/lit/ - Literature

>>15468264
Since I believe that I am a property of my body (consciousness is an emergent property of the brain), I will go with the closest option: I am my body.

>>15468264

>>15468264
I am not body; my body belongs to God.

>>15468327
Meaning is inherently possesive

>>15468327
>it is a grave mistake
>doesn't explain why
>it is a vain effort
>doesn't explain why
>hence I win
Heidegger more like Heinigger

>>15468354
thats just some guy quoting heidegger

>>15468280
>Consciousness is an emergent property

>>15468264
Ownership is a consequence of combining labor with matter
The body reflexively labors, therefore it reflexively self-owns itself.

>>15468264
Easy answer to this one you can't own someone's body it's like applying air quality standards to someone's breath. The most midwit bourgeois type of ethics imaginable is viewing property rights as somehow fundamental. Ownership is like a jaywalking in that both are derivative of deeper moral reasoning.

>mereology
hahahahahahah do you even electrons?

>>15468310
>>15468372
can you stupid fuckers just go away and die or something

Both ownership and self are made up abstractions

We are neither our bodies nor do we own them. We are a collective stream of information. Look around you: is what you are experiencing physical? Whether or not you or any one anon posting here is even a discrete entity is dubious.

>>15468877
this

Subject on suicide watch

>>15468735
I’m a naive physicalist too but we have to deal with their shitposting until someone satisfactorily demonstrates that radical emergence is a real thing. So probably never. The real moral of the story is that no one should give a fuck about philosophy, even the intelligent on the surface level stuff like Chalmers

>>15468264
Self-ownership is self-ownership, dumbshit.

I neither am a body nor own a body

>>15468877
based

>>15469421
brains in jars get out