Brainlet book

[Anonymous No.11626456]

This is why atheists are no longer taken seriously.

[Anonymous No.11626459]

>>11626456
have you read the old testament?

[Anonymous No.11626474]

>>11626456
and christians haven't been take seriously since science has incessantly been btfoing all of their retarded assumptions since Galileo
your point?

[Anonymous No.11626479]

>>11626474
>and christians haven't been take seriously since science has incessantly been btfoing all of their retarded assumptions since Galileo

/thread

[Anonymous No.11626481]

>>11626456
Why does the one who wrote the foreword take up more book cover space than the actual author?

[Anonymous No.11626489]

>>11626459
Yes.
>>11626474
>christians haven't been take seriously
You're willingly blind.

Surely you see the issue with calling the Judeo-Christian God evil when you're using a Judeo-Christian based system of morality to do so.

[Anonymous No.11626523]

>>11626489
>muh morality
kid, I decide my own morality and honestly I'm a pretty amoral sort of guy. I don't need an abrahamic desert deity to determine how I'm going to act or judge things.
your irrelevant drivel is getting tiresome and people have long since stopped caring about your mythology-that's-better-than-science stories.
have you impeded the progress of humanity enough already? just FOAD

[Anonymous No.11626525]

>>11626489
My system of morality doesn't allow for slavery

The Judeo-Christian system of morality does

[Anonymous No.11626543]

>not recognizing the crypto-theological metaphysics of science as just the latest incarnation of jesuit philosophical formalism

yall niggas need to read some books. btw darkins is right, god is definitely even more eviler than skeletor

[Anonymous No.11626545]

>>11626525
>my system of morality
Lol

[Anonymous No.11626599]

>>11626523
>he believes in progress

[Anonymous No.11626620]

>>11626523
That's the point though, you decide your own morality along with everyone, so how can you judge how good or evil a being is in a way that is not completely subjective to you and different from everyone else?
Atleast religious people can, since they adhere to the idea that morality is objective and unchanging, and they all have to agree to it, whether they are wrong (probably) or not doesn't change that if they are not being disingenuous when laying claims on good and evil, you are.

[Anonymous No.11626651]

>>11626474
Check again, brainlet. Science is swinging back into the hands of the theists.

[Anonymous No.11626657]

>>11626651
Right now theists are busy covering up mass child abuse, again.

[Anonymous No.11626682]

>>11626657
A small group of theists that we can all agree are in the wrong. You would not think it fair if all atheists were collectively responsible for everything any one of them had done, so do not pin the actions of others who happen to agree with us on a few issues on us so generally.

[Anonymous No.11626688]

>>11626657
ad hominem

[Anonymous No.11626704]

>>11626682
300 suspects is not a small group but an indication for a systematic or organized enterprise. When will people realize that organized religious groups are nothing but tax-exempted criminal gangs.

[Anonymous No.11626707]

>>11626651
Really, its swinging into the hands of pantheists, panpyschists and panentheists.

[Anonymous No.11626716]

>>11626704
300 suspects. There are over 2 billion Christians in the world.

[Anonymous No.11626719]

>>11626704
fallacy of composition

>>11626707
this is correct.

[Anonymous No.11626731]

>>11626657
>>11626704
Not him, but this isn't an argument against theism. On your point however, pedophile rings can be found in virtually every elite group, subculture, professio and society today, the Catholic Church isn't abnormal, it is actually the norm.

[Anonymous No.11626754]

>>11626456
>This is why atheists are no longer taken seriously.
Yet they completely dominate philosophy and the scientific elite

[Anonymous No.11626766]

>>11626651
>Check again, brainlet. Science is swinging back into the hands of the theists.

[Anonymous No.11626772]

>>11626754
All the encrusted boomer positivists yet to die off and postmodern relativist faggots.

[Anonymous No.11626781]

>>11626772
>analytic philosophy
>postmodern relativist

[Anonymous No.11626789]

>>11626704
tax exemption is preferable, the reason christcuckery is dying is because of the separation of church and state

[Anonymous No.11626797]

>>11626781
>he thinks analytic philosophy has remained immune to buttfucking relativist neocommies

[Anonymous No.11626806]

>>11626797
Cringe

[Anonymous No.11626814]

>>11626806
t. retard

[Anonymous No.11626829]

>>11626814
t.

[Anonymous No.11626831]

>>11626489
>mfw the field of ethics has been around longer than Christianity

[Anonymous No.11626838]

>>11626829
>projecting this hard

[Anonymous No.11626843]

>>11626754
Funny that the highest IQ on the chart is majority theist. It's like that expanding brain meme

>God exists
>God doesnt exist
>Actually God necessarily must exist

[Anonymous No.11626890]

>>11626843
Imagine being this stupid

[Anonymous No.11627078]

>>11626754
So atheists are midwits?

[Anonymous No.11627091]

>>11626829
>le epic style
Is this actually just ironic?

[Anonymous No.11627548]

>>11626754
Imagine being so retarded you interpret that as a progressive increase instead of a switch/interrupter/diode behavior.

[Anonymous No.11627628]

>>11627548
Cope

http://diyhpl.us/~nmz787/pdf/The_Relation_Between_Intelligence_and_Religiosity__A_Meta-Analysis_and_Some_Proposed_Explanations.pdf

[Anonymous No.11627635]

>>11626474
>>11626479
>>11626523 (ouch)
>>11626657
>>11626707
>>11626719
>>11626766
I come to bait threads for the cringe. You all have supplied abundantly.

[Anonymous No.11627646]

>>11626474
>the bibble is a science textbook
>>11627628
(((zuckerman)))

[Anonymous No.11627652]

>>11626651
Provide one bit of support for this assertion, you unbearable pseud.
I’ll wait ...

[Anonymous No.11628169]

>>11626523
Is this pasta? This has got to be pasta

[Anonymous No.11628185]

>>11626481
Because his name sells books. ;)

[Anonymous No.11628552]

>>11626523
>he thinks that society can progress with subjective morality
If i werent a christian id tell you to kill yourself

[Anonymous No.11628579]

>>11626489
>killing is bad
>God kills
>therefore, God is bad
Where’s the issue?

[Anonymous No.11628598]

>>11626843
>what are trends?

[Anonymous No.11628646]

>>11628579
why is killing bad?

[Anonymous No.11629087]

>foreword by richard dawkins

rofl, he's not even trying to pretend that his book is not written for people with an actual functioning brain.

[Anonymous No.11629095]

>>11628646
God said so

[Anonymous No.11629123]

>>11628579
For God we are only characters in his story.

[Anonymous No.11629170]

>>11626523