/lit/ - Literature

>>15640473
>Phoneposter
>>>/r/eddit is that way, amigo.

>>15640473
It's Nietzsche idk what you expected. He invented being edgy

>>15640473
Should be called ‘I want to masturbate and you should too, it’s not a sin heres why’

>>15640507
Masturbation isnt a sin in the bible at all.

>>15640524
Its not looked favorably upon though

>>15640596
Why, then, do so many Christians masturbate?

Here's the real ending to The Anti-Christ. The Cambridge translation is the only English version that preserves it, so a lot of people don't know about it:

Law against Christianity

Given on the Day of Salvation, on the first day of the year one ( - 30 September 1888, according to the false calculation of time)

War to the death against vice: the vice is Christianity

First proposition. - Every type of anti-nature is a vice. The priest is the
most vicious type of person: he teaches anti-nature. Priests are not to be
reasoned with, they are to be locked up.

Second proposition. - Any participation in church services is an attack
on public morality. One should be harsher with Protestants than with
Catholics, harsher with liberal Protestants than with orthodox ones. The
criminality of being Christian increases with your proximity to science.
The criminal of criminals is consequently the philosopher.

Third proposition. - The execrable location where Christianity brooded
over its basilisk eggs should be razed to the ground and, being the depraved
spot on earth, it should be the horror of all posterity. Poisonous snakes
should be bred on top of it.

Fourth proposition. - The preacher of chastity is a public incitement to
anti-nature. Contempt for sexuality, making it unclean with the concept
of 'uncleanliness', these are the real sins against the holy spirit of life.

Fifth proposition. - Eating at the same table as a priest ostracizes: you
are excommunicated from honest society. The priest is our Chandala, -
he should be ostracized, starved, driven into every type of desert.

Sixth proposition. - The 'holy' history should be called by the name
it deserves, the accursed history; the words 'God', 'saviour', 'redeemer',
'saint' should be used as terms of abuse, to signify criminals.

Seventh proposition. - The rest follows from this.

>>15640473
You’ve read this? How long ago?
I read it years ago, but why am I always the one that has to remind you people of the first few pages where he specifically WARNS YOU that the book isn’t meant for everyone. You, who unironically uses the meme term “cringe”, are certainly NOT ready to read it.
Consider yourself “filtered”. Since you like that chan-talk so much.

>>15640694
Shut up bulldyke.

>>15640507
Nietzsche hates masturbation though

>>15640694
shut the fuck up you stupid cunt

Ecce homo was cringe af as well

>>15640694
cringe

>>15640805
i like his manic energy.

>>15640473
I came not with the peace, but with the sword (C) Nietzsche. Or Jesus??? Man, to be edgy is sanity, to be soi polite cuck is insanity.

>>15640694
Jesus fuck how are you consistently this insufferable.

>>15642598

>>15640693
What does all this mean if there is no free will?

>>15640473
Jews invented Satan, by believing in Satan you're worshipping Satan in a sense.

>>15642635
unironically God is One. he is Satan. jews invented soi god.

>>15640693
Nietzsche contra Nietzsche:
9. You desire to LIVE ‘according to Nature’? Oh, you noble Nietzsche, what fraud of words! Imagine to yourself a being like Nature, boundlessly extravagant, boundlessly indifferent, without purpose or consideration, without pity or justice, at once fruitful and barren and uncertain: imagine to yourselves INDIFFERENCE as a power—how COULD you live in accordance with such indifference? To live—is not that just endeavouring to be otherwise than this Nature? Is not living valuing, preferring, being unjust, being limited, endeavouring to be different? And granted that your imperative And granted that your imperative, ‘living according to Nature,’ means actually the same as ‘living according to life’—how could you do DIFFERENTLY? Why should you make a principle out of what you yourselves are, and must be? In reality, however, it is quite otherwise with you: while you pretend to read with rapture the canon of your law in Nature, you want something quite the contrary, you extraordinary stage-player and self-deluder! In your pride you wish to dictate your morals and ideals to Nature, to Nature herself, and to incorporate them therein; you insist that it shall be Nature ‘according to the Overman,’ and would like everything to be made after your own image, as a vast, eternal glorification and generalism of aristocratic radicalism! With all your love for power, you have forced yourselves so long, so persistently, and with such hypnotic rigidity to see Nature FALSELY, that is to say, like Nietzsche, that you are no longer able to see it otherwise— and to crown all, some unfathomable superciliousness gives you the Bedlamite hope that BECAUSE you are able to tyrannize over others—Nietzscheanism is tyranny—Nature will also allow herself to be tyrannized over: is not Nietzsche a PART of Nature? … But this is an old and everlasting story: what happened in old times with the Nietzsche still happens today, as soon as ever a philosophy begins to believe in itself. It always creates the world in its own image; it cannot do otherwise; philosophy is this tyrannical impulse itself, the most spiritual desire, the desire to a ‘creation of the world,’ the will to the causa prima.

>>15642653
tldr. what?

>>15642630
The exact same thing.

>>15642653
For anyone wondering this is from Gay Science, op changed some words. It's basically Nietzsche predicting a rebuttal

>>15640473
>It's okay, my Frederick, I care for you much.

>>15640693
>First proposition. - Every type of anti-nature is a vice. The priest is the most vicious type of person: he teaches anti-nature. Priests are not to be reasoned with, they are to be locked up.
>excretions are natural
>sewers are not natural
>not living in excrement is a vice

This is retarded. Actual /r/atheist faggots are not as dumb. My God.

>>15640473
he was a turbo coomer

>>15640473
>I like Nietzsche
well I like sugar and I like tea but I don't like Nietzsche, no sirree

>>15640473
Yes, yes, good boy.

>>15640795
Wrong, he was merely describing the clerical mindset
also he was a chronic masturbator

>>15644137
not true faggot

>>15640490
>amigo