/lit/ - Literature

>>21591608
I hate women

>>21591630
keyed

>>21591630
you hate yourself more, fag
>>21591608
imagine the smell

>>21591608
I don't know man, The dude convinced the world that Objectification is a thing (but not when you do it for money) . It buffles me that there are no legit published counter-arguments to something so stupid.

Imagine the privilege of being cucked by her

>>21591608
She’d pop your head like a watermelon if you ate her out. It’d be like sticking your head in a bear trap

>>21592068
Is that an a priori or an aposteriori claim?

>>21592082
kek

>>21592068
i randomly clicked on a brazilian porno like this a while back and now i'm trying to make it happen.

i m a g i n e

>>21591608
Aren't we afraid of spiders and snakes, disgusted at cockroaches and rats, while also sick from the smells os rotten food and delighted at the sights and sounds of Beauty?

>>21591608
Kant died a virgin and avoided masturbation his entire life.

Many people believe this made him some sort of awkward loser, the kind you might imagine meeting today, you know, wearing a outdated hat or posting on this very site. However, it is in fact entirely the opposite; that is, him being an awkward loser: for while he was a virgin -and avoided masturbation- he was actually quite funny and confident and even made others slightly uncomfortable with his joking mannerisms around sex.

For example: the story of how Kant demanded to be tucked in tight at night is often heard of as his way of staving off the urge to masturbate. What is not told is just how awkward Kant would make this for his servants.

Being virtually perpetually horny, and actually monstrously hung, Kant would get into get into his jammies and get under the covers and call on of his servants.
"Oh Jaaaaamers" Kant might say (assuming the servants name is James in this case)
"a-ah yes Mr. Kant"
"Call me Emmanuel! I've told you a hundred times"
Kant could tell his servants to call him Kant one time, then Emmanuel the next, and he did this for well over 2 decades that some of them worked for him and he laughed every time.

"a-ah yes sir, Emmanuel"
"oh and tuck me in, i don't want to visit the circus if it comes to town!"
"y-yes sir"
"you know what i mean by circus right?"
"yes sir"
Kant would joke about the "circus" coming to town; and this was in reference to a powerful erection that he would get under the covers, which could lift the fabric and "pitch a tent" as its said.

"y-yes sir, Emmanuel sir" the servant would say, his eyes already dropping to the floor because he knew what came next
"oh-oh noo tuck me in! The circus is coming! QUICK!"
James would be made to tuck Kant into bed while a massive erection formed (supposedly 10inches plus) And Kand would stare at James the entire time and breath really heavy muttering inaudible sometimes punctuated by "circus" with a big pleasant smile on his face.
The tuck in duties were supposedly rotated weekly by Kant's staff, but all of them have given similar accounts.

>>21591608
why are her mannerisms and gesticulations primarily negroid in nature?

>>21592658
look at that ass again, do you think that anything but a 9 inch bbc is going to make her scream?

>>21592687
the knife I plunge into her guts and twist may.

>>21592690
lol chill, chud

>>21591608
why do zoomers like muscular women? is it because they are gay?

>>21591608

BBBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

snnnnniiiiiiffffffffffff...oh yes my dear....sssnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff....quite pungent indeed...is that....dare I say....sssssssnniff...eggs I smell?......sniff sniff....hmmm...yes...quite so my darling....sniff....quite pungent eggs yes very much so .....ssssssssssssssnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiiiiffffff....ah yes...and also....a hint of....sniff....cheese.....quite wet my dear....sniff...but of yes...this will do nicely....sniff.....please my dear....another if you please....nice a big now....

BBBBBBRRRRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPPPFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPFFFFFF

Oh yes...very good!....very sloppy and wet my dear....hmmmmm...is that a drop of nugget I see on the rim?...hmmmm.....let me.....let me just have a little taste before the sniff my darling.......hmmmmm....hmm..yes....that is a delicate bit of chocolate my dear....ah yes....let me guess...curry for dinner?....oh quite right I am....aren't I?....ok....time for sniff.....sssssnnnnnnniiiiiiiiffffffff.....hmmm...hhhmmmmm I see...yes....yes indeed as well curry......hmmm....that fragrance is quite noticeable....yes.....onion and garlic chutney I take it my dear?.....hmmmmm....yes quite.....

BBBBBBRRRRRRRRPPPPPPFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTTT

Oh I was not expecting that…that little gust my dear….you caught me off guard…yes…so gentle it was though…hmmmm…let me taste this little one…just one small sniff…..sniff…ah….ssssssnnnnnniiiiiffffffffffff…and yet…so strong…yes…the odor….sniff sniff…hmmm….is that….sniff….hmmm….I can almost taste it my dear…..yes….just…sniff….a little whiff more if you please…..ssssssnnnnnniiiiiffffffffff…ah yes I have it now….yes quite….hhhhmmmm…delectable my dear…..quite exquisite yes…..I dare say…sniff….the most pungent one yet my dear….ssssnnnnniiiifffffffffffffffffffffff….yes….

>>21592718
It's because we are high test

>>21592721
no. high test men like women with wide hips and some fat on them. and small ribcages.

>>21591608
Without priori knowledge literally nothing can be known you retard. It just collapses into an irrational solipsism

>>21591608
>"A priori versus a posteriori knowledge. A priori concepts are a product of evolution (except if you believe that concepts exist before the brain is evolved that can produce them, in which case you could prove your theory by teaching differential calculus to rhinos, crabs or lizards). Therefore they are a posteriori. The whole debacle arose because earlier philosophers could not conceive of a connection between biology and thought, and simply assumed that "man" is "inherently endowed" with a "rational faculty" that is immutable, pre-existent, and eternal. Today we know that thought and the hardware that makes it possible are just as much in flux as everything else, and have known this for some time (since the days of Hegel, at the least, and certainly by the time of the aftermath to Darwin's arrival), so this entire debacle is no longer an issue."

>>21591608
how is a posteriori knowledge possible without a priori knowledge then?

>>21592726
Woman in OP has all that. That stuff doesn't preclude muscle.

>>21592736
Why did brains evolve to imagine triangles and not something else our actual brains can't imagine? The patterns the organism evolves to encompass exist "a priori" to the organism.

>>21592581
>Beauty
only ugly people think things (themselves) are beautiful.

This is more like genetic memory anyway, not the food part, that's actually an example of a priori sense data being correct.

>>21591608
>How is a priori knowledge possible
through experience; one experience if touching a hot stove is enough for stupid people to not touch the stove again, but most people are intelligent enough to not touch a hot stove in the first place. None of this is as complicated as fake intellectuals and theologian types wanted to make out.

Like,
> it comes from the metaphysical conditions that are necessary for the existence of a mind.
you could phrase it that way to make it sound overly complicated. It's true that a priori can be wrong sometimes, the baseline dispositions of things which are in error; like when we don't realize at first that most predators dress to seem very innocent and act harmless, but it's a matter of learning by observation of the environment; which includes understanding the simplistic tricks people use to leverage the baseline disposition.

>>21591630
>>21591918
honestly everything about that video is offensive.

Try and imagine her as a man and see if you don't get the instinct to punch. Then ask why you tolerate oafish attention seeking behavior in Women and not in Men.

>>21592022
your refutation, >>21592630

It's a well known fact that sexual repression drives people insane whilst creating the most childlike of dispositions in them, for want of never experiencing the full scope of their senses. Church sucks.

>>21592630
What

>>21592718
she's not muscular, she just has a fat bottom and weak arms. Is she supposed to be a body builder or something? huh.

>>21592721
no it's because you're physically, cognitively and emotionally weak and want a mummy who can keep the bullies away from your various holes who recognize you for what you are.

>>21592771
It's pasta retard

>>21592907
i've got no idea what you're referring to, since you didn't specify. take your pasta and stick it up your nose you guido wop

>>21591630
I hate women.

>>21592658
They aren’t?

>>21593097
>faggoty zoomer sentence with sanfrancisco AIDS intonation built in via incorrect use of punctuation
literally figuratively spiritually and existentially end yourself.

What compels an attractive woman to do this?

>>21592658
Being an obnoxious social media attention whore might have something to do with it.

>>21593226
What compels men to do it other than homosexuality?

>>21593248
That question should be reserved for /fit/.

>>21593248
Homosexual men are more likely to take risks and generally are less inhibited. See: AIDS.

>>21593226
Body dysmorphia, wanting to look intimidating/ugly because of a previous sexual assault, being a lesbian, etc

>>21593248
Glory

>>21591608
because there is no "a priori" and "a posteriori." All is experience, the inner contents of your mind are also experienced. The inner contents of your mind are particular qualia as are the outerly perceived things.

>>21591608
What metaphysical conditions does Kant use?
>>21592771
>one experience if touching a hot stove is enough for stupid people to not touch the stove again
A priori knowledge is knowledge that is neccesary and universal, it is possible that someone doesn't feel pain touching the stove so it is not a priori knowledge

>>21593226
>What compels a woman t-
Attention. The answer is always attention.

>>21593266
Point is that women generally don't find men that look like muscly cartoon characters attractive either, so asking why already attractive women do it is fucking dumb.

>>21593335
>women generally don't find men that look like muscly cartoon characters attractive either
false. they absolutely do, the problem is that many roidheads are balding manlets which are not attractive. muscle tallhandsome chad beats regular tallhandsome chad

>>21593353
>false. they absolutely do

No they don't. Women like a thin and fit man yes, but not roided out gymrats.

>>21593363
cope.

>>21593373
lol. You literally asked what compels a woman to work out retard, don't ask if you don't want answers.

>>21591608
is coffee good for you?

>>21592789
>no it's because you're physically, cognitively and emotionally weak and want a mummy who can keep the bullies away from your various holes who recognize you for what you are.
bros...

>>21593317
>A priori knowledge is knowledge that is neccesary and universal, it is possible that someone doesn't feel pain touching the stove so it is not a priori knowledge
Uhmm.. no. That is not what priori or posteriori means at all,

law:
a priori means "at a glace, at first sight," i.e. knowing a tree is a tree by looking at it, posterior is knowing 'afterwards' by ... only learning later that it was a tree.

Actually technically, my stove example of only knowing it was hot 'after' burning your hand would be posterior, whereas realizing it was hot 'before' touching would be prior. But things like knowing by smell that food is bad is certainly priori.

>>21593507
You needed this medicine.

>>21593391
yes

>>21593529
ed.
>a priori means "at a glace, at first sight," i.e. knowing a tree is a tree by looking at it, posterior is knowing 'afterwards' by ... only learning later that it was a tree.
but as i said a prior 'can' still be in error; you may glance from thecorner of your eye and a prior perceive a tree in the distance, but only after great study in posteriori 'may' you learn that it was a piece of broccoli being held next to your head.

small, faraway.

people who've never studied math in their life arguing about a priori and a posteriori
kill me

>>21593544
>posteriori
Isn't that just italian for ass?

>>21593544
what have terms in roman law got to do with your arabian numeracy, slave? we don't have the concept of zero and your counting is all fucked up. speak not to us, slave, but count the grain-measure.

>>21593529
We are not talking about law, we are talking about philosophy. What in philosophy we mean by a priori is that we know for example that "all grass is green" is true without the need for looking at all the existing grass, therefore is necessary and universal. It is an a priori truth that it cannot exist a squared circle, another a priori truth would be "all single people are not married" it is impossible that a single person would be married. By your definition nothing is a priori knowledge because we need always to learn the concepts and the meanings of words afterwards

>>21591608
imagine seeing videos like this and still not realizing that uncle ted was right