[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 444 KB, 1080x1348, 0_rxfJTsvNd23n13GZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20923538 No.20923538 [Reply] [Original]

>been developing my own philosophy the past few months
>just found out what quantum physics are
>they are basically rebranded philosophy
>mfw i wont be taken seriously because a large amount of the claims i make are already in quantum physics (but we have reached the same conclusion in different ways (MINE IS TRUER THO))
time to become a doomer
all is lost
my best bet at doing something people will appreciate now is becoming a poet
well i mean quantum physics just seems like rebranded idealism to some extent, so i can probably bullshit my way into being a quantum physician, right?

>> No.20923544

>>20923538
Now this is what anonymity does to a man

>> No.20923546

>>20923538
>been developing my own philosophy the past few months
It's bullshit.

>> No.20923548
File: 27 KB, 350x420, tumblr_a7845bf0de55bd4a46d67f3116cfeabb_c441542c_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20923548

>> No.20923572

>>20923538
>bullshit my way into being a quantum physician
ironically you dont even realize how on point that is

>> No.20923585

Grow up

>> No.20924476

>>20923538
>just found out what quantum physics are, they are basically rebranded philosophy
No, that's not even a little true. Shitty philosophers pretend to understand quantum all the time, and make ridiculous pseudoscience arguments about what quantum means, but quantum is absolutely not in any way philosophy. It's a bunch of math describing average behavior of tiny particles and its influence is well-established to disappear in practice with anything macro scale. You have to learn physics and be really fucking good at calculus before you can be a quantum physician, and it's clear you have done neither. Good luck starting though.

>> No.20924642

people telling you to grow up are being silly, it's obviously just a young person. enjoy your youth OP

>> No.20924769

>>20923538
He rapes his sister, Phoebe.

>> No.20924931

>>20924769
true
"i was afraid my parents might barge in on me all of a sudden"

>> No.20924948

>>20923538
>i wont be taken seriously because a large amount of the claims i make are already in quantum physics
Garbage quantum mysticism isnt the same thing. This anon adequately explains it >>20924476. You fell for a bunch of grifting retards selling pseudo -"religious" shit.
Go through with your philosophy, at least it might be based on actual arguments instead of pretending physics supports it.

>> No.20924966

>>20923538
Lol no. You have no idea how deep the quantum physics rabbit hole goes.

>> No.20924977

the more people mistake this board for /x/ the more it dies

>> No.20925295

>>20924977
Did you know NATO symbology has a symbol for friendly MASS RAPE.

>> No.20925298

>>20924642
Best post yet

>> No.20925299

>>20923538
>>been developing my own philosophy the past few months
>>just found out what quantum physics are
>>they are basically rebranded philosophy
Sneed.

>> No.20925302

>>20925295
Like what the american soldiers did in Britian

>> No.20925304

>>20924966
Go on then, redpill me.

>> No.20925311

i don't need to be a quantum physicist to be amazed about the influential properties of observation

>> No.20925312

>>20925302
Chocolate is a form of consent son.

Like what the Russians did for 3 days in Berlin.

What the allies did to Japan is more Neutral mass rape using friendly units. That's how we got NGE. Thank you Japanese women 1945-1968 for your service. Your sons look just like Rokubungi.

>> No.20925325
File: 19 KB, 788x214, OFRF--------.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20925325

IV Corps, reinforced, full to capacity, raping you are mum.

>> No.20927031

>>20925304
I will suppose you have a half-decent maths background (if not, go learn some linear algebra)
I recommend the following texts:
>Conceptual introduction to quantum mechanics (Jeffrey Barrett)
>Interpreting the quantum world (Jeffrey Bub)
>Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (collected essays of J S Bell)
>Incompleteness, nonlocality, and realism (M Redhead)
For connections with literary theory, try:
>Complementarity: Anti-Epistemology after Bohr and Derrida (Plotnitsky Arkady)
some interesting contemporary approaches:
>Picturing Quantum Processes
As far as I understand it, this presents a new formalism and framework for quantum theory inspired by Whitehead's process philosophy. It's supposedly been very applicable in quantum computation and information

>> No.20927159
File: 753 KB, 700x636, image_2022-04-30_214311416.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20927159

>>20927031
>I will suppose you have a half-decent maths background
I do.
>I recommend the following texts
I am simply not interested enough to work through 6 textbooks, or even one for that matter, but thanks for the list. I'll save it in case I ever intend to get into this field.

Although, if you can't write a simple post illuminating how deep this rabbit hole goes, maybe with an example, to a layman can you really say you understand it?

>> No.20927216

>>20923538
Quantum physics is literally jewish gaslighting

>> No.20927232
File: 66 KB, 1024x1024, their problem marcus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20927232

Look at little Calvin here stuck in 1750 clockwork mechanical schools of thought.
Everything is in an approximate superposition, deal with it

>> No.20927294

>>20927216
Give me books on the subject.

>> No.20927318

>>20924476
What do you mean? Quantum interpretations of whether to believe Many worlds vs. Copenhagen, or another interpretations falls directly in line with a philosophical world view. While they're not directly metaphysical, they still have larger implications. It would seem YOU don't understand it, you're just trying to disagree with OP while fundamentally knowing nothing about the subject

>> No.20927338

>>20923546
Spbp

>> No.20927389

>>20927294
There are no books. I just mean the multiverse shit by the way, which is disputed by a lot of non kike quantum physicists in the first place, but they try to pretend their made up atheist bullshit is the rational consensus

>> No.20927395

>>20927159
You are such an insufferable mongrel. I would crush you with my heel if I ever saw you.

>> No.20927414

>>20927318
Not even the person you’re responding to but this reply is so senseless. OP is a retard for saying “quantum physics is rebranded philosophy,” because then there would be absolutely no reason for there to be a field of quantum physics filled with high-level mathematics separate from philosophy AND philosophy of science. Making philosophical claims based on findings from quantum physics does not encompass what quantum physics is. You retards are acting so absolutist about conceptual fields of study. Quantum physicists philosophize sometimes, philosophers know math sometimes.

>> No.20927421

>>20927414
It's not absolutist because you have to take a stance on one of the interpretations. Your argument is basically "Well, you are wrong because you are wrong. There."

Shut the fuck up if you don't understand it

>> No.20927474

>>20927318
>falls directly in line with a philosophical world view
It really doesn't. They're just doing what Deepak Chopra does but with more respectable credentials. Look no further than Lewis applying MW to modal reality to see just how ridiculous the usurping of abstract particle physics results by the philosophical community can get.

Our understanding of quantum mechanics is in its infancy and those who say they can use it to predict when you'll meet your soulmate are just as bona fide as those that say they can use it understand epistemology or metaphysics.

>> No.20927481

>>20927474
Nobody in the thread implied they're using it to "meet their soulmate" dude, nice strawman arguments. Nobody mentioned Deepak chopra either, so this looks very schizo meds tier on you

>> No.20927482

>>20927389
The multiverse thing is unfalsifiable. Just like God

>> No.20927491

>>20927481
Reading comprehension a motherfucker, huh?

>> No.20927507

>>20927395
lmao that's a "no", then

>> No.20927525

>>20927491
Make a real argument next time rather than throw around fallacies

>> No.20927532

anon, you're not reading actual quantum mechanics. you're reading bullshit from people who think quantum mechanics can be extrapolated into the above-atomic world. it's as silly as drawing a philosophical worldview out of newton's laws of physics

>> No.20927545
File: 659 KB, 709x462, 1448109478125.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20927545

>>20927395
Thanks for the laugh faggot

>> No.20927550

>>20927525
Its probably a time-sink to bother expanding, but they're not fallacies. When you take results from particle physics experiments and run with them without understanding what it is you're modeling from, then there is a certain sense where someone like David Lewis is no more well-informed than Deepak Chopra.

Using our tenuous grasp of the world of quantum mechanics to construct a real-world framework for understanding is premature. If someone is claiming that they've gleaned anything existentially useful from the double slit experiment, they are in the same company as new age charlatans.

>> No.20927576

>>20925298
High praise indeed ...

>> No.20927591

>>20927232
I am literally currently inside your dad from an impartial observers frame of reference at full force in his vagina mouth and anus.

>> No.20927598

>>20925302
You mean spend a lot of money on chicks, provide them with stuff that was hard to get or carefully rationed in Britain (e.g. chocolate, nylons, cigarettes), and "comfort" them in the absence of their deployed husbands and boyfriends?

The word "rape" has become meaningless through overuse. I blame feminism.

>> No.20927599

>>20927481
Possible Girls is a paper which covers this topic. If you read closer the paper is a critique of toxic manhood.

>> No.20927603

>>20927216
Never change, /lit/.

>> No.20927612

>>20927598
Yeah but in Britain you didn’t rape them with knife afterwards leaving a dead mother on the tatami. Like Aarfy did in catch 22. Because I’m big in Japan.

>> No.20927618
File: 747 KB, 666x500, cringe10.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20927618

>>20927395
>I would crush you with my heel if I ever saw you.

>> No.20927632
File: 41 KB, 618x597, b57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20927632

>>20927550
Right, that's why they're called theories. They're not meant to be perfect and infallible

You have to hold an interpretation to study it or make any valuable developments