/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10492091]

What books do art thots read?

[Anonymous No.10492097]

Nietzsche

[Anonymous No.10492101]

gunna post a few just to help you find an answer

[Anonymous No.10492103]

daily reminder that this is Samsara and stop engaging it

[Anonymous No.10492109]

>>10492091
1. Thay don't
2. Albert Camus and shit
3. John Green

[Anonymous No.10492110]

>>10492103
wut

[Anonymous No.10492112]

>>10492097
If only they did

[Anonymous No.10492114]

>>10492101

[Anonymous No.10492119]

>>10492114

[Anonymous No.10492120]

>>10492091
Kundera - The Unbearable Lightness of Being
Rilke - Letters to a Young Poet
A lot of Murakami
Easton and Hardy - The Ethical Slut

[Anonymous No.10492127]

>>10492119

[Anonymous No.10492132]

>>10492120
Yeah

[Anonymous No.10492135]

>>10492119
Here is art hoe taken to its limits; nazi hoe

[Anonymous No.10492138]

>>10492112
>"read Nietzsche!"
>Nietzsche promotes aristocratic virtues, disdains egalitarianism, views women as second to men

What did she mean by this?

[Anonymous No.10492141]

>>10492127
They all look the same

[Anonymous No.10492144]

>>10492091
>TFW no Sarah gf

[Anonymous No.10492145]

>>10492138
She was referring to how Nietzsche views truth as subjective. Don't play retarded.

[Anonymous No.10492169]

>>10492091
Can't believe nobody has said this, but

>she has three Jane Austen books on her shelf
>hasn't read them

[Anonymous No.10492187]

>>10492110

This is samsara. stop trying to change the world and stop getting upset about what it's like. none of that matters.

art thots don't matter
the fact that people make up terms like art thot doesn't matter
what art thots read or don't read doesn't matter
whether you like the girl in OP's pic or not doesn't matter
posting in this thread doesn't matter
your opinion about this thread doesn't matter
this post doesn't matter
you reading this doesn't change anything and it doesn't matter
expressing your opinion doesn't change the thing you have an opinion about
having an opinion means you get stung by like and dislike sensations
opinions don't matter
like and dislike don't matter


read this again if you understood it,
throw it away if you didn't
it doesn't matter either way

this is samsara

[Anonymous No.10492197]

>>10492103
isn't samsara that doom gameplay .wad that still doesn't have Caleb yet?

[Anonymous No.10492206]

>>10492187
No I'm pretty sure that Samsara is that doom .wad made by the guy who made Demon Steele and it's unfinished because they never added Caleb

[Anonymous No.10492228]

Murakami and they all have the Tolkien quote about all those who wonder are not lost tattooed on them.

[Anonymous No.10492270]

They pretend to be simpletons in front of men but in private they are reading Melville, Gaddis, Hegel, Dante etc.

[Anonymous No.10492334]

>>10492270
>Melville, Gaddis, Hegel, Dante etc.
Can I get a quick rundown on these esoteric gentlemen?

[Anonymous No.10492355]

>>10492120
>A lot of Murakami
always murakami and they love miyazaki too

[Anonymous No.10492368]

Kundera. not Murakami. Also trendy contemporary fiction and a little bit of nonfiction on modern art or architecture

t. someone who dated hip art thots from hip art schools in Paris

[Anonymous No.10492410]

I unironically love these threads

[Anonymous No.10492411]

>>10492270
>williams all in a row
>three copies of taipei

[Anonymous No.10492417]

Bukowski, only.

[Anonymous No.10492421]

where is the ‘art’ part?

[Anonymous No.10492423]

>>10492145
Kekekek

[Anonymous No.10492440]

>>10492334
>>Melville
Mariner and American prose stylist
>Gaddis
PoMo maximalist
>Hegel
Daddy
>Dante
Florentine epic poet

[Anonymous No.10492449]

Baudelaire

[Anonymous No.10492451]

Whatever their ex did

[Anonymous No.10492455]

>>10492091
They whinge about the objectification of women then they finger themselves to 50 Shades.

[Anonymous No.10492456]

Rupi Kaur

[Anonymous No.10492461]

>>10492270
>the goth section of my bookshelf
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.10492462]

>>10492449
made for anal desu

[Anonymous No.10492467]

>>10492138
>implying women don't like being treated as second to men

[Anonymous No.10492468]

>>10492461
>the goth section has Tao Lin, Moby Dick, and JR
????????

[Anonymous No.10492472]

>>10492091
harry potter

[Anonymous No.10492475]

>>10492468
Its the colour

[Anonymous No.10492483]

>>10492467
Of course they do. I just don't know how (assuming she actually has read Nietzsche) she could go through a whole book like Beyond Good and Evil which has parts that would now be considered "misogynistic" without getting triggered.

[Anonymous No.10492488]

>>10492368
Did you go to these schools too or how did you find them?

[Anonymous No.10492491]

>>10492488
any school with an art program with have them

[Anonymous No.10492497]

>>10492475
>women

[Anonymous No.10492541]

>>10492456
>no 2b art hoe crossover gf
Why live

[Anonymous No.10492557]

Homer, Nabokov, Heidegger

[Anonymous No.10492562]

>>10492091
They read trash like this

[Anonymous No.10492571]

Sartre, de Sade, Nietzsche, Camus, Dostoyevsky. Entry level existentialist core.

[Anonymous No.10492578]

>>10492451
Or whatever their dad hates

[Anonymous No.10492581]

>>10492557
I would smash that raven shortie all day for the rest of my life

[Anonymous No.10492593]

>>10492091
Antonin Artaud

[Anonymous No.10492600]

>>10492421
exactly

[Anonymous No.10492619]

>>10492562
What's this from

[Anonymous No.10492622]

>>10492562
GARBAGE

[Anonymous No.10492629]

>>10492451
ken CUTE

[Anonymous No.10492632]

>>10492562
I threw up a little bit

[Anonymous No.10492642]

>>10492091
Bukowski, DFW.

[Anonymous No.10492655]

>>10492091
Sylvia Plath
Ginsberg
Anne Sexton
Elizabeth Bishop
Audre Lorde (esp. if sjw)
Rilke (if theyre really edgy)
Raymond Carver (nostly bc of that one natt wolff movie)

t. I know a girl that looks exactely like this.

[Anonymous No.10492677]

>>10492451
My ex used to only read shitty James Patterson books. If this means her taste has improved praise be to allah

[Anonymous No.10492690]

>>10492655
You know what to do.

[Anonymous No.10492708]

They don't read, they do drugs. You ignorant /amidoingthisright/it'sbeanalongtime.test/

[Anonymous No.10492715]

>>10492708
>muh drugs
more of a youtube comment than a /lit/ post desu

[Anonymous No.10492741]

>>10492018

because phrases like "Mutatis mutandis" are extremely fucking useful. And when you're writing for a literate/academic audience you can count on people understanding you on the other side. And because the author's job isn't to coddle a reader like a child with low self esteem.

[Anonymous No.10492750]

>>10492270
how did she get her Recognitions and J R to be level? we been sleeping on these hoes long enough.

[Anonymous No.10492760]

kafka while people are watching or when their friend is taking a "random out of nowhere" picture

Jodi Picoult when they are safe in their own home and no one is watching

[Anonymous No.10492761]

>>10492091

I WANT TO EJACULATE ON THAT FACE

[Anonymous No.10492795]

>>10492451
nice thigh gap and cameltoe

[Anonymous No.10492796]

>>10492761
we all do

[Anonymous No.10492799]

>>10492355
What's wrong with Miyazaki?
Just because he's popular with both men and women doesn't mean he is shit. What is up with you contrarian faggots?
When girls like something a lot it's suddenly bad.
Being contrarian =/= sophisticated. When will losers on here learn?

[Anonymous No.10492825]

>>10492091
Not sure because I haven't met every art thot.

What books do Chad read?

What book do male film buffs read?
I'm curious.

[Anonymous No.10492832]

>>10492562
I feel like this had to potential to be a good look at a chad sadist, but the writing is just reddit-tier.

[Anonymous No.10492846]

>>10492715
Th ank u for replying{spoiled}iwasdoingitrightafterall

[Anonymous No.10492878]

>>10492825
>What book do male film buffs read?
The Screenwriter's Bible
Scripts of favorite films
The Disaster Artist
Anglo-core (Shakespeare, Milton, Melville)
Plato
DFW
Terry Pratchett, Dasheil Hammett & other "good" genre writers
Autobiographies of significant artists and historical figures

t. Film buff who lives with another film buff

[Anonymous No.10492894]

>>10492449
uhh, sauce?

[Anonymous No.10492895]

[Anonymous No.10492896]

>>10492571
Based Goth Charlotte

[Anonymous No.10492897]

>>10492878
I see.
What do Chads read?

I think I will make a thread about that. Please don't report it.

[Anonymous No.10492900]

[Anonymous No.10492902]

How do we know all the girls posted in this thread are thots?

Also, is this question under the assumption that art girls are all thots?

[Anonymous No.10492903]

[Anonymous No.10492907]

>>10492270
>Larkin JR Tao Lin Melville

I want to cum inside her.

[Anonymous No.10492910]

>>10492690
>It took this long for a Descartes post

[Anonymous No.10492911]

>>10492878
Actual film buff here. I would never touch Pratchett or autobiographies.

[Anonymous No.10492943]

They read fucking Vonnegut and YA novels. Sometimes To Kill A Mockingbird because omg so powerful message about race or Emily Bronte because omg womyn power

[Anonymous No.10492955]

>>10492910
It's kind of a dead meme, but still a classic

[Anonymous No.10492966]

>>10492799
He makes kid movies. Good kid movies, but kid movies nonetheless.

[Anonymous No.10492974]

>>10492903
That guy behind them is so lucky for being so close to Neet-chan. I will never be that close to her. Lucky bastard.

[Anonymous No.10492987]

>>10492903
How do I acquire a gf like this?

[Anonymous No.10493015]

>>10492270
>buying only black books
>taking a selfie with your bookshelf dressed like a hobo inside a well heated room

i cannot express how much of a waste of oxygen some of these thots have become

[Anonymous No.10493017]

women
queers
fags
non-whites
intersectional marxist-feminist pamphlets
foucault
vegan recipes
DSM-V

also, soft antinatalist philosophy
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3ZaVTP41OnA

[Anonymous No.10493028]

>>10493015
this guy gets it

we should have more acid attacks

[Anonymous No.10493037]

>>10492966
So does Disney. And I hate thisidea of "for kids;" they are "kid friendly" not FOR kids. Meaning, if a child were to watch it, there would be things they can get out of it.
Meanwhile, a show like Madmen or movie like American Psycho is not kid friendly, as a kid wouldn't get much out of it or shouldn't be watching most of the content in it.
Also Princess Mononoke was a bit more young adult/adult. So no, he doesn't just make "kid's movies."

[Anonymous No.10493039]

>>10492091
They don't they do blow and suck cock

[Anonymous No.10493043]

>>10493017
There are plenty of men who are antinatilists but sure.
I agree, most people who have kids shouldn't have kids for different reasons though.
A kid is not just a thing you whimsically decide to bring into this world.

[Anonymous No.10493051]

Penguin Classics
de Sade
Bronte
de Beavouir
Sartre
Biography of Vincent van Gogh
Books from the store in art museums

[Anonymous No.10493065]

>>10493037
No, they are kid movies that are adult friendly. They are the kind of movies you watch with your daughter or your little sister but not by yourself. If you watch Disney or Miyazaki movies by yourself as an adult then you're a manchildren.

[Anonymous No.10493070]

>>10492091
How has Jane Eyre not been mentioned yet?
>"I'm not like other girls"-core

[Anonymous No.10493075]

Deleuze
Continental philosophy
‘French theory’
Judith Butler
Introduction to deconstruction
Fanon
Shakesqueer
Peter Singer
The case for refugees
Chimamanda Adichie
Queer Phenomenology
Agamben

[Anonymous No.10493079]

>>10493051
>de Sade

what the fuck

[Anonymous No.10493106]

>>10493079
They want to be edgy and seem smart at the same time. I remember in high school I was friends with a thot like that. She was a complete slut and used to describe me scenes from 120 Days of Sodom.

[Anonymous No.10493129]

>>10492091
I knew this artsy girl who although wasn't really into literature loved Story of the Eye.

[Anonymous No.10493140]

>>10493065
Some of them have more for kids to get out it than others like Ponyo, spirited Away, Castle in the Sky, or all Disney princess movies but not all of them. But no, they are not all "adult friendly" but kid friendly to varying degrees.
Are you so stern that you have no childlike wonder or fondness left in you at all? Sure it should be mostly toned down in adulthood, but I would say nostalgia is a good enough reason to find most kid friendly features entertaining.
It doesn't mean refusing to grow up or being stuck in eternal childhood, rather bringing back memories of those days.
And please don't tell me you're one of those people that think animation=for kids.

[Anonymous No.10493149]

>>10492987
read neechee

[Anonymous No.10493152]

The art thot pretends to be well-versed in literature, but only really reads the newest popular young adult novel. Anyone who thinks otherwise is probably overestimating them because they want to get in their pants.

[Anonymous No.10493166]

>>10493152
there are 100s or 1000s of art schools that have 100s or 1000s of girls in each, every year... some of them have to be cool

[Anonymous No.10493171]

pliz help I need smug neechee gf to be the lighnting of my life
what do

[Anonymous No.10493175]

>>10492741
Ha! I, too, was in that thread.

[Anonymous No.10493190]

>>10492091
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSaMsBvr608

WHY DOES CRINGY LOOSER LIKE HIM GETS TO HAVE A CUTE POETESS GF AND I DON'T

[Anonymous No.10493191]

They don't or it's that weird NYTimes best seller shit that's not genre fiction/YA/Airport Lit. The 'Intergenerational Epic' about a 1 handed girl who lives on a farm in some Central American country type shit.

[Anonymous No.10493205]

>>10493166
Lol, you overestimate these people

[Anonymous No.10493210]

>>10493190
>at 1:47 you can see her foot
Thanks, anon. Thanks you so much.

[Anonymous No.10493220]

>>10493190
I bet he has more personality and is less socially retarded than you and most of this board combined so I'm not that confused.

Grow up, get a personality, and stop being socially anxiousness.

[Anonymous No.10493235]

>>10492900
Worst prosecutor.

[Anonymous No.10493245]

>>10492449
tfw no big tiddy/booty goth gf

[Anonymous No.10493248]

>>10493190
why would you want her to be your gf? they both seem boring and like they deserve each other. she keeps mimicking his accent. seems trash.

[Anonymous No.10493249]

>>10493235
>for you

[Anonymous No.10493257]

>>10492987
>go to evergreen state
>¿
>anarchy

[Anonymous No.10493261]

>>10492417
this, basic art thot literature

[Anonymous No.10493266]

>>10492091
Almost the exact same we do, with a heavier focus on women writers

[Anonymous No.10493269]

>>10492449
holy SHIT why is her ass so big and firm

[Anonymous No.10493270]

>>10493220
>>10493248
but she cute

[Anonymous No.10493284]

>>10492557
>tfw no polygamous interracial litgoth wives

[Anonymous No.10493295]

>>10492091
My sister is one of those.

[Anonymous No.10493302]

>>10492557
>nabokov
>heidegger
whatever helps you get through the long days at the office anon

[Anonymous No.10493305]

>>10493149
and don't forget to completely misinterpret everything he writes

[Anonymous No.10493312]

>>10493295
I fucked your sister

[Anonymous No.10493313]

How has nobody mentioned Virginia Woolf yet? Art hoes eat that shit up. I've dated two of them and they both wanted to suck that dead bitch's tits.

[Anonymous No.10493317]

>>10493312
I don't doubt it.

[Anonymous No.10493330]

>>10493317
I'm not that guy but personally I fucked her six times.

[Anonymous No.10493352]

>>10493295
The art part or the thot part

[Anonymous No.10493353]

>>10492562
The fact that stuff of this caliber gets published makes me feel a lot better about my own writing skill.

[Anonymous No.10493354]

>>10492187
if this thread doesn't matter why respond :^)

[Anonymous No.10493383]

I've dated a couple of them and can confirm this list:
Nin
Bataille (only Story of the Eye, they probably are unaware of his other writings)
Sexton
Woolf
Camus
Sartre (but only his Nausea and his interviews. no one actually reads Being and Nothingness in 2018)
Gluck
Proust

[Anonymous No.10493387]

>>10492187
Art thots matter a lot cause they're real cute and I want one

[Anonymous No.10493388]

>>10493352
Both but much more of the latter.

[Anonymous No.10493390]

>>10492897
no need

[Anonymous No.10493393]

>>10493302
Are you joking? Girls love Lolita and entry level existentialism.

[Anonymous No.10493405]

>>10493393
Yeah. Nabokov is mostly enjoyed by women and faggy guys who hope to impress them. Not that they read Nabokov to impress them necessarily, though some absolutely do. It's just that the type of guy who reads him is often the type who will throw out his back to impress some dumb ho with the body of a 14 year old boy and a heinous personality.

[Anonymous No.10493409]

>>10493405
>It's just that the type of guy who reads him is often the type who will throw out his back to impress some dumb ho with the body of a 14 year old boy and a heinous personality.
Fuck off, I like his prose as well

[Anonymous No.10493418]

>>10493409
>I said often
>And anyway you probably are one of those guys
how does that contradict my point exactly?

[Anonymous No.10493420]

>>10493388
Come on, give us the gory details

[Anonymous No.10493431]

>>10493295
>tfw sister recently bought a choker

[Anonymous No.10493450]

>>10492103
isn't Samsara that place that Tripitaka, Monkey, Sandy and Pigsy were journeying to?

Sam-sa-a-ra
Sam-sa-a-ra
They say it was in IN-DIA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1dlaikCaa4

[Anonymous No.10493496]

>>10493420
Believe it or not my sister doesn't tell me the gory details of her sex life, I can only extrapolate from the vast number of guys she's brought home and/or dated since she was 13 (she's 19 now). She also dresses worse (more revealing) than the girls ITT, except she's less of a goth-slut and more of a hippie-slut.

>>10493431
I don't really feel attraction to my sister. I mean, I can tell she's attractive, but ehhh, she's my younger sister and I still sort of associate her with the memories of the child she was, I dunno.

[Anonymous No.10493500]

>>10493418
It doesn't I'm just butthurt you bullseyed me anonymously

[Anonymous No.10493510]

>>10493500
Well, you admitted it so it shows you have *slightly* more character than the usual faggy guys. There is hope for you yet.

[Anonymous No.10493518]

>>10493312
James Joyce?

[Anonymous No.10493527]

HAIRY
SLIPPERY
CLEFTS

[Anonymous No.10493542]

>>10493431
Where did this stupid idea that girls who wear chokers are sluts/do oral come from? The word originally describes a style of necklace. Who decides this shit about all girls who wear X thing anyway? How would they know? Seems like a stupid baseless rumor.
A lot of girls i know just wear it just to wear it(mainly because other girls are doing it now).
Can we start saying all guys who have gotee's are douchebags? Or all guys who wear boxer briefs are faggots?

[Anonymous No.10493543]

>>10492112
>implying you wouldn't want this mouth wrapped around your circumcised penis

[Anonymous No.10493550]

>>10492145
Yes but she was saying that like it shut down his argument, when really the values of either argument is subjective, but at least he was open to a dialogue whereas she wasn't cause sure knew she'd get BTFO

[Anonymous No.10493558]

>>10492270
>all these losers gawking at a mediocre writer with entry level taste

Kill yourselves, please

[Anonymous No.10493584]

>>10492562
Whoa that's SSS Rank Garbage

[Anonymous No.10493589]

>>10493542
Thats just how the world works

[Anonymous No.10493607]

>>10493542
>Can we start saying
People do say the examples you gave all the time.

Chokers, for a lot of women, are worn to signify to men that they want to choke on dicks. But it's enough of a trend that some women do it just because they think it looks cool.

[Anonymous No.10493615]

>>10492187
I'm intrigued

[Anonymous No.10493641]

>>10492642
>Love that memory

[Anonymous No.10493646]

>>10493607
"for a lot of women"
Citation? I know a lot of women and I have never heard them imply that. Actually no, there was this one girl but that was because she heard it from guys(mainly her brother). I do hear it implied by mostly males.

You are right though, that it is mostly a trend that girls just think "looks" cute. Just like the maxie dress and the maxie skirt.
>>10493589
You are a fool along with almost every man in the world as well, if you don't see this is a satire.

[Anonymous No.10493652]

>>10493152
t. never met an art hoe

[Anonymous No.10493657]

>>10493646
I don't need a citation. I've facefucked enough dumb bitches to know. Which is why males mainly say it, as you point out. We know from experience with these hoes. Of course they wouldn't say it themselves because A) it is gauche and B) the choker says it for them.

[Anonymous No.10493658]

>>10493190
Because he's a British filmmaker with a chad jawline

[Anonymous No.10493672]

Believe it or not, it was an Artsy girl that taught me about Pynchon before I ever came to /lit/

[Anonymous No.10493683]

>>10493542
>stereotypes might not be true 100% of the time

woah, great insight

[Anonymous No.10493711]

>>10493542
>A lot of girls i know just wear it just to wear it
How do you know they just wear it to wear it?

It may not be an ALL thing: but it is a MOST thing.

Like tongue rings. Its a slutdog whistle (bitch whistle)

Like tight short clubdresses.

Chokers are up there.

[Anonymous No.10493725]

>>10493615
He's basically paraphrasing Ram Dass

[Anonymous No.10493726]

>>10493646
>Citation? I know a lot of women and I have never heard them imply that
jhfghaghaghahahahahaahahha

this is soooo fuckinngnggngng funnnyyy

This anon is EXTREMELY INCREDULOUS

BECAUSE HE KNOWS A LOT OF GIRLS THAT WHERE CHOKERS AND HE DOESNT GET LAID BY THEM!!!!!!!

babhahbabhahbahahahbaha


THAT MEANS GIRLS THAT WEAR CHOKERS ARE NOT SLUTTY!!!!!

>wait...no....it cant be..... whats....whats wrong with me....no....they cant be sluts.....me....they no succ me..... but they wear chokers.....no....it cant be....no....nooo......nooooooooooooooo

[Anonymous No.10493733]

>>10493726
This. Lol.

[Anonymous No.10493739]

>>10493683
I'm saying where the fuck did this stereotype even come from? I have never heard of a girl wearing a choker saying she likes to suck dick. It seems like a male invented meme after a couple encounters with girls who just happened to be wearing chokers.
I bet you won't remember the numbero f
>>10493657
Sure, and I bet you won't remember the many other times you "facefucked" a girl who didn't have a choker. This is a cognitive bias called availability heuristic my friend.

The some of the girls I ever met who wear these are virgins or basement dwellers like myself.
They majority of girls seem to just wear it because it's a cute new trend.

[Anonymous No.10493751]

>>10493739
Lol and your view is confirmation bias. See >>>>10493646

Loser.

[Anonymous No.10493753]

>>10493646
So its also possible you are a girl who wears them and is not slutty and is nervous that people think you are?

Most girls like and want sex to begin with. Most girls that wear chokers do too. Many girls that wear chokers are extra sexual, saying "I want a guy to choke me, I want this to be your hands, look at how used to it I am, I can walk around in public with this tight thing around my neck, I like to get choked during sex, I am submissive"

[Anonymous No.10493755]

>>10493726
ROFL :D

[Anonymous No.10493759]

>>10493739
>putting a dog collar made from erotic materials around your neck
>cute
Choker = anal whore.

[Anonymous No.10493760]

>>10493711
>tight short club dresses
Now I know you're full of shit
Many college girls these days go to bars dressed in "nightclub wear" because that is just what you do. Again, peer pressure and trends.

Tongue rings were always more like a goth/punk thing though.
I think you mean nipple piercings(yes many women I actually met who get those want it because it makes nipple stimulation more sensitive)

[Anonymous No.10493762]

>>10492562
thats 100% from sam hyde

thats exactly his writing style

[Anonymous No.10493764]

>>10493646
>I know a lot of women and I have never heard them imply that.
How much do you talk about the details of their sex lives with them? How much dooo they imply about their sex lives? If hardly at all, you must assume they hardly have sex at all right?

[Anonymous No.10493765]

>>10492895
No no no no no

[Anonymous No.10493766]

>>10493759
Does anyone have the screen cap btw?

[Anonymous No.10493769]

>>10492491
Seconded, banged art students in a US liberal arts school

Also, art thots read less than edgy literature chicks but edgy literature chicks aren't as hot

[Anonymous No.10493778]

>>10492562
>1513110385387.jpg
isnt this the anonymous Oxygen Thief?

[Anonymous No.10493787]

>>10493726
I'm a woman...
I was thinking of buying one myself as accessory with certain outfits. I don't see why I should be judged over some baseless. stereotype.
>>10493733>>10493755
>>10493753
Yes, and no they aren't even tight. What are you on? Most(at least the ones these days) are stretchy. pic related Which type of choker are you talking about? The metal ones or the ones with spikes(more goth actually).

[Anonymous No.10493796]

>>10492449
I will read her Lautreamont
as I lash her cantaloupes

[Anonymous No.10493809]

>>10492270
mira pls stop self-promoting and be my gf

[Anonymous No.10493811]

>>10493764
Not too much with those girls who had them but I don't think chokers are sexual. It's more a goth/punk trend that has become popular(like the black nail polish and lipstick).
Like I said, I think you mean nipple piercings. I have talked to girls who get them and they admitted that it increases nipple sensitivity during stimulation.

[Anonymous No.10493820]

Christian girls in chokers are cute af
I want a girl that teases me with subtle fetish shit.

And i want to write overly romantic poetry for her.

:(

[Anonymous No.10493849]

>>10493759
Choker=/= collar.
Collars are made of metal and are very tight
Choker[necklaces] are made from a variety of materials and in many different shapes. Often loosely fitted. It is just a nice accessory to show off a slender neck..

[Anonymous No.10493856]

>>10493820
>tease me with subtle fetish shit.
Chokers necklaces aren't a bdsm fetish. Just stop. It's just an accessory and yes they are cute.

[Anonymous No.10493874]

>>10493849
>>10493856
Yeah I'm sure it's just a coincidence that so many of them have an o-ring for attaching a leash.

[Anonymous No.10493885]

>>10493874
This. Wearing a choker is like saying you spend 100$ on lube per week.

[Anonymous No.10493889]

>>10493874
Many of them?
Now you are just making things up again.
OP's pic related doesn't have that ring.
The place where I got the picture of that choker doesn't have any like that either. This is the style i see most girls wearing now.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M6VWDR4/ref=asc_df_B01M6VWDR45325405/?tag=hyprod-20&creative=395033&creativeASIN=B01M6VWDR4&linkCode=df0&hvadid=167125073467&hvpos=1o2&hvnetw=g&hvrand=17023796401120752607&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9004041&hvtargid=pla-310095192428

Chokers =/=collar. That girl in your pic related is wearing an actual collar most likely.

[Anonymous No.10493905]

>>10493787
Ok, so this is all about...this has nothing to do with what you know, but just what you hope..

as I said: Many girls are slutty to begin with. Many girls who wear those are greater than average slutty. You can wear it and be judged however. Everyone will think you love to suck cock... do you not?

It is a sensual aesthetic thing, lingerie like, like those stockings and garter belts or whatever, french maid neck thing.

What about it attracts you, what does it mean to you, could it be deep in your subconscious you want to give off submissive vibes? What does it make you think and feel? Why do you have the urge to wear it at all? What is the meaning of its look? A dog collar?

[Anonymous No.10493908]

>>10493811
>but I don't think chokers are sexual
it doesnt matter what you think. Google: Are chokers sexual

[Anonymous No.10493910]

>>10493889
Here's OP's girl wearing a collar with the Histoire d'O ring. Are you happy now?

[Anonymous No.10493921]

>>10493905
god you people are such spergs

[Anonymous No.10493930]

>>10493542
tits or gtfo

[Anonymous No.10493934]

>>10492895
Is she gonna shoot up a church

[Anonymous No.10493935]

>>10493542
>Can we start saying all guys who have gotee's are douchebags
I-I thought we already did?

[Anonymous No.10493966]

>>10493496
That's hot

You think she's been double teamed?

[Anonymous No.10493984]

>>10493921
>god you people are such spergs
so, I will take that as a yes

[Anonymous No.10493994]

>>10493542
its just the truth ma'am im sorry god made you be addicted 2 cock in your throat

[Anonymous No.10493999]

>>10493910
Well, the girls I know who have chokers aren't the ones that look like that so I am going to stand by my statement. Collar=/=choker and if it did, the chokers today are much different.
>>10493908
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=choker%20necklace
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meaning-behind-a-choker-necklace
>>10493905
Nothing. It's just a type of necklace. It is YOU who are making it have a meaning based on your heuristics.
It is not a collar. You can't attach a leash to it. It is not tight but loose, It can be made of velvet, plastic, have charms around it, or jewels. I like it because it looks cute with some outfits. If you have a long neck it looks even cuter.

I don't want to get into this gender bullshit but if many girls are sluts wtf are guys?
I'm also going to assume your idea of "slut" is a girl who so much of thinks about sex often or masturbates.

[Anonymous No.10494004]

>>10493994
You're a moron. I have never done an of that and neither have the girls I take to who wear it.
It is just an accessory.>>10493999

[Anonymous No.10494008]

>>10493935
We don't. Some girls just don't like it /think it is ugly. I don't mind it. The mustache however...I don't see how anyone can wear that without being either a dad or a pedo...

[Anonymous No.10494019]

>>10492690

[Anonymous No.10494022]

>>10492091
Art History text books hopefully.

[Anonymous No.10494032]

>>10493787
>I don't see why I should be judged over some baseless. stereotype.
All women are whores, wearing the 'this is a black belt for sucking dick' choker doesn't alter that fact, so I wouldn't worry about it if I was you.

[Anonymous No.10494034]

>>10493921
people are going to think what they want when they see others: do what you want and like.

When people see someone with a mohawk they are going to think whatever. When they see someone with tattoos they may think x y or z. Someone with tongue ring. Someone with nipple piercings. Someone with a red sports car. Someone with tight pants. Someone with handlebar mustache. Everyone will judge everyone. You wear a choker, some people will say, oh thats just a weird looking necklace, it looks sweet and cute and aesthetic and fashionable, and adorable and classic and classy and cool and noble... and some people might think, wow thats sexy.

I am sorry if I offended you or upset you at all, just messing around a bit...its not a big deal either way... I just do strongly believe a lot of sexyual girls wear those.

[Anonymous No.10494037]

>>10494032
>i shouldnt be judged for having my tits hang out of my small piece of cloth called a shirt and ass hugging leggings that i only ever take off to fuck negro men

[Anonymous No.10494038]

>>10493999
nice trips, also will you marry me desu senpai?

[Anonymous No.10494042]

>>10493999
a slut is an unmarried woman whos had a large number of sexual partners, specifically 0-1 or more

[Anonymous No.10494043]

>>10492187
I too, have just finished my first college class on Buddhism

[Anonymous No.10494046]

>>10492987
You don't, these women think they are bisexual and in ""open relationships.""

[Anonymous No.10494049]

>>10492097
milk and honey lmao i hate going to art school

[Anonymous No.10494052]

>>10494037
My point was that the judging is inevitable (and earned).

[Anonymous No.10494073]

>>10493999

[Anonymous No.10494077]

>>10494042
Wow. Please don't tell me this applies only to women? I want to hold some suspension of disbelief that you aren't a massive basement dweller faggot.

[Anonymous No.10494079]

>>10493999
for you
>>10494034
my sincere apology for harassing you

[Anonymous No.10494090]

>>10494032
All men are whores. All they do is try to get their dick wet or think about it constantly when they're not getting their dick wet by masturbating.

And my point is still that chokers don't mean that. Collars=/=chokers.
wearing lingerie doesn't mean that(what about married couples who use it)?
>>10494037
they shouldn't because men aren't judged for wearing NO shirt. This is becuase they aren't sexually objectified and their bodies over sexualized by society though so of course you won't notice this hypocrisy.

[Anonymous No.10494107]

>>10494090
Only women can be whores by definition
All chokers are somewhat sexual but there's a gradiant

[Anonymous No.10494109]

>>10494073
All of the links in those search result reference how now chokers are bcoming a trend as a fashion accessory despite what ever connotations they may have had to some people. My point still stands.
And i really think you are mistaking collars with the chokers girls are wearing these days(the latter being made of different types of materials and not having a ring within that attaches a lease.
>>10494079
I didn't say you were harassing me. I just think the logic behind the whole thing is stupid and demonstrably false especially now a days since it has been revived as a fashion trend.

[Anonymous No.10494116]

>>10494109
>All of the links in those search result reference how now chokers are bcoming a trend as a fashion accessory despite what ever connotations they may have had to some people.
No. Goodnight.

[Anonymous No.10494117]

>>10494107
Only women
Ahh of course it is only true because you say it.
It's totally objective, not a concept of gender created by society at all. Anyway, I'm not here to discuss this sexism.

At least you finally admit you are wrong. The "chokers" that are sexual are actually collars.
How old are you anyway? Are you really saying all the girls you have "faced fucked" as one anon said were wearing chokers?

[Anonymous No.10494119]

>>10494109
I didnt mean literal harassing or to imply you said that, just colloquial, bothering, haranguing. Get that choker, waltz around the mall, get all the men to stare, be free and happy, and pretty, and proud, and noble, and elegant, and eloquent. And then maybe get some cum in your ass if you want

[Anonymous No.10494123]

>>10494116
Yes they did and you didn't even look at all of them. Nice argument. The links I provided also referenced what I was talking about.
Chokers=/= collars and the girls who wear what you all a choker that happen to be into BDSM are actually wearing collars. Many of the girls wearing chokers today are not into that. Plain and simple. It is a trend.

[Anonymous No.10494124]

>>10494109
>All of the links in those search result reference how now chokers are bcoming a trend as a fashion accessory despite what ever connotations they may have had to some people.
NO. thousands and thousands of links and discussions all about the percieved (PERCEIVED) sexuality of it, from men and women. Maybe you are right and mostly women are naive, ditsy, dumb and innocent, and just like it because its CUTE!! hehehehe... I want to wear a teddy bear on my head... and spin in a field of flowers in a dress, hehehehehe,,,, this is the best... why do I want thiss.... the only reason I want to be cute cant possibly be to attract male attention!!!

[Anonymous No.10494127]

>>10494123
We are done with the collar talk... there is a small relation but the entirty of the point doesnt hinge on that. Stop having a crises and freaking out. 20-80 percent of the men who see you wearing it will think you like to have sex at least 5-9 times a week.

20-80 percent of men might think the average girl likes to have sex 3-4 times a week

[Anonymous No.10494128]

>>10494119
I know what you meant. And there you go again with the stupid logic. Most girls wearing chokers these days a not doing that. It has become a fashion trend.

[Anonymous No.10494131]

>>10494123
>Many of the girls wearing chokers today are not into that. Plain and simple. It is a trend.
chockers have been popular since at least the 90s, sluts have been popular since at least the 90s (00090 bc)

[Anonymous No.10494134]

>>10494128
what are the odds you are a guy pretending to be a girl, trap or not?

[Anonymous No.10494135]

>>10494124
Looking nice shouldn't be for "male" attention or for attention of the opposite sex in general. I wouldn't expect am ugly, fashionless, basement dwelling, NEET to understand this however.

[Anonymous No.10494141]

>>10494131
Wrong "sluts have been popular for 1000s of years.
The term has just shifted gears to mean an woman who appears to be promiscuous based on preconceived notion of gender whether she has had sex ever, rarely, or often with or without exchange of money.

[Anonymous No.10494144]

>>10494134
0

[Anonymous No.10494145]

>>10494117
>Ahh of course it is only true because you say it.
I didn't create the term, a whore is implicitly female, that's just what it describes
>It's totally objective, not a concept of gender created by society at all.
Whew, I don't even know where to start, this is not an unpopular view nowadays but it suprises me everytime it get's thrown out. We are humans, what seperates us from animals is our social constructs, they are fundamental, and not arbitrary. This one in particular is perennial, perhaps because women are sexual selectors and child bearers. You really need to think more about what social constructs mean, and not use it pejoratively everytime you think one to be negative, you can't just wantonly discard them like a child knocking down sand castles

[Anonymous No.10494147]

>>10494135
what s the meaning of putting bells and whistles and ornaments on you to """look""" nice... why do you think that looks nice? What about it looks nice? You ever see tribes in africa with the women with the rings around their neck to make their neck longer? Does that look nice?

[Anonymous No.10494155]

>>10494145
I'm not going to waste the time tearing apart each point either but consider this:
These ideas came up in a patrilneal society where birth control was not available to make it worse. In such a society women would need to be chaste to ensure women are faithful(this did not always work funny enough, so much for "natural") and she wouldn't get pregnant with other children that aren't the man in question. It isn't the only way to live, just a way we chose to live. A decision is not "genetic."

[Anonymous No.10494167]

>>10494147
It's deforming and I'm not from that culture so no, not to me.
And hmmm, I thought you said women only dress nice for male attention? Now you're asking me what's nice about it?
Anyway, it's just another piece of jewelry. There were choker style necklaces for years.
It coordinates with the outfit. There are guys who like wearing jewelry too you know. Always have for 100s of years.

[Anonymous No.10494175]

>>10494135
You are actually right about al this, alas, now that I actually think about it, and your use of the term trend triggered my understand. I just dont often think about the raw existence of millions of girls in america ages 12-19.

Millions. Some of them have sex X amount per Y. Some have sex A amount per B. Some dont have sex at all.

It is possible 50% of girls who wear chokers have sex a lot (what would be considered 'slut' by... 90% of people, including themselves). And 50% dont have sex at all who wear them... or some percent have normal amount of sex.

But it is this potentially massive figure of girls who dont think or no much about sex, or arent sexual themselves much, who say: woah, that looks cool, I like how that looks... like I like how that hat and bag looks... I want to wear that.

So then millions of girls 12-19 wear the choker... and maybe they dont have a lot of sex, maybe they do.

We need to figure out how many girls wear chokers how often and how often they have sex, its the only way to solve this discussion (and no a poll of 5,000 wouldn't do).

What would the numbers have to be for you to admit you were wrong? Or there is no right or wrong in this: because as long as a single girl, yourself maybe, is not that slutty, and wears the choker, once a year, or 12 times a year, or 100 times a year, then it doesnt matter about others or views, you can only say "im not a slut, and im wearing this, so dont judge me as one", and everyone can be like "ok...cool...."

[Anonymous No.10494177]

>>10494175
spergs should be forbidden to speak to women

[Anonymous No.10494179]

>>10494167
>And hmmm, I thought you said women only dress nice for male attention? Now you're asking me what's nice about it?
Ok, some evidence of your difficulties with logical reasoning... ok... but I shall read on... I have noticed you made a few of these mistakes, so that makes me just a little more suspicious you are not a neckbear (was going to fix that typo, but deciding to leave it for obvious reasons) pretending to be a ditsy girl.. but ok, I will read on.

[Anonymous No.10494183]

>>10494167
what does the necklace mean to you though, coordinate outfit, why, why does that matter, when you have a choker necklace on, you dont see it, besides all the times you look in the mirror and take selfies throughout the day, so why does it matter? you just love how pretty you look? You are like, others must think my outfit looks so good? No, you do it for yourself. But how is that for yourself... you dont see it... you know how others see it... how does it impart any feeling of 'this is a sensible thing to do, this makes sense and means something' 'to me'...what does it mean....

[Anonymous No.10494189]

>>10494183
Hmm I see, it's jsut autism then.
Normal people, both men and women, want to look nice when they leave the house or go out. Someone who is perhaps autistic like you or doesn't leave the house at all like you, just wound't understand. Now I don't go out that much and don't take selfies(hence I am on a Japanese cartoon imagery forum), however, when I do go outside, I want to look nice. Most sensible people who goes out wants to look nice. Get it? Girls tend to be a bit more obsessed about how they look because they have more pressure from society to look decent too(NOT just from guys but mainly from other girls). It's a gender role kind of still forced on girls.

[Anonymous No.10494190]

>>10494155
I do appreciate the rare female opinions here, it's just, if you're going to talk about socio sexuality or constructs, read and think about them, don't rehash surface level twitter analysis in a sarcastic tone. Better than /pol/ though I suppose. As for chokers, you can argue whether their social perception is deserved, but that doesn't change it. I like some lace chokers, but there is a sexual element there for one reason or another. Even out the outfit I guess?

[Anonymous No.10494192]

[Anonymous No.10494204]

>>10494167
>t. eternal f*male

[Anonymous No.10494206]

>>10494190
I have read and thought about them for a while. I stand by my statement. I encourage you to get into neuroscience,molecular biology, and endocrinology before you spout such things about gender. It might surprise you but I didn't consider myself a feminist for a while at some point.
I am a /sci/entist who likes to read humanities and lit sometimes.
Anyway, I think whatever connotations chokers may have had, it has changed/ is changing since it is a trend again.

[Anonymous No.10494213]

>>10494189
but where does the idea of putting this tightish ("its not that tighttttt!! hehehe") black material around your neck equal look good come from? Why do you think that looks good? Or nice, you said nice. What about it looks nice, why does it make you feel nice to wear the choker, why do you think it looks cute, what about it looks cute, makes you feel cute, nice? Why do you think it looks good? (redundant, I know, but wanted to make sure you really get the gist of what I am getting at)

[Anonymous No.10494215]

>>10494189
the majority of things you do in your life is to attract a male, unless you are a lesbian

[Anonymous No.10494225]

>>10494213
What do YOU like to wear?
Why do you think it looks nice?

I feel like you can asked that about any accessory. Choker necklaces are just another accessory. Looks nice on a slender neck too.

[Anonymous No.10494227]

>>10494189
Holy crap... I just realized your witchy jezabel ways almost tricked me!! with your choker =/= collar statements over and over... I almost believed it... I did concede that point but now I realized... yes they do not = 100% .... but its pretty freaking close!>!>!>!!!!>!!

Its like 90% or more, the same concept thing..

Come on... at least you have to admit its not near 0% equality.

[Anonymous No.10494230]

>>10494189

[Anonymous No.10494234]

>>10494189
http://theberry.com/2016/08/19/guess-wearing-this-makes-you-a-slut/

Last question I will ask, I think, I dont think I left any loose ends:

If it turned out, lets just say: in reality, 90% of girls who wore chokers were what we could all agree on even themselves were sluts: what would you think then? Pure thought experiment

[Anonymous No.10494240]

>>10494215
What do you mean majority of things? You mean appearances wise?
It is more to just look nice. Girls have an image to maintain as females in our society(and many others) still. Gender role. This is changing though.
Women like to paint their nails and most guys couldn't give two shits and women know this, yet they love to do it. You will get death stares from other girls for daring to wear flipflops in the summer without nail polish actually. It's quite absurd actually. Same with make up often. So no it is not all about men.

[Anonymous No.10494244]

>>10494225
>I feel like you can asked that about any accessory. Choker necklaces are just another accessory. Looks nice on a slender neck too.
I dont wear any accessorys because I am not trying to attract men.

but I am asking what about it, try to explain the rational, what about it makes it look cute, where does the concept of cute come from?

[Anonymous No.10494248]

>>10494225
>I feel like you can asked that about any accessory. Choker necklaces are just another accessory. Looks nice on a slender neck too.
if you were to wear one, how would t make you feel, why, where would that feeling come from, where does your understanding of it looking nice, good, cute, come from? Why do you think it looks nice, good cute, how do you know? What makes you think that? Why that? Try to explain it... just because? no reason, it just does? How? There must be some sense, there must be some reason and meaning, you think it makes sense to say it looks good or cute.

[Anonymous No.10494252]

>>10494240
>Women like to paint their nails and most guys couldn't give two shits and women know this, yet they love to do it.
subconsciously they do, men dont care, but if they do see a girl with pretty nail polish it can evoke a response in them:

subconcious or otherwise, feminine, sexiness, glossy, shiny, if they paint them themselves it shows of 'touch', gentle, precession, 'girlyness', and like birds that have vibrant colors to attract mates.

If there are multiple girls and one has fancy nailpolish and the others have none, it may just be something you recognize, and its just like aesthetic art on their body, that attracts attention. and then there is the competition, if a girl stops wearing makeup she will be left behind, because the makeup girls will likely be able to look better than her.

[Anonymous No.10494254]

>>10494227
>>10494230
But that is noticeably different from the types most girls wear these days. Mainly the types the people I know wear. When I looked up chokers those aren't the first things I saw on amazon or any boutique.
...Jezabel? hahahahaha wow you are very autistic. I have never been on such a blog. I'm just going off my experiences and my ideas.

>>10494234
Again, you need to literally be autistic to think this article wasn't satire. She is poking fun at the absurd idea that this choker somehow automatically makes any woman who wears it a slut.
I'm not even joking anymore...have you been clinically tested for autism? because you may seriously have it.

[Anonymous No.10494258]

>>10493787
Try walking to an art school and compare it to a Catholic Church. The women in one are for the most part sluts and wear chokers, in the other there's no chokers and only some are sluts. It's hardly baseless, it's worn by art hoes and they are called hoes for a reason.

[Anonymous No.10494260]

Anything liberal or nihilistic.

[Anonymous No.10494262]

>>10494240
s-so...this is the first time I have talked to a female in aprox. 5 years....w-will you go out on a date with me? If we went out to dinner where would you want to go?

[Anonymous No.10494265]

>>10494254
I will read the rest of this post, just saw you didn't respond to the one thing I cared about most:
If it turned out, lets just say: in reality, 90% of girls who wore chokers were what we could all agree on even themselves were sluts: what would you think then? Pure thought experiment

Please answer that, and honestly, as it really ties the whole understanding of the conversation and perspectives together.

[Anonymous No.10494266]

>>10494206
>I am a /sci/entist who likes to read humanities and lit sometimes.
I must jump in, it all makes sense now! Some of the stupidest people I've met were in my biology program; oh and don't worry, I can tell you only read sometimes because you communicate like an idiot. You can keep wearing that stem badge though
Have you triggered me? Yes!
We're talking about social constructs and the human experience, vaguely mentioning neuroscience (ironic given where the field is at right now) and microbiology doesn't mean much, in fact it doesn't mean anything. Science is not the profaned solution to any and every problem or situation, there's more to being a human than series of chemical reactions.
Oh and don't forget, I'm better than you!

[Anonymous No.10494274]

>>10494244
I'm not wearing the accessory to attract men though. I like the way it looks.
And accessories aren't just for women anon; there are male accessories that look nice on men. Jeez go on /fa/ once in a while perhaps.
>>10494258
But it's not just them wearing it. that's my point. there are different designs.You know what forget it, you don't like chokers, fine. You don't have to wear it or like it.

[Anonymous No.10494283]

>>10494254
Would you consider yourself a sexual person? Would you like to have sex often? Are you sexually adventurous? (a failure to answer these questions would be telling answers)

[Anonymous No.10494286]

>>10492795
yeah her vag is outta control

[Anonymous No.10494287]

>>10494274
There aren't many slut designs. A choker isn't a necklace. In any case I also don't have to respect women who wear them or assume their sexual morality as in 9/10 cases they are sluts and stereotypes are just generalised wisdom.

[Anonymous No.10494289]

>>10492562
pretty sure it is illegal tho

[Anonymous No.10494291]

>>10494266
No science doesn't answer everything. Many things are cultural and by looking at history many things can be elucidated as well such as gender roles and how it has differed across time and culture.
You're the one making it look like patriarchy is nature. It's really not. It's just one way for humans to organised themselves. Gender roles in general were efficient, particularly in the distant past. The same cannot be said now.
But think what you want.

I meant Molecular biology in terms of the in depth study of genetics that goes along with it.

>>10494262
I would say it's still a stereotype. Regardless, even if at one point it was so, it is changing now. It's a trend, nothing more.

[Anonymous No.10494297]

>>10494254
is there any practical reason for women to show cleavage? Is there any reason for womens shirts to be made such that they possibly show cleavage besides "I know men like boobs"?

[Anonymous No.10494299]

>>10494286
you her bf?

[Anonymous No.10494300]

>>10494287
There is this style of necklace called "choker necklace" that has exist for a very long time anon. It's the same stylistic concept and also no BDSM related like a collar but whatever you think anon. Regardless, you probably won't talk to any girls 10/10 times. It's pretty sad to assume everything about another human being without even getting to know them however. Not that getting to know anyone is what you typically do anyway it seems.

[Anonymous No.10494305]

>>10494283
>Would you consider yourself a sexual person? Would you like to have sex often? Are you sexually adventurous? (a failure to answer these questions would be telling answers)
Yes, I would consider myself a sexual promiscuous and adventurous person. I am in a polyamorous relationship, and have had around 80 lovers in my life, around half of which were one night stands. I love giving blowjobs, even sometimes to strangers at the bar, and as long as there is lube I am a pretty big fan of anal, but this has nothing to do with chokers!

[Anonymous No.10494311]

>>10493778
Yes

[Anonymous No.10494315]

>>10494297
idk, bro I don't do that nor do I have much to show. Again, some girls may just like the outfit some may be trying to attract a certain guy. How did this get to cleavage? Some girls just have very big boobs though so keep that in mind. I'm heading out now.

[Anonymous No.10494319]

>>10494283
No, I've never been in a relationship and haven't had much motivation diligently seek one.
>>10494305
fuck you for trying to answer for me. My gooodness you are all such losers and autists.

[Anonymous No.10494320]

>>10494315
>How did this get to cleavage?
HOW ARE YOU A SCIENTST, DO YOU KNOW WHAT DISCUSSION IS, DO YOU KNOW WHAT CONVERSATION, WHAT RELATION IS, WHAT TOPICS ARE, DO YOU KNOW WHAT UNDERSTANDING IS DO YOU KNOW WHAT ARGUMENT IS DO YOU KNOW WHAT POINTS ARE DO YOU KNOW WHAT LOGICAL REASONABLE RELATIONS WITHIN TOPICS ARE THAT CAN PROVE AND AID POINTS

goodnight

[Anonymous No.10494321]

>>10494319
>My gooodness you are all such losers and autists.
and you are no fun, dont understand humor, and are a tad slow

[Anonymous No.10494324]

>>10494320
Dude...relax. we are talking about chokers and sexual things but I jsut find it far reaching that we now have to bring this to cleavage is my point. You really do have autism and good night.

[Anonymous No.10494326]

>>10494319
im sorry for everyone bad I said to you, hope you have a good night and life, wear and enjoy your chokers and whatever else you want to wear, others peoples thoughts about your dress doesnt matter, peace

[Anonymous No.10494328]

>>10494324
>bring this to cleavage is my point.
the point is, expressing how maybe a massive amount of the female population may do a particular behavior strictly because of its relation to the male gaze

[Anonymous No.10494330]

>>10494300
You assume that after meeting a choker wearing woman an assumption that she's a slut would somehow change.

[Anonymous No.10494331]

>>10494321
I understand humor but that was a poor attempt. I am not slow.

[Anonymous No.10494332]

>>10494324
seriously, im sorry, im gonna cry because how rude I was, im crying...im sorry. you are good and cool and nice for talking, im sorry

[Anonymous No.10494334]

>>10494328
But that is not the case for all things in appearance. And like I said, it can different between different women. What ever dude.
>>10494330
whatever. less and less girls will stop caring what you think

[Anonymous No.10494350]

>>10494332
kek I thought I was the only one who suddenly stops capitalizing when I emotionally break down to a girl for no reason

[Anonymous No.10494354]

>>10494350
because we just had a long empassioned vigorous conversation and its the closest ive ever been to having sex and I was rude, and I just truly want to say sorry and that I am thankful she seems cool and smart and should wear what she wants and I love her

[Anonymous No.10494358]

>>10494354
Whewx10
This is good content

[Anonymous No.10494359]

Fun thread

[Anonymous No.10494360]

>>10494358
That girl has a dandruff issue.

[Anonymous No.10494371]

>>10492091
***look at in public

[Anonymous No.10494378]

>>10494258

I don't even know which logical fallacy to point out first

[Anonymous No.10494385]

>>10494378
Well this isn't reddit so you can save yourself the trouble.

[Anonymous No.10494423]

>>10492091
https://ontherapyaspse.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/geoffrey-miller-the-mating-mind.pdf

[Anonymous No.10494427]

>>10492187
no u

[Anonymous No.10494433]

>>10492557
why can't i have both?

[Anonymous No.10494436]

>chokers arent suggestive

[Anonymous No.10494467]

>>10492562
I want to vomit

[Anonymous No.10494473]

>>10494436
Of course they are, I haven't seen anyone claim anything otherwise

[Anonymous No.10494476]

>>10494189
you're cute and now i want to fuck
good job, anon

[Anonymous No.10494490]

Vonnegut, Bukowski, Camus, Murakami, shit they see on Goodreads, Pynchon if you're lucky

[Anonymous No.10494493]

/lit/ femanon is best femanon

[Anonymous No.10494496]

>>10492894
A failed actress

https://www.youtube.com/user/MishysWords

[Anonymous No.10494502]

>>10492091
Having the displeasure of knowing a lot of art thots, most of them don't beyond a small clique of depressive art thot authors except the literary subspecies of art thot who mostly read entry tier pessimistic & existentialist shit; Camus, Pessoa, Cioran, etc.

[Anonymous No.10494513]

>>10493051
best art ho in thread

[Anonymous No.10494528]

>>10494493
Fuck off roast thot

[Anonymous No.10494531]

>>10493910
she looks like shit lmao. poor bert

[Anonymous No.10494533]

Can we all agree that chokers look nice and most women are sluts and be done with it.

[Anonymous No.10494539]

>>10494533

The most intelligent thing posted in this thread, and that's saying something..

[Anonymous No.10494562]

Do /lit/ femanons like bugs?

[Anonymous No.10494657]

>>10492119
mamma mia

[Anonymous No.10494663]

>>10494528
shut up homo
i want the qt ditz back

[Anonymous No.10494669]

GREAT thread

[Anonymous No.10494676]

i thought i was on /fa/
i had to double check

[Anonymous No.10494732]

>>10493383
>tfw own a copy of being and nothingness
>can't get passed the 75% mark because of how indulgent the philosophy is

I mean geez. I get metaphysics, but when you're like 7 ergo statements into an example on why the concept of a chair isn't the chair itself you can fuck right off.

[Anonymous No.10494897]

>>10492109
>tfw Camus is such a chad he pulls thots beyond the grave.

[Anonymous No.10495001]

Holy fuck--the border-line suffering whore posted ITT are literally the women I hate most on this earth.

Solely responsible for bringing about the downfall of Western Civilization.

[Anonymous No.10495093]

>>10495001
they make me want to crawl on the floor and beg them to put cigs out on my tongue and step on my balls

[Anonymous No.10495101]

>>10495093
I have an opposite reaction--I want to gather them all and put them in a concentration camp and nun-like women would teach them how to be proper women and would starve them to death if they didn't adhere to their new teachings.

[Anonymous No.10495119]

>>10495101
I just want to do all their chores for them, clean their floors, wash their dishes, give them half my paycheck and let them degrade me and spit in my face

[Anonymous No.10495133]

>>10495119
Cuck.

[Anonymous No.10495138]

>>10494676
these, there cant be a single discussion not related to a book on this board faggots are the worst; these, I know this is your home away from home and all and you are all unsocial and have no where else to talk about all your thoughts but you should only think about books and only talk about them, I very much want to limit your intellectual capacity and discussion, faggots are absolutely the worst

[Anonymous No.10495163]

>>10495133
I don't have a wife no one is cuckolding me

[Anonymous No.10495201]

>>10492112
who is she?

[Anonymous No.10495218]

>>10492135
Name?

[Anonymous No.10495222]

>>10494732
don't worry, Sartre stopped being philosophically relevant decades ago. spend your time with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty instead

[Anonymous No.10495442]

>>10495001
>>10495093
>>10495101
>>10495119
damn
both are quite appealing
i'm really conflicted here

[Anonymous No.10495876]

Arno Schmidt

[Anonymous No.10495924]

>>10495876
what are we looking at here?

[Anonymous No.10495938]

>>10494192
this one hurt

[Anonymous No.10496080]

>>10495876
me on the right

[Anonymous No.10496139]

>>10492895
Squire! Where’s my Sword?!

[Anonymous No.10496215]

>>10492562
>American litterature

[Anonymous No.10496368]

>>10495201