[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 446 KB, 1002x542, ENlzDvjVUAA-wg7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061767 No.16061767 [Reply] [Original]

/physiognomy/ thread
Do you judge the work of an author based on their physiognomy?

>> No.16061792
File: 20 KB, 330x413, pinchmeister.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061792

>>16061767
No, since your pic disproves the idea that physiognomy is important. Sartre is butt-ugly, Jünger is aristocratically handsome, yet both writers wrote absolute cringe.

Sartre is enjoyed by faggy artfags who cannot be assed to actually make the effort to read Heidegger, and Jünger is enjoyed by edgelords who wear combat boots in the summer and listen to Sabaton.

As a corollary to my evidence, look at this goofy-ass face in my pic. This faggot wrote some of the best fiction in the last 50 years.

>> No.16061802

No. Physiognomy has of grain of truth that people like to extrapolate into an entire wheat field which is why the subject is retarded, but it's especially useless for the merits of writers giving that writing requires a faglord phenotype in the first place. Attractiveness reinforces the veil of self love and therefore makes the truth more elusive, hot writers are handicapped by coomerism. Obviously they can overcome this handicap and become great though.

>> No.16061804
File: 29 KB, 620x400, immanuel-kant-9360144-1-402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061804

>>16061792
Further, this five foot goblin creature wrote the most important works of philosophy since Plato.

>> No.16061806

>>16061792
Pynchon is trash.

>> No.16061813

>>16061806
I don't care about your unqualified opinions.

>> No.16061814
File: 243 KB, 828x1554, 1596427044919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061814

>>16061804
OH NO NO NO NO

>> No.16061855

Yes but not based on how attractive they are. Generally, the bigger the forehead, the more smarter they are. I for instance have a fivehead and i am like, really smart

>> No.16061879

>>16061855
Or you just have a squishy face/recessive facial features.

>> No.16061943
File: 195 KB, 1000x1434, aldous-huxley-signed-photograph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061943

Can we just stop and appreciate how attractive Aldous Huxley is? No homo

>> No.16061965
File: 265 KB, 606x375, Nietzsche and Wagner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061965

>>16061767

>> No.16061969

>>16061943
Like an ugly David Bowie.

>> No.16061975
File: 1.09 MB, 1200x632, c4r1ox7zw0631.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061975

>>16061767

>> No.16061984

If you'd read Junger you wouldn't have used him for this image.

>> No.16061991
File: 72 KB, 456x600, external content-duckduckgo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16061991

>>16061804

>> No.16062008
File: 1.76 MB, 1401x2055, Alfred_Jarry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062008

what can you say about this man?

>> No.16062027
File: 62 KB, 300x367, odnb-9780198614128-e-1012614-graphic-1-full.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062027

>>16061969
>slaps your girls ass when you're not looking and howls like a chimp

>> No.16062034

>>16062008
Not very confident and lacking in self-respect.

>> No.16062037

>>16062027
>Oy guvna!

>> No.16062065
File: 77 KB, 936x1280, vert-aldoux-huxley-henri-manuel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062065

>>16062037

>> No.16062075
File: 240 KB, 940x528, Kant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062075

>>16061991
Kant's ugliness has been greatly exaggerated. He wasn't tall, but in his time people in general were smaller.

>> No.16062076
File: 76 KB, 1200x628, albert camus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062076

>> No.16062077

>>16061991
Clearly based on the Jacobi portrait that is always mistaken for Kant.

>> No.16062081
File: 136 KB, 456x620, 87614790113ca48fecbc22251cce7995.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062081

>> No.16062082
File: 257 KB, 677x845, Immanuel_Kant_(portrait).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062082

>>16062075
>Kant's ugliness has been greatly exaggerated.

>> No.16062083

>>16062065
>oy think she a real tootie girl wouldan'--t miss a real man like a glove oy' esterday yah?

>> No.16062095
File: 74 KB, 522x800, mw216738.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062095

>>16062083

>> No.16062110
File: 539 KB, 1200x1457, Grabbe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062110

>Do you judge the work of an author based on their physiognomy?
Generally yes, Grabbe is so far the only exception to the rule I've found.

>> No.16062122
File: 83 KB, 737x454, 1587411460227.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062122

Why do fascist look like faggots?
Hitler looks like he is a total hornbag for masculine bodies.

And why do left wingers never shave?
Karl Marx looks like a cozy grandpa who goes at the pub and has deep conversations.

>> No.16062160
File: 64 KB, 700x638, 1499902467650.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062160

>>16062122
>Hitler looks like he is a total hornbag for masculine bodies.
project harder

>> No.16062178
File: 97 KB, 803x996, Nb_pinacoteca_stieler_friedrich_wilhelm_joseph_von_schelling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062178

/Schelling/

>> No.16062182

>>16062095
>Ey'hahahaa I likey da sound of THAT

>> No.16062187

>>16061943
fine anglo specimen

>> No.16062189

These threads are the pseudest threads on /lit/

>> No.16062204
File: 85 KB, 960x814, gene wolfe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062204

Young Gene Wolfe

>> No.16062209
File: 948 KB, 155x173, whatever.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062209

>>16062122
What a fag you are.

>> No.16062218

>>16062122
you know you’ve hit a nerve when the guy with the hitler folder appears lol

>> No.16062219
File: 25 KB, 340x485, Codreanu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062219

>>16061767
What does his face tell you?

>> No.16062228

Death of the author and contextualizing author's work within the boundaries of his own life are two sides of the same coin.

>> No.16062247

>>16061792
Pynchon sucks cock, you fucking pseud-n*gger

>> No.16062248
File: 27 KB, 480x320, Cam-e-Mitch-480x320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062248

>>16062160
>>16062209
I don't what it is, if feels similar to the faggots in modern family.

>> No.16062255
File: 162 KB, 1071x699, 1596227144113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062255

>>16062122
>Hitler looks like he is a total hornbag for masculine bodies.

Ok, you utter moron.

>> No.16062257
File: 130 KB, 970x570, derrida-foucault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062257

So you guys read Derrida and Foucault non-stop, or are they ugly and thus uninteresting?

>> No.16062272

>>16062257
Physiognomy is not just about ugly vs. beautiful.
Foucault looks like a typical neoliberal libertine pedo.
Derrida looks like a dishonest con-man.

>> No.16062275
File: 581 KB, 1069x1600, F8CE963B-991B-49F4-9CCA-FD0CDE373A47.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062275

>>16062257
Derrida had great hair for someone above middle age.

>> No.16062276
File: 43 KB, 512x768, Pamiri_man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062276

>>16061792

>Junger is cringe
>I know this because I've just invented smeone who reads him, and this fictional person does things I don't like

>> No.16062279

>>16061767
Attractive people get invited to too many parties and waste too much time on social trifles; they don't have the luxury of vast swathes of time alone in which to Get Good.

>> No.16062283

>>16062008
I'll bet he wrote edgy shit.

>> No.16062298

>>16062219
That he's based and redpilled.

>> No.16062333
File: 13 KB, 298x237, aaaaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062333

>>16062272
My problem with it is that you already know that they are what you say they are, without looking at them. For instance, what can you tell me about pic related without looking up who he is (and hoping you do not know who he is). I'd understand if you are not as precise as "typical neolibaril libertine pedo" but please, be more specific than "he has kind eyes".

>> No.16062350

>>16062333
Looks Jewish

>> No.16062381
File: 69 KB, 300x300, 17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062381

>The world is a kingdom of holes. The hole is bound up with refusal, with negation and with Nothingness. The hole is first and foremost what is not. This nihilating function of the hole is revealed by such vulgar expressions as 'arsehole with no buttocks' - which means 'naught' or 'nothingness'. To call an enemy an 'arsehole with no buttocks' is to annihilate him...

>> No.16062384

>>16061767
Yes.

How old is Junger there?

>> No.16062389

>>16062257
Foucault is interesting, Jews are not

>> No.16062401
File: 11 KB, 196x193, bvbvb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062401

>>16062350
Why though? And this man?

>> No.16062405

>>16062381
Seems like the sort of thought that tiny little forehead would produce.

>> No.16062495

>>16062381
>the world is a kingdom of women
this is very bad.

>> No.16062512

>>16062247
I don't care about your unqualified opinion.

>>16062276
The eternal cope of the Sabaton/Jünger cringelord.

>> No.16062518

>>16062381
Sartre is much ado about nothing.

>> No.16062539
File: 85 KB, 1000x673, faulkner-pipe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062539

>>16061767
A writer should at least get extra points for looking the part.

>> No.16062629
File: 154 KB, 964x1388, external-content.duckduckgo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062629

>>16062077

>> No.16062770

>>16062255
>avoided contact with women
Sounds totally gay. Yep, I think he was a closet fag

>> No.16062801

>>16062110
Damn be must have written some big brained books

>> No.16062827
File: 234 KB, 1527x1081, Wagner profile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062827

>>16062801

>> No.16062845

It's true. Male models make the greatest philosophers, scientists, and literary artists.

>> No.16062851

>>16062076
Kek

>> No.16062888

>>16061767
This is disporven by great scientis 9/10 times they’re butt ugly, and maybe 1 is a regular joe like Feynman.

>> No.16062907

>>16062801
Grabbe is good, he is one of the most important German dramatists of his time. I have no idea if he is available in English though.

>> No.16062925
File: 212 KB, 596x1867, 1588476399069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16062925

>>16062512
>unqualified opinion

>> No.16063569

>>16062925
BAPTIZED IN FI-YAH
FORDY TO WON
SPIRIT OF SPARTANZ
DEATH
AND
GLORY
SHOULDER OF POWLAND
SECOND TO NONE
WRATH OF THE WEHRMACHT
.. not exactly brought to a halt, now was it?

>> No.16063660
File: 51 KB, 480x288, dostoevsky-dickens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16063660

>>16061767
dosto and dick and common sense kinda disprove physiognomy, if anything is more determinant of one's appearance and overall opportunity to become a famous author it's wealth. But as always their a plenty of examples where that's not the case, generalizing like one does in physiognomy is a brainlet move.

>> No.16063700
File: 278 KB, 389x469, 1477128733555.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16063700

>>16063660
>dosto and dickens are ugly

>> No.16063795

>>16062219
That he loves to larp

>> No.16063834

>>16062204
the descriptions of himself in fifth head of cerberus never gelled with me because i only had pictures of him taken at conventions for reference. i now see the planetary face and it is oddly sinister in a twilight zone kind of way.

>> No.16063920

>>16061991
damn that guy looks like, just 40 years older.
how do I cope?

>> No.16063922

>>16062255
>Kubitzek
That was before he met Ernst you mong.

>> No.16063927

>>16063920
*like me

>> No.16063953

>>16063660
They were both horrifically bad prose stylists, so that's something.

>> No.16063966
File: 42 KB, 641x482, 1577386005435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16063966

i dont judge authors by their faces, but I do judge posters by their tummies

>> No.16064124

>>16062219
That he's immune to Jewish tricks

>> No.16064245

>>16063920
>how do I cope?
By writing one of the most influential works of philosophy maybe

>> No.16064291

>>16062401
Absolutely anglo.

>> No.16064301

>>16063966
Who this guy?

>> No.16064326
File: 117 KB, 208x281, Thomas Carlyle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064326

>>16061767

>> No.16064332 [DELETED] 
File: 16 KB, 321x432, T. Carlyle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064332

>>16064326

>> No.16064345

>>16061767
when will belcea post physique?

>> No.16064346 [DELETED] 
File: 402 KB, 1566x2000, Thomas Carlyle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064346

>>16064332

>> No.16064352 [DELETED] 
File: 101 KB, 856x1172, Carlyle T..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064352

>>16064346

>> No.16064365 [DELETED] 
File: 285 KB, 401x278, ComfyCarlyle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064365

>>16064352

>> No.16064384

>>16064326
>>16064332
>>16064346
>>16064352
>>16064365
One would have sufficed retard

>> No.16064442
File: 6 KB, 230x219, crying pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064442

>>16064384
Okay.

>> No.16064464
File: 110 KB, 581x410, kan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064464

>>16061804

Kant was a cutie and you know it.

>> No.16064478

>>16062204

>Wolfe studied judo and boxed in the army.

Based

>> No.16064508

>>16063922

What the fuck does that have to do with anything?

>> No.16064527

>>16064464
>freshly printed newspaper would make him sneeze
cute

>> No.16064598

>>16062218
kek

>> No.16064646

>>16064464
>>freshly printed newspaper would make him sneeze

So kant was basically the male version of a cute anime girl?

>> No.16064816

>>16062082
At least from a masculine point of view there really doesn't seem to be anything wrong with him though.

>> No.16064864

>>16062082
>Ah yes, this crappy miniature painted when he was an old man is surely a good representation of his physical attractiveness!

>> No.16064900
File: 151 KB, 900x900, 661d720f-755f-4af4-9d23-a2f9d922a726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16064900

Two of the greatest minds to ever live.