[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 35 KB, 480x480, 12121212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10954343 No.10954343 [Reply] [Original]

>post excerpt from highly acclaimed novel from the 50s as my own
>lit criticizes it and calls it amateurish and puts it down like its nothing

Really gets the noggin joggin huh? You elitist faggots think you're so good. When in truth you write like cringy spastic lords buttfucked with a thesaurus.

>> No.10954392

>>10954343
highly acclaimed =/= good

>> No.10954398

>>10954392
I agree. Thats why I did this experiment with multiple books over a 2 week period. /lit/ is full of passive aggressive pseudo intellectual retards

>> No.10954472
File: 425 KB, 1402x1500, newbooks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10954472

>>10954343
Most of the people on this board are high school or college-age unpublished fakers who haven't read most of the books they discuss. Why are you surprised that they just put down anything you offer? They make fun of great authors knowingly all the time too.

>> No.10954488

>>10954472
>confucius

lmfao you're a brainlet

>> No.10954501

>>10954488
Exhibit A, thank you.

>> No.10954516

>>10954343
But is the book actually good?

>> No.10954521

>>10954472
>Philip k dick
it's funny how you can make your opinion so unimportant

>> No.10954634

>>10954521
And Exhibit B. This is what you're dealing with, OP: maladjusted teenagers pretending to be scholars.

>> No.10954637

Many highly acclaimed novels are trash, and a lot of novels nobody knows about are amazing, consensus is not a guarantee of quality

>> No.10954660

>>10954637
>>10954398

>> No.10954692

>>10954343
What was the novel?

>> No.10954719

post the passages and novels you were referring to

>> No.10954744

>>10954392
This
>>10954488
"Confucius say, don't progress."