[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 39 KB, 317x475, 765337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11481999 No.11481999 [Reply] [Original]

thoughts?

>> No.11482010

none found

>> No.11482111

>>11481999
Bought this a year ago hoping that he'd elucidate on his "transcendental empiricism" but I gotta say I should've listened when people told me how utterly obscure this man was. Still, I like his version of synthesis and his inclusion of math, science, art, film, literature, and virtually all sorts of media for his work.

>> No.11482233

Intentional gibberish to get attention

to defenders: What's it about? What does he prove?

>> No.11482280

>>11482233
>What does he prove?
deleuze takes a 'constructivist' approach to philosophy, so the whole notion of 'proving' is alien to him. proofs are for mathematicians. philosophy is for generating concepts, and taming tight, wild undergrad strange.

>> No.11482490

>>11481999
>>11482111
Nice trips, bros

>> No.11483803

bump

>> No.11483891

>>11482280
this but unironically

>>11481999
nice trips. it's garbage, like all deleuze; philosophy as art piece rather than an endeavor for truth.

>> No.11483913

>>11483891
>an endeavor for truth
le dropped

>> No.11483930

>>11481999
He fucked Kant up the ass

>> No.11483980

>>11481999
I've been meaning to read this for a while but even the summaries and "simple" explanations give me a fucking headache. Can anyone explain in caveman language what he's actually on about with this thing?

>> No.11484033
File: 30 KB, 640x537, 2em3v4O_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11484033

>>11483980
> Grug no real, Grug made of relations independent of their terms and relations between relations (Grug call this pure difference)
> Grug's pure differences wobbly and constantly differ from one another and from themselves (they have a becoming)
> the becoming of Grug's pure differences is made of repetition with variation (Grug do something, Grug get better at it)
> this repetition with variation is the natural form of repetition, identical repetition (without variation) is the artificial one
> Grug's pure differences are real all the time, striving to become actual (from virtual)
> Grug's pure differences are universal singular (they might have similarities, but do not form under a concept, each drop of water is made of different relations) and have singular points (thresholds, like the boiling point of water)

>> No.11484051
File: 108 KB, 907x677, D6C172E8-4CB1-4B83-A04F-A7E7B360A838.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11484051

>>11484033
I know this post is kind of a joke but this is the best and most coherent explanation I’ve ever received on this book. Thank you based grug-anon

>> No.11484075

>>11483913
brainlet detected. philosophy should increase knowledge. deleuze does not do that. he is not a philosopher.

>> No.11484128

>>11484033
unironically don't see anything wrong with this
it's a lot like whitehead

>> No.11484137

>>11484075
>knowledge
Knowledge of what? The knowledge from philosophy is really just knowledge of what philosophers have said throughout history. If it has a relationship with reality than explain which of the thousands of philosophers is the ‘correct’ one. You’ll get a million different answers from a billion different people. A philosophy is just a concept you place upon reality. A philosophy is a way of looking at the world and changing it, either in your day to day life or in a grander way. In that respect Deleuze succeeds.

>> No.11484359

>>11484075
>philosophy should increase knowledge
What? Understanding, maybe, but not knowledge, that's science.

>> No.11484660

>>11484033
beautiful post, much appreciated

>> No.11484734

>>11484075
this is just embarrassing

>> No.11486191

>>11482233
>Intentional gibberish
Reminder that Deleuze's philosophy is applied by the IDF to their military operations(and worked wondrously).
http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/art-war-deleuze-guattari-debord-and-israeli-defence-force

>> No.11486374

>>11486191
Hopefully /pol/ will hate him even more. Too bad he's not himself Jewish like Derrida. At least he's a leftist.

>> No.11486403

>>11484033
based grugposter producing the best deleuze summary on /lit/

>> No.11487006

>>11483891
>philosophy as art piece rather than an endeavor for truth.

There's no contradiction, art has its own truth. Even Nietzsche knew this despite opposing the two constantly.

>> No.11487346

>>11486374
Sorry buddy: https://www.counter-currents.com/2013/03/deleuze-guattari-and-the-new-right-part-1/