[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 33 KB, 390x280, prose-word-abstract-letterpress-wood-260nw-792423331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19493557 No.19493557 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.19493563

>>19493557
Joyce. Disregard anyone who says otherwise.
Then maybe someone like Burton.

>> No.19493606

>>19493563
Joyce himself said Newman is.

>> No.19493690

>>19493563
What about Nabakov?

>> No.19493932

>>19493690
ESL hack. Garish, cloying, forgettable.

>> No.19493940

>>19493690
Let people compare him to Joyce by all means, but his English is patball to Joyce's champion game.

>> No.19493995

>>19493690
A non-entity. A puffed up monstrosity. A very tense looking but really loose writing. Means nothing to me.

>> No.19494042
File: 305 KB, 900x675, 5CB9ACEA-37B1-4339-81E2-2FF5C6C6B51A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19494042

>>19493557
Walter Scott

>> No.19494053
File: 117 KB, 208x281, Thomas Carlyle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19494053

>>19493557

>> No.19494075
File: 10 KB, 250x172, bfg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19494075

>>19493557
poetry like proust is god

>> No.19494081

>>19493557
Joyce and Ezra

>> No.19494108

>>19493557
Faulkner

>> No.19494119

>>19493557
that gay yankee

>> No.19494125

>>19494119
Chuck Palahniuk?

>> No.19494153

>>19493606
As did Wilde, but Johnson said Addison and I tend to agree with the big man.

>> No.19494166

>>19493557
The long sentence Chads
Cormac McCarthy or Thomas Browne.

>> No.19494334

>>19493557
Melville

>> No.19494344

Depends on the style and aesthetic you desire as trying to judge them by a singular metric that they don’t universally share is a fool’s errand.

>> No.19494372

Gene Wolfe. He says the big stuff small and the small stuff big.

>> No.19494434

>>19493563
Thomas Hardy and it's not even debatable.

>> No.19494451

>>19493557
Gass or Burgess. That being said, Tolstoy and Dosto show literature does not need prose per se. I'd also make a huge honorable selection for John Updike

>> No.19494628

>>19493690
really bad. Pale Fire and Ada are good, everything else I've read from him is terrible.

>> No.19494861 [DELETED] 

>>19493932
>>19493940
>>19493995
>>19494628
I had no idea he was as bad author. It's extremely confusing to me since he still ends up in /lit/'s top 100 for some reason.

>> No.19494867
File: 27 KB, 194x193, bocchi knows the answer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19494867

>>19494334
this

>> No.19494870

tbqhwyf Schopenhauer translations tend to be s-tier English prose

it's all about the soul behind the words

>> No.19495455

>>19494451
Dosto did, but Tolstoy is just soap opera trash.

>> No.19495708

Sir Thomas Browne

>> No.19495738

>>19494870
Limp wrists typed this

>> No.19495767

>>19494334
the only correct answer

>> No.19495780

Beckett and if you can't see it you're retarded or need to open your mind

>> No.19496072

>>19495780
correct

>> No.19496345

It comes down to personal opinion at some point. I wouldn't say he's the best but Pynchon hasn't been mentioned yet and he's one of my favorites

>> No.19496368
File: 114 KB, 700x1050, 4856EF4C-2F1E-4805-A640-81E5BC332C9C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19496368

Hp Lovecraft

>> No.19496440

>>19493557
O. K.

>> No.19496968

>>19493606
Who is that?

>> No.19497124

The prose of Emily Dickinson in her letters.

>> No.19497163

>>19496968
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann

>> No.19498026

>>19493940
Oh, bullshit.
>>19493995
Pretentious play-pretend
>>19494628
If you read The Eye and didn’t like it you’ve got singular preferences.

>> No.19498038

>>19494451
>>19493563
Gass and Joyce. Though I’d give it to Joyce, as Gass is pretty patchy with his writing

>> No.19498057
File: 157 KB, 800x400, Nathaniel-Hawthorne.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19498057

>>19493557
>>19494334
Hawthorne

>> No.19498096

>>19498038
I think Gass had the best grasp of syntax. Burgess is very close, but man could Gass write a sentence. I find Joyce to be beautiful but not compelling like Gass was.

>> No.19498136

>>19498096
I think Joyce is the most well rounded prose stylist. But Gass’s prose, although inferior, is so REAL. I don’t know the correct word to use besides that, it’s like if prose had the grandness of poetry through being as common and low as possible.

>> No.19498253

>>19493557
Patrick Rothfuss!

>> No.19498288

It's difficult to be a prose stylist in English. It's very simplistic(as in lacking features rather than unnecessary complexity) and inflexible in terms of grammar.

>> No.19498366

>>19497163
Joyce was talking about Cardinal Newman.

>> No.19498375

>>19497163
is there anything he can't do?

>> No.19498382

>>19498288
GET BACK IN YOUR BUNKER KLAUS

>> No.19498389

>>19493557
wodehouse

>> No.19498532

>>19498288
>meanwhile all the most famous prose stylists are in English
ESL insecurity strikes again

>> No.19498538

>>19498288
>It's very simplistic(as in lacking features rather than unnecessary complexity)
Meaningless
>and inflexible in terms of grammar.
Not even remotely accurate. Hang yourself brownskin

>> No.19498557

>>19498057
absolutely not, he is completely unremarkable

>> No.19498847

>>19498288
hitler dubs

>> No.19498857

>>19498288
its simplistic because its complex? lol

>> No.19499158

>>19498389

This guy gets it

>> No.19499164

>>19494053
Correct. No one in English writes like him.

>> No.19499289

>>19498532
>>meanwhile all the most famous prose stylists are in English
No? Only time when anglos get good prose stylists is when some ESL like nabokov tries their native language techniques

>> No.19499296

>>19499289
So is he or is he not a good author?
>>19493932
>>19493940
>>19493995
>>19494628

>> No.19499326

Proust
>inb4 english
dilate, mutt

>> No.19500980
File: 31 KB, 490x736, gug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19500980

>>19493557
Pynchman

>> No.19501671

>>19499296
yes