/lit/ - Literature

>>18135430
>t.

>>18135436
heh

Quick, somebody post the basedjack guy! That would be such a funny response!

>>18135430
based I forgot the > poster

>>18135430
>I strongly suggest you go to your local community college, look up a "debating skills" class, and attend it before ever posting on the internet again. Seriously, I'm sick of what this has become; a pastiche of a pastiche. Someone said or did something you didn't like? That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work?
What you're doing; It's not an argument. It's not original. It's not funny, nor is it witty, and I'd go so far as to say that it's barely an ad hominem anymore, because the image is used with so many conflicting viewpoints that it's lost all meaning. Now when I see it, I just think "the poster dislikes the archetype he's mocking, but lacks the cognitive capacity to clearly articulate what it is he dislikes, and is therefore a midwit.".
That's what I think; I think that you're a midwit. It's not even that I feel attacked; in fact, I become all the more disheartened when my opinion aligns with the one you're promulgating, knowing that it's being dragged through the mud by retards such as yourself. You should stop posting, because you aren't funny, you aren't clever, and no one really cares if you disagree with some imaginary ideal. Only a faggot would caption something someone else says and post it alongside a soijak.

>>18135479
Retard can't even greentext properly. Did you type all of that out?

>>18135487
> Retard can't even greentext properly. Did you type all of that out?

>I strongly suggest you go to your local community college, look up a "debating skills" class, and attend it before ever posting on the internet again. Seriously, I'm sick of what this has become; a pastiche of a pastiche. Someone said or did something you didn't like? That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work though?
>What you're doing; It's not an argument. It's not original. It's not funny, nor is it witty, and I'd go so far as to say that it's barely an ad hominem anymore, because the image is used with so many conflicting viewpoints that it's lost all meaning. Now when I see it, I just think "the poster dislikes the archetype he's mocking, but lacks the cognitive capacity to clearly articulate what it is he dislikes, and is therefore a midwit." though.
>That's what I think; I think that you're a midwit. It's not even that I feel attacked; in fact, I become all the more disheartened when my opinion aligns with the one you're promulgating, knowing that it's being dragged through the mud by retards such as yourself. You should stop posting, because you aren't funny, you aren't clever, and no one really cares if you disagree with some imaginary ideal. Only a faggot would caption something someone else says and post it alongside a soijak though.

>>18135436
Keked

>>18135430
All this would accomplish is that people would use "sophistry" or "ad hom" instead of "strawman" and "ywnbaw." Pretty much it would make everyone like the start with the Greeks crowd, never read the Greeks but use their lingo.

>>18135667
>All this would accomplish is that people would use "sophistry" or "ad hom" instead of "strawman" and "ywnbaw." Pretty much it would make everyone like the start with the Greeks crowd, never read the Greeks but use their lingo.

>>18135430
>promulgating
don't be disgusting

>>18135430
>That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work?
Because it's easy, fun and causes major seething as evidence by the post you just typed up. Continue to seethe, and have a nice day, sir.

Hey I was just in that thread.

>>18135430
you never be a real woman, or man

>>18135430

Or how about you don’t subscribe to shitty ideas

OP I tend to agree that soijak and cringe/based posts have basically ruined debate on this board (and 4chan in general).

Still, it's better than reddit where everybody actually acts like a soijak. But if you want serious debate don't do it on these major websites.

>>18135828

>>18135436
How will OP ever recover?

>>18135828
Which philosopher do I align myself with to be like SHLLLLLLLRRRRRPPPPza?

>>18135430
seethe

>>18135430
lmao I was at the original thread this was posted. And thus a new copypasta is born

>>18135430
>That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work?
Because it's often a reply to bait, low effort posts, or coming from somebody impervious to rational thought.

>>18135430
>I strongly suggest you go to your local community college, look up a "debating skills" class, and attend it before ever posting on the internet again. Seriously, I'm sick of what this has become; a pastiche of a pastiche. Someone said or did something you didn't like? That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work?
>What you're doing; It's not an argument. It's not original. It's not funny, nor is it witty, and I'd go so far as to say that it's barely an ad hominem anymore, because the image is used with so many conflicting viewpoints that it's lost all meaning. Now when I see it, I just think "the poster dislikes the archetype he's mocking, but lacks the cognitive capacity to clearly articulate what it is he dislikes, and is therefore a midwit.".
>That's what I think; I think that you're a midwit. It's not even that I feel attacked; in fact, I become all the more disheartened when my opinion aligns with the one you're promulgating, knowing that it's being dragged through the mud by retards such as yourself. You should stop posting, because you aren't funny, you aren't clever, and no one really cares if you disagree with some imaginary ideal. Only a faggot would caption something someone else says and post it alongside a soijak