[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 32 KB, 276x361, hegel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10797621 No.10797621 [Reply] [Original]

What does /lit/ think of Hegol's criticism of the Enlightenment? Hogel thought that the Enlightenment lead to the French revolution because reason rampantly destroyed the content of society. Pure insight can only ever grasp the concept of an object, and when taking religion as it's object, commits the same error that it accuses religion of: having faith. Reason cannot verify that reason is internally consistent, and as a result, the pure insight of the Enlightenment operates by faith at it's core.
Does Hegel's criticism really explain the impetus for the French revolution, and isn't reason always internally consistent?

>> No.10798341
File: 779 KB, 647x656, IMG_3850.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10798341

/lit/ is to dumb for Hegel. Try /leftypol/

>> No.10798357

>>10798341
Man but I swear I used to see a lot of Hegel posts

>> No.10799505

>>10797621
>durhur you have assumed a few uncontroversial small axioms as philosophical bedrock
>this is the same as having faith in the whole bible
You can't get rid of axioms entirely but you can minimize them.