/lit/ - Literature

stirner is complete sperg

>>16943941
Gender isn’t abstract, it’s the same as sex and sex influences the chemical makeup of your brain
Sorry but you won’t be passing on my watch

It's nice that Stirner has become so iconic that you can tell it's him from a shitty MS Paint image that takes 15 seconds to draw.

>>16943953
This.
Gender is just the word Protestants used to refer to Sex, because they were too scared to call it by its real name.

>>16943941
>live in fully realized egoist society
>some guy comes and rapes your child because it's both your and his property but he has more power than you
>kills you

One man's testicle is worth more than a thousand women

>>16943971
>judges a philosophical theory from the viewpoint of the victim
you must be a woman

>>16943953
But those differences don't make a man/woman. They at most make a male/female. To say "a man" and to say "a male" conjure two very different things. One is abstract and one has some basis in the real world.

>>16943953
>sex is natural!!!
>then why not everyone is according to their sexes
>because ILLNESSS WAHHHHHHH
>so you say something natural like deviation should be explained by using abstract concepts?
>WAAAAAAAAHHHH BUTTTT DEGENERACY NOOOOOOOOOOO
>okay, was nice talking to you

>>16943971
A fully egoist society would not please my ego. While the theory is true. You only own what you can protect. I don't want to spend all my time protecting my shit. Thus it pleases my ego to use social gheist like property rights to 'mostly' keep my property as mine. But those gheist aren't real and at anytime someone can just take my shit if I lack the power to defend it. That needs to be in the back of my head when I make use of these gheists.

>>16944050
Humans are born with ten fingers
Some outliers may be born with genetic abnormalities that cause them to have more or less than this number.
It’s 100% fine to name this phenomenon, just like we named sexual dysmorphia. But it’s not fine to teach that humans can be born with any amount of fingers, or even worse, choose how many fingers one has.
It is dishonest to pretend trannies are anything other than what they are, outliers. I don’t care that it hurts your feelings to be referred to as abnormal.

Material reality is a spook compared to me. Why do you give a fuck about other peoples spooks? What does this make you feel and do you like how it makes you feel? If God could be a spook then anything can be a spook.

>>16944102
>But it’s not fine to teach that humans can be born with any amount of fingers, or even worse, choose how many fingers one has
lol why?

>>16944163
Dishonest science lol
Pretending the abnormal is the standard isn’t correct

>>16944102
Gender is the perception of sex. It in itself isn't real. Most of the problems in a transexual mind comes from the perception of the sexes. If we did away with pointless gendering then we could differinciate between the trendy cross dressers and the genital mutilaters. Imagine eliminating dsyphoria by eliminating how we perceive gender.

When a trans woman wants to be a man, the penis is the last part to be changed. They morph themselves to what society thinks a man is. Imagine if society only had male/female and not men/women

>>16944132
You are a spook. In my world at least. But it pleases my ego to talk to you even if you are. Because my ego is drunk and bored. If i wanted to seek religious fulfilment then I might even indulge a spook like god.

>>16944174
Before the word gender was invented in the 50s we still had feminine and masculine concepts though

>>16944174
Gender is a modern spook. The word for it was sex. Your theories are spooks and I will kill you and torture you until you cry and admit everything you believe in is wrong
This isn't a larp or a threat btw, you better sue me

>>16944173
>Dishonest
nice spook
>Pretending the abnormal is the standard isn’t correct
saying there can be people with 6 fingers isnt the same as asserting abnormality as the norm, same is with trannies, they are different, but no one says they are the standard

>>16943941
>abstract concepts like gender
Dude I still remember the first time I saw my dad naked. Nothing abstract about it.

>>16943941
>>16943953
In this thread we learn that /lit/ doesn't know what the word abstract means

>>16944204
Yes they are though. Where have you been?

>>16944188
Why still have them?

>>16944200
There are no genders only penises and vaginas.

>>16943941
niGGER shut up, the only abstract thing here is your idea of a person. Nobody is a pure ego, go outside

>>16944223
they want to be normalized in the political sense (which is also a spook), not in the ontological as in "trannies are new standard of sexuality"

>>16944225
Why still have fundamental concepts that work? You tell me

>>16943941
Can I rape someone if it satisfies my ego?

>>16944319
Cause you need to acknowledge things that could illogically alter your world view.

>>16944327
Yes, but you'll have to kill her afterwards to avoid her retaliation, and hide the body so no one finds out and wants to please their ego by getting revenge.

It all returns back to normal anyway, things will just get different labels. They're currently calling men "people with penises". This term will likely replace men within a few decades.

I'm glad that in 2020, when climate change is the worst it's ever been, we're focussing on the important issues like whether someone used the correct pronoun. Troons are self-centered; nothing exists outsude of their reality and for some reason we listened to them with women's ears.

>>16944055
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=njt_8ML_pbA

I love this interaction between Chomsky and some weirdo egoist because it really shows just how dumb egoism really is—through the guy’s own accurate, succinct description of what it’s all about. Chomsky doesn’t even offer a good rebuttal, but the idea of “greed from above and envy from below” as an end goal is just so mentally retarded that you can’t begin to describe it in a complimentary way without getting into weirdo jargon.

>>16944838
>I'm glad that in 2020, when climate change is the worst it's ever been

And you'll be lamenting it, again, in 2030 as being "the worst it's ever been".

>>16943953
Someone’s spooked beyond saving

>>16944990
>egoism
Egoism is not a philosophy or a worldview. Egoism is what we each are. That is anarchy.

>>16944163
Don't like mutilating children or enabling attention whores.

>>16945018
Stirner does not just describe a Union of egoists as a current state of things, he recommends it as a replacement for our current structures. Egoism is absolutely a philosophy, you retard. I get sick of you idiots who don’t read the book and then act all smug and like you’re the only one who gets it, prodded on by other retards who are even worse at acting like they read the book.

>>16945006
Well yes, because nothing is being done about it. What's your point, anon?

>>16943941
>abstract
HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>16943941
If you view women as people then you are spooked by humanism.

>>16945702
Howbis humanism a spook? all philosophy is inseperable from the from human experience

>>16945715
>How is emphasizing the agency and authority of every single human being not a spook
Lol stirnerites

>>16943941
>abstract
>gender

You will never be a woman

Reminder the gender dichotomy is some anglo linguistic garbage, and not a science.

Reminder the sex and gender dichotomy is some anglo linguistic garbage, and not a science.

>>16945758
Meant to put in sex and gender dichotomy, rather.

>>16945715
That's not what humanism means you utter pleb