/lit/ - Literature

-1

>>18639433
3, just so i can give aristotle a big hug and kiss for everything he’s done for me

>>18639433
eat standing

>>18639433
as if Nietzsche wouldn't sit alone

>still trying to force this meme

>>18639433
take my lunch into a bathroom stall and eat it sitting on the bowl

idk 3/4 of these people but table 5 based on physiognomy

2
i've always wanted to bully marx. i think hegel would join in the the fun

I guess 8 since that is the only one that I would understand the discussions at

3 with my fellow chads

Obvious shill thread pretending moldbug and land are real philosophers.

>>18639486

Also I am pretty shure that the school shooter will probably come from table 1

>Schoppenheimer sitting next to Eagle
fucking DROPPED

>>18639433
3. because I have a degree in Wildlife Science and want to tell Aristotle what I know. But that cafeteria probably smells fucking horrible.

somebody be a doll and label them please
i'd like to know the owner of that impressive beak sitting at table 4

>>18639511
John Locke

>>18639511
1 is Nietzsche, Stirner and Rand
2 is Marx, Hegel and Schopenhauer
3 is Aristotle and Kant
4 is Hume, Locke and Adam Smith
5 is Kierkegaard, Deleuze and Foucault
6 is Murray Rothbad and Lysander Spooner
7 is Kropotkin and Bakunin
8 is Hoppe, Land and Moldbug

Table 4 of course. Table 3 is also acceptable.

>>18639433
1. But I am a little embarrassed about it.

>>18639496
table 1 or 8

>>18639525
>>18639526
much appreciated
now give us a kiss love

>>18639433
Schops would be at table #9.

For me, either #1 or #7

>>18639547
*kisses you*

>>18639433
Was Kant drinking red bull? Anyway I would sit at table 2 opposite Hegel. Every time Schopenhauer and Marx attempted to speak I would silence them with a slap.

>>18639433
Anything is fine.

>>18639433
Who’s the cute girl at table 5.

>>18639458
He's 'trying' to flirt wity Rand.

>>18639587
Michelle Foucault, infamous convicted pedophile and feminist.

What number is the empty one on the far right?

>>18639587
Foucault, I think.

>>18639596
Nine. Schopenhauers seat

>>18639433
By all accounts Hume was chill as fuck, so it’s gotta be 4.

>>18639433
Why would Schoppie sit next to Hegel?

>>18639433
I'm caught between wanting to be close enough to 2 to hear Schopenhauer tear into Marx and Hegel and far enough out I don't have to smell Marx. Maybe 8 because I know HHH has a sense of humour and not so sure about any of the others.

2 or 1, dunno.

>>18639605
No that’s the *hot* girl.

>>18639627
Marx would literally bully chopp to death desu. Marx was a mean motherfucker. He's also the most well read and intelligent there.

>>18639493
tpbp

Why is schoppy sitting next to hegel of all people? Is he trying to start a fight?

>>18639433
Obviously 5

>>18639433
7

Assuming there's any validity to what OP is going for:
1. ?
2. ?
3. ?
4. Classical liberals
5. ?
6. Ancaps
7: Ancoms
8: Neoreactionaries (?)

>>18639433

I'm a school shooter here, who do i kill and who do i spare?

Rand has to go cause fuck women and Schopie has to live cause i'm not getting him out of his misery

>>18639728

Ask Kants where is the cafeteria before you go there to shoot people, he won't lie about it because of the categorical imperative.

>>18639728
Keep 1, 5, and 8 alive everyone else is holding back the will

>>18639433
>not including 10 tables so that we can roll for it
OP is a fag

>>18639736
Based

>>18639433
2 and 8 are the only good answers

>>18639433
1 so I know what Stirner looks like
(But actually 5)

>>18639433
None of 'em. I'm sitting outside in the grass listening to music with the Daoist Chads

>>18639433
4.
I would be staring at 3 though and getting remarks from 1 while mocking 2

Haven't gotten as far as kant's Critique of Sigma Grindset

>>18639433
7

>>18639433
I said and give a speech

>>18640399
I m-meant to say… uhhh… I mean “I s-Stand and give a speech”

>>18639433
Definitely not 1, 4, 6, 7 and 8. I would have picked Kierkegaard if he wasn't with Foucalt and Deleuze.

Table 2 would be the most fun, but table 3 would be the most enlightening.

>>18639505
>Eagle

>>18639449
based primative

>>18639433
table 7 looks like they have good food

>>18639433
4

>>18639433
a lot of these groups don't even have a common language. they wouldn't even be able to talk to each other lmao

>>18639433
1 or 5

>>18639433
nigga i would go full Columbine but pull a John Savage on Kierkegaard

>>18640360
>t.

>>18640460
>a lot of these groups
Most of them could easily talk, what are you on about?

Table 1 and fire a rocket launcher directly into table 2 and 5.

4

3 chads wya ?

>>18640497
>t.

You have to go back

>>18640460
Latin and/or Greek. All of them, except the internet retards at 8 who wouldn't be able to hold a discussion with any of these others in a common language anyway. Pleb (and I never use that, but if you don't know that you're a fucking intellectual dirt farmer.)

>>18640513
Reddit mostly

>>18640360
This post gave me cancer

>>18639433
Who are all these white niggas?

>>18640587
It’s called “civilisation” Tyrone

>>18640529
>Latin and/or Greek.
Literally isn't fluency, retard. Being able to read Greek doesn't mean someone like Kant is going to have a full-blown conversation with Aristotle in Greek lmfao

>>18639641
>He's also the most well read and intelligent there.
Please be fucking bait.

>>18639477
aahahah you fucking imbecile. even though marx theories may be dated he'd rip you a new one while you tried to stutter forth your second "f-f-free market"

>>18639433
I'll take the empty table, thanks

>>18640951
You could just ask him to clearly explain what 'average homogeneous labor' means and then keep asking him to clarify when he obfuscated

>no Baudrillard
Table 2

>>18639433
Aristotle and Kant, no hesitation.
Hegel should really be with Aristotle though.

sit by myself because i'm a nerd, but this guys are the nerds that i won't associate with

>>18640537
The West is dying cuck. Continue to SEETHE

>>18641042
Spooked idealism.
Things change. Surf it or die

>>18641084
No one asked you, buttercuck.

>>18639433
2
Would love the to hear those teleology fags debate with Schopenhauer on human nature, le progress and tragic sense of history.

>>18641084
>A self hating white woman
Not surprising

>>18639433
uhhh check these dubs
captcha: adhd

>>18641155
Checked

>>18639433
Aristotle. Don't need the hack beside him though.

>>18640399
>>18640409
anon... I...

>>18641084

>>18639433
>what the fuck? why are there so many nerds here?

>>18639433
3, probably, the others are 2weird4me

>>18640930
Sorry Marx is the dumb idiothead who was a dumb idiot. Your based internet friends don't like him so he must be CRINGE! I mean, hasn't he heard of da human nature? LOL CRINGE!

>>18639528
All of these tables are trash. No tables are acceptable.

>>18640961
Oh don't worry, he'll answer pretty well. Not only did he read Das Kapital volume 3, unlike some, but he even wrote it.
He didn't obfuscated. You didn't read him, that's not the same thing.

>>18639433
The real question is which of the tables would want you there. Anyway I'd sit at 3.

3, without a doubt.

>>18639445
This. I want to give him my half pint of chocolate milk.

>>18639433
3
4
and i guess 2 for the laughs

Everyone would sit at three.
I would sit at two and then we would kill Marx. The rest of the cafeteria would rejoice and I would be the popular kid. Also, look at those virgins at table one.

>>18640961
>haw haw yeah I-Karly! Give us a working definition of dialectic materialism!
>lol nice fucking sputter go wash your beard ya stinky pig

>>18639433
6, but 3 or 1 would be fun too.

>>18645062
>table one
It's that perennial table with the weird kids who no one else wants. They've got one girl amongst them but she never pairs off because their standards are too high, and so are hers.

>>18643323
this, but unironically

>>18643323
meds

Eight is the most based. And if you disagree, you're a fucking brainlet who lives in the past, I swear to God. Any questions?

>>18645277
>Any questions?
No one wants to hear from a double digit IQer

>>18645282
That's not a question, anon. Therefore, it is you who possesses a room temperature IQ, after all. Who would have thought...