/lit/ - Literature

>>15775417
Robin DiAngelo (if you read her correctly).

>>15775417
Me

>>15775417
Apparently a suburbanite zoomer with zero problems in life that is playing larp with ideology

>>15775417
Conservatists usually do not think. Conservatism is a meme. What is there left to conserve? Most, if not all self proclaimed conservatives are bootlickers and never dare to question the status quo.

Peter Sloterdijk?

>>15775417
>Conservative ever thinking

>>15775434
fpbp

>>15775422
Accelerationist Robin knows exactly what she is doing.

None, since conservatives don’t think. They merely spout long debunked bullshit that shouldn’t be taken seriously by anyone

>>15775456
Welcome to 4chan, you're here forever

>>15775417

>>15775442
This is perhaps the best answer but I would also mention Patrick Deneen who wrote "Why Liberalism Failed".

I think Deneen is the only right-winger who grapples with the real source of all contemporary problems, namely liberal ideology and capitalism.

Holy shit this thread, fuck off shills.

>>15775417
I'd say Thomas Sowell.

>>15775680
Fourth nigger

>>15775716
Half*

>>15775456
spbp
>>15775702
epbp
>>15775680
cringe

>>15775720
books that explain why the left can't meme?

>>15776434
ur a retard, it's a meme made by paleocons to make fun of neocons

>>15775417
Patrick Deneen, Sohrab Ahmari, Adrian Vermeule

>>15776434
attack helicopter haha

>>15776434
That's clearly not a reactionary meme, and I agree with its point.

>>15775417
There's no such thing as a conservative thinker. There's no intellectual foundation to conservatism.

>>15775431
Calm down Achmed.

Sowell, Scruton et al

>>15775442

I was going to say this. But then I thought twice about it because he is from the late 20th century.
At that point, I realized why OP's question was fucking stupid. This century is too wet behind the ears to have produced anything in the way of a canon of heavy hitting intellectuals yet.

But that much is to be expected from an OP that presumably thinks attention whoreing cringe grifters like Fuentes count as "thinkers"

Conservies are all cucks and closet fags/trannies.

>>15776484
>There's no intellectual foundation to conservatism.
Could I interest you in a smoke?

>>15776503
>Fuentes
>a grifter

>>15776530

Oh I'm sorry. I must be getting old. It's difficult for me to tell the difference between grifters and any other self aggrandizing attention whoring e celebs.

Care to explain?

>>15776434
That’s not a left wing meme.

>>15776530
Nick is a grifter you idiot.
The guys brags about how much money he makes and sells a bunch of tshirts and stuff, you'd think he would be utilising his millions towards some kind of institutional end, which he isn't, and which is what he criticised other right-wing people for also not doing.

>>15776576
>>15776604
Bro... just, trust the plan.

>>15776525
>He told the story of watching protesters in the streets from the window of his apartment in Paris in May 1968, and realizing that building things of value (communities, societies, nations, legal and economic systems, institutions of civil society) is hard and takes time, while destroying them is easy and often accomplished in a flash. It was then, he said, that he became, or realized that he was, a conservative.
Based.

>>15775430
BASED

Patrick Deneen and arguably Dugin

>>15776530
>make holocaust jokes on YouTube
>get banned
>”NOOOO CONSERVATIVE VOICES ARE BEING CENSORED THE ONLY WAY TO STOP IT IS TO BUY $50 ‘Proud Nicker’ HOODIE, GET IT BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE THE N-WORD ISN’T THAT FUNNY?”
I don’t think he’s a glowie like a lot of that crowd are but he’s still a massive queer.

>>15775417
pleasureman from MPC

>>15776530
quick rundown on this onions boy?

>>15776471
Nailed it.

>>15776525
Where do I start?

>>15775417
>conservative thinker
oxymoron

>>15776812

>obvious developmental disability, probably aspergers, evinced by his odd idiosyncratic speech and body language

>makes a food review show on youtube called "TheReportofTheWeek", rates fastfood wearing a cheap ill fitting suit which is sartorially absurd

>his content circulates around on imageboards with anons amusement at his strange content. We nickname him "reviewbrah".

>Tosh.0 does a deep dive on his channel for laughs

>the publicity causes normies to flock to his channel, and lowkey bully him by saying he's a "great person" and lightly mocking some of the odd things he says, as well as being quizzical over his style of dress

>normies sub and keep watching because they find his innocence placating, and everybody loves a freakshow

>reviewbrah is now a very prominent youtube channel, with monetized videos and is now making bank simply for posting weird insubstantial content

>>15775702
This is why the moderate centrist is always a tacit leftist, they're usually fine with the way society is moving and on board with anything the establishment has in store for them.

>>15775417
BIG YARV

>>15775422
How do I read her correctly?

>>15776846
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoybTk6TEX4 (kino)

Watch these, and then read his book about beauty as well as the book on architecture, then start with those two or three books that came out in the past 10 years which I believe are "How to be a Conservative", "Fools Frauds and Firebrands" and maybe another. Then you can read his all those main works and essays he wrote from the 80's to 90's about Conservatism such as from the Salisbury Review. The Soul of the World, Sexual Desire and On Modern Culture are very good as well.

>>15776939
No people just like him because "he's pure", which he is, but normies are just cringe about these things.

I do honestly enjoy his content however.

>>15775417
Thomas Sowell no question

>conservative
>thinker

an oxymoron?

>>15775702
>he said this over 100 years ago
OH NO NO NO NO

>>15775417
Tucker Carlson

>>15775417
>conservative
just read Moldbug already

>>15777812
>read a pile of trash
No.

>>15775417

What bothers me most about this guy is his youth. He is very unprepared to be a conservative pundit, and the risk of him regretting in his mid 30s a lot of the things he says now is very high.

>>15777987
Worst part is that if he had just kept his mouth shut, he'd probably be making a decent amount in TPUSA with a future in the GOP/conservative movement. Instead he decided to be a Mexican white nationalist.

>>15778002

Yes, attention whoring and short term greed have fucked him up. If he wants to do something else in a decade, something more ambitious, any rival will easily use his white nationalist videos to attack him.
I dont hate him, just feel bad for him because he is very young and fucked himself.

Zoomers don't understand why everybody was anonymous before social media (in general through nicknames in message boards, 4chan was unique in that it was anonymous and without nicknames, apart from tripfags)

>>15776434
Being this dumdum

>>15778032
Nick these two gentlemen think it was a mistake that you didn't take the free trip to israel

>>15777987
>>15778002
>>15778032
>conservatism must be what it is now
>conservatism must be the radical left of 20 years ago
>you cannot do anything for your principles because that would be silly
>"i'm just worried he doesn't quite get what he's doing" *retard voice*
>just sell out bro
>all the traction you've gained today, it'll be gone tomorrow, so sell out

>>15778054
Or he could've just toned it down a bit and said the same shit Tucker has. Instead he was arguing against racemixing and shit lmao. But Nick also doesn't have any principles, see the catboy shit.

>>15778050
How is being anti-Israel conservative? Tucker doesn't sit there and talk about Israel non-stop because it's actually almost irrelevant if you don't hate Jews or aren't Muslim. If anything, being pro-Israel has been the conservative position since at least the post-war era.

>>15778188
It might not be irrelevant and a lot of his success comes from being willing to explore why Jews and Israel are so influential in America when the mainstream parties won't question it. Does this really have to be unpacked for you

>>15778217
It is irrelevant, like AIPAC is shitty and all, but it's very low on the list of things conservatives should be worried about. It's clear Nick is just watered down /pol/, not actually conservative.

>>15776939
He’s not a complete autist, he used to post on r9k and was fairly normal (by their standards), iirc he just wears the big suits because he likes old-school style and originally made the videos as exercises for impaired/awkward speech (probably assburger’s)
His post-Tosh videos are heavily tongue in cheek, don’t tell me you think his hammy delivery is 100% genuine

I think people would stop hating nick if he accepted he isn't a leader. He is entertainment and opinions on current events. In that role he is pretty damn good

>>15779104
He's not even good there lmao, he's just repackaged /pol/ talking points.

>>15779129
There is no such thing as /pol/ talking points. I'm not sure if majority of /pol/ is even christian. There is constant infighting going on between various competing camps on very fundamental things in politics.

>>15779139
Nick is just a dressed up white nationalist and it's painfully obvious to any outside observer.

>>15779143
I don't disagree with that. Anyone with an IQ over 120 is "white nationalist" in a sense. All I'm saying is that "/pol/ talking points" is not a thing.

Nick is just Pat Buchanan cloned into this century, filled with edgy humour and given a massive ego. Which is why I find him entertaining.