/lit/ - Literature

Sometimes I find it valuable to have one person's perspective, rather than the anonymous mishmash of information that you find on the internet

That women in the reflection knows she just got mogged.

>>21204676
peak fertility, right there.

go back to /b/ retard

>>21204676
I can only look at pics like this without being upset (25% Lust 75% Existential hatred) by recalling the indomitability of the wall. No thots shall survive it.

>>21205141
aren't you such a man from the underground, lmao

>>21205141
> that 44 years old girl from Terrifier II in your way.

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet and better formatted at that?
No, I want to know that girl likes to do during sex
>>21205141
I know females who are stunning at 30+

>>21205141
and yet we can always have access to fresh new thots if you have a bit of money.

>>21205189
>I know females who are stunning at 30+
Literally only women ever say this. Everyone knows women hit terminal velocity in the wrong direction post wall. It's not a matter of exceptions, but rather the general rule; as it stands no woman of 30 can stand against a younger in a contest of sheer BEAUTY, not eroticism, and win. This is tacitly admitted by women n their entire life's behaviour, and explicitly by all men in their tacit cloistered admissions.

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet and better formatted at that?
what the fuck do you want to know? when the next marvel movie will release?
Try and figure out the extent of the deluge myth in pre-colonial from fucking Wikipedia. It says almost nothing - where a book will tell you that every tribe in native America had a great deluge and canoe/mountain survivor.
Trawling numerous Wikipedia articles is gives you only an elementary understanding at best, and likely a misunderstanding. Anything difficult to learn like abstract quantum mechanics or serious mathematics will require a serious text unless you're well-versed in the field already.

>should I use the most mainstream one-sentence-only take to understand this?
>or an entire book written for such a purpose?

>>21204676
You just wanted everyone to discuss the booby girl didn't you?

>>21205262
The French would like a word with you.

>>21204676
Are you aware that people do not compile knowledge on specialized topics for free and thus you are required to pay to access it? This is called "buying a book".

>>21205189
>I know females who are stunning at 30+
there's exceptions to every rule like a handsome Chinese man, but those like hot 30+ year old women, are a rarity and can be dismissed from the data set.

>>21205141
The wall is even more powerful when you realize that any time you see a classic hot girl pic on 4chan that gets semi regularly posted, it's probably at least 5-10 years old, which means she hit the wall years ago and is just out there somewhere, right this very moment, drinking a bottle of red wine or standing in line buying scented candles

Any time I see a YLYL picture I think that bitch is 36 now and statistically probably single

The internet absolutely mogs books as a source of reference material and general solutions to problems. Honestly it's not even close. Google's search engine is one of the most powerful tools on the planet and it's free. Teaching myself to program at a fairly rudimentary level wasn't particularly difficult. Right now I'm teaching myself Japanese. Ain't paid a penny for all of this, though I'm considering it for Japanese.

>>21204676
_____ ___ ___

>>21204676
It's the other way around actually
The internet is almost completely trash that's been copypasted

>>21205804
/Thread

>>21204676

>>21205238
post your latest fresh thot

>>21205291
You thought /lit/ discussed books?

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet
no get some more interesting hobbies

you share every poor learner's perception of knowledge, where you think it is just a bunch of facts and information glued together without any structure, so you don't see the value of having someone with good didactic abilities laying down principles and concepts in a systemic, understandable way.

>>21206658
Based and higher order learning pilled

>>21205326
>beauty
>the french

>>21205280
There's more to the internet than wikipedia, like your post for example.

>>21204676
fuuuck shes hot. I thinks its her thick blond disheveled hair that really takes her beauty up a level, the boobs and thighs too.

>>21206274
https://www.whatsyourprice.com/

>>21206942
Why bother with this shit when you can just buy an escort.

>>21206967
The girls on that website are more college aged and less used up, although you arent guaranteed anything. For me it's asian massage parlors which are cheaper than escorts.

>>21206910
Lmao simp detected *bonk* lts the horny police *bonk* it's epic nnn brother, stay strong!

>>21204724

>>21204827
perk fragility, on the right

>>21206658
The internet has that too. People always talking about how they learn better with khans academy than any textbook.

>>21205189
>I know females who are stunning at 30+
that's called outliers

>>21204676

For me, it's the face, hair and thighs much more so than the boobs.

>>21206942
I was hoping this was a site like "hot or not" where people post pics of random fertile chicks and we get to (hypothetically) bid on them as a proxy ranking system.
Now I am sad and disheartened at the state of the internet and the world.

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet
Considering almost any book one can think of is downloadable on the internet, I guess so.
>and better formatted at that?
Are you seriously implying that the average yahoo answers, reddit or 4chan post is formulated in a more clear and eloquent way than it is in a good book? You can't be serious.
>Why are people still writing informational texts?
People learn a lot by doing extensive reading, also you tend to learn more from a physical book than from a digital one.

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet and better formatted at that?
If you can easily find everything you want on the internet, and better formatted at that, then the things you're looking for are commonplace

More pics like OP

>>21207433
man of culture detected

>>21207582
Yooooo, that's what I was expecting too! I was very disappointed...

>>21208946
Stupid frogposter

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet
Yes because it contains all books id like to read in pdf form
>and better formatted at that
Lmao no
>Why are people still writing informational texts?
Organized information with original insight compared to raw information
Both can equally lead to your own reflections

>>21205141
Some women age into a kind of "mature" look that makes them look just as good, if not better, than how they looked when younger. They might no longer look "youthful", but they've gained a different kind of beauty. Wish I could post examples, but it's something I've seen with women in real life. Don't feel resentful though, us men don't need women to be happy - we only need to pursue our goals (and those goals should be things other than women).

>>21208946

>>21210116
>(and those goals should be things other than women).
Why? What if they aren't?

>>21210126
God bless you brother

>>21204676
So you can talk to titcows like this and lick their thighs and put their titties in your mouth.

>>21204676
>Isn't everything you could have ever wanted to know already on the internet
No
It sucks knowing I can't afford these rare and/or out of print books
They're not uploaded online either
That's not even getting into books that were purposely made hidden or lost

>>21204676
>Scars
Nice

>>21205389
Internet's good for 0-50 but books are better for 51-100

>>21204676
Any pornstars with the same aesthetic?

>>21211027
Early Erica Campbell

The money shot

>>21205141
2 more weeks

>>21205262
Lara Logan is 51

I love her so. I'm 69

>>21205280
Not him but... post deluge, you aint gonna have those books either. The deluge myth is because of the deluge itself, people survived it, they fucking spoke about it, it passed down.

Although I agree otherwise, you cannot do deep learning without big text. If a Wikipedia competitor came along where the articles were organised in sequence rather than hyperlinked and then you can read them as and when you want but in a structured way, that might be interesting.

>>21204724
>That women in the reflection knows she just got mogged.
she's not bad either though if you look closely

>>21207614
I have worthwhile physical books in my house that I can type in the author and the book name and even an isbn and get crickets, it's disingenuous to act like the internet is a complete set of the previous literature available

>>21212005
>>21207614
should have clarified I was mostly responding to your first point, the rest I find agreeable

>>21211301
Hm. Not all shitlibs stand with Ukraine, it seems.
She’s holding up pretty good for her age too. Only two years older

>>21205362
>>21205262
Yup this place fucking blows now. Infested with Nazis who jerk off to loli hentai and faggots that unironically think every text ever written has been digitized and is available on the internet. You're all fucking idiots.

psyop cunts trying to make anons fail their NNN, sage goes in all fields

>>21212067
right. There are some really great poems that are not available anywhere on the internet, and poetry collections with no ebook version

>>21205141
For me its 25% Lust, 75% sadness for humanity.

Any happiness we manage to find when mating is entirely accidental. Our pairing choices are made on a short term genetic basis: "She's the hottest woman I can manage to fuck and marry/he's the man with the best access to resources for my children." Serious long term incompatibility is completely swept aside by "lust" and "love".

Example: imagine her offering herself to any man; the man would be considered gay or at the very least mentally strange to turn her down.

Another example: how often do you see a couple where one is very very attractive, and the other is "ugly". It rarely happens and when it does its noteworthy; we instinctively know how to sort ourselves, genetically, and any deviation is considered nonsensical. Imagine a supermodel marrying a 5'5" unemployed man, or Elon Musk marrying a 50 y.o. grandmother. ("ugly" being a combination of genetic endowment and material wealth, heavily weighted towards the latter for men, and towards the former for women)

We're just so eager to get our tiny lives permanently tangled up with each other, with so little forethought, and based on the shallowest motives, that we delude ourselves into thinking them profound in the short term. We're run by an instinctual algorithm that has no concern for our psychological well being. And then we're mystified in 5 years when the relationship is failing. We're still just overgrown children, having sex with each other and making more children.

>t. 40 y.o. boomer, married to hot chick, still hot, threatens to suicide 4x per year...I never thought I would reach the point of numbness and apathy, but 20 years will do that to love, as water wears away a stone

>>21212511
>Elon Musk marrying a 50 y.o. grandmother
https://youtu.be/QT13kk8HDDo