[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 27 KB, 340x347, ImmanuelKant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17094107 No.17094107 [Reply] [Original]

Where should I start and where should I end?

>> No.17094118

>>17094107
The last thread have a wrong pic, this time I fix it

>> No.17094359

playboi carti

>> No.17094375

In the previous thread where you got a lot of recommendations that would give you additional directions

>> No.17094384

With the greeks.

>> No.17094417

>>17094118
We didn't need another thread

>> No.17094423

Plus not Kant either

>> No.17094499
File: 132 KB, 1600x898, CRL-SMR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17094499

>>17094107
Start with the greeks and end here

>> No.17094663

>>17094359
/thread

>> No.17094688

>>17094359
Holy based...

>> No.17094699

>>17094107
Scruton and Scruton.
>t. lazy bastard

>> No.17094761

>>17094417
I didn't answer the comments on the other thread, I let it die for good.

>> No.17094770
File: 28 KB, 328x499, 1596651397982.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17094770

Start here.

>> No.17094771

>>17094375
Yes, I download everything you guys recommend, thanks. I will probably make another thread about Metaphysicis

>> No.17094778

>>17094423
Kant must be ugly af

>> No.17094791

>>17094699
Thanks anon, I will download his introduction on Aesthetics

>> No.17094797

>>17094770
I throught for a second it was some LGBT book, thanks anon

>> No.17095107
File: 24 KB, 200x258, ramsay-david-hume-detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17095107

>>17094107
Who is the best aestheticist?

>> No.17095184
File: 234 KB, 639x585, This_guy_created_the_frog-e750e58808f6297f18a583a3f4fe9167.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17095184

>>17094107
Why there are no new aestheticists?

Can you name at least one new philosopher worthwhile?

>> No.17095462

>>17094499
Thanks anon, yo también habló español

>> No.17095499
File: 1.22 MB, 1641x923, Shakespeare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17095499

>>17094499
His arguments against Shakespeare are retarded.

>> No.17095505

>>17094107
Greeks, then Germans.

>> No.17095597

>>17095505
Which Greeks? Which books?

Which Germans? Which books? (Seriously)

>> No.17095602

>>17095597
JUST ASK HOW TO START WITH THE GREEKS AND END WITH THE GERMANS! ALL OF THEM!!!

>> No.17095616

>>17095597
I'm sorry anon but I've just answered this question too many times.

>> No.17095849

>>17095616
Hahahhahah

Ok anon thanks anyway

>>17095602
You too

>> No.17097361

>>17095616
lmao that is pathetic

>> No.17097472

Dietrich von Hildebrand

>> No.17097504

>>17097472
Which books?

>> No.17097515

>>17097504
Aesthetics I & II roger scurton wrote a forward for volume two

>> No.17097542

>>17097515
Thanks anon, I appreciate it

>> No.17098865

>>17097542
You're welcome

>> No.17099348
File: 13 KB, 337x450, detail-Edmund-Burke-Joshua-Reynolds-studio-oil-1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17099348

>>17094107

>> No.17100404

>>17099348
That isn't Scruton

>> No.17100437

>>17094771
Post the recommendations pls, I didn't see the other thread but I'm interested in the subject.

>> No.17100469
File: 11 KB, 333x499, 0FD1B978-2526-4790-8463-2B18D3AC3DFA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17100469

I really really really liked this book, gives a unique interpretation of aesthetics based on his conceptions of strata and his ideas on emergent properties.

I also never see him discussed so you actually have some variety with him.

>> No.17100508

>>17100437
They recommend me Scruton, Evopsych, Plato, Heidegger and Hegel. That's it. The thread was short because there was a mistake and I decide to let the thread die.

>> No.17100509

>>17095184
It's basically impossible to improve on Hume, Kant, and Hegel. Everyone else is just building off them. I guess phenomelogy is the closest thing to a new aesthetic philosophy I can think of with Heidegger and Monty

>> No.17100521

>>17100469
Wow, thanks anon!

>> No.17100532

>>17100509
This

>> No.17101470

>>17095184
Heidegger

>> No.17102294

>>17095107
Like this anon say>>17100509
Is impossible to improve Hume