[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 19 KB, 220x306, gay retard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14768596 No.14768596 [Reply] [Original]

*ends philosophy*

>> No.14768608

>>14768596
This is a meme. He proposes open issues in PI that he genuinely hopes progress can be made on.

>> No.14768615

>>14768596
twice

>> No.14768622

>>14768596
>Herp derp look at me, I'm a faggot and philosophy is just miscommunication
Why do people take this guy seriously?

>> No.14768623

>>14768596
He's a little glib.

>> No.14768846

*...as a dry academic pusruit*

*starts it as a way of life*

(or rather, takes it back to its original meaning, as the greeks and indians did it)

>> No.14768874

>>14768846
I used to write Wittgenstein off because I just can’t get into academic philosophy especially analytics, but the more I learn about him, the more I realize he actually has genuine worth.

>> No.14768958
File: 671 KB, 1009x1317, Kant_gemaelde_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14768958

>>14768596

Philosophy already ended decades before

>> No.14768997

>>14768596
Not even he believed that anon

>>14768874
Better late than never. Wittgenstein will haunt you forever now, and I mean that in a good way. Its like an itch you can't scratch whenever you find yourself moving towards analytic dogmatism, or on the flip side, if you want to have a little indeterminacy in your continental soup without having to go full Derrida. And anyone with any self respect should want this.

>> No.14769186

simply youthful hubris, he realized later he had not.

>> No.14769951
File: 249 KB, 810x963, 1581412930303.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14769951

>>14768958
*millennia before

>> No.14770097

>>14768997
>>14768874
Quick rundown on his beliefs? Why did he refuted his earlier thoughts, the same way Laws is on the Republic?

>> No.14770262

>>14769951

I love Shankara but I consider him more into the theology field.

>> No.14770265

Philosophy is yet to start.

>> No.14770270

Wittgenstein is the David Foster Wallace of philosophy. A hack, who rose into prominence for some unknown reasons.

>> No.14770518
File: 10 KB, 332x336, 1503929961528.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14770518

>>14770270
>literally tens of thousands of pages of literature over the last 100 years on his work and influenced by his ideas
>academic publications and courses explaining his importance explicitly
>anon, 2020: "rose into prominence for unknown reasons"

Referencing DFW doesn't make your point any stronger, you're just namedropping two people you haven't read instead of one.

>> No.14770898

>>14770097
I would not say he refuted his old ideas. In Philosophical investigations he refers a couple of times to it to expand on ideas presented there. It's more incomplete than completely wrong.