[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 100 KB, 706x227, Screenshot_20230202_135914_Firefox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21605772 No.21605772 [Reply] [Original]

Is the Bible literally true?

>> No.21605782

>>21605772
Absolutely. Only gaytheist scientists and historians will tell you otherwise and they're just serving their (((masters)))

>> No.21605822

>>21605772
yes.
a nice thing to do is read it through and sesrch for an answer to any doubt you have while reading/finding a hard passage.
all criticism of Christianity is either malicious misinterpretation, or doubts held onto instead of answered.

Biblehub is great for commentary and the original languages, and youll often find answers in the gotquestions site (although they have a calvinist slant).
always try to read as many different explanations as you can, so you don't get reeled into someone's specific interpretation. you get better at realizing what's proper after you've learned some.
also read the NT, then the OT. makes it easier.
for a helpful order: Matthew, Mark, Luke, Acts, John, Epistles, Revelation, OT.

>> No.21605823

I think it's plausible.

>> No.21605848

>>21605772
Christianity confirmed reddit.

>> No.21605854
File: 3.91 MB, 1292x8757, 1472700586876.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21605854

>>21605772
Yes

>> No.21605864

It's literally AND only figuratively true.

>> No.21605865

>>21605772
Marge: "Come on, Homer, Japan will be fun. You liked Rashomon"
Homer: "That's not how I remember it!"

>> No.21605866

>>21605864
It's figuratively literally true.

>> No.21605878

>>21605854
Welp, guess I better go to communion then.

>> No.21605932

the bible is true even if its not true

>> No.21605935

>>21605772
Literally true? Yes. Empirically true? It depends.

>> No.21605946

ITT: christcuck larpers

>> No.21606037

>>21605772
>Gospel according to Mark (never met Jesus)
>Gospel according to Matthew (never met Jesus)
>Gospel according to Luke (never met Jesus)
>John (met Jesus) finally decides to set the record straight, releases his own gospel, because you guys couldn't even get the names of the disciples right
>like 50 years later
>the other gospels stay in because uhhh

>> No.21606040

it's about math you fucking retards

>> No.21606056

>>21605782
But unironically so, jew.

>> No.21606098

>>21606037
>Matthew (never met Jesus)
I suspect you are not unretarded.

>> No.21606145

>>21605772
There is no literal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VLPDSRL5f4

>> No.21606203
File: 113 KB, 720x883, 1673871363475055.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21606203

>>21605946
cope, Crosslet

>> No.21606609

>>21605932
the final answer

>> No.21606619

>>21606609
The Bible is true because it is not true. Atheists and Christians are both correct

>> No.21606684

>>21605866
checked dubs of truth

>> No.21606882
File: 244 KB, 697x893, 1673869990957512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21606882

>>21605932
Based
Speaking power to "truth"

>> No.21608011

>>21605772
No, try reading actual history.