/lit/ - Literature

our only biological function is to breed, to make copies of our dna. if you don't do this, you are a failure as an organism

>>17894406
>morals equal to all organisms
kek

>>17894403
he did breed though.

>>17894406
Biological determinism and its consequences have been a disaster for the young male race. There is more to life than reproduction.

>>17894512
>There is more to life than reproduction
indeed, there is also the continual practice of self-delusion

>>17894524
why did we stop being hunter gatherers then if there's nothing more to human life than fucking?

>>17894533
to increase our populations

>>17894406
isaac newton was a failure as an organism?

>>17894556
in purely biological terms

>>17894569
who cares

>>17894569
Go live in the jungle with the chimps if breeding alone is your criteria for success and failure in life.

>>17894569
you just rang the incel bell

>>17894578
>>17894581
>>17894583
cope

>>17894403
Schopenhauer used to have sex (albeit with prostitutes) all the time

>>17894588
have sex and seethe

>>17894406
modern humans are not bound to simple evolutionary caprices.

>>17894406
The eternal coomer

>>17894406
>our only biological function is to breed
You’re a cow, then?

>>17894406
>our only biological function is to breed,

>>17894512
You're right but the fact that it's an unpleasant thought for you really doesn't have anything to do with that

>>17894536
We could increase our populations by fucking more.

>>17894406
maybe genetically
however i think that we can also spread ourselves through a sphere of knowlege almost
spreading ourselves similarly to genes but in a cultural form

>>17894403
>dude everything is about sex
read a fucking book subhuman

>>17894403
In his defense, his mother was a real cunt who most definitely fucked him up for life.

>>17894406
Wow.

The goal of the human chattel is to breed. The goal of the self actualized chad is to realize it's better to have never been born and not to breed. Unless you're in the .01% and can escape of life of pointless toil.

>>17894406
Empedocles - no kids, an hero
Heraclitus - no kids
Silenus - no kids
Parmenides - no kids
Plato - gay nigga
Epicurus - no kids
Epictetus - no kids
Bodhidharma - no kids
Zhuang - no kids
Abhinavagupta - no kids
Shankaracharya - no kids
Mani - no kids
Al-Kindi - no kids
Al-Farabi - no kids
Averroes - no kids
Avicenna - no kids
Aquinas - no kids
Spinoza - no kids
Kant - no kids
Leibniz - no kids
Hume - no kids
Kierkegaard - no kids
Fourier - no kids
Schopenhauer - no kids
Stirner - no kids
Mainländer - no kids, an hero
Nietzsche - no kids
Weininger - no kids, an hero
Michelstaedter - no kids, an hero
Spengler - no kids
Wittgenstein - gay nigga
Zapffe - no kids
Weil - no kids
Evola - no kids
Arendt - no kids
Beauvoir - no kids
Sartre - no kids
Debord - no kids, an hero
Caraco - no kids, an hero
Cioran - no kids
Althusser - no kids
Foucault - gay nigga
Kaczynski - no kids
John Gray - no kids

>>17895833
>Sartre - no kids
Do we tell him boys?

>>17894406
Imagine taking Darwinism as a moral program

>>17894403
>cant breed
Soon enough noone will be able to. Then we can write long works of literature full of very wise notions. All thanks to plastics and environmental pollution.

>>17895844
W-what?

>>17895833
Schopenhauer would have had at least two daughters, but they died.

>>17895855
Alas, those not breeding are already writing long works of literature, but it's all fanfiction and far from being full of anything wise.

>>17895864
He never wanted those leeches. We have to also keep in mind that birth control wasn't available in his age. Also there is no concrete evidence of her kids. Even if he did he never accepted them so that's good.

>>17895871
I suppose the existential crysis and the inevitable demise of humanity is not stimulating them properly. Or, they are so delusional and detached from reality, that nothing can stimulate them properly.

>>17894406
I MUST COOOM

>>17894403
Many such cases. Sad

>>17894406
successful anti natalist false flag

>>17895833
>he's just discovered that all philosophers without exception were massive failures at life

>>17894512
>Biological determinism

based
gimme readings against biological determinism
no concept disgusts me more

>>17894406
i bred and regret it daily you dumb biologism theorycrafter

>>17894406
>if you don't do this, you are a failure as an organism
It should be, "if you *can't* do this," as being able to but not doing so is an act of restraint.
>>17894418
>>17894512
>>17894556
>>17894578
>>17894581
>>17894633
>>17894666
>>17894766
>>17894783
>>17895127
>>17895830
>>17895833
>>17896045
^ would like to pretend they had a choice in the matter. Should an armless man be praised for never have felt the temptation to steal? Cope in its purest form.

>>17894406
based, I'm turning in my ticket for state-mandated tomboy gf

>>17894406
Some individuals are more than just an organism. They're also a historical event, an achievement which often requires forgoing reproduction.

>>17896103
According to Mr. Philosopher here.

>>17896103
>without exception
Socrates had a wife and kids

>>17895064
but that would lead to conflict.

>>17895127
I don't understand /lit/
Why the fuck would anyone waste time reading instead of having sex?
Can you not have sex?
You are all pathetic losers to me,disgusting uncultured celibates.
Instead of reading,have sex.

>>17895833
Kierkegaard was a sex-haver, there can be no doubt. As a notorious sex-haver myself, I immediately recognized a fellow sex-haver when I began reading the works of Søren Kierkegaard. I thought to myself 'yup, this guy is a sex-haver.'

What confuses people who aren't sex-havers (basically all academics and atheists) is that Kierkegaard had reached such a level of sex-having as to be a sex-haver without ever actually having had sex. You see for most people the characteristic of being a sex-haver is secondary and derivative of the act of having had sex. However, for Apex sex-havers, of which Kierkegaard was undoubtedly one, the identity of sex-haver is a primordial one which proceeds existence and the act of sex and stands as essence to the reality of the sex-haver in question.
I visited a reputable medium in my city who was able to channel Katja Jorgjensen, a niece of Kierkegaard. The spirit assured us that Kierkegaard was indeed an infamous sex-haver and conducted himself as you would expect a sex-haver of his caliber to. She regailed us with stories of how he was responsible for uncounted remote female orgasms whenever he sat in the parlor crammed full of Copenhagen's most beautiful ladies who had at this point formed something of a cult of Amor flocking around the prodigal sex-haver who never once had sex with a single one of them and read out his newest satire of Hegelian Absolutism. She admitted that she herself had been so overcome with her uncle's stature of sex-haver that she had once tried to have sex with him herself. However, Kierkegaard had sternly rebuffed her since he was too busy being a sex-haver editing the latest 600 page polemic against an ironic pro-Lutheran pamphlet that a pseudonymous character of his own invention was responsible for to bother with having sex with the impish harlot. He gave her a box full of striped candies tied with a ribbon and sent her on back to her parents, muttering something about 'more proof that Kantianism wafts up from the shtetl.'

I would urge all sex-havers and non-sex-havers alike to read this epochal sex-haver so that some portion of his sex-having ways might rub off on you.

>>17898744
well said

>>17894403
>can't think clearly
>therefore this thread
why did he do it /b/ros

>>17894406
Here's a perfect example of everything wrong with middle class morality; look how he takes scientific facts (that we are meant to reproduce) and then equates them to social facts (that you are a failure if you don't). You sir, are an idiot and you don't even know it.

>>17894403
>Why'd he do it?
Because of the chains of society, exemplified niggardly bastards like >>17894406 who if you listen to them they will rob you of every happiness. Schopenhauer clearly listened to them.

>>17898744

I remember Schopy writing that love ‘nature’s stratagem to perpetuate the species’, and that our intelligence is a form of objectivization of the will and subordinated to it. So, is a condom, a fucking condom, a refutation of one of Schopy’s main theses?

>>17894403
>haven't read Schopenhauer
many such cases. I fucking hate this board.

dunno man wolverine radiated uber secret pimp vibes

>>17894406
>“man is not reproduced as man: he is simply regenerated as a survivor (a surviving productive force). If he eats, drinks, lives somewhere, reproduces himself, it is because the system requires his self-production in order to reproduce itself: it needs men. If it could function with slaves, there would be no ‘free’ workers. If it could function with asexual mechanical robots, there would be no sexual reproduction” (For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, p. 86)

>>17894512
>>17894406
>>17897313
I could breed, but I choose to spill my seed in twink bucci as an act of defiance against god.

>>17894406
Lmao @ all these cope replies.

>>17894406
FPWP

>>17901741
Anon.... no you dont.

You pretend to cum into feminine boys while you watch pornography on the internet.

then try to psych yourself up by posting things like this on /lit/.

>>17894403
better philosopher than the alternatives of his time

>>17894406
fpbp
~
Lots of incels around here

>>17897273
You are pathologically and biologically deluded then. Stop reading post-modern moralist literature fucking with your brain, anon. My son has given me more meaning, more life energy and passion.

You are a failure until you man up and become a good father

Where the fuck did the meme that schopenhauer was an incel even come from lmao? He was very well off financially and had several affairs with different women in his youth.

>>17904717
>The arguments which are in common use to justify a high opinion of woman have now been examined in all except a few points to which I shall recur, from the point of view of critical philosophy, and have been controverted. I hope that I have justified my deliberate choice of ground, although, indeed, Schopenhauer's fate should have been a warning to me. His depreciation of women in his philosophical work "On Women," has been frequently attributed to the circumstance that a beautiful Venetian girl, in whose company he was, fell in love with the extremely handsome personal appearance of Byron; as if a low opinion of women were not more likely to come to him who had had the best not the worst fortune with them

>>17902408
But I do. I did on Sunday

>>17898667
I will not listen to a gymcel.

>>17904870
Who wrote this? What is it?