/lit/ - Literature

>>22644177
OP I think you meant to type 'left' but accidentally typed 'right' instead. Honest mistake.

>>22644206
Name a few right wing authors that aren't gay then. Evola's asshole must have had so much white dick in there, it's a miracle that this spaghetti shit could even sit.

This is lame bait. Using anecdotal evidence you could make a case for almost anyone's homosexuality.

>>22644177
Their morality is entirely derived from aesthetics, so naturally they're all going to be gay. Why do you think all the woman-haters (gays) on /lit/ are fascists?

>>22644177
What

There's no such thing as homosexual.
Two men can't have sex with each other. It's like saying that a beard is a dick, or that tits are vaginas.
Ultimately their condition is derived from a pathological obsession with everything that is infertile. It could be said that homosexuals are unable to educate kids, not because they are deranged perverts, but because of the infertility and scarceness of the ideas that they plant, or try to plant on them.
Now it could he said that there's infertile heterosexual couples too, but in this case, the infertility is physiological and not mental. In the homosexual, the infertility is both mental and physical.

>>22645095

>>22644177
Are there any leftoid authors that haven't fucked a kid or virtue signaled about it?

>>22644245

>>22645117
He was not right wing
>>22644177
I would say Olavo de Carvalho, but he had some homo experiences
I guess you right

>>22644177
Nietzsche

>muh right wing muh left wing

fuck you OP

>>22644177
>Any authors that weren't homosexual? This shit is almost impossible.

fixed and answered

>>22645220
>pro-cuckoldry zionist shill that only huemonkeys know about

>>22644955
>Their morality is entirely derived from aesthetics
You're thinking of romantic cucks. Proper homofascists have an amoral worldview.

>>22644177
I'm bored so I'll give OP an opportunity to describe the homosexuality of Joseph de Maistre.

Mishima was actually straight

>>22645481
Fascism is 20th century romanticism.

>>22645705
>Romanticism
Kitsch
>ftfy

>>22645596
Reading his brother Xavier right now; really enjoying Voyage around my Room

>>22644177
Me

>>22645468
Just because he doesn’t sucking Dugins yellow cock doesn’t make him pro-cuck

>My political opponents are
>Le gay???
Insightful

>>22644177
why did this chick blow up? Is it just guys pining for her?

>>22647094

>>22647148
Basically

>>22647148
she is an instawhore and indeed has lots of orbiters devoted to her whoredom

>>22647151
Noooooooo you should divorce on a whim

>>22645095
>It could be said that homosexuals are unable to educate kids, not because they are deranged perverts, but because of the infertility and scarceness of the ideas that they plant, or try to plant on them.
Opposite is the case. Read Plato.

>>22645442
>The erotic relation of men to youths was the necessary and sole preparation, to a degree unattainable to our comprehension, of all manly education (pretty much as for a long time all higher education of women was only attainable through love and marriage). All idealism of the strength of the Greek nature threw itself into that relation, and it is probable that never since have young men been treated so attentively, so lovingly so entirely with a view to their welfare (virtus) as in the fifth and sixth centuries B.C.— according to the beautiful saying of Holderlin: “denn liebend giebt der Sterbliche vom Besten”. The higher the light in which this relation was regarded, the lower sank intercourse with women.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Human All Too Human 259

>Plato goes further. He says with an innocence possible only for a Greek, not a "Christian," that there would be no Platonic philosophy at all if there were not such beautiful youths in Athens: it is only their sight that transposes the philosopher's soul into an erotic trance, leaving it no peace until it lowers the seed of all exalted things into such beautiful soil
Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols chapter 8, 23

>What does our chatter about the Greeks amount to! What do we understand of their art, the soul of which is passion for naked male beauty!
—Friedrich Nietzsche, Daybreak, Aphorism 170

>Even the boldest remained still before Holbein's self-portrait in the hall of drawings! And I now struggled futilely in Nietzsche's presence to define the magical attraction of that wonderful portrait. It did not help that I so-to-speak traced line after line of that face. This approach was powerless to describe the expression of fully developed manhood combined with the charm of fresh youth (Holbein's self-portrait, as is known, presents him without a beard). And I failed to capture even the individual traits in their full value. I faltered when I came to the mouth. I could see the lips before me. So fully rounded yet so energetically closed! Not avid, yet as if created for pleasure!
>"A mouth . . .," I stammered bewilderedly.
>"A mouth to kiss!"
>Disconcertedly I looked aside. Truly, it was Nietzsche who had spoken, in an attitude and a tone which seemed to contrast most strangely with the mildly sensual coloration of his words. For leaning far back in his armchair, his head bowed onto his chest and his arms hanging limply on the armrests, he seemed to have spoken out of a dream rather than as a comment on my report.
—Ludwig von Scheffler's recollection of Nietzsche

>>22648068
Lewis is just saying it's better to be gay than a psychopath, which I agree with

>>22648094
Perhaps the picture is being misinterpreted. It's not meant to say they are all pro-homosexual. What is noticeable is that they are not SADISTS who think ALL HOMOS SHOULD BE CRUSHED AND BOGGED (NO MERCY NO SYMPATHY) which is what deracinated ""conservatives"" seem to think

>>22648064
you should if your wifey is cheating on you, mr. cuckservative

>>22648101
Catholics think it is a sin to divorce your partner even if they are abusive and/or cheating on you. They say you can "separate" but in that case you are NEVER allowed to have a romantic relationship, marry, or have sex ever again. Holy cuckeroni.

>>22648094
He's saying that boarding schools are evil

>>22648097
Besides twitter incels and evangelicals pastors I don't see anyone saying that
>>22648101
Everyone is capable of doing evil, but you can tell if a woman will cheat on you or not. No fim a culpa é sempre do corno
>>22648105
This is why cheating should be a crime, you are putting someone at risk of getting STDs and also ruining their life

>>22648074
Didn't knew Niet was so based and homopilled

>>22648129
>This is why cheating should be a crime
Kys christoid

>>22644177
me

>>22648097
When you remove Christcuckery from the picture there becomes increasingly little legitimate reasons to have an undying hatred for homosexuality. One can think it is unnatural but also think that it is unnecessary to have such an undying malice for homosexuals.

>>22644177
Try the actual right-wing i.e. monarchists and hoppean libertarians/propertarians. Socialist fascist trannies not right-wing.

>>22644177
What are some book series where the sequel is superior to the original?

Homosexual men are the aristocrats of the species

>>22648567
Yea desu
>Gauche taste
>Out of touch with the general populace
>Napoleon complex
>Sex life resulting in STD's
>Dying from preventable disease because of their hubris
>Hate it when you don't include them
One could go on but I need to fuck a woman with a fat ass and smelly feet.

>>22644177
Most authors before 1000 or so
100% of the world was right wing since its inception really. Leftism is a very recent construct (jews to blame)

>>22645102
would be funnier if gadaffi wasn't based af