/lit/ - Literature

>>17048910
Is OP the archetypal zoomer faggot?
>muh only grid of analysis is through le funny boomer meme!

>>17048910
Its the opposite you fucking retard holy shit how do you misinterpret such a basic concept

>>17050423
The unrel is technology?

>>17052133
that's it, I'm done

>>17050416
seethe harder boomer

>>17048910
>is mediated
OP is fake and gay.

I don’t know but from reading his so called “masterpiece” he seemed like a big buffoon and I couldn’t really stand much longer to see him embarrass himself talking about God and Disneyworld and trying to make some inane comparison only a frenchie high on his own farts could make, so I tossed it in the waste bin

cant remember why i saved this pic but seems relevant

adorno is the ultimate boomer
>why do kids like the jazz? culture was better back in my day before the capitalists degraded it

>>17048910
Sorry OP but you clearly dont understand what he was on about.

>>17050416
nice refutation incel

>>17048910
What are you talking about? Boomers love technology.

Boomer grandparents: Modern tech and society bad
/lit/: Cringe
Baudrillard, Ted, Ellul: Modern tech and society bad
/lit/ BASED
Edit: Thanks for the gold, kind stranger

>>17053259
Thats now what baudrillard said. Why are you so damn stupid?

>>17053259
hit the nail on the head, have some gold!

>>17053273
This post is NOT a wholesome 100 Keanu Chungus moment

>>17048910
What would Baudrillard say about things like Tinder, social media, Onlyfans, etc. effect on authentic human relationships/social connection? Parasocial relationships and internet pornography are like a simulacrum of the authentic experience but don't quite capture the full essence of it. Can anyone who has read him in depth chime in?

>>17053327
Deleuze is better for this one. It’s the deterritorialization and reterritorialization of relationships and human interaction by capitalism.

>>17053327
>effect on authentic human relationships/social connection?
Forgot to also mention, basically the online interaction becomes the real to the afflicted, so actually meeting up and doing shit with the person would be odd to them.

>>17053327
>What would Baudrillard say about things like Tinder, social media, Onlyfans, etc. effect on authentic human relationships/social connection?
First, he would laugh at your "authentic human social connection", since the "authentic social connection" is nothing but a simulacrum replacing the illusive high stakes games of seduction of more aristocratic times. He would probably think that those on social media are now self-aware of the absense of meaning in what they are doing and in their presentation of themselves and these connections are really nothing but low stakes games of seduction and illusion part of the lowest stakes game of all: fashion (though there is potential for the stakes to increase in this game. This is no doubt the path that Baudrillard would've been most interested in (especially reading his comments on Borges' lottery in babylon in his de la seduction)). Baudrillard's thought is very Bataillean in that he believes energy comes from this symbolic exchange, just as with Bataille energy comes from "the core".

>>17053599
>nothing but a simulacrum replacing the illusive high stakes games of seduction of more aristocratic times
> Baudrillard's thought is very Bataillean in that he believes energy comes from this symbolic exchange, just as with Bataille energy comes from "the core".
good advertisement for guenon (pbuh) and evola, as this faggy mumbo jumbo will just make people insane.

>>17048910
This is not his opinion. He was against production as a goal, which is why he stopped being a Marxist. To "production", focusing on accumulating, he opposed symbolic exchange, focusing on destruction and giving (not at all in a christian-moral sense). You can then see how Nietzschean and Bataillean his thought is. Instead of accumulating value, he sacrificed it. To show you his positive thoughts on technology, read about his opinion on Japan's use of technology in the transparency of evil.

>>17053254
>Boomers love technology.
No.
>Stop standing in front of your screen and go outside!

>>17053647
I agree, which is why I am definitely not a follower of Bataille, Foucault, or Baudrillard. But it is useful to know your enemies.

>>17053647
Keep that fascist shit in the trash where it belongs

>>17048910
yes he was a boomer, but the rare based kind

>>17053647
>guenon (pbuh) and evola
You are commenting on mumbo jumbo yet support these two!

>>17053659
based

>>17053661
>guenon (pbuh) and evola
>fascist
pick one

>>17053682
yes. they are both quite lucid.

>>17053484
Lmao

>>17053650
So he was a weeb.

>>17053720
the last century and a half of french art was heavily influenced by japanese woodblock prints, so being a weed runs in frog blood

>>17053838
*weeb
but weed is also accurate

he's just a genius, you wouldn't understand it

>>17053655
Who do you think is still watching network television? And who's using Facebook and clicking on all my ads? Boomers.

>>17053707
reterritorialize my asshole daddy

>>17053859
I don't think you understand OP's post. But he's a genius so I wouldn't expect you to.

>>17053661
eat your onions faggot

>>17052711
Want to know how I can tell you're a Amerilard?

>>17053655
>>Stop standing in front of your screen and go outside!
Empty platitudes. Boomers still use smartphones just as much as Millennials and Gen Z, they're still staunch materialists at their very core.

>>17052739
why wouldn't you save it, it's amazing

>>17052711
>and I couldn’t really stand much longer to see him embarrass himself talking about God and Disneyworld
t. seething Coastalcuck

embarrassment

>>17053911
Cringe.

>>17053484
Reterritorialized into pure simulation. Here's your hyperreal paragirlfriend, enjoy.

>>17056327
>Reterritorialized into pure simulation.
Is it really “pure” simulation though? This might just be me nitpicking, but with parasocial dating app relationships (anyone that has used it knows about the girls that you’ll talk with for like a month online but then you ask to hang out to have lunch together, they get super reluctant but still do it, and they are massive social retards in person), even if the relationship never manifests to being in person, there are still thoughts and messages being sent across. Then in the more advanced case of having like a cartoon gf, isn’t there still a relationship with by proxy with the artist via his/her art, as they are projecting themselves outwards with their creation?

Granted, all of this shit is hell earth either way.

>>17056375
I would say the only "purer" you can get is the eventual point that these things are procedurally AI-generated and the artists and performers no longer have a hand in it at all, but it's pretty close.

>>17050416
based / fpbp

>>17057310
based