/lit/ - Literature

>>15032298

>>15032291
orgyofthewill

>>15032565
>orgyofthewill
Did you just recommend me a blog?

>>15032565
Literally the most edgy shit I have read in my life. He has no fucking clue what he is talking about and unlike NEET-Chan, doesn´t have the skill and knowledge to give his ramblings life.

Capital aka Nick Land is the ubermensch hyper-pbuh.

>>15032404
oh fuck oh god im gonna cooooooom

>>15032291
Spengler wrote that the Faustian Man was already the Ubermensch. Hence, NEETsche was merely going into his subconscious, and tried to pass off the Western Ideal as his own.

>>15032291
Maybe the real Übermensch were the frens we made along the way.

>>15032404
DAMN a now thats whbat i call an uberWOmensch

>>15032291
>anarchoids
Get fucked, spook. You won't gonna make it.

>>15032709
That's silly.

/lit/ useless as usual

The "non cookie cutter" was an improvement to the term ubermensch, and lenny has been the only thinker who provided practical advice to reach that status

>>15032291
yes. here's the ubermensch in a corporate setting. https://jobs.netflix.com/culture

Heidegger, Deleuze and Foucault have extended his thought in a meaningful way

--

Es lockt dich meine Art und Sprach,
Du folgest mir, du gehst mir nach?
Geh nur dir selber treulich nach: —
So folgst du mir — gemach! gemach!

>>15032291
Jung

>>15033484
Yes but the anon was asking in regards to the idea of the Ubermensch.

>>15033494
The ideal or great man, is not specifically the same as Nietzsche Ubermensch.

>>15033511
deleuze then

>>15033520
>Political thinkers must not apply (looking at the crypto-Nazis and anarchoids)

>>15032291
>improved upon Nietzschean thought
Deleuze, I wouldn't really say "improved" though, more like updated, or produced a worthy exploration in Nietzsche's footsteps
>>15033690
if either of those is your take on Deleuze you must have read very little from him

>>15032674
>Literally the most edgy shit I have read in my life.
Doesn't make it wrong.

>He has no fucking clue what he is talking about
He has way more of a clue than anyone on /lit/, that's for sure. Try actually reading it and his other essays / books.

>>15032291
Evola made some interesting developments on a similar vein.

>>15032291
Heidegger maybe. Specially his later aesthetic writings and the ones dealing with Hölderlin.

>>15034441
Evola was a crazy metaphysician and not Nietzschean at all

>>15032291
>Übermensch

*Anarch

>>15034523
I admire him as a soldier, but he was a bad philosopher. Using Max Stirner to develop his concept of the Anarch was retarded.

>>15034481
This is the only right one in this thread

There was one and his name was Adolf Hitler

>>15032291
UBERMAN is when you dunk on liberals with your HUGE muscles and GIANT dick because you are a MASTER and not a SLAVE like the VIRTUAL SIGNALLING leftists.

>>15032291
Kyoto School and Heidegger

>>15034606
He's a brilliant philosopher, one of the most important of all time.

based

>>15032710
the only true take

Sloterdijk is somewhat Nietzschean, but more historically and in method. The same is the case with pretty much all of the French.

>>15038514
>the "I love my dag" Macy's commercial

>>15038525
I don't understand your reference as I am neither American nor do I watch commercials

>>15032709
Where did Spengler write that?

>>15036027
The shit you read in this website

>>15039259
What have you read by him?

based

The classic

>>15032715
> not uberwench

>>15032404
Who is she?

bump

Bronze age pervert

>>15032291
>Has there been anyone of note since Nietzsche who has attempted to think the Übermensch and has actually improved upon Nietzschean thought?

>>15044027
You got your answer already >>15034523