/lit/ - Literature

His philosophy is really, really shallow. You must be a teenager.

>>15759239
There can be no depth after Stirner

>>15759239
>completes the system of german idealism and annihiliates it
>his philosophy is really shallow

>>15759320
it really is. Show me the academic stirnerites. I can point to a good few academic marxists and hegelians.

>>15759417
>No academics therefore its shallow

Holy fucking shit, if this isn't bait unironically kys

>>15759230
>whines about spooks
>becomes a spook himself

>>15759230
>only my spooks are not spooks

>>15759230
>>15759262
Nietzsche destroyed philosophy, but many other people have too.

>>15759417
Bernard A Laska, Lawrence S Stepelevich (more of a hegelian, but also wrote a lot on Stirner), Nikolas Lobkowicz, John F. Welsh, LA Schiereck, etc.
Kinda stupid question considering that Stirner was forgotten, or put in the shadow of Nietzsche or Marx for a shit ton of time

>>15759467
Nietzsche didn't destroy philosophy, he is very much still a Modern, a theologian

>>15759230
Literally a meme writer that only 16 year old loners read.

>>15759417
He rejects academy. He even rejects the "spook?" of Philosophy as a formal institution.

>>15759230
>hypostatises the ego
YIKES

>>15759467
?

>>15759417
>Basing the validity of a philosopher on the reaction to his work rather than the work itself.
Read.

>>15759239
I...i...it must have depth, some one told me iii...it needs to have depth!

>>15759467
>Confirms nihilism and then decides to make his own rules
>destroyed philosophy

>>15759262
>I only care about me
>well that's gay, and the community rejects you
Stirner refuted

>>15759436
Yes, unironically, even as much as a meme as academia is today.

>>15759230
>no one except edgy anarchists cares about you
Daily reminder that the ego is a spook

>>15763110
You passed the vibe check

>>15759230
Wrong image

>>15763128
Now, thats harvester of (yous)

>>15759230
Based he proved that every philosphy, ideology, value etc. are the construction of ego(yes the sophists were right) then annihilated every spook.

>>15763564
>Yes the sophists were right
>stirner shits on Fischer in "Philosophical Reactionaries" for saying he's a modern sophist
>stirner shits on sophists in "The Ancients" chapter of Der Einzige

>>15764484
Sophists were right in a sense that everyone try to present their own world view.

>>15763136
> community only cares about itself
> it is the same as me
Stirner confirmed

>>15759230
>Destroys wisdom with ego.
How cute. I offer you compassion.

>>15765204
>Einzige = Ego
>claims to know wisdoms
:3

>>15763136
The community is a spook

>>15759417
Me (after I get this doctorate).

BUSTIN MAKES ME FEEL GOOD

>>15765298
Are you seriously falling for the german funny terminology? Can't you put in perspective what came from such approach since Hegel, idealism, Marx, Stirner, Wittgenstein, Heidegger, until finally Habermas? It's a vicious deed. Don't fall for the german funny words, my friend.

>>15759230
Honest question, what's the core difference between Stirner, Nietzsche, Rand, and LaVey? Am I forgetting someone?

>>15765656
Read Stirner's Critics

>>15759230
Retroactively refuted by Socrates (ﷺ)

>>15765688
I'm aware of Stirner's "Ego and It's Own", and I'm sorry that you got stuck there.

>>15765743
Stuck?

>>15759230
*destroys his milk business*

>>15759230
And then get btfo by basic psychology. What a shame.

>>15765832
Would you drink Stirner's milk?

>>15759230
Marx the spooklord was so triggered by based Stirner lol

>>15765301
The community provides you with essential resources and services so it's hardly a spook.