/lit/ - Literature

>>15247048
How do you figure? I’ve mostly put Feurbach’s thoughts behind me after reading SC

>>15247062
Well, my sir, I suggest you read "Karl Marx and Max Stirner" by Nicolas Lobkowicz or "Stirner and Marx" by Alexander Green

>>15247122
Maybe, but since you brought it up, I think it’s best you explain what you mean
Too many threads are based on everyone know concepts A and B and concluding with concept C and you rarely show that you know what concerts A and B are. Not to say you don’t, just to say, make some effort. A little.

>>15247211
In 1844 M&E wrote "The Holy Family", a rather Feuerbachian critique of other yiung Hegelians. In late 1844, they read "Der Einzige".
On a completely unrelated note, in 1845, M&E started writing "The German Ideology", 700 page work mostly on Stirner (2/3rds) and were constantly yapping on how communism isnt an ideal, and more importantly, they shat on Feuerbach. From that histmat developed.
Could it be they had an epiphany during those few months between TGI and THF, or was it Der Einzige?
Not to mention that marxism still retains all its previous ideals, but conceals them under a guise of historical necessity and inevitability. Why would he do that? Well M&E turned an ought into an is, because Stirner obliterated oughts in his work. The world will self regulate into their previous ideals - they have the cake and eat it too.

>>15247268
Thank you very much

>>15247268
what should i read to familiarize myself with feuerbach? is it worth doing?