93 KB, 188x220, tobias-and-raphael.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11635539

>>11632879
Tobit is some of most pleasurable reading in the Bible. Basically Tobias goes on an adventure with a dog and an angel to reclaim the family fortune. But Protestants don't want you to read it.

>> No.11635986

>>11633377
>it's literally facts
Science so much more than facts.
Go read the scientific method chapter in a 5th grade textbook, you absolute fucking retard.

>> No.11636001

I did too before I found out the director is a raging pedo

>> No.11636013

>>11635516
Which is why science and Christianity are both fundamentally a repackaging of the same truth-obsessed ideas. They have far more in common than either are willing to admit.

To clarify, scientists doing research are not the same as proselytising proponents of scientism, though there is undoubtedly some crossover.

>> No.11636066
File: 84 KB, 496x750, fedora2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11636066

>>11632879
Personally, I think OP is a faggot.

>> No.11636068

>>11636001
t. Rabbi Hersehl Goldstein

>Notwithstanding the media hysteria over sex abuse in the Catholic Church, priests abuse at a rate far lower than that of other males. While even one case of abuse is too many, approximately only 4% of all active priests between 1950 and 2002 were even accused of abuse – a rate far lower than that of other males in the general population.

> "ased on the surveys and studies conducted by different denominations over the past 30 years, experts who study child abuse say they see little reason to conclude that sexual abuse is mostly a Catholic issue. 'We don't see the Catholic Church as a hotbed of this or a place that has a bigger problem than anyone else,' said Ernie Allen, president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children …

>"Experts disagree on the rate of sexual abuse among the general American male population, but Allen says a conservative estimate is one in 10. Margaret Leland Smith, a researcher at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, says her review of the numbers indicates it’s closer to one in 5 …

>"Since the mid-1980s, insurance companies have offered sexual misconduct coverage as a rider on liability insurance, and their own studies indicate that Catholic churches are not higher risk than other congregations … It's been that way for decades."

http://www.themediareport.com/fast-facts/

>> No.11636072

>>11633507
>Not knowing the Church built robots in the middle ages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ycyj76VPOtc

>> No.11636112

>>11632926
>>11633377
>caring about facts
lmfao @ you nerds.

>> No.11636125

>>11633377
You underestimate how much of what we think of as "true" is based on intuition as opposed to empirical research.

>> No.11636154

>>11632879
Good edition too, anon. Good shit.

>> No.11637316

>>11632879
The Apocrypha isn't canon. More canon than those dumb YouTube vidya theories, but still not canonical.