/lit/ - Literature

>>8895322
Because this is a literature board and conservative views is a sign of illiteracy

>>8895323
Oh snap! You sure showed that bitch boy! Fuck Drumpf and fuck white people xD

They aren't. They just aren't as found among /lit/ as they are other boards

T. Fascist

Libertarian and conservative views are welcome on /lit/.

Complaining about Jews and extolling Trump and Putin is best discussed on /pol/.

>>8895322
They aren't, so long as the person espousing them isn't a frogposter who talks about Jewish conspiracies and is only here to discuss politics and not literature

>>8895336
>they are, as long as they aren't my imaginary strawmen

>>8895327
See, they resort to meme language as their inadequate education gives them no legible ways to even forumulate their disagreement.

Daily reminder that complaining about discrimination in the book industry is against the rules

>>8895337
I assume the OP is talking about the Trump thread that was just deleted. The OP seemed more interested in talking about Jews and how anyone who disagreed with him were 'kike shills'.

>>8895339
Reddit-tier post

Oh look, it's the same /pol/ thread that got deleted 15 minutes ago. Hi again pol!

>>8895343
Bait thread should always be banned

>>8895348
>free speech is good as long as it doesn't offend me

>>8895350
Impressive rebutal, are you going to call me a cuck or a nu-male next?
How about posting an image of an undesirable person to imply it represents me?

I have conservative views, but that last thread was trash and deserved to be treated as such.

who /wrongsideofhistory/ here?

>>8895353
It wasn't fucking bait you lying retard.
>>8895355
No need, you're making a fool out of yourself.

>>8895354
You should keep that sort of nonsense on /pol/.

Why are conservatives always complaining about things being banned when they aren't?

>>8895354
>I post about hating jews on /lit/ and can't figure out why I get banned

Oh, boy.

>>8895361
If you say so, frogposter

>>8895352
>le /pol/ boogeyman
>>8895362
>this sort of nonsense should be banned because I don't like it even if it's literature related
>>8895366
>stop saying things I don't like! WAAAH

>>8895322
>banned
But anon, half of the replies in any given thread are /pol/-tier shitposts

>>8895369
literally /pol/

>le start with the greeks board
>not conservative
US English really is the worst. It'll mark you for life as unread.

>>8895369
This is the type of posters OP is claiming should be permitted

>>8895354
Free speech means the government can't infringe on your speech.
This is 4chan, a site with rules. When frogposting faggots break the rules, most commonly by posting shitty bait threads or just blatantly off-topic threads like this one, the threads should be deleted and op should be banned.
Do not invoke the bill of rights when you don't understand how it works.

>>8895322

>>8895365
There have been multiple deleted threads because the OP dared to not be a PC SJW liberal

Because this is literally a sister board of Reddit

KILL WHITEY

>>8895369
>le bogieman meme
just stay quiet

telling you to shut the fuck up is every bit my right as it is yours to think and say stupid things

>>8895378
>le free speech is only legal meme
>>8895379
>redditor deflecting
>>8895384
>sit down, shitlord!
That works in your home site, huh?

>>8895380
>There have been multiple deleted threads because the OP dared to not be a PC SJW liberal
Could you give an exaple of such threads? Do you mean threads unrelated to literature?

>>8895369
The Trump thread wasn't about literature at all, it was a thread about Jews, which isn't literature related.

You should take it to /pol/, they're very eager to discuss such matters there.

As for the rest of your histronic outburst, kill you'are'selve

/lit/. is a right-wing board.
Prove me wrong.

>>8895380
>OP is daring
>OP is not a faggot
you're so new i feel we should diaper you

>>8895322
>/lit/ is for the discussion of literature, specifically books (fiction & non-fiction), short stories, poetry, creative writing, etc. If you want to discuss history, religion, or the humanities, go to /his/. If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/.

>>8895380
Is it this hard for you to understand that none of your threads would be deleted if you made them about literature?
Nobody makes "pc sjw liberal" threads, but if they did they should be banned too. Politics should be banned. This is /lit/.

Kill me.

>>8895391

>thread about Jews isn't literature related
>they LITERALLY worship "the word"

try again pleb

>>8895387
They were all related to literature. The thread about conservative books and >>8895343 for example
>>8895391
Shut up libshit

>>8895398
>Politics should be banned
Music to my ears. There is no greater cancer.

>>8895392
The fact you have to claim this on 4chan

>>8895322
>Why are conservative views banned on /lit/?
Are you ban evading pol-kun?

>>8895385
There it is, the image that allows /pol/ to ignore any citicism because clearly anybody disagreeing with them is a newfag redditor

>>8895382
This board is dead, goyim.

>>8895402
shit they stole off the ionian school does not count as jewish. i'll accept buddhist arguments but only because i know what they did to the animists

>>8895398
I'm complaining about literature threads being deleted, or threads that are both politics and literature. Or do you think politics and literature never overlap?

>>8895322
look at this thread, and you know why the state that you call "conservative views being banned" is a reasonable one

>>8895385
There is literally nothing wrong with being a nu-male

>>8895407
It's very accurate actually. You can tell by the defensive "boogeyman!" replies

>>8895412
I think if you read any book which has the word string PC SJW liberal in it, I have more respect for the people reading books about dragon mating and quirky detective agencies.

>>8895412
No legitimate literature threads have been deleted that I know of. Frogposters posting transparent bait and that guy who started the thread by bitching at reddit (immediately spiralling into trumpposting) got deleted, rightfully so.

>>8895416
>Your just a big meanie!
>Bogieman!
>Bogieman!
>Don't yell at me!
>No step on my opinion!

>>8895416
>It's very accurate actually

Half the shit on the list outside "not racist" describes /pol/tards perfectly

>>8895419
>politics is bad, stop having views, politics and literature are never related!

>>8895323
If you're of an eastern ethnicity then I could understand you being all for liberal thought. However, any educated westerner will hold conservative views; a person doesn't even have to be all that well versed in history to know that the French Revolution is what set off the degradation of western society that has been perpetually going on since. Every generation since then has tried and succeeded in being more liberal than their parents. Any man who is capable of independent thought will understand the consequence of this.

>>8895399
Only if you are a white devil.

>>8895403
That's a thinly veiled /pol/ thread. You know that from the second reply it's going to descend into a spiral of "SJW" "cultural marxism" and "fuck off back to /pol/" posts that discuss literally nothing about literature or the industry.

It's not about deleting conservative views, it's about keeping the shitposting in check. If the thread about conservative literature actually talked about books then I see no reason to delete it. Same with the one you linked if you guys could not spazz out and remain on topic.

>>8895424
Politics is for sub-100 IQ people.

>>8895420
Keep denying. I guess you are the authority who decides what is literature and what is bait?

Also here's a frog.

>>8895416
I just find it hilarious that /pol/ acts exactly like the retards on tumblr that they hate by demanding that all boards on 4chan serve as hugboxes for their views, and anyone who disagrees with them or is annoyed by them must be an sjw pc liberal from reddit
You are all cancer and should be permabanned from everywhere other than your containment boards

>>8895430
Stay nihilistic goy!
>>8895429
It's not a /pol/ thread, OP actually wanted a serious discussion. Where the fuck else can it be posted?

>>8895431
Frogs are not literature. Easy one.

>>8895416
It isn't actually. You can tell by the defensive "fallacy fallacy" replies

>>8895431
No, because I'm not a mod. But do you know why mods are mods? Because they ARE the authority that decides what is or is not a shitpost, you stupid frogposting faggot.

>>8895322
It's the most fag board, and the easiest transition board for redditors that pretend to be intellectual since it's their only excuse for not an hero themselves.

>>8895424
No, politics are wonderful and there are many eloquent writers either side of the authoritarian or liberal divide. There's also plenty of shit writers. "PC SJW liberal" isn't even shit political writing; it's a jingle of a useful idiot. You're essentially of the same reading level as a tumblrite or Twilight reader. In any meritocratic conservative society, you would be dead or working a job which required you to be illiterate and easily led, for the benefit of those of us who have read Mandeville and are worth something as humans.

>>8895435
>nihilistic
>implying
You are so far below 100 IQ you can't even decipher such an obvious statement.

>>8895434
Nobody wants a hugbox, we just don't want to be fucking banned and for autistic condescending libshit nu-anons to sperg out and turn this site into reddit. 4chan has always been edgy

>>8895435
>OP actually wanted a serious discussion
The OP doesn't suggest that at all. Maybe he's just not used to create decent threads from having browsed the 'redpilled' boards

>>8895439
>mods are right because they're mods
We programmed this one well Chaim!