/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.11308076]

Is this the great american book? Is it really underrated?

[Anonymous No.11308085]

rather just read Woody Allen's books desu

[Anonymous No.11308136]

oh. I thought Jerry had written some secondary lit on Heidegger for a moment.

[Anonymous No.11308257]

>>11308136
lol

[Anonymous No.11308335]

>>11308136
He's done more for contemporary culture than Heidegger has done.

[Anonymous No.11308507]

Heidegger, more like Hi Nigger

[Anonymous No.11308513]

>>11308335
absolutely jewish thing to say

[Anonymous No.11308524]

The following work consequently focuses on the most distinguishing
feature of the “Thing” lecture— the fourfold— and attempts to do so
“on its own terms.” So much confusion and befuddlement has attended
Heidegger’s thinking of the fourfold that his basic insights into the thing
have largely gone unheeded. Too often commentators have taken flight
from the perplexity of thinking through the fourfold in Heidegger’s work
by assimilating it to some outside framework or set of concerns, be they
Platonic, Aristotelian, Ancient Greek more generally, Native American,
Chinese, Hölderlinian, or a recasting of Heidegger’s own Being and Time.
But even when this is not the case, commentary has not remained very
close to the actual wording of Heidegger’s text.3
In making my case for
the fourfold’s central place in a Heideggerian thinking of relationality,
my intention is to take Heidegger at his word and follow the presentation
of the fourfold as given in “The Thing” lecture of 1949, as well
as the complementary presentation in the lecture “Building Dwelling
Thinking” from 1951.4
The following chapters devoted to the fourfold
thus examine these initial depictions on a word- for- word basis. Instead
of explaining away the fourfold, I endeavor to trace out the importance
of each term used in these presentations, following their resonances
throughout the surrounding texts. Broadly speaking, then, the chapters
devoted to the fourfold stake out and survey the terrain of Heidegger’s
later concerns out from this epicenter of the fourfold. In so doing, I
develop a conception of mediation and relationality as operative across
Heidegger’s thinking of the thing. While such an approach may not grant
us comprehensive coverage of Heidegger’s later thought, it does allow us
an ordered approach to the bulk of his motivating concerns of the period
and a point of conceptual purchase for reading the later Heidegger.
- SeinLanguage, p. 5

christ i had no idea Jerry has such command on this topic

[Anonymous No.11308527]

>>11308335
What is the point of this post?

[Anonymous No.11308677]

Is this the birth of an epic new meme?

[Anonymous No.11310014]

>>11308076
Thats nothing. Look at this.

[Anonymous No.11310053]

>>11310014
paper books are for plebs

[Anonymous No.11310059]

>>11310053
Seriously try reading it. Kelsey Grammer is a fucking nutcase

[Anonymous No.11310150]

>>11308136
D A S E I N F E L D

[Anonymous No.11310156]

>>11308085
I wouldn't.