/lit/ - Literature

>>15606484
Derrida

>>15606490
Pardon me, but that's not what underrated typically refers to, sir

Eric Gans, Girard, Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, Carl Schmitt

>>15606484
Chomsky is an idiot. His only real contribution to Linguistics is that he galvanized alot of people to prove him wrong which happened quickly.

I think Hayek is underrated.

>>15607291
>Hayek
>underrated
A literal overrated liberal.

>>15607328
He is literally underrated.

>>15607328
Seeing as liberals ignore him, I'm not sure what you mean by overrated here.

Lysenko, he was dead wrong at his core, yet managed to predict and prefigure ideas that have only begun to be examined in Western biology in the post-GWAS era. I believe that unlike other discredited scientists, that are nonetheless considered important in the development a given fireld, he is unfairly maligned due to a perceived role in causing soviet famines.

>>15606484
Simondon, Bergson, Guattari, Bion

>>15606484
Mises, Röpke (nonexistent, at least outside of German-speaking countries), Gramsci, Oakeshott, Burnham, Vögelin

Ratzinger

implying there are intellectuals in the kali yuga

>>15607342
>>15607328
>>15607291
I don't see how Hayek can be considered to be underrated when his influence in neoliberalism is considerable.

>>15607414
Based and Lysenkopilled. With a physiognomy like this, how can you say he was really wrong?

>>15609749
Evola confirmed to be a pseud

>>15606484
I'm quite underrated which is strange since I always believed my work would find favour with academia if not the general public. My treatise on the artificial self-mythologizing done by modern internet user went completely unnoticed. Granted it was written in the 90s, I still expected that it would be somewhat relevant given the popularity of Twitter and 4chan.

>>15609817
are you under the impression that Evola coined the term kali yuga?

Bachelard, Bergson, Blanchot

>>15609847
I'm just saying he lived in the 20th century and is thus confirmed for not being an intellectual.

>>15606484
The thing about Peterson is he doesn't really add anything new he just kind of puts other peoples ideas together. He even is aware of this which is why credits people like Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud so often.

>>15609868
i'm pretty sure everyone can agree with that

>>15606484
Kevin Solway

>>15607257
Seconding Shcmitt.
Foucault, Deleuze and Derrida are often reviled but also often admired, I'm not sure they can be said to be underrated.

>>15607437
Pretty patrician list, especially Simondon.

>>15608058
Nice to see Oakeshott mentioned on /lit/ again, he used to be a short-lived meme years ago.

>>15609850
Wanted to say this. In that vein I will add Conche, Boutang, Alain, Meyerson, Lautman.


>>15606484
Eliade, Rudolf Otto, Max Brentano, Max Picard, Jacques Barzun, Fernand Braudel, Rémi Brague, Gabriel Marcel, Gadamer, Ricoeur.

>>15606484
>intellectuals
>your pic

Neil Degrasse Tyson
Stefan Molyneux
Varg Vikernes
Ben Shapiro
Ted Kacynzky
Joseph Paul Watson
Sam Harris
Dave Chapelle

Eric Hoffer

>>15610060
>no Dyson
sad

>>15607437
i agree with simondon and bergson

>>15607414
LYsenko didn’t even believe genes existed; if he was ‘on the right track’ in any sense it was despite himself.

>>15607414
Lysenko was completely insane and his ideas have not been vindicated whatsoever

>>15610600
>>15610585
>coping Kulaks

Jordan Peterson

>>15607414
Hadn't heard of him, thnxs for the reading material anon.

>>15609795
What the fuck is going on with his cheekbones?

>>15606484

>>15610585
They don't exist.

Thomas Sowell

>>15606484
Mises and Hayek

Agamben and Girard

>>15607257
>Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida
cringe