/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10588893]

Is it true?

[Anonymous No.10588917]

>>10588893
put a space in between normies and conservadumbs and move Big Red and similar kinds to that section.

[Anonymous No.10588923]

>>10588893
No, libertarians have been empirically demonstrated to be the ideological community with the highest IQ

[Anonymous No.10588933]

>>10588923
t. A libertariantard

[Anonymous No.10588936]

>>10588923
lol

[Anonymous No.10588955]

>>10588933
>>10588936
righteousmind.com/largest-study-of-libertarian-psych/

[Anonymous No.10588956]

>>10588923
Muh roads! We don’t need government to pay for the roads dude. I want to smoke pot while having gay sex with guns in a Walmart parking lot haha

[Anonymous No.10588978]

>>10588923
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DeiK0fdPv8Y

[Anonymous No.10588987]

>>10588956
>an-cap tax protest fedora manchildren are the only type of libertarians

[Anonymous No.10589004]

>>10588923
prob because it's the smallest ideological community of the major three in burgerland

[Anonymous No.10589027]

>>10588987
Name another type.

[Anonymous No.10589041]

>>10588893
As a Marxist this seems about right to me. I don’t know if I would carve out a specific category for ‘theists’.
It makes sense to me that ‘jaded reacrionaries’ would be on the very highest because by their very exceptionalness they can’t fit into the normal communities of average people, and their stand out abilities mean they will drift to the top of institutions. The fundamental error they make is to invision that all rulers would be a smart and virtuous as themselves, and that political machination wouldn’t cause idiot incompetents to become Kings. They fail to remember that the enlightened despot is the exception, not the rule.

I also wouldn’t include that batch of reactionaries except for Spengler.

[Anonymous No.10589053]

>>10588893

>stormfags at the bottom

The ehtnonationalist stance can be reached independently, your conflating intellectual flavours of it with the visceral ones.
Calling them all "stormfags" is a crude generalization.

[Anonymous No.10589065]

>stormfags at the bottom

The ehtnonationalist stance can be reached independently, you're conflating intellectual flavours with visceral ones.
You know this is a crude generalization.

[Anonymous No.10589066]

>>10589041
>As a Marxist

[Anonymous No.10589079]

mfw 140iq normie

[Anonymous No.10589080]

>>10589041
>as a Marxist

[Anonymous No.10589083]

According to online iq tests I'm a faded reactionary.

[Anonymous No.10589095]

>>10589041
Marxists can't do basic algebra.

[Anonymous No.10589098]

>>10589041
>As a Marxist

[Anonymous No.10589101]

>>10589065
go suck more zog cock

[Anonymous No.10589115]

>>10588893
>Bernie Bros
>Higher IQ than conservadumbs
Have you actually talked to any of his followers? Some of the most juvenile conversations I've ever had in my entire life.

[Anonymous No.10589119]

>>10589115
Even intelligent people can be infected by herd mentality.

[Anonymous No.10589128]

yes
t. marxist

[Anonymous No.10589132]

>>10588893
Swap egoists and milquetoast liberals and you got yourself one accurate chart

[Anonymous No.10589136]

>>10589115
lmao conservatives (contemporary) are def worse imho

bernouts are more likely to be college educated at least (which does correlate with iq)

[Anonymous No.10589146]

>>10589101
Not realizing that Israel is a weaponizable example of the ethnostate.

[Anonymous No.10589148]

>>10588893
chess is for normies?

[Anonymous No.10589157]

[Anonymous No.10589184]

>>10589115
They're pretty awful but I have had much worse convos with conservatives

[Anonymous No.10589191]

Egoists are fucking retards.

[Anonymous No.10589198]

>>10589136
>bernouts are more likely to be college educated
In my experience the opposite seems to be more true, the people with degrees who do advocate for him are always drowning in student debt (an issue worth addressing but not with the "solutions" Bernie had).

[Anonymous No.10589227]

>>10589101
90iq schizoid go.

[Anonymous No.10589230]

>>10589198
lol i go to a school with need based financial aid and most people here still supported him. bernie was pretty popular among the young affluent and educated. hillary ironically did better among the working class.

[Anonymous No.10589242]

>>10588893
What does the chess piece represent, chess players?

[Anonymous No.10589247]

>>10588893
I identify mostly with the jaded reactionaries, but I don't think I'm as smart as any of them

[Anonymous No.10589248]

>>10588893
I had to do an IQ test when applying for my job and I got a 135. I'm also very right winged.

[Anonymous No.10589271]

>>10589248
Explains why you got sub-140

[Anonymous No.10589273]

>conservatis are dum lol xDD
>fukin trumpsters! more like dumpsters lol!!
Ebin

[Anonymous No.10589279]

>>10589230
>bernie was pretty popular among the young affluent
the usual consumers of snake oil

[Anonymous No.10589283]

>>10588893
Is that Aleister Crowley on the right? This chart is one big piece of bait lmao

[Anonymous No.10589292]

>>10589148
Normies are literally pawns of the establishment.

[Anonymous No.10589300]

>>10589248
>right winged

You’re a worldbeater alright

[Anonymous No.10589302]

>>10589132
>t. deluded faggot
>>10589148
The image is equating normies with pawns

[Anonymous No.10589345]

>>10588923
cuz they act like fucking machines;
it's too idealistic intended for humans being rational, but we're far from it

[Anonymous No.10589365]

>>10589283
that's spengler

[Anonymous No.10589376]

>>10589292
Normies are the only true rebels left

[Anonymous No.10589408]

>>10588893
no and whoever made it wasted their time

[Anonymous No.10589671]

>>10589027

Minarchists.

[Anonymous No.10589686]

>>10588893
Intelligence only predicts competence. Personality predicts behavior.

[Anonymous No.10589687]

>>10588893
>Nearly all religious people are conservative
>Theists score near the highest, conservatives the lowests
>Marxists above Stormfags
>Normies above anyone
I'd say it's pretty retarded OP

[Anonymous No.10589690]

>>10588893
THIS IS NOT LITERATURE

MODS WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING

[Anonymous No.10589691]

>>10589041
>As a Marxist

[Anonymous No.10589697]

>>10589690
>he thinks we have mods here

[Anonymous No.10590710]

>>10589027
libertarian socialists
that chick who burned her obama tshirt

[Anonymous No.10590725]

>tfw traditionalist reactionary

[Anonymous No.10590735]

>>10589687
Look at the pictures, "conservadumb" clearly does not refer to all conservatives.

[Anonymous No.10590741]

>>10590710
An oxymoron?

[Anonymous No.10590743]

>>10590725
National Socialists are barbarian offspring of romantic nihilism, an attempt at creating the future... which necessitates the destruction of both liberal democracy and monarchy and its society's vestigial feudalism. Some reactionary impulses underly the movement, but more as a matter of exploitation than of intellectual parity. There is very little that is traditional in Nazism... if anything it is the modern force of brute colonisation, industry, twin forces of rationality and irrationality blurred into a violent social magma... abortion-demon countryside... mass hominid slaughterhouse, bomb-rape of civilisation.

[Anonymous No.10590776]

>>10588893
>>10589690
>>10589697

SAGE AND REPORT. MODS ARE COMING. THEY WILL SAVE US. I know they're coming. I believe in them. They're heroes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBwS66EBUcY

[Anonymous No.10590924]

Shift everything down one and put esoteric hitlerism at the top

[Anonymous No.10590936]

>>10589065
I seriously hope you don't consider Richard fucking Spencer the intellectual you want to hide behind

[Anonymous No.10590944]

>>10590725
In all my years I've never seen a national socialist or any denomination thereof not look like absolute shit IRL
You can tell because your image can't even find real examples

[Anonymous No.10590954]

>>10590743
Backed. Its crucial to keep NS and trad paganism strictly differentiated (the former loves to coopt the latter)

[Anonymous No.10590963]

>>10588893
But what's above 150 ?
t. delusional about his IQ

[Anonymous No.10590980]

>>10590710
>Libertarian socialists
Yeah. Them and the vegan meat eaters.

[Anonymous No.10590983]

>>10590741
As if taking power away from democratically accountable governments and giving it to corporations in the name of freedom isn't the oxymoron.

[Anonymous No.10590989]

>>10589027
Liberal socialists

[Anonymous No.10590998]

>>10588893
Where do you draw the line between Egoists and neckbeard libertarians

[Anonymous No.10591000]

>>10588893
Normies are unironically where everyone should be desu.

[Anonymous No.10591032]

>>10590998
Principle vs practical

[Anonymous No.10591034]

>>10590741
xD

[Anonymous No.10591041]

>>10590980
>>10590741

Are both of you in high school? Libertarian was always socialist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUs_Q_rfl9I

[Anonymous No.10591446]

>>10588893
Holds for my general experience, though I'd probably split theists into two sections — those that read commentarries in the bible (120+) and those that don't (90-). I'd also carve out a specific section for pundits/thought leaders that falls between marxists and theists, because being able to manipulate people into believing self-defeating ideologies (liberal, conservative, stormfaggotry) takes real fucking wit.
t. 139 reactionary.

[Anonymous No.10591482]

>>10588893
>when you realize this chart was made by a clueless 18 year old art student who dwells at starbucks all day

[Anonymous No.10591551]

>>10591446
As the person who made the image (flattered to see it used as bait) I agree. For instance, Hitler and Hitler-followers are two absolutely different breeds of people. And, to take my image a little more seriously than I should: to be honest, I am not so sure about the relatively high position of the theists. Obviously, a straight plane of IQ makes more subtle differences in thought hard to quanitfy, but what I notice most about religious and mystic writers is their absolutely vivid insight into the human condition (see: Weil or Buber or Augustine). A man like Aquinas is a little more like a Marxist, a very impressive systematiser with a devoted attention to ethical and epistemological concerns.
Houellebecq is an artist of rich empathy and insight, but not a genius, and certainly not by frail political associations. Spengler and de Maistre are more like autistic hyperbreeds of mystic, moralist and systematiser, with something like the stubborn character of Schopenhauer in them. I think I put all those people there not to judge their intelligence but to associate a certain mindset with a certain knowing pessimism and intellectual frankness. But Evola, Spengler and de Maistre are... hm... more romantic icons than intellectual heavyweights. Vivid, forceful, encapsulating... but not rigorous ideas.
Solzhenitsyn is a man with mystic human insights, but can't readily be placed above the likes Adorno. Pope Benedict XVI (like Aquinas) is more appropriate, given his autistic German philosophical nature. Perhaps I should have used symbols and representations moreso than profiles in the right-hand side of the chart in the same way I did with the left. It embarrasses me to look at it a little. The general sentiment is something I agree with, but the specifics are all completely inaccurate. I made it for fun - obviously Stirner's picture represents a particular moral attitude and philosophical acuity rather than the real psychiatric intellect of the man himself - but these things strike deeper into our minds than we acknowledge. I do not want to perpetuate any discomfiting illusions. I do not want to embolden obstinance. I do not want to provoke unease and discomfort of the wrong kind.

[Anonymous No.10591659]

>it lines up with my IQ perfectly
guys????????

[Anonymous No.10591677]

>>10591659
>just asked my friend
>his iq is in the theist ranges
>he's literally a philosophical theist
guys??????????????????????

[Anonymous No.10591680]

>>10588893
Where does jordan peterson fall? I am guessing near Hank Schrader

[Anonymous No.10591685]

>>10589345
I used to be a libertarian until I realized how fucking retarded everyone is and that they need a shepherd.

[Anonymous No.10591712]

>>10590944
im guessing youre american

[Anonymous No.10591727]

>>10588893
Swap stormfags and liberals and yeah

[Anonymous No.10591732]

im nazbol, where do i fit?

[Anonymous No.10591744]

>>10588893
>142 IQ
>jaded reactionary
proof of principle right here :^)

[Anonymous No.10591750]

>>10591732
Too low to be on the graph

[Anonymous No.10591756]

>>10591750
do not reply to me ever again, liberal faggot

[Anonymous No.10591791]

>>10588923
this post nigga hahahahaahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.10591849]

>>10588893
>mfw third position traditionalist larping as emmanuel macron

[Anonymous No.10591893]

>>10588893
I like to think so but probably not
t. Realist marxistfag

[Anonymous No.10591925]

>>10591893
>marxist
>realist

[Anonymous No.10592132]

>>10588893
hardly

[Anonymous No.10592263]

>>10589041
>As a Marxist

[Anonymous No.10592392]

>>10588923
Which is probably true, since libertarianism only really works if you have people smart enough to make logical decisions.

If all people acted in their rational self interested shrinking the government to a minimum is probably very viable.

But if you have gangs of ~75 IQ people running around you better have a state to protect you.

[Anonymous No.10592496]

>>10591680
Where Solzhenitzyn and Dostoyevsky meet

[Anonymous No.10592530]

>>10590743
This. Fascism and especially National Socialism are merely expressions of he same modern nihilism

[Anonymous No.10593071]

>>10589687
>>Nearly all religious people are conservative
>>Theists score near the highest, conservatives the lowests

That strikes me as pretty accurate, the smartest people "bend back" towards religion but their faith is radically different from your typical megachurch attendee. I also suspect something like this applies for conservatism, though some of it's leftists and liberals getting cocky from making redneck kids look silly in school and then floundering when they try the same approach against thoughtful conservatives and theists.

[Anonymous No.10593209]

>>10589041
>as a marxist

[Anonymous No.10593216]

>>10590776
...mods?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePRZC_OulYc

[Anonymous No.10593309]

Intelligence is something that transcends category because sufficiently intelligent people can convince themselves of even the most ridiculous thing and make it sound convincing if they really wish to believe in it.

[Anonymous No.10593342]

>>10589027
Rural redneck ancap fags

[Anonymous No.10593351]

>>10593309
Yeah William Lane Craig proves that

[Anonymous No.10593364]

>IQ
>A measure of anything other than ability to recall past data and recognise patterns

This IQ meme needs to die. I genuinely can't think of a worse way to categorize human insight than using this joke of a metric. It in no way accounts for ability to empathise, see things from another's point of view, openness to having ideas challenged, etc.

[Anonymous No.10593479]

>>10593351
>dada weg is smud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rz9J6qXIzc