[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 52 KB, 480x596, IMG_4452.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9686225 No.9686225[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>girl whips out your dick on the first date
>girlfriend has your child and struggles through years of poverty, your personal secretary, driver, die old on a honeymoon night
>life of a poet

>> No.9686731
File: 67 KB, 720x715, 1496802125093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9686731

>>9686225

hohoho fuck buddy i don't really understand what you're getting at here

>> No.9686816
File: 821 KB, 1276x628, 1493436232673.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9686816

>>9686225
>caring about a few women

beta

>> No.9687148

>>9686225
Any threads about women are off-topic. I have never had my love of books and poetry connected to my romantic life in any way.

Even women I consider borderline brilliant who actually read become immensely disinterested if I bring up literary fiction or books they havent read, to the point of eyes glazing over. And women such as these represent like 5% of the women I have dated and married. Mostly they say "oh I love books" but really mean Harry Potter, Angels and Demons, or some book they read once about a flawed woman getting fucked by a perfect man on vacation.

>> No.9687156

>>9687148
Eh, I guess it depends on where you live and who you know. My girlfriend turned me to Cioran, for example, and we kind of read the same philosophy books; similarly, a lot of other girls I've dated had an independent and deep interest in literature.

>> No.9687162

>>9687156
sound like uni gfs in your major.

>> No.9687178

>>9687156
Good try, roastie, but just a bit too much.

>> No.9687185

>>9687162
Yeah pretty much, which kind of makes my point a bit less relevant to the general discussion.

>> No.9687203
File: 27 KB, 400x400, 1498250866240.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9687203

>>9687148
>Any threads about women are off-topic.
He doesn't write to get women

>> No.9687228

>>9686816
Trump deserves scrutiny because a notorious liar with an eggshell ego. Everything he says and does HAS to be looked at under a microscope.

You can't really give this guy the benefit of the doubt, he a proven, pathological liar.

>> No.9687248

>girl whips out her dick on the first date
>life of a nietzsche fanboy

>> No.9687249
File: 700 KB, 1000x767, 1493651012105.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9687249

>>9687228
>>9686816

>> No.9687257

>>9687249
Trump is an author, we're as board-relevant and this fucking thread is.

>> No.9687264

The male body is so fucking repulsive, how do women do it?

>> No.9687292

>>9687228
But Obama gets a free pass because he's black and therefore morally superior and incapable of doing wrong, right? For eight years liberals didn't give a shit about how the government proceeded or how many arabs they bombed, but now everything is to be scrutinized? Bunch of hypocrites.

>> No.9687302

>>9687292
Son, we're leftists here, not liberals.

>> No.9687313

>>9687292
The media should't have given him a total pass, but there's no reason so suspect him of having skeletons in the closet of covering up illegal activity. Obama's greatest crime was totally legal: concentrating untold power into the executive office; the office now held by Trump who has all those same powers.

Congress is the villain because they refuse to do anything about this abrogation of their authority. They'd probably like it if they were useless figureheads and the president took the heat for everything.