Does this board ever talk about anything other than submissive stuff?

[Anonymous No.11142113]

Either it's a religious worry, or a political worry, but keeping people submissive in this manner is itself Sadistic. I want books that aren't filtered out by the mods fucked up tastes, but I also don't want to impose on this board anymore than I do already. Help a guy find his book like a bio of Napoleon and Lolita together in one, friends.

[Anonymous No.11142149]

>itt post BAD BANNED BOOKS that THE MAN DOESNT WANT U TO READ

what exactly are you asking for?

[Anonymous No.11142152]

>>11142113
>t. fat, ugly loser

[Anonymous No.11142199]

>>11142149
>>11142152
Modern Conan books with realist aesthetic and at least middlebrow servicing of themes. It seems any time I talk about these books everyone here is looking for fantasy or gay sex or pedo flower arranging zen shit, and I just want to read a plain spoken Sade dealing with life and doing well. Some might even say he's a hero, not an antihero, and that he isn't cheesy, or gay - like every masculine character is a symbol of repression, or every girl is a symbol of low T. Should I just move on from this place so the pedo religious people can continue making /lit.tes submissive?

[Anonymous No.11142207]

>>11142199
Join us on /pol/ and /r9k/, m8, we are still some masculine alphas left

[Anonymous No.11142218]

>>11142199
if you're going to baselessly accuse us of something you've decided we all do, in every post you make, then there really isn't much point in staying, is there?

[Anonymous No.11142222]

>>11142199
If you were masculine you would only read non-fiction bios and ancient-mil strat books but you’re not you’re probably someone who never played varsity sports and has never fucked above a 7/10 white woman

[Anonymous No.11142224]

>>11142207
this but ironic

[Anonymous No.11142231]

>>11142113
>books that aren't filtered out by the mods fucked up tastes
There are none. Mods barely do anything here. Discuss Mein Kampf or whatever as much as you want to. There's practically nothing truly transgressive today. Everything is polarized and everything has its place. Terrorists bomb us, we bomb terrorists, artists squirt paint out of their vaginas, we call them pretentious wankers, SJWs spout radical bullshit, alt-right spouts radical bullshit, commies want this, liberals want that.

>>11142199
Completely unexpectedly, OP turns out to be a banal /pol/ edgelord

[Anonymous No.11142241]

>>11142207
x then biz then pol is the order that has been chosen. I've got my /x/ handle on things and next I'll be attacking biz forms of thought. Then I'll do pol. But for now, I'm here fore daily dose of shaking the babies and counting their screams.

[Anonymous No.11142255]

>>11142199
Holy shit dude like wow ... you’re so fucking masculine. Can I feel your bicep? I’m not even guy but I’m getting a massive boner from the aura of your masculinity and cynicism

[Anonymous No.11142258]

>>11142199
Holy shit dude like wow ... you’re so fucking masculine. Can I feel your bicep? I’m not even gay but I’m getting a massive boner from the aura of your masculinity and cynicism

[Anonymous No.11142261]

>>11142241
No one in this thread has even told you that your opinions are wrong, the only thing that happened is that you're getting told you are sperging out like an idiot and making no sense.

Imagine having a victim complex this bad and not even realizing the nonsense that you're spewing. I'm a conservative and I've never felt attacked or even in the minority here. Maybe its because we're discussing literature, and not out personal politics, and OP thinks that what literature you read has to be central to what politics you ascribe to.

Can't wait to see him remake this thread another day or two from now, still believing that /lit/ is a hivemind that attacks anything that it doesn't like.

[Anonymous No.11142292]

>>11142218
Pretty much the basis of why I'm here all day every day, friend. You same tamatoes, I say based accusations, like J'ai Acc...but I digress.
>>11142222
Yeah, not the point. I don't care obviously how masculinity is perceived. Thus Christabel. I just get tired of the general submissiveness celebrations and desire books which paint Sadistic pursuits in a positive light. I guess I need to read genre fiction for this, but why? Like fucking why is it so impossible for fiction writers to manifest this kind of character without it being an antagonist, a god, a father, or the object of desire??? No one deals with the psychologically important aspects of politicians or judges or cops or generals without making sure to dumb it down, and it fucking sucks! I like to read and I'm tired of these pussy books telling me the joys of an unexpected rim job.
>>11142231
not edgelord, seriously curious reader with fucked up fetishes that make me hate myself and my gender. I'm tired of being emasculated and curious why none here feel the same.

[Anonymous No.11142320]

>>11142292
Go back to /r9k/, you fucking sappy loser

[Anonymous No.11142328]

>>11142261
This is fucking laughable. You wimps talk nothing but personal politics in book form all day. It's the only thing that interests you, and not until someone calls you out for it do you modify your criticism as someone supporting open discussion.
I just want to discuss books without discussing their relevance to the news cycles. It doesn't mean I don't want to talk about politics, but I'm looking to talk about character representations and what types of character are lauded here are male alpha fantasy or classic, gay sex books for mindless pleasure, or pedo flower arranging zen shit.

Just someone say Dumas and I'll shut the fuck up about there being no contemporary like him.

[Anonymous No.11142329]

>>11142292
god i hate absurdist nihilist niggers so much

[Anonymous No.11142374]

>>11142320
>>11142329
>No one deals with the psychologically important aspects of politicians or judges or cops or generals without making sure to dumb it down, and it fucking sucks!

This is fair, though. The open butt-cheeked liberal selfsniffing farter of modern epics always succeeds in erasing hero amidst us. Having no representations of good father figures or decent young males is a fucking shame, and it's not taken seriously by the right who allow others to pander us with their denigration of anything resembling a stoic nature - and do so as an inversion of the denigration that people from the left use against the masculine character.

[Anonymous No.11142387]

>>11142374
It didn't take you long to start posting about politics and fall back on the news cycle you pretend to decry, anon.

[Anonymous No.11142434]

>>11142387
>/lit/ doesn't read
>circlejerk, circlejerk.
>I won cause I came first!
Enjoy your revolution lads.

[Anonymous No.11143515]

>>11142292
It's J'accuse you fucking pseud