/lit/ - Literature

>>20573360
This

>>20573360
Authored by registered Frank Gardner

inb4 coping and seething

/lit/ is a fakecel only board

>>20573354
Incels:
>women only want 8/10, they accuse you of rape everyday, if you look at a woman you will be arrested, it is literally impossible to get matches on tinder if you are not chad
Me:
>has sex

You're move, incels :^)

incels are wrong about half of things

>>20575055
You don't belong here, then

>>20575055
survivor's bias

>>20575069
Which half?

Me in the pic btw.

>>20575122
Mostly biological predestination and categorizing people into nonsense categories that don't reflect reality.
They're also wrong about the idea that all people are individuals who are special and deserve equity

>>20575055
>has sex
You mean you went through the degrading song and dance of convincing Becky to allow you to use her body to experience thirty seconds of friction before you coomed into a little baloon?
"Sex" is pathetic.

>>20573416
>King James Version
Not the real Bible

>>20573354
The incel doctrines are easily refuted by empirical observation. I know tons of very attractive women in relationships with non-attractive, unnotable in every way dorks. Women will date anyone.

>>20575122
They are wrong about “chads” mainly. It should be exclusively women that are hated.

>>20575171
that's the one fucking thing they aren't wrong about tho

>attractive people are treated better and have better lives generally

Whats contentious about this?

>>20575190
the problem is that every single person who has an opinion on the topic doesn't understand nuance and unlike your posts insists upon extremes
it's always either
>looks don't matter in any way and never have
or
>looks determine everything 100%
people are mindsick

>>20573416
Refuted by the New Testament writers 1550 years before being published.

>>20575171
I've been turned down by 95% of women I talk to but managed to get a date with a model taller than me and 12 years my junior. I'm not even rich and never read any pickup artist shit but I guess with enough looking someone will appreciate you. I still have never had sex though so perhaps not vindicated at all but my flame hasnt burned out yet. Honestly might be better to have to try harder because markers associated with ease of marriage (money, height, fame, etc) are also linked to more likely divorce. No one really gets an easy life, everyone has to suffer eventually and I don't feel like hating chads because they suffer differently is very fair.

imagine not being a blackpilled /fit/ incel
imagine actually being an unhealthy loser
imagine not even trying
imagine not doing your absolute best despite it not bringing any satisfaction
never going to make it

>>20573416
Debunked by Epicurus before it was even written

>>20575135
>Mostly biological predestination and categorizing people into nonsense categories that don't reflect reality.
The first is obviously true; the second is what all science does, and Incel categories are better than most of the soft science's ones (not saying much).
>They're also wrong about the idea that all people are individuals who are special and deserve equity
This is a strawmen to refute those Leftists who claim to believe such in spite of their actions. Most are either 'I want a state-mandated GF' or have just given up. I'm the latter.

Dating coaches, who specialize in working with people with autism, are in demand

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098150733/dating-coaches-who-specialize-in-working-with-people-with-autism-are-in-demand

>>20575498
I'd say the problems with their categories is that they cripple them even more and easily turn it into a self-fulfilling-prophecy.
Also basing all the self-worth and potential happiness on the ability to get a GF seems just wrong and incredibly unhealthy to me. They got meme'd. But been there done that and also I could've easily ended up as an incel myself.

>>20575343
This guy gets it

>>20575135
You clearly have no clue what they believe

The only thing I disagree with them about is the betabux meme. Otherwise they’re right.

>>20573354
The pdf isn't on libgen

>>20575135
people are individuals but not everyone is equal, honcho.

>>20575580
Betabucks is certainly real on a societal scale. Single moms siphon gorillonz of gibs. Incels paying taxes are effectively providing betabucks.
Aside from that it is plain fact that a large proportion of children raised (and funded) are not from the (current) boyfriend/husband. It comes mostly from people marrying single moms (my wife's son) but even in a given marriage the proportion of children that are not from the father is far from negligible. Of course estimate vary a lot because no one gets the greenlight to make the necessary research but I remember educated guesses around 5%.
All of this fits into alpha fucks beta bucks.

>>20575610
preventing women from fucking losers with big dicks is the next step after Roe V. Wade just getting turned over hours ago.

>>20575610
>even in a given marriage the proportion of children that are not from the father is far from negligible
I obviously mean "not from the declared father".

>>20575614
Not a mutt, but good on you. The great satan somehow did something right. Now I'll have to shitpost on /pol/.

>>20575592
It's on z-libary though... (But not in pdf format)

>>20575171
Lookism is not the be all and end all of incel thought.

>>20575567
I suppose.
Society rates people solely by their sexual success—why be surprised when loners do the same?

>>20575719
Losing your virginity is the only rite of passage left for men that isn't an exercise in crass consumerism such as getting your first car or working a 9-5. The idea that getting a girlfriend doesn't matter is just absurd.

>>20575359
He only managed to point out that a paradox existed in human logic when one examines the existence of a God within the human logical framework.Even this is generous, as he makes several assumptions that aren't a given in religious thought, even Christian thought.
He also fails to realize the inadequacy of the human mind. Humans can hardly give an objective and logical definition for something such a free will or conscioussness, and it is for this reason that so many paradoxes exist around the two concepts. Many are insane enough to throw their arms up and say the two are an illusion- something readily disproven merely by existing- simply out of the misguided desire to reject whatever the limited human faculties are unable to analyze in a comprehensive manner.

>>20575786
Losing your virginity has been a consumerist rite of passage for a long time. Social signaling is still consumerism.

>>20575786
Losing your virginity is much more soulless than getting a job, at least in the manner it is done today.

>>20575270
The Septuagint is the oldest complete OT we have. Also maybe the original one. Masoretic text is a Jewish forgery from the 11th century. Pure copium by kikes. God spoke to us in Greek. Cope about it, Jew.

>>20575607
People are not individuals. Especially not the peasants.

>>20576026
>reading comprehension
I see American hours have started.
>Jewish forgery from the 11th century
Let's be honest it's a 8-9th century forgery, we just don't have a full copy before the 11th century.

>>20575890
I don't think that your post really acheives much. The biggest paradoxes surrounding free will and consciousness melt away when you stop arbitrarily assuming that there must be some all knowing all powerful consciousness controlling everything. I'm not even sure what your point is? There is some extra-human logical system where there are no paradoxes and God makes perfect sense? Ok, what is it then? Now you're not only arbitrarily assuming that there is a God you're also arbitrarily assuming that there is some forbidden logic system to explain the fact that God is completely illogical. Since humans are created in God's image surely human logic would follow God's logic and hence God would not be a logical impossibility?

>>20575786
Losing virginity in current year
>Download [APP] on [PHONE]
>Pay for [APP SUBSCRIPTION]
>Take photographs wearing [BRAND] on [PHONE]
>Take photographs with [PRODUCT]

>>20575319
No offense but dates mean nothing. As long as you don't have sex with a woman nothing happened.
This is part of the problem with PUA, guys learn funny routines and get phone numbers and think they are players. If you don't have sex it's better to be rejected immediately instead of wasting time on dates.

>>20575610
>Incels paying taxes

https://youtu.be/QT13kk8HDDo

>>20576026
>God spoke to us in Greek
do you realize the implications of this?