[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 64 KB, 781x444, translations.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623454 No.11623454 [Reply] [Original]

What Bible translation should /lit/ be reading?

https://www.strawpoll.me/16273082

>> No.11623530

>>11623454
ESV is pretty damn good. Reads well too.

>> No.11623554
File: 189 KB, 304x400, geneva-bible.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623554

>>11623454
*ahem*

>> No.11623574

usccb.org/bible/

Released on March 9, 2011, the New American Bible, Revised Edition (NABRE) is the culmination of nearly 20 years of work by a group of nearly 100 scholars and theologians, including bishops, revisers and editors. The NABRE includes a newly revised translation of the entire Old Testament (including the Book of Psalms) along with the 1986 edition of the New Testament.

>> No.11623622

>>11623454
niv

>> No.11623633

>>11623454
Jefferson Bible

>> No.11623653
File: 115 KB, 500x504, we-have-this-thread-every-day-29221693.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623653

>>11623454

>> No.11623658

>>11623653
Then surely you've all been able to work out the right answer by now. Can you give us the final verdict?

>> No.11623801

>>11623658
Not the anon you are replying to but the verdict is bassically original language is obviously the best if you can read it. After that it is a long spew of disagreements based on variablility within value of various aspects such as accuracy versus readibility. I was on a while back when the consensus began to lean toward KJV, which I strongly hope has faded from the norm.

>> No.11625327
File: 158 KB, 554x554, 69614dfa0052e5b2d1afc0abafd2cda4--my-bible-the-works.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11625327

Read whichever one you enjoy reading. Read some passages online and then choose. Any Word for Word (Essentially literal) translation is good.

I recommend trying out the ESV, NKJV, or NRSV. Also it doesn't hurt to read more than one translation (actually it's good). Read John in one translation, then try another.

>> No.11625512

>>11623454
You should probably read the one that has been read the most and quoted the most by past writers.

>> No.11625523

>>11623653
we do not have this thread everyday or even every week. what is you're need to lie?

>> No.11625672

>that one guy reading the NIV

hehe

>> No.11625678

Daily reminder that the ESV is just a glorified rebranding of the RSV, which itself was a translation by a bunch of theological liberals

>> No.11625684

KJV for the literary version
NRSV for the academic version

Wouldn't really recommend much else unless you're from a specific denomination ect