[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 39 KB, 317x475, 1501461419197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10664426 No.10664426 [Reply] [Original]

Is this book really as mind-opening as people claim it is?

>> No.10664440

Why don't you read it and find out instead of posting on 4chan all day?

>> No.10664445

>>10664440
Because 4chan is basically crack.

>> No.10664480

>>10664445
not an argument

>> No.10664487

>>10664440
/thread

>> No.10664488

>>10664480
Its a reason

>> No.10664499

>>10664488
It's an excuse.

>> No.10664508

itt: nobody who has read it

>> No.10664519

>>10664508
I'll read it right now u fag. I'll report back in a few hours

>> No.10664558

You need to see whats it breaking from for it to be interesting, it's like the nietzschaen anti-hegel via parts of kant

>> No.10664611

>>10664499
There's probably an epic song lyric I could fit in here but I can't think of anything.

>> No.10664619

>>10664558
Why bother reading what it's breaking if what it's breaking is breaking (and therefore flawed)?

>> No.10664642

>>10664619
Because you probably believe in it unknowingly via sharing the same aspects of ideals

>> No.10664654

>>10664611
You don't have to post everything that crosses your mind, anon.

>> No.10664661

It's so bad Deleuze killed himself

>> No.10664665

>>10664661
What's so sad about it? He killed himself just as he was about to die anyway.

>> No.10664682

>>10664619
yeahhh, youre gonna need to lose that attitude if youre going to read deleuze

>> No.10664704

>>10664426
It sucks all postmodern stuff sucks

>> No.10665030

>>10664619
huh, nothin personal kid but all thought is flawed

>> No.10665035

>>10664426
Yes but you have to know what you're in for. Don't bother reading it unless you're well-versed in Nietzsche, Spinoza, Hume, Kant, Proust, Bergson -- and even then, a guide is recommended.
>>10664704
It's not really postmodern (in the way you most likely mean).

>> No.10665044

>>10665035
How do you know what I most likely mean?

>> No.10665129

>>10665044
>How do you know what I most likely mean by saying that Deleuze sucks because all postmodern stuff sucks?
Because you're probably a Peterson parrot and so you probably are thinking of "postmodern" as wannabe Derrridean crass relativist pseudoMarxist liberal feminism, and Deleuze is definitely not that.

>>10664426
The Joe Hughes guide to D&R is very helpful and concise, would recommend. Its posted on b-ok.org. The Henry Sommers Hall guide is not posted there (but some of his other work on Delueze is), and that one is less concise, and more like a step by step walk through paragraph by paragraph, if you think that would be helpful.

D&R is certainly worthwhile if you want to get up on contemporary philosophy. As >>10665035 said though, you should have some context for it first, at least some Kant, Spinoza and Nietzsche, Bergson too. Hume and Proust maybe less so imo, though they would certainly help.

>> No.10665310

Imagine The Critique of Pure Reason was written by a French post-structuralist imbecile instead of Immanuel Kant. That's Différence et Répétition