/lit/ - Literature

>>16967704
>conservative
>intellectualism
lol

>>16967719
intellectualism can only ever be conservative. progressives and reactionaries miss the point of society and the ego entirely, and can never truly live in full.

>>16967704
return to real conservatism

A bombing campaign

>>16967704
return to real conservatism

>>16967755
What does Gnosticism have to do with politics? I am interested

Detach it from the republican party, and throw that institution the trash.

>>16967731
Well, when do you guys start acting like it? All I see is a complete lack of self-awareness and utter disregard for reality in lieu of easily scrutinized scapegoats.

>>16967704
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DvmLMUfGss

>>16967858
How about you kill yourself.

>>16967824
The distinction between barbarians and civilisation.

By destroying the technological system.

>>16967704
>>16967731
Bro conservatism is incompatible with industrial society and technological progress. There only IS reactionary or progressive. Modern conservatives aren't a thing. They just want progress but slower.

>>16967871
If I do then who will provide for my family? Who will protect them from you vultures who seek to remove humanity, replace it with algebraic logic that defies and denigrates the sacredness of human variation. Only fools believe their thoughts alone are the righteous ones. Many exist as and indeed even more true than the ones you form your identity around. As soon as you think you've escaped your propgramming and ascended, you've already lost your way.

>>16967895
what if someone were to oscillate between reactionaryism and progressivism lmao

>>16967704
Why the fuck would you want to save it? Conservativism is just progressivism going the speed limit. It's for spineless faggots.

>>16967704
You can't save what never was

>>16967731
>said the libshit

>>16967866
Who was in the right here?

>>16967731
Conservatism is just progressivism driving the speed limit

>>16967731
>trust me man
sure they do bro

>>16968129
>>16967912
If you mean American Conservatism that wants to conserve Classical Liberalism I agree. But what about other forms of conservatism that recognizes the need for order, the state, and religion? Maistre for example.

>>16967704
Name me some contemporary Conservative thinkers who are anti-capitalism.

>>16967755
Come on,now I have to post the whole thing,it's fucking perfect,read Jung globalists,I barely care for other social issues,since they are a mere illusion created by exaggerated capitalism,race must not mix

>>16968146
He's not totally anti-capitalist but understands the need for some kind of social net and cautions capitalism's effects on culture.

>>16968168
So a rightoid equivalent of a succdem (even though they are right themselves of course)

>>16968140
See: >>16967876 >>16967895

>>16968190
No he's nowhere near the bernie fans

>>16968168
>He's not totally anti-capitalist
Cool then he's not conservative

>>16968165
Next part,daily reminder that unless you're a npc you have a soul,you might not feel consciously guilty for something,but that doesn't mean it won't affect your subconcious,this is one of the many reasons trannyes and the lgbt(haha they added a plus oink oink) is almost completely insane,maybe with the exception being people who have actually found true love.

Consumerism is a vicious cicle,your subconcious will be affected,your very soul can be blackened or purified,with significant effects,things like repenting work very well,do it,don't expect to meet the creator,or for the biblical God to be ''real'',as organized religion was created with materialistic intention.


Also,daily reminder that the majority of people atheists vote for are very religious too,you can't escape,they have goals higher than those who vote for them.
Some examples include Bohemian Grove,while I wouldn't race to accuse them of Satanism,those important people were surely not atheists.

>>16967704
intellectualism is inherently anti conservative
conservatism is inherently anti intellectual

>>16967755
>>16968165
not this shit again lmao

>>16968168
everything the ebin groyper boy stands for only exists to defend capitalism, he either is severely retarded and just parrots the usual right wing talking points or hes another grifter
i think the former is more likely

>>16968197
not practical

>>16967903
Cringe. Kill yourself, or read Peterson and sort yourself out.

>>16968227
>everything the ebin groyper boy stands for only exists to defend capitalism
Give example

>>16968229
It's practical, just not possible -- without some major external event. Pre-Industrial societies existed quite sufficiently.

What would Buckley have unironically thought about the current corps of Republicans and Trump?

>>16967704
Not by memeing this bozo five times a day.

>>16968267
He wrote an article bashing Trump before he died, but I'm sure he would have sucked up to him after he found success in 2016.

>>16968267
>unironically
I get that this is chanspeech, but can someone explain what it means?

>>16967704
It cannot - give yourself over to the desire of your heart instead of your cucked ideal of compromise.
Intellectualism cannot bow itself to "conserving" the current state of being, you must become a National Socialist or plunge yourself in materialism madness as the state to be conserved is pushed further left.

>>16968255
Quality of life would suck. Although I could see an argument on how it's all relative.

Fascism is inherently anti-intellectual. Intellectualism is predicated on individuals freely entertaining, exchanging, and developing ideas. "Conservatives" (fascists) want to make their ideas the only approved ones, and silence the intelligentsia forever.

>>16968279
it means to be non-ironic. an ironic statement would be "chuck's fuck and suck", while an unironic statement must be "sneed's feed and seed". lurk more and read evola.

>>16968244
im not extremely familiar with him but as far as i know he stands for the usual rightoid stuff, social hierarchy, traditional gender roles, "race realism" etc.
im not saying these ideas exclusively exist to prop up and justify capitalism and its derivatives colonialism and imperialism, but its a major part of them, especially with ideas of race and especially nowadays

>>16968291
>Conservatives" (fascists)
Leftists are braindead.
Also no, read "Mussolini's Intellectuals" fascism is not anti intellectual.

>>16968242
>calling someone cringe.
Suggesting Peterson. This is why no one takes you seriously

>>16968255
literally just go live in the forest with your gf and children bro. varg did it and he's an odinfag LARPoid formerly e-celeb retard. there's nothing keeping you inside society.

>It's a "leftists call everyone they don't like fascists" thread
Can you all even define fascism?

>>16968242
jordan peterson is one of the most vapid people i have ever had the displeasure of listening to

>>16968321
Idk some shit about tantric femboy buttsex?

>>16968303
He is a demographic realist not a race realist. He puts all of the above before Capitalism. Still don't see how "everything he stands for only exists to defend capitalism" and how those things encourage capitalism at all.

>>16968221
Ok I misspelled trannies but whatever I don't care
Next part,social media is quite literally a collective subconcious and magic is ''real'',there are a lot,and I mean a lot of filters for those who wish to delve deeper,and become like the people they vote for.
Don't fall for the wicca bullshit,it should in theory work but it's still a waste of time.

More redpills,Hitler,Mohhamed,whatever the fuck Wotan(name literally means murder frenzy I think) is,and maybe even Genghis Khan were the same man,the archetype is one and the same,they were all ''possesed''
Read Jungs analysis on Hitler,I've noticed that people come to different conclusion with Jung,kind of similar thing with Nietzche.
>>16968227
Atheism is the only false religion,you will create a god of disbellief,this might actually be the anti-Christ.
Your actions have consequnces,upon yourself and upon the human species.

I have no clue what the fuck the anti-christ will be,I don't identify as Christian,but it's inevitable,do you really think we will have eternal peace,whatever ideology rulles in 2020 will fall eventually,and at the moment it's democracy,no peace lasts forever anon.
This is why Liberalism or liberal socialism or democratic socialism or whatever shit uni told you to like is going to collapse,these ideas will forever be shunned,and the cycles humanity goes trought shall repeat,peace is never eternal,crazier things have happened in history,much crazier.

The ''anti-christ'' will destroy whatever is acceptable by society,and he will not be much more different from ''Christ'',whatever you love,be it equality or hierarchy,liberalism or traditionalism,will be destroyed,unless it is already shunned and hated.

Astrology is real too,but because humans have projected their ideas onto the stars for generations,not for any bullshit reasons like teenage girls would like to say.

>>16968310
>>16968323
Trump won.

>>16968321
Fascism is when white people do bad

>>16968338
>>16968221
>>16968165
What is this shit and why are you spamming it?

>>16967704
reject Burke and return to Aristotle

>>16968339

>>16968352
wash your dick.

>>16968306
You're braindead. What this guy said is true >>16967895 and conservatism is dead. The only thing left are movements to return to a "time before progress," i.e. fascism.

>>16968348
it's the truth.

>>16968323
It's no different from Lacan's diagrams.

>>16968379
No, "conservatives" just turn into liberals. Not fascists. Fascism is not reactionary if that's what you're implying. It's actually pretty progressive it's just Marxists have slandered it as "reactionary" because it stands in the way of their view of dialectical progress.