[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 33 KB, 780x438, feelweirdman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15645486 No.15645486 [Reply] [Original]

Reading Philosophy unironically makes you 10x wiser than 99% of people. Its so amazing how you can understand and detect all the patterns of behaviour in a society with extreme accuracy just from reading philosophy. Its not even fair bros, its like cheat codes

>> No.15645505

I too remember being 16

>> No.15645508

>>15645486
Everything you need to live life is in Plato and Confucius.

>> No.15645510

>>15645486
actually, reading philosophy distances you from reality. you can see evidence of this by looking at academics, whos heads are far up their own asses.

>> No.15645513

>>15645486
The only difference between a philosopher and an ordinary person is that the philosopher is more adept at justifying his prejudices

>> No.15645518

>>15645510
thats a false causality anon and has nothing to do with what OP meant lmao

>> No.15645524

>>15645508
Everything you need to live life is in Epictetus and Land.

>> No.15645548

>>15645510
Incorrect and beside the point.
Being able to think more abstractly than pleb normies is based, by the way.

>> No.15645575

I don't even care if people don't like philosophy but then why do you feel the need to even reply to a thread? What makes your opinion worth anything if you can't even read a book? To try your failed stand up bits?

>> No.15645610

>>15645486
You would have to reach a very high level of Philo proficiency to achieve that state. And have it supported by science reading.

Most casual and entey level Philo readers actually disassociate from reality first. It's like an U shaped curve

>> No.15645637
File: 218 KB, 305x549, A4FCB4EF-4A47-4C54-855D-7F967F5FDBB5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15645637

>>15645610
>And have it supported by science reading.
Lel I never get why people think like this

>> No.15645656

>>15645486
This, but also with not browsing Reddit.

>> No.15645682

>>15645610
>an U

>> No.15645690

>>15645510
True philosophy would mean really LIVING IT.

>> No.15645694

>>15645505
He's still correct.

>> No.15645701

>>15645610
>an U
This is incorrect grammar.

>> No.15645704

>>15645694
This.

>> No.15645714

>>15645510
I think it can definitely allow one to be distanced from being caught up in it all. Being confronted with one's own mortality and how little it matters makes even large scale problems seem insignificant.

>> No.15645727

>>15645694

He isn't. 'understand and detect all the patterns of behaviour' isn't particularly difficult - being able to parse philosophy doesn't grant you any insight into what you couldn't divine already unless you're a huge midwit.

>> No.15645753

People who read don't read philosophy are to people who read philosophy as women are to men.

>> No.15645763

>>15645486
So what patterns and behaviors have you detected, anon?

>> No.15645764

>>15645763
You're fuckin gay

>> No.15645782

>>15645486
You aren't wiser if you don't act better. Anyone can recognise patterns, the hard part is actually doing things better. That's why I like Epictetus so much, he always gives you a kick up the arse so you recognise your own complacency.

>> No.15645789

>>15645764
You're thinking gay thoughts again.

>> No.15645875

>>15645682
>>15645701
Sorry about that

>> No.15645951

>>15645510
This is something that Plato addresses over and over, retard.

>> No.15646149

>>15645486
Based

>> No.15646177
File: 216 KB, 579x458, gay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646177

>>15645486
Caralho, OP, vai tomar no seu cu.

>> No.15646190

>>15646177
Op aqui

Vai tu po caralho tu zuca de merda, so queremos tugas nesta board cabrão

>> No.15646290

>>15645694
>>15645704
samefag

>> No.15646327

>>15645510
more a prob with academia than with philosophy

>> No.15646329

>>15645486
>read philosophy
>still fucking retarded

Why is my life like this?

>> No.15646349

>>15645637
i think its because science and philosophy arent different, theyve just been made to seem alien to one another because of territorial academics

really, theyre perfect compliments. science can tell us a lot about measurable, observable things. philosophy picks up when science cant go any further. also philosophy is the initial instinct behind science.

i really fucking hate all the scientism nowadays, as if more STEM bros is what we need, but its also hard to knock actual hard-nosed scientific insight

>> No.15646657

I would rather guess that your feeling comes from the realization of how much more retarded one's past self was and because you judge other people by your past self's feeling of false equality, you assume that now you have truly overcome everyone else. Philosophy can be the right way but only if you don't settle down and assume a sense of finished enlightenment.

>> No.15646662
File: 229 KB, 500x500, AE61A5EA-DFC7-420D-AEFF-B104D3646E05.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646662

>>15646349
>i think its because science and philosophy arent different
Strong disagree, I love the fact that sciencefags can’t engage with my work. What are they gonna do, empirically measure the semiologic conversion of the symbolic order into signs? Take radio wave readings of the commodity form? Science is fucking gay, I wish it was the Stone Age.

>> No.15646695

>>15646662
>Science is fucking gay, I wish it was the Stone Age.
>*returns to spending his entire life on the computer*

>> No.15646713
File: 246 KB, 1180x842, 5CF5A49D-AB6D-4DBD-BAE9-4A4C685F158D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646713

>>15646695
Woah bro you totally got me there, don’t forget I live in a house, use electricity, drive a car to my job, use computers to teach my classes, teach a film studies class, submit papers electronically to journals, and publish work based off the cultural ramifications of industrial society. You totally invalidated my desires in one fell swoop.

>> No.15646715
File: 13 KB, 220x311, Richard_Feynman_Nobel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646715

>>15645548
You learn math and science if you want to do that. Philosophers are chasing ghosts that they made up to jerk off ovver their slow brains that were too dumb for math.

>> No.15646716

>>15646695
You're a faggot

>> No.15646726

>>15646715
>t. Never heard of leibniz, or Wittgenstein, or...

>> No.15646736
File: 110 KB, 1280x973, 1584078230950.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646736

>>15646716
retard

>> No.15646801

>>15645510
>academics
>read philosophy

>> No.15646811

And then you get in an argument irl and realize it doesn't matter how smart you are because no one cares
>It's a complex issue because
>Y'all need to shut y'all racists asses up
>I'm just trying to understand that if when you say
>ayo whitey just shut up now, slave masters and shiet

>> No.15646818
File: 97 KB, 905x942, 702F0E27-40E9-4B14-AA92-AEE8D858F4BD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646818

Is this the thread were we complain about normal people?

WHYYYYY DO NORMIES SPEAK SO FREELY OF THINGS THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND. WHY DO THEY THINK SO DOGMATICALLY AS IF SOMETHING IS SET ON STONE WHEN ITS SOME RANDOM SHIT THEY JUST MADE UP OR HEARD SOMEONE ELSE SAY. AND THEY GET ALL PATRONIZING ABOUT SHIT I DONT CARE ABOUT. AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH FFFUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKKKKKKKK

>> No.15646838

>>15646818
Based

>> No.15646902
File: 18 KB, 599x474, D4E20E8F-E5F2-4F9C-8BCC-F4AECE7981A3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15646902

>>15646818
>I don’t care if it’s a simulacra I still enjoy it
>what do you mean it’s not real? It’s right there, how is it it real?

>> No.15647067

>>15646902
kek

>> No.15647213

>>15646902
But according to fags on this very site even books are just simulacra and I enjoy those, is there nothing sacred???

>> No.15647233
File: 770 KB, 680x576, ycrW4Pv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15647233

Reading philosophy is to living life what reading /v/ is to playing video games.
The two are distinctly different activities, even if they revolve around the same subject. You don't become a wise man from reading philosophy, just like you don't get good in video games from reading /v/.
Spend 90% on actual practice, 10% on reading shitposts by other retards (who's philosophys goat shitposter of all time?)

>> No.15647309

>>15647233
>who's philosophys goat shitposter of all time?
Hegel

>> No.15647515

>>15647309

based hegel explains shitposting to the uninitiated:
>> There are two aspects to merely clever argumentation that call for fur- ther notice and which are to be contrasted with conceptually comprehend. On the one hand, merely clever argumentation conducts itself negatively towards the content apprehended; it knows how to refute it and reduce it to nothing. It says, “This is not the way it is”; this insight is the merely negative; it is final, and it does not itself go beyond itself to a new content. Rather, if it is again to have any content, something other from somewhere else has to be found. It is reflection into the empty I, the vanity of its own knowing. – What this vanity expresses is not only that this content is vain but also that this insight itself is vain, for it is the negative which catches no glimpse of the positive within itself. Because this reflection does not gain its negativity itself for its content, it is not immersed in the subject matter at all but is always above and beyond it, and thus it imagines that by asserting the void, it is going much further than the insight which was so rich in content. On the other hand, as was formerly pointed out, in comprehensive thinking, the negative belongs to the content itself and is the positive, both as its immanent movement and determination and as the totality of these. Taken as a result, it is the determinate negative which emerges out of this movement and is likewise thereby a positive content.

>> No.15647533

>>15645875
It's okay, just try to be better next time, always aspiring.

>> No.15647541

>>15646290
It really isn't.

>> No.15647565

>>15647515
Very cool.

>> No.15647882

>>15646657
How do I stop thinking my current self is my final form?

>> No.15647984

>>15647882
this very question presupposes that you haven't reached your final form - rejoice, fren, you already have what you're seeking for

>> No.15648105

>>15647882
Read jung